Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 94(2): 172-8, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21534363

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Meropenem plays a significant role in the current antimicrobial treatment of serious infections. Recently, generic meropenems have become widely available in Thailand. OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness and safety ofa generic meropenem (Mapenem) with the original meropenem (Meronem) in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients with serious infections that had been treated with either the generic or the original meropenem in nine secondary- and tertiary-care hospitals nationwide. The treatment outcomes at days 3, 7, and 14 after the use ofmeropenem between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety seven patients with a mean (SD) age of 66.4 +/- 16.9 years were included. There were 228 (57.4%) males and 169 (42.6%) females. Two hundred and seven (52.1%) and 190 (47.9%) cases fell into the generic and original groups respectively. There were no significant differences regarding age, gender history of underlying disease, body weight, and ward of admission between the two groups. The majority ofpatients had presented with the respiratory tract (48.6%) and bloodstream infections (29.5%). The three most common causative bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli. The distribution ofthe sites of infection, causative microorganisms, the dosage ofmeropenem, and duration oftreatment were similar between the two groups. The distribution of patients with complete resolution, improvement, stable, worse, diedfrom infection, and died from other causes were similar between the two groups at day 3, 7, and 14 ofmeropenem use (p > 0.05). The drugs were well-tolerated, and less than 2% of patients in both groups discontinued meropenem due to the adverse drug effects. CONCLUSION: The generic meropenem has a similar effectiveness in the treatment of serious bacterial infections when compared with original meropenem. Both formulations are well tolerated among patients with substantial comorbidities. Adverse drug effects that lead to drug discontinuation are uncommon.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Tienamicinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Meropeném , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses ; 34(7): 575-579, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29575905

RESUMO

We reported a simple genome editing approach that can generate human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) coreceptor defective cells, which may be useful for latent viral eradication treatment. Samples of bone marrow leftover after diagnostic procedures and crude bone marrow from aviremic HIV patients were subjected to zinc finger nuclease-mediated stop codon insertion into chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) loci. Locked nucleic acid-based polymerase chain reaction was used to estimate the amount of insertion in the expandable CD34+ cells. The results showed that about 0.5% of CD34+ cells carried stop codon insertions in CCR5 loci. Cells edited using this simple protocol have the potential to be infused back into the bone marrow.


Assuntos
Códon sem Sentido , Códon de Terminação , Terapia Genética/métodos , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Receptores CCR5/genética , Transplante de Medula Óssea , Humanos
3.
JMM Case Rep ; 1(4): e002618, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28663805

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Mycobacterium haemophilum is one of the non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) that can cause cutaneous infection. As acid-fast staining cannot distinguish NTM from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and as skin culture for M. haemophilum is not performed routinely, the diagnosis of M. haemophilum infection in Thailand is rarely made. CASE PRESENTATION: Between 2006 and 2009, five patients with M. haemophilum infection were diagnosed in Ramathibodi Hospital, a tertiary care centre in Bangkok, Thailand. The patients were aged 3, 29, 47, 75 and 76 years, and four were immunocompromised. Three patients received immunosuppressive medication. Most patients presented with subacute cutaneous infection. A suboptimal response to conventional antibiotics raised suspicions of M. haemophilum cutaneous infections, which can occur in immunocompromised patients. Diagnoses of these cases were made by skin culture for mycobacteria at an incubating temperature of around 30 °C with iron supplementation, DNA sequencing, or PCR/restriction enzyme analysis. Rifampicin, ofloxacin and clarithromycin were active against all isolates, whereas ethambutol and streptomycin were inactive. CONCLUSION: Skin culture should be performed under special conditions or molecular technique should be used to identify M. haemophilum in susceptible patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA