Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 6(6): e1674, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22724029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alternative treatments for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) are required in East Africa. Paromomycin sulphate (PM) has been shown to be efficacious for VL treatment in India. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized-controlled trial (RCT) to compare efficacy and safety of PM (20 mg/kg/day for 21 days) and PM plus sodium stibogluconate (SSG) combination (PM, 15 mg/kg/day and SSG, 20 mg/kg/day for 17 days) with SSG (20 mg/kg/day for 30 days) for treatment of VL in East Africa. Patients aged 4-60 years with parasitologically confirmed VL were enrolled, excluding patients with contraindications. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were parasite clearance at 6-months follow-up and end of treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed mainly using adverse event (AE) data. FINDINGS: The PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 205 patients per arm with primary efficacy data available for 198 and 200 patients respectively. The SSG & PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 381 and 386 patients per arm respectively, with primary efficacy data available for 359 patients per arm. In Intention-to-Treat complete-case analyses, the efficacy of PM was significantly lower than SSG (84.3% versus 94.1%, difference = 9.7%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.6 to 15.7%, p = 0.002). The efficacy of SSG & PM was comparable to SSG (91.4% versus 93.9%, difference = 2.5%, 95% CI: -1.3 to 6.3%, p = 0.198). End of treatment efficacy results were very similar. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the three treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The 17 day SSG & PM combination treatment had a good safety profile and was similar in efficacy to the standard 30 day SSG treatment, suggesting suitability for VL treatment in East Africa. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00255567.


Assuntos
Gluconato de Antimônio e Sódio/administração & dosagem , Antiprotozoários/administração & dosagem , Leishmaniose Visceral/tratamento farmacológico , Paromomicina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , África Oriental , Gluconato de Antimônio e Sódio/efeitos adversos , Antiprotozoários/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paromomicina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 104(11): 706-12, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20870258

RESUMO

In sub-Saharan Africa, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is treated with either Pentostam(TM) (sodium antimony gluconate) or generic sodium stibogluconate (SSG), except in Uganda where Glucantime(®) (meglumine antimoniate) has been in use for at least a decade. Between January 2008 and February 2009, 54 Ethiopian VL patients were treated with Glucantime. The medical charts of these patients were reviewed to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of Glucantime in a routine healthcare setting. None of the patients from south Ethiopia (n=24) and 46.4% of the patients from north Ethiopia (n=30) were HIV co-infected. At completion of treatment (Day 31), cure rates were 78.6% (95% CI 59.0-91.7%) in north Ethiopia and 100% (95% CI 85.8-100%) in south Ethiopia. Thirty-three non-serious and six serious adverse events (two pancreatitis, one renal failure and three deaths) were observed in 26 patients. One-third of the non-serious adverse events were due to biochemical pancreatitis. During treatment, a case-fatality rate of 10.0% in north Ethiopia and 0.0% in south Ethiopia was noted. These data show that Glucantime can be as effective as Pentostam or SSG in HIV-negative patients. The data also point to clinical pancreatitis as a safety concern, especially in patients with HIV co-infection.


Assuntos
Antiprotozoários/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV , Leishmaniose Visceral/tratamento farmacológico , Meglumina/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiprotozoários/efeitos adversos , Criança , Comorbidade , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Leishmaniose Visceral/epidemiologia , Masculino , Meglumina/efeitos adversos , Antimoniato de Meglumina , Compostos Organometálicos/efeitos adversos , Pancreatite/induzido quimicamente , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA