Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(3): 728-734, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The outcome of endovascular treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) is dependent on timely recanalization. To identify ELVO in the field, we present a simplified score, which has been applied and validated in the field by emergency medical services (EMS). Methods and Analysis: Ventura ELVO Scale (VES) comprise of 4 components: Eye Deviation, Aphasia, Neglect, and Obtundation with score range 0-4. The score of greater than or equal to 1 will be considered as ELVO positive. A positive VES along with positive Cincinnati scale prompts ELVO activation. EMS then notify to neurointervention protocol at the receiving stroke center. The performance of VES was evaluated retrospectively. For statistical analysis, SAS version 9.4 was used and Fisher's modelling was used for the comparative analysis. RESULTS: Total 184 patients were included in the final analysis, 62 (33.7%) patients were called VES positive from the field. Out of 62, 36 (58%) patients had ELVO. The mean NIHSS on arrival was 16 in VES positive and 5 in VES negative patients. VES was 94.7% sensitive and 82.4% specific while the PPV and NPV of VES were 58.1% and 98.4%, respectively. It showed 84.9% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: VES is an effective and simplified prehospital screening tool for detection of ELVO in the field. Its implementation can beat the target door to groin time to improve outcomes and in future it can be used for rerouting of ELVO patients to comprehensive stroke center.


Assuntos
Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/fisiopatologia , Afasia/psicologia , Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/fisiopatologia , Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/psicologia , Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Movimentos Oculares , Humanos , Transtornos da Percepção/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Percepção/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Percepção/psicologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/psicologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento
2.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 2023 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Challenges to revascularization of large vessel occlusions (LVOs) persist. Current stent retrievers have limited effectiveness for removing organized thrombi. The NeVa device is a novel stent retriever designed to capture organized thrombi within the scaffold during retrieval. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of revascularization of acute LVOs with the NeVa device. METHODS: Prospective, international, multicenter, single-arm, Investigational Device Exemption study to evaluate the performance of the NeVa device in recanalizing LVOs including internal carotid artery, M1/M2 middle cerebral artery, and vertebrobasilar arteries, within 8 hours of onset. Primary endpoint was rate of expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) score 2b-3 within 3 NeVa passes, tested for non-inferiority against a performance goal of 72% with a -10% margin. Additional endpoints included first pass success and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2. Primary composite safety endpoint was 90-day mortality and/or 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: From April 2021 to April 2022, 139 subjects were enrolled at 25 centers. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 16 (IQR 12-20). In the primary analysis population (n=107), eTICI 2b-3 within 3 NeVa passes occurred in 90.7% (97/107; non-inferiority P<0.0001; post hoc superiority P<0.0001). First pass eTICI 2b-3 was observed in 73.8% (79/107), with first pass eTICI 2b67-3 in 69.2% (74/107) and eTICI 2c-3 in 48.6% (52/107). Median number of passes was 1 (IQR 1-2). Final eTICI 2b-3 rate was 99.1% (106/107); final eTICI 2b67-3 rate was 91.6% (98/107); final eTICI 2c-3 rate was 72.9% (78/107). Good outcome (90-day mRS score 0-2) was seen in 65.1% (69/106). Mortality was 9.4% (13/138) with sICH in 5.0% (7/139). CONCLUSIONS: The NeVa device is highly effective and safe for revascularization of LVO strokes and demonstrates superior first pass success compared with a predicate performance goal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04514562.

3.
Front Neurol ; 13: 884235, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35585846

RESUMO

Background: The first pass effect has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions. Objective: To determine the rates of first pass effect in MCA M1 occlusions and determine if proximal or distal location of occlusion modified clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with recanalized MCA M1 occlusions who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) were reviewed to determine the effect of first pass effect (FPE) and location of occlusion on clinical outcomes. MCA occlusions were classified as proximal if they included the first two thirds of the MCA and involved the lenticulostriate vessels, or distal if they did not. Results: We included 261 patients of which 27% achieved FPE. Of the cohort, there were 91 (35%) proximal MCA occlusions and 170 (65%) distal MCA occlusions. Baseline demographics and treatment time metrics were comparable across both groups. There was a trend toward good clinical outcome in patients with or without a FPE (60 vs. 46%; p = 0.06), however a higher rate of excellent clinical outcome was noted in patients with FPE (46 vs. 30%; p = 0.02). When compared by location, patients with distal MCA occlusions had a higher rate of excellent clinical outcome (40 vs. 25%; p = 0.02). Multivariable analysis showed that distal MCA occlusion was the strongest predictor of an excellent clinical outcome and first pass effect. Conclusion: Patients with MCA M1 occlusions with FPE have a higher rate of excellent clinical outcomes compared to those who did not. Location of MCA occlusion appears to modify rates of first pass effect and excellent clinical outcomes.

4.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 13(11): 979-984, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33323503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in distal arterial occlusions (DAO). We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MT in patients with DAO and compare their outcomes with proximal arterial occlusion (PAO) strokes. METHODS: The Trevo Registry was a prospective open-label MT registry including 2008 patients from 76 sites across 12 countries. Patients were categorized into: PAO: intracranial ICA, and MCA-M1; and DAO: MCA-M2, MCA-M3, ACA, and PCA. Baseline and outcome variables were compared across the PAO vs DAO patients with pre-morbid mRS 0-2. RESULTS: Among 407 DAOs including 350 (86.0%) M2, 25 (6.1%) M3, 10 (2.5%) ACA, and 22 (5.4%) PCA occlusions, there were 376 DAO with pre-morbid mRS 0-2 which were compared with 1268 PAO patients. The median baseline NIHSS score was lower in DAO (13 [8-18] vs 16 [12-20], P<0.001). There were no differences in terms of age, sex, IV-tPA use, co-morbidities, or time to treatment across DAO vs PAO. The rates of post-procedure reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-mortality were comparable between both groups. DAO showed significantly higher rates of 90-day mRS 0-2 (68.3% vs 56.5%, P<0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the level of arterial occlusion was not associated with the chances of excellent outcome (DAO for 90-day mRS 0-1: OR; 1.18, 95% CI [0.90 to 1.54], P=0.225), successful reperfusion or SICH. However, DAO patients were more likely to be functionally independent (mRS 0-2: OR; 1.45, 95% CI [1,09 to 1.92], P=0.01) or dead (OR; 1.54, 95% CI [1.06 to 2.27], P=0.02) at 90 days. CONCLUSION: Endovascular therapy in DAO appears to result in a comparable safety and technical success profile as in PAO. The potential benefits of DAO thrombectomy should be investigated in future randomized trials.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Trombectomia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Front Neurol ; 11: 83, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32132966

RESUMO

Background and Objective: The first pass effect (FPE; achieving complete recanalization with a single thrombectomy device pass) has been shown to be associated with higher rates of good clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Here, we investigate clinical and radiographic factors associated with FPE in a large U.S. post-marketing registry (TRACK, Trevo Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke). Methods: We analyzed the TRACK database (multicenter registry of 634 patients from 23 centers from March 2013 through August 2015), which 609 patients were included in the final analysis. FPE was defined as a single pass/use of device, TICI 2c/3 recanalization, and no use of rescue therapy. Analysis of individual patient data from TRACK were performed to analyze clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with FPE as well-compared clinical outcomes defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 and 90 days from hospital discharge to the non-FPE group. Results: The rate of FPE in TRACK was 23% (140/609). There was no association between patient demographics and FPE, including age (p = 0.36), sex (p = 0.50), race (p = 0.50), location of occlusion (p = 0.26), baseline NIHSS (p = 0.62), or past medical history. There was no difference in the use of a balloon-guide catheter or general anesthesia (49 and 57% with FPE vs. 47 and 64%, p = 0.63 and p = 0.14, respectively). Clinical outcomes were significantly associated with FPE; 63 vs. 44% in non-FPE patients achieved mRS 0-2 at 90 days (p = 0.0004). Conclusion: Our study showed that achieving complete recanalization with a single thrombectomy pass using the Trevo device was highly beneficial. The most common clinical factors that are used to determine eligibility for endovascular therapy, such as NIHSS severity, location of occlusion or patient age were not predictive of the ability to achieve FPE.

6.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 10(6): 516-524, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28963367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using stent-retrievers in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusions; however, it remains unclear if these results translate to a real-world setting. The TREVO Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke (TRACK) multicenter Registry aimed to evaluate the use of the Trevo device in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty-three centers enrolled consecutive AIS patients treated from March 2013 through August 2015 with the Trevo device. The primary outcome was defined as achieving a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score of ≥2b. Secondary outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: A total of 634patients were included. Mean age was 66.1±14.8 years and mean baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 17.4±6.7; 86.7% had an anterior circulation occlusion. Mean time from symptom onset to puncture and time to revascularization were 363.1±264.5 min and 78.8±49.6 min, respectively. 80.3% achieved TICI ≥2b. 90-day mRS ≤2 was achieved in 47.9%, compared with 51.4% when restricting the analysis to the anterior circulation and within 6 hours (similar to recent AHA/ASA guidelines), and 54.3% for those who achieved complete revascularization. The 90-day mortality rate was 19.8%. Independent predictors of clinical outcome included age, baseline NIHSS, use of balloon guide catheter, revascularization, and sICH. CONCLUSION: The TRACK Registry results demonstrate the generalizability of the recent thrombectomy RCTs in real-world clinical practice. No differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes were shown between patients treated within the AHA/ASA guidelines and those treated outside the recommendations.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/cirurgia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Trombectomia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombectomia/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA