Sympathotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: the cutting versus clamping methods.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy/sympathotomy for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis is generally performed by either cutting or clamping the sympathetic chain. However, it remains unclear as to which of these methods is more effective and has fewer side effects. This study was conducted to compare the effects of sympathotomy by cutting or clamping at T3 on two outcomes--postoperative palmar sweating and compensatory sweating; it also evaluated postoperative patient satisfaction. METHODS: The participants were among 289 patients who underwent bilateral sympathotomy at T3 for palmar hyperhidrosis. These patients were sent questionnaires by mail to assess their self-reported degree of postoperative palmar sweating and compensatory sweating, as well as their level of satisfaction. Of the 92 patients who responded to the questionnaire, 54 had undergone sympathotomy by cutting (cutting group) and 38 by clamping (clamping group). RESULTS: The degree of postoperative palmar sweating was significantly lower in the cutting group than in the clamping group. However, compensatory sweating was significantly more severe in the cutting group than in the clamping group. No significant difference was observed in the degree of patient satisfaction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sympathotomy by clamping at T3 was less effective in reducing the primary symptom of postoperative palmar sweating, but induced less compensatory sweating than did sympathotomy by cutting at T3. However, both methods were similar with regard to patient satisfaction. The degree of postoperative palmar sweating and the severity of compensatory sweating were inversely correlated with the degree of patient satisfaction.

Association between change in self-efficacy and reduction in disability among patients with chronic pain.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate whether changes in psychosocial factors and pain severity were associated with reduction in disability due to pain among patients with chronic pain. We hypothesized that increased self-efficacy would reduce disability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This longitudinal observational study included 72 patients. Patients' psychological and physical variables were assessed before and after 3 months of treatment. Demographic and clinical information were collected, including the Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale, and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess pain intensity. First, univariate regression analyses were conducted to clarify associations between change in PDAS and sex, age, pain duration, changes in psychosocial factors (self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression) and change in pain intensity. Second, multivariate regression was conducted using the variables identified in the univariate analyses (PSEQ and NRS) to detect the most relevant factor for reducing disability. RESULTS: Univariate regression analyses clarified that changes in PSEQ (ß = -0.31; 95% CI: -0.54--0.08, p = 0.008) and NRS (ß = 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.04) were associated with reduction in PDAS. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that change in PSEQ (ß = 0.26; 95% CI: -0.50--0.02; p = 0.01) was associated with a reduction in disability, independent of change in NRS. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest improved self-efficacy is associated with reduced disability in patients with chronic pain, independent of reduction in pain intensity. Focusing on improvement in self-efficacy may be an effective strategy in chronic pain treatment in addition to pain relief.