Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biochemistry ; 60(33): 2560-2575, 2021 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339177

RESUMO

The self-labeling protein tags (SLPs) HaloTag7, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag allow the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with synthetic molecules for applications in bioimaging and biotechnology. To guide the selection of an SLP-substrate pair and provide guidelines for the design of substrates, we report a systematic and comparative study of the labeling kinetics and substrate specificities of HaloTag7, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag. HaloTag7 reaches almost diffusion-limited labeling rate constants with certain rhodamine substrates, which are more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than those of SNAP-tag for the corresponding substrates. SNAP-tag labeling rate constants, however, are less affected by the structure of the label than those of HaloTag7, which vary over 6 orders of magnitude for commonly employed substrates. Determining the crystal structures of HaloTag7 and SNAP-tag labeled with fluorescent substrates allowed us to rationalize their substrate preferences. We also demonstrate how these insights can be exploited to design substrates with improved labeling kinetics.


Assuntos
Corantes Fluorescentes/química , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/química , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/química , Cinética , Modelos Moleculares , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/genética , Estrutura Terciária de Proteína , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/genética , Rodaminas/química , Coloração e Rotulagem , Especificidade por Substrato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA