Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there an association between patients' reproductive history and the mean euploidy rates per biopsied blastocysts (m-ER) or the live birth rates (LBRs) per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers? SUMMARY ANSWER: Patients' reproductive history (as annotated during counselling) showed no association with the m-ER, but a lower LBR was reported after euploid blastocyst transfer in women with a history of repeated implantation failure (RIF). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have investigated the association between the m-ER and (i) patients' basal characteristics, (ii) ovarian stimulation strategy and dosage, (iii) culture media and conditions, and (iv) embryo morphology and day of full blastocyst development. Conversely, the expected m-ER due to women's reproductive history (previous live births (LBs), miscarriages, failed IVF cycles and transfers, and lack of euploid blastocysts among prior cohorts of biopsied embryos) still needs investigations. Yet, this information is critical to counsel new patients about a first cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), but even more so after former adverse outcomes to prevent treatment drop-out. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This observational study included all patients undergoing a comprehensive chromosome testing (CCT)-based PGT-A cycle with at least one biopsied blastocyst in the period April 2013-December 2019 at a private IVF clinic (n = 2676 patients undergoing 2676 treatments and producing and 8151 blastocysts). m-ER were investigated according to women's reproductive history of LBs: no/≥1, miscarriages: no/1/>1; failed IVF cycles: no/1/2/>2, and implantation failures after previous transfers: no/1/2/>2. Among the 2676 patients included in this study, 440 (16%) had already undergone PGT-A before the study period; the data from these patients were further clustered according to the presence or absence of euploid embryo(s) in their previous cohort of biopsied blastocysts. The clinical outcomes per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers (n =1580) were investigated according to the number of patients' previous miscarriages and implantation failures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The procedures involved in this study included ICSI, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy without hatching in Day 3, CCT-based PGT-A without reporting segmental and/or putative mitotic (or mosaic) aneuploidies and single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as well as linear regressions and generalised linear models among ranges of maternal age at oocyte retrieval were performed to identify significant differences for continuous variables. Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses were instead used for categorical variables. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Maternal age at oocyte retrieval was the only variable significantly associated with the m-ER. We defined five clusters (<35 years: 66 ± 31%; 35-37 years: 58 ± 33%; 38-40 years: 43 ± 35%; 40-42 years: 28 ± 34%; and >42 years: 17 ± 31%) and all analyses were conducted among them. The m-ER did not show any association with the number of previous LBs, miscarriages, failed IVF cycles or implantation failures. Among patients who had already undergone PGT-A before the study period, the m-ER did not associate with the absence (or presence) of euploid blastocysts in their former cohort of biopsied embryos. Regarding clinical outcomes of the first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, the implantation rate was 51%, the miscarriage rate was 14% and the LBR was 44%. This LBR was independent of the number of previous miscarriages, but showed a decreasing trend depending on the number of previous implantation failures, reaching statistical significance when comparing patients with >2 failures and patients with no prior failure (36% versus 47%, P < 0.01; multivariate-OR adjusted for embryo quality and day of full blastocyst development: 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, P < 0.01). No such differences were shown for previous miscarriage rates. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size for treatments following a former completed PGT-A cycle should be larger in future studies. The data should be confirmed from a multicentre perspective. The analysis should be performed also in non-PGT cycles and/or including patients who did not produce blastocysts, in order to investigate a putative association between women's reproductive history with outcomes other than euploidy and LBRs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These data are critical to counsel infertile couples before, during and after a PGT-A cycle, especially to prevent treatment discontinuation due to previous adverse reproductive events. Beyond the 'maternal age effect', the causes of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and RIF are likely to be endometrial receptivity and selectivity issues; transferring euploid blastocysts might reduce the risk of a further miscarriage, but more information beyond euploidy are required to improve the prognosis in case of RIF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received and there are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Assessment and management of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an IVF laboratory.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The study set out to identify corrective measures aimed at reducing the risk of aerosol-mediated viral infection within an IVF laboratory. DESIGN: A failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary IVF team. A schematic representation of new protocols and procedures adopted during COVID-19 emergency has been defined, including directives about the behaviour to adopt when entering the clinic and the laboratory, in case of face-to-face contact with patients and between staff members. In addition, the risk of cross-contamination between samples belonging to different patients during cell handling and manipulation has been evaluated. Potential failure modes for each phase of the emergency have been analysed, focusing on possible sources of error. Risk priority numbers have been calculated as products of Occurrence × Severity × Detection scores. RESULTS: Except for cell-cell contamination, which was considered highly unlikely, failure modes during patient-staff, staff-staff and staff-cell interactions were estimated as carrrying a moderate to high risk of infection. The main corrective measures entailed precautionary logistic measures, the implementation of additional personal protective equipment and changes in the IVF laboratory procedures and scheduling of the daily routine. Some procedures were also revised, aiming to increase staff's awareness and caution. CONCLUSIONS: Standard laboratory protocols are insufficient to face a virus whose transmission is aerosol mediated. The measures outlined in this FMEA should thus be considered not only for facing this pandemic, but also for the future to promptly manage any aerosol-mediated virus infection, whose impact on the management of an IVF laboratory might be less severe than COVID-19 although not completely negligible.

Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.

STUDY QUESTION: Are trophectoderm biopsy or other pre-vitrification features or laboratory practices associated with differences in blastocyst post-warming behavior (degeneration, re-expansion and live birth after single embryo transfer (SET))? SUMMARY ANSWER: Blastocyst morphology, day of full development and artificial shrinkage (either laser-assisted or biopsy-induced) are the pre-vitrification parameters/practices most strongly associated with post-warming behavior and implantation potential while there was no association with trophectoderm biopsy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since the introduction of vitrification, the adoption of cycle segmentation, freeze-all and SET policies, as well of trophectoderm biopsy-based aneuploidy testing (i.e. pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)), the number of blastocysts vitrified worldwide has increased greatly. Previous studies already defined generally high blastocyst cryo-survival rates after vitrification-warming (>95%), along with a positive correlation between blastocyst re-expansion and morphology with implantation. Additionally, artificial shrinkage has been outlined as a potentially beneficial procedure, while the association between embryo cryo-survival and trophectoderm biopsy is still unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cohort study conducted at two IVF centers (1 and 2). A total of 2129 consecutive SETs using vitrified-warmed blastocysts in either non-PGT or PGT-A cycles between June 2016 and August 2017 were included. A freeze-all strategy was in place and three main pre-vitrification practices were used: (i) no biopsy and no artificial shrinkage (Clinic 1); (ii) trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification of collapsed blastocyst within 30 min (Clinics 1 and 2); and (iii) no biopsy but laser-assisted artificial shrinkage (Clinic 2). The primary outcome was the blastocyst degeneration rate. Overall, 2108 surviving blastocysts were graded at 1.5 h after warming for degeneration (absent or partial) and re-expansion (full, partial or absent) grades and post-warming morphological quality. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association of any pre-vitrification feature with blastocyst post-warming behavior. The logistic regressions conducted upon live birth after either untested or euploid SET also included the post-warming characteristics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Center 1 is a private IVF facility, while center 2 is the IVF facility of a University hospital. In non-PGT cycles, ICSI with blastocyst culture up to full-expansion and vitrification were performed. At center 1 the untested blastocysts were vitrified when still expanded, while at center 2 they underwent laser-assisted artificial shrinkage. In PGT-A cycles, in both clinics, trophectoderm biopsy (which involves laser-assisted shrinkage) was done without previous zona-opening on Day 3, and vitrification was performed within 30 min whilst the blastocyst remained collapsed. A qPCR-based chromosome analysis was conducted. Only SETs were performed (euploid-SET in case of PGT-A). Any cycle-, laboratory- and embryo-based feature which could impact blastocyst post-warming behavior was included in the analyses as putative confounder. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The overall degeneration rate was 1% (N = 21/2129). The results were consistent among different vitrification/warming operators or kits used, as well as any other IVF laboratory-related parameter. Blastocyst artificial shrinkage (either laser-assisted or biopsy-induced) involved a lower risk of degeneration after warming (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 0.26 [0.09-0.79]). Conversely, both poor morphological quality pre-vitrification and taking 7 days to reach full blastulation resulted in a significantly higher risk (OR [95% CI] = 11.67 [3.42-39.83] and 4.43 [1.10-20.55], respectively). Importantly, trophectoderm biopsy did not show any association with blastocyst cryo-survival/degeneration. Overall 2.5% (N = 53/2108) blastocysts failed to re-expand post-warming. The only parameters significantly associated with no blastocyst re-expansion post-warming were average (OR [95% CI] = 4.96 [2.20-11.21]) or poor (OR [95% CI] = 19.54 [8.39-45.50]) morphological quality and taking 7 days to reach full blastulation (OR [95% CI] = 3.19 [1.23-8.29]), as well as prevention of spontaneous hatching pre-vitrification (OR [95% CI] = 0.10 [0.01-0.85]). The post-warming features of the survived blastocyst (i.e. degeneration and re-expansion scores and morphological quality) showed no significant association with vitrified blastocyst competence (i.e. live birth) when corrected for pre-vitrification ones (i.e. morphological quality, day of full development and, for untested SET, maternal age at oocyte retrieval). Of note, poor-quality blastocysts pre-vitrification showed a high overall cryo-survival rate post-warming 92.8% (N = 116/125), but the live birth rates were only 2.1% (N = 1/48) and 7.3% (N = 5/68) after untested and euploid SET, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is not randomized and the populations of patients undergoing either non-PGT or PGT-A cycles were different. Centers 1 and 2 adopted different pre-vitrification practices for non-biopsied blastocysts, according to their own laboratory policy. To this regard, multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted for all outcomes under investigation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Pre-vitrification features may be used to assist selection of competent embryos, moreover, these results allay concern that trophectoderm biopsy might be associated with impaired blastocyst quality or competence after vitrification/warming. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives.

Preserving female fertility is crucial in a multifunctional healthcare system that takes care of patients' future quality of life. Oocyte cryopreservation is recognized by several international scientific societies as the gold standard for fertility preservation in postpubertal women, for both medical and non-medical indications. The main medical indications are oncologic diseases, gynecologic diseases such as severe endometriosis, systemic diseases compromising the ovarian reserve, and genetic conditions involving premature menopause. This paper describes the whole clinical and laboratory work-up of a fertility preservation treatment by outlining recommendations for objective and evidence-based counseling. Furthermore, it focuses on the effectiveness of the procedure and describes the most appropriate strategies to fully exploit the ovarian reserve and maximize the number of oocytes retrieved in the shortest possible time. The evaluation of the ovarian reserve, the definition of an ideal stimulation protocol, as well as oocyte retrieval, denudation, and vitrification procedures have been detailed along with approaches to maximize their efficacy, efficiency, and safety.