Management of iatrogenic ureteric injury with retrograde ureteric stenting: an analysis of factors affecting technical success and long-term outcome.

Background Iatrogenic ureteral injuries arise as serious complication following obstetrics, gynecological, general, and urological surgery with incidence in the range of 0.5-10%. Retrograde placement of double-J ureteric stent is a possible treatment option if the injury is not recognized at the time of surgery. Purpose To assess technical success and long-term outcome associated with retrograde ureteric stent insertion for iatrogenic ureteric injury. Material and Methods Between 1999 and 2011, 26 patients with initially unrecognized iatrogenic ureteric injury underwent initial management with retrograde ureteric stenting. Full case-notes were available for review in 25 patients. Results The mean interval from injury to attempted stenting was 19.4 days. Successful retrograde ureteric stenting was achieved in 21/25 patients (81%). Retrograde stenting failed in four patients, and nephrostomy followed by alternative procedures were performed instead. At a median follow-up interval of 9.7 months, normal anatomy was demonstrated on 12/21 patients (57%) and a stricture was observed in 6/21 patients (28%) with three requiring surgical intervention. Conclusion Retrograde stenting is a safe and efficient initial management in patients with iatrogenic ureteric injuries.

Retrograde transileal conduit stent placement for obstructed uropathy--success of primary and exchange stent placement.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, success, and complications associated with retrograde ureteric stent insertion via the ileal conduit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 35 consecutive patients (17 men and 18 women; mean age, 55 y; age range, 40-75 y) requiring primary (20 stents) and exchange (70 stents) retrograde ureteric stent insertion via the ileal conduit over a 3-year period. Patient demographic data, procedural and technical data, and clinical follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: Technical success was 90% (18 of 20) for primary stent placement and 100% (70 of 70) for stent exchange. There were two immediate complications (< 24 h) of sepsis and ureteric injury and one early complication (> 25 h but < 30 d) of sepsis requiring observation and medical management. Difficult procedures (defined as a fluoroscopy screening time > 31 min) and technical failures were found to be associated with encrusted stents visualized on prior computed tomography (P = .012), increased length of ileal conduit (> 20 cm) (P = .023), and ileal conduit kink (< 90 degrees) (P = .032). Only the occurrence of encrusted stents visualized on prior computed tomography (P = .022) was associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde placement of ureteric stents via the ileal conduit is safe and effective. Retrograde stent placement should be considered the treatment option of choice for a first-time occurrence of obstructive uropathy at the ureteroileal anastomosis.

Prostate volume: does it predict patient outcomes following prostate artery embolisation? A retrospective cohort study.

Prostate artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated patient questionnaire quantifying LUTS and is used for patient selection for PAE, but it is largely subjective. Prostate volume is an easily estimated objective parameter across multiple imaging modalities. No strict threshold of prostate volume is established as a selection criterion for PAE, but it is generally accepted that prostate volume should be over 40 to 50 mL.We looked at a sample of 65 cases performed at a large teaching hospital between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of four years follow up. Embospheres between 100 to 500 microns were injected into the prostatic arteries bilaterally (if technically feasible). A 'bullet shape' model was used to estimate prostatic volume from initial CT. N = 13 had an estimated volume < 51 mL (range 31-50 mL). IPSS before and at 3 months post-procedure were collected.80% of patients indicated a beneficial response to PAE (IPSS improvement > 5). 23% of patients required further PAE procedure or surgery. No major complications were recorded. The mean change in IPSS under 51 mL compared to over 51 mL cohort was 10.2 versus 11 (standard deviation 7.5 versus 7.3) (p = 0.44, 2 tailed Student's T-test).There was no statistically significant difference in the IPSS improvement or outcome of small volume prostates under 51 mL compared to large volume. Our results suggest that prostate volume should not be used to exclude patients for PAE.

Successful fibroid embolization of pelvic and inferior mesenteric artery collaterals after previous uterine artery embolization.

A 47-year-old woman with a history of myomectomies and uterine artery embolization 15 years previously presented with increasing menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated multiple enhancing fibroids, extensive uterine supply from what appeared to be patent uterine arteries, and significant supply from what appeared to be the left ovarian artery. Aortography demonstrated no ovarian supply, but extensive collateral supply from distal branches of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), with further collateral supply from the anterior division of both internal iliac arteries. There was no filling of the uterine arteries distal to the coils. Embolization was performed with technical and clinical success. This case highlights the potential for recruitment of collateral vessels following coil embolization and is the first reported case of successful fibroid embolization from distal IMA branches.

Long-term follow-up of treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations with AMPLATZER Vascular Plug and AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II devices.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, complications, and long-term success of embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) with the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug and AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 15 consecutive patients (19 embolization episodes) who had embolization of PAVMs between April 2004 and April 2009 with an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug or AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II. There were 4 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 56 years (range 24-74 years). A prospective database of all cases of PAVM embolization is kept in the department. Patient history, detailed procedural records, and clinical and radiological follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 19 PAVMs, an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug was deployed in 11, and an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II was deployed in 8. The technical success of the procedure was 100% for PAVM occlusion; 30-day mortality in the group was zero. Successful radiologic follow-up with the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug was a mean of 28 months (range 0-60 months) and with the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II was a mean of 18 months (range 12-36 months). There was one recanalization of an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug 36 months after embolization giving an annual event rate of 0.03 recanalizations per AMPLATZER Vascular Plug or AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II per year. There were no major complications. Clinically, there was one (1 of 18 cases [5%]) immediate complication of chest pain that resolved in 24 hours with simple analgesia. There were no early or late clinical complications. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of PAVM with either an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug or an AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II is safe and effective and associated with a low reintervention rate. Further follow-up is ongoing to ensure continued occlusion of treated PAVMs.

Three-year follow-up of fenestrated thoracoabdominal stent graft bridging an endovascular thoracic stent graft and a surgical abdominal aortic graft.

This case report describes repair of a type I endoleak at the distal landing zone of a thoracic aortic stent graft by endovascular placement of a thoracoabdominal fenestrated stent graft (Cook, Brisbane, Australia). The fenestrated stent graft was interposed between a previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) Gelsoft tube graft (Sulzer Vascutek Ltd, Inchinnan, United Kingdom) and two overlapping Zenith thoracic endografts (Cook Inc, Bloomington, Indiana). Placement was made more complex because the distal thoracic endograft had rotated into a horizontal position. At 3-year clinical and computed tomography (CT) follow-up, continued clinical and radiologic success was shown with no further intervention required.

Correction to: British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Registry.

On page 1553, the caption on Table 1 should read: Retrieval of filter by filter make/model and % retrievals within the manufacturer timescale.

Retrograde exchange of heavily encrusted ureteric stents via the ileal conduit: a technical report.

We describe two cases of retrograde ureteric stent exchange of heavily encrusted ureteric stents (JJ) via tortuous ileal conduits. The blocked ureteric stents were snared from inside the conduit so they could be accessed and a wire inserted. The lumens of the stents were unblocked with a wire but the stents could not be withdrawn due to heavy encrustation of the ureteric stent in the renal pelvis. A stiff wire was inserted to provide support and a 9 French peel away sheath was used to remove the encrustations allowing the stents to be withdrawn and exchanged. This is a safe and successful technique allowing ureteric stents to be removed when heavily encrusted.

Iliac arteries: how registries can help improve outcomes.

There are many publications reporting excellent short and long-term results with endovascular techniques. Patients included in trials are often highly selected and may not represent real world practice. Registries are important to interventional radiologists for several reasons; they reflect prevailing practice and can be used to establish real world standards of care and safety profiles. This information allows individuals and centers to evaluate their outcomes compared with national norms. The British Iliac Angioplasty and Stenting (BIAS) registry is an example of a mature registry that has been collecting data since 2000 and has been reporting outcomes since 2001. This article discusses the evidence to support both endovascular and surgical intervention for aortoiliac occlusive disease, the role of registries, and optimal techniques for aortoiliac intervention.

British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Registry.

PURPOSE: The British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Registry was produced to provide an audit of current United Kingdom (UK) practice regarding placement and retrieval of IVC filters to address concerns regarding their safety. METHODS: The IVC filter registry is a web-based registry, launched by the BSIR on behalf of its membership in October 2007. This report is based on prospectively collected data from October 2007 to March 2011. This report contains analysis of data on 1,434 IVC filter placements and 400 attempted retrievals performed at 68 UK centers. Data collected included patient demographics, insertion and retrieval data, and patient follow-up. RESULTS: IVC filter use in the majority of patients in the UK follows accepted CIRSE guidelines. Filter placement is usually a low-risk procedure, with a low major complication rate (<0.5 %). Cook Gunther Tulip (560 filters: 39 %) and Celect (359 filters: 25 %) filters constituted the majority of IVC filters inserted, with Bard G2, Recovery filters, Cordis Trapease, and OptEase constituting most of the remainder (445 filters: 31 %). More than 96 % of IVC filters deployed as intended. Operator inexperience (<25 procedure) was significantly associated with complications (p < 0.001). Of the IVC filters initially intended for temporary placement, retrieval was attempted in 78 %. Of these retrieval was technically successful in 83 %. Successful retrieval was significantly reduced for implants left in situ for >9 weeks versus those with a shorter dwell time. New lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or IVC thrombosis was reported in 88 patients following filter placement, there was no significant difference of incidence between filter types. CONCLUSIONS: This registry report provides interventional radiologists and clinicians with an improved understanding of the technical aspects of IVC filter placement to help improve practice, and the potential consequences of IVC filter placement so that we are better able to advise patients. There is a significant learning curve associated with IVC filter insertion, and when a filter is placed with the intention of removal, procedures should be in place to avoid the patient being lost to follow-up.