Age and its impact on crisis management performance and learning after simulation-based education by acute care physicians: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Physiological changes associated with ageing could negatively impact the crisis resource management skills of acute care physicians. This study was designed to determine whether physician age impacts crisis resource management skills, and crisis resource management skills learning and retention using full-body manikin simulation training in acute care physicians. METHODS: Acute care physicians at two Canadian universities participated in three 8-min simulated crisis (pulseless electrical activity) scenarios. An initial crisis scenario (pre-test) was followed by debriefing with a trained facilitator and a second crisis scenario (immediate post-test). Participants returned for a third crisis scenario 3-6 months later (retention post-test). RESULTS: For the 48 participants included in the final analysis, age negatively correlated with baseline Global Rating Scale (GRS; r=-0.30, P<0.05) and technical checklist scores (r=-0.44, P<0.01). However, only years in practice and prior simulation experience, but not age, were significant in a subsequent stepwise regression analysis. Learning from simulation-based education was shown with a mean difference in scores from pre-test to immediate post-test of 2.28 for GRS score (P<0.001) and 1.69 for technical checklist correct score (P<0.001); learning was retained for 3-6 months. Only prior simulation experience was significantly correlated with a decreased change in learning (r=-0.30, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A reduced amount of prior simulation training and increased years in practice, but not age on its own, were significant predictors of low baseline crisis resource management performance. Simulation-based education leads to crisis resource management learning that is well retained for 3-6 months, regardless of age or years in practice.

Anesthesia quality indicators to measure and improve your practice: a modified delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the new competency-based post-graduate medical education curriculum has renewed the push by medical regulatory bodies in Canada to strongly advocate and/or mandate continuous quality improvement (cQI) for all physicians. Electronic anesthesia information management systems contain vast amounts of information yet it is unclear how this information could be used to promote cQI for practicing anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to create a refined list of meaningful anesthesia quality indicators to assist anesthesiologists in the process of continuous self-assessment and feedback of their practice. METHODS: An initial list of quality indicators was created though a literature search. A modified-Delphi (mDelphi) method was used to rank these indicators and achieve consensus on those indicators considered to be most relevant. Fourteen anesthesiologists representing different regions across Canada participated in the panel. RESULTS: The initial list contained 132 items and through 3 rounds of mDelphi the panelists selected 56 items from the list that they believed to be top priority. In the fourth round, a subset of 20 of these indicators were ranked as highest priority. The list included items related to process, structure and outcome. CONCLUSION: This ranked list of anesthesia quality indicators from this modified Delphi study could aid clinicians in their individual practice assessments for continuous quality improvement mandated by Canadian medical regulatory bodies. Feasibility and usability of these quality indicators, and the significance of process versus outcome measures in assessment, are areas of future research.

Optimizing Cefazolin Prophylaxis in Obstetrical Patients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of an allergy history-guided algorithm for optimizing perioperative cefazolin use in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: The Allergy Clarification for Cefazolin Evidence-based Prescribing Tool (ACCEPT) was developed through consensus by allergists, anesthesiologists, and infectious diseases specialists, and implemented over a 2-month period (December 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019). A segmented regression on monthly cefazolin use was conducted during the baseline (January 1 to November 30, 2018) and intervention (February 1 to December 31, 2019) periods to evaluate the impact of ACCEPT on the monthly use of perioperative cefazolin in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy undergoing cesarean delivery. The frequency of perioperative allergic reactions and surgical site infections was collected during both periods. RESULTS: Of the 3128 eligible women who underwent a cesarean delivery, 282 (9%) reported a beta-lactam allergy. The most common beta-lactam allergens were penicillin (64.3%), amoxicillin (16.0%), and cefaclor (6.0%). The most frequently reported allergic reactions were rash (38.1%), hives (21.4%), and unknown (11.6%). Use of cefazolin increased from 52% (baseline) to 87% during the intervention period. Segmented regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant increase following implementation (incidence rate ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.19-2.21, P = 0.002). There was 1 perioperative allergic reaction in the baseline period and 2 during the intervention period. Cefazolin use remained high (92%) 2 years after algorithm implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a simple allergy history-guided algorithm in obstetrical patients with reported beta-lactam allergy resulted in a sustained increase in perioperative cefazolin prophylaxis.

Impact of the Allergy Clarification for Cefazolin Evidence-based Prescribing Tool on Receipt of Preferred Perioperative Prophylaxis: An Interrupted Time Series Study.

Implementation of a perioperative allergy and antibiotic assessment tool in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy resulted in a pronounced and sustained increase in perioperative cefazolin use. This intervention could result in improved efficiencies surrounding perioperative antibiotic administration and possible reductions in surgical site infection rates.

Anesthesia considerations of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a case series.

PURPOSE: Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder with disability in voluntary actions such as eating and writing. First-line treatment involves pharmacological agents, although efficacy is limited by side effects. In these patients, functional neurosurgery can be considered. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy offers a non-invasive solution for treatment. This paper examines an original cohort of ET patients undergoing MRgFUS thalamotomy and discusses the anesthetic management of these cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the anesthetic records of all MRgFUS thalamotomy cases from 15 May 2012 to 16 July 2015 at our centre (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada) to expand a data set provided by the focused ultrasound system manufacturer (Insightec, Tirat Carmel, Israel) from a prior phase-II regulatory approval study. Specific drug and procedural details were listed including aspects of the patients' experience. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in the analysis, 78 from a phase-II trial (16 were from the local site) and four local non-trial cases. No patient required general anesthesia and only 29% of cases required sedation to tolerate the procedure. The most frequent medications required were antiemetics and analgesics. Headache (31%) was the most frequent perioperative symptom. Transient intra-procedural paresthesia symptoms were a common occurrence (32%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRgFUS for thalamotomy provides a non-invasive and well-tolerated method for treating ET, which usually only requires monitored anesthesia care sedation. Nevertheless, there are several predictable side effects that require contingency planning including the personnel and means to resolve them.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le tremblement essentiel (TE) est un trouble moteur courant qui affecte les mouvements volontaires tels que se nourrir ou écrire. Le traitement de première ligne est basé sur des agents pharmacologiques, mais son efficacité est limitée par les effets secondaires. Chez de tels patients, une neurochirurgie fonctionnelle peut être envisagée. La thalamotomie par ultrasons focalisés guidés par imagerie de résonance magnétique (ou MRgFUS) offre une solution de traitement non invasive. Cet article examine une cohorte initiale de patients souffrant de TE et subissant une thalamotomie par MRgFUS et discute de la prise en charge anesthésique de ces cas. MéTHODE: Nous avons évalué de manière rétrospective les dossiers anesthésiques de toutes les interventions de thalamotomie par MRgFUS réalisées entre le 15 mai 2012 et le 16 juillet 2015 dans notre centre (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada) afin d'élargir un ensemble de données fourni par le fabricant de systèmes d'ultrasons focalisés (Insightec, Tirat Carmel, Israël) basé sur une étude d'approbation règlementaire de phase II. Les médicaments spécifiques et détails procéduraux ont été enregistrés, y compris divers aspects de l'expérience des patients. RéSULTATS: Un total de 82 patients ont été inclus dans l'analyse, dont 78 participants de l'étude de phase II (16 au site local) et quatre cas locaux non inclus dans l'étude. Aucun patient n'a nécessité d'anesthésie générale et seulement 29 % des cas ont nécessité une sédation pour tolérer l'intervention. Les médicaments les plus fréquemment requis étaient les antiémétiques et analgésiques. Les céphalées (31 %) constituaient le symptôme périopératoire le plus fréquent. Des symptômes de paresthésie intra-procédurale transitoire étaient fréquents (32 %). CONCLUSION: L'utilisation de la MRgFUS pour la thalamotomie offre une méthode non invasive et bien tolérée pour le traitement du tremblement essentiel, qui ne nécessite habituellement qu'une sédation sous surveillance comme soin anesthésique. Toutefois, cette intervention a plusieurs effets secondaires prévisibles qui nécessitent un plan de contingence incluant le personnel et les moyens pour les traiter.

Misconceptions Surrounding Penicillin Allergy: Implications for Anesthesiologists.

Administration of preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, often with a cephalosporin, is the mainstay of surgical site infection prevention guidelines. Unfortunately, due to prevalent misconceptions, patients labeled as having a penicillin allergy often receive alternate and less-effective antibiotics, placing them at risk of a variety of adverse effects including increased morbidity and higher risk of surgical site infection. The perioperative physician should ascertain the nature of previous reactions to aid in determining the probability of the prevalence of a true allergy. Penicillin allergy testing may be performed but may not be feasible in the perioperative setting. Current evidence on the structural determinants of penicillin and cephalosporin allergies refutes the misconception of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cefazolin, and there is no clear evidence of an increased risk of anaphylaxis in cefazolin-naive, penicillin-allergic patients. A clinical practice algorithm for the perioperative evaluation and management of patients reporting a history of penicillin allergy is presented, concluding that cephalosporins can be safely administered to a majority of such patients.

Is central venous pressure still relevant in the contemporary era of liver resection?

BACKGROUND: Perioperative red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) remains common after liver resection and carries risk of increased morbidity and worse oncologic outcomes. We sought to assess the factors associated with perioperative RBCT after hepatectomy with a focus on intraoperative hemodynamics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our prospective hepatectomy database, supplemented by a review of anesthetic records of all patients undergoing hepatectomy with hemodynamic monitoring (arterial and central venous pressures [CVP]) from 2003-2012. Primary outcome was perioperative RBCT (during and within 30 d after surgery). After descriptive and univariate comparisons, multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with RBCT. RESULTS: Of 851 hepatectomies, 530 had complete hemodynamic data and 30.2% (161 of 530) received RBCT. Among transfused patients, female gender (P = 0.01), preoperative anemia (P < 0.001), and major liver resection (P = 0.02) were more common. Mean estimated blood loss was 1.1 L higher (2.0 versus 0.9 L; P < 0.001) and operating time was 1.1 h longer (5.8 versus 4.7 h; P < 0.001) in transfused patients. Trends in intraoperative CVP differed significantly based on transfusion status (P = 0.007). Independent factors associated with RBCT included female gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; P = 0.01), preoperative anemia (OR, 2.38; P = 0.03), longer operative time (OR, 1.19 per hour; P = 0.03), and higher intraoperative CVP at 1 h during surgery (OR, 1.10 per mm Hg; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood of RBCT is independently associated with female gender, preoperative anemia, longer operative time, and higher intraoperative CVP. Focus on management of preoperative anemia, operative efficiency, and low intraoperative CVP is needed to minimize the need for RBCTs.

Simulation-based assessment of anesthesiology residents' competence: development and implementation of the Canadian National Anesthesiology Simulation Curriculum (CanNASC).

The specialty of anesthesiology will soon adopt the Competence By Design (CBD) approach to residency education developed by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC). A foundational component of CBD is frequent and contextualized assessment of trainees. In 2013, the RCPSC Anesthesiology Specialty Committee assembled a group of simulation educators, representing each of the 17 Canadian anesthesiology residency programs, to form the Canadian National Anesthesiology Simulation Curriculum (CanNASC) Task Force. The goals were to develop, implement, and evaluate a set of consensus-driven standardized mannequin-based simulation scenarios that every trainee must complete satisfactorily prior to completion of anesthesiology residency and certification. Curriculum development followed Kern's principles and was accomplished via monthly teleconferences and annual face-to-face meetings. The development and implementation processes included the following key elements: 1) Curriculum needs assessment: 368 of 958 invitees (38.4%) responded to a national survey resulting in 64 suggested scenario topics. Use of a modified Delphi technique resulted in seven important and technically feasible scenarios. 2) Scenario development: All scenarios have learning objectives from the National Curriculum for Canadian Anesthesiology Residency. Standardized scenario templates were created, and the content was refined and piloted. 3) Assessment: A validated Global Rating Scale (GRS) is the primary assessment tool, informed by using scenario-specific checklists (created via a modified Delphi technique) and the Anesthesia Non-Technical Skills GRS. 4) Implementation: Standardized implementation guidelines, pre-brief/debrief documents, and rater training videos, guide, and commentary were generated. National implementation of the scenarios and program evaluation is currently underway. It is highly feasible to achieve specialty-based consensus on the elements of a national simulation-based curriculum. Our process could be adapted by any specialty interested in implementing a simulation-based curriculum incorporating competency-based assessment on a national scale.

A decision model and cost analysis of intra-operative cell salvage during hepatic resection.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) can reduce allogeneic transfusions but with notable direct costs. This study assessed whether routine use of ICS is cost minimizing in hepatectomy and defines a subpopulation of patients where ICS is most cost minimizing based on patient transfusion risk. METHODS: A decision model from a health systems perspective was developed to examine adoption and non-adoption of ICS use for hepatectomy. A prospectively maintained database of hepatectomy patients provided data to populate the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to determine the probability of ICS being cost-minimizing at specified transfusion risks. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to identify factors most relevant to institutions considering adoption of ICS for hepatectomies. RESULTS: In the base case analysis (transfusion risk of 28.8%) the probability that routine utilization of ICS is cost-minimizing is 64%. The probability that ICS is cost-minimizing exceeds 50% if the patient transfusion risk exceeds 25%. The model was most sensitive to patient transfusion risk, variation in costs of allogeneic blood, and number of appropriate cases the device could be used for. CONCLUSIONS: ICS is cost-minimizing for routine use in liver resection, particularly when used for patients with a risk of transfusion of 25% or greater.

Major liver resection, systemic fibrinolytic activity, and the impact of tranexamic acid.

BACKGROUND: Hyperfibrinolysis may occur due to systemic inflammation or hepatic injury that occurs during liver resection. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that decreases bleeding in various settings, but has not been well studied in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: In this prospective, phase II trial, 18 patients undergoing major liver resection were sequentially assigned to one of three cohorts: (i) Control (no TXA); (ii) TXA Dose I - 1 g bolus followed by 1 g infusion over 8 h; (iii) TXA Dose II - 1 g bolus followed by 10 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery. Serial blood samples were collected for thromboelastography (TEG), coagulation components and TXA concentration. RESULTS: No abnormalities in hemostatic function were identified on TEG. PAP complex levels increased to peak at 1106 µg/L (normal 0-512 µg/L) following parenchymal transection, then decreased to baseline by the morning following surgery. TXA reached stable, therapeutic concentrations early in both dosing regimens. There were no differences between patients based on TXA. CONCLUSIONS: There is no thromboelastographic evidence of hyperfibrinolysis in patients undergoing major liver resection. TXA does not influence the change in systemic fibrinolysis; it may reduce bleeding through a different mechanism of action. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01651182.

Using a situational awareness global assessment technique for interprofessional obstetrical team training with high fidelity simulation.

Evidence suggests that breakdowns in communication and a lack of situation awareness contribute to poor performance of medical teams. In this pilot study, three interprofessional obstetrical teams determined the feasibility of using the situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) during simulated critical event management of three obstetrical scenarios. After each scenario, teams were asked to complete questionnaires assessing their opinion of how their performance was affected by the introduction of questions during a SAGAT stop. Fifteen obstetrical professionals took part in the study and completed the three scenarios in teams consisting of five members. At nine questions per stop, more participants agreed or strongly agreed that there were too many questions per stop (57.1%) than when we asked six questions per stop (13%) and three questions per stop (0%). A number of interprofessional differences in response to this interprofessional experience were noted. A team SAGAT score was determined by calculating the proportion of correct responses for each individual. Higher scores were associated with better adherence to outcome times, although not statistically significant. A robust study design building on our pilot data is needed to probe the differing interprofessional perceptions of SAGAT and the potential association between its scores and clinical outcome times.

Impact of acute stress on resident performance during simulated resuscitation episodes: a prospective randomized cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: Medical trainees have identified stress as an important contributor to their medical errors in acute care environments. PURPOSES: The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of acute stressors to simulated resuscitation scenarios would impact on residents' simulated clinical performance. METHODS: Fifty-four residents completed a control and a high-stress simulated scenario on separate visits. Stress measures were collected before and after scenarios. Two assessors independently evaluated residents' videotaped performance. RESULTS: Both control and high-stress scenarios triggered significant stress responses among participants; however, stress responses were not significantly different between control and high-stress conditions. No difference in performance was found between control and high-stress conditions (F value = 2.84, p = .098). CONCLUSIONS: Residents exposed to simulated resuscitation scenarios experienced significant stress responses irrespective of the presence of acute stressors during these scenarios. This anticipatory stressful response could impact on resident learning and performance and should be further explored.

Effects of clinical supervision on resident learning and patient care during simulated ICU scenarios.

OBJECTIVES: Closer supervision of residents' clinical activities has been promoted to improve patient safety, but may additionally affect resident participation in patient care and learning. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of closer supervision on patient care, resident participation, and the development of resident ability to care independently for critically ill patients during simulated scenarios. DESIGN: This quantitative study represents a component of a larger mixed-methods study. Residents were randomized to one of three levels of supervision, defined by the physical proximity of the supervisor (distant, immediately available, and direct). Each resident completed a simulation scenario under the supervision of a critical care fellow, immediately followed by a modified scenario of similar content without supervision. SETTING: The simulation center of a tertiary, university-affiliated academic center in a large urban city. SUBJECTS: Fifty-three residents completing a critical care rotation and 24 critical care fellows were recruited between April 2009 and June 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the supervised scenarios, lower team performance checklist scores were obtained for distant supervision compared with immediately available and direct supervision (mean [SD], direct: 72% [12%] vs immediately available: 77% [10%] vs distant: 61% [11%]; p = 0.0013). The percentage of checklist items completed by the residents themselves was significantly lower during direct supervision (median [interquartile range], direct: 40% [21%] vs immediately available: 58% [16%] vs distant: 55% [11%]; p = 0.005). During unsupervised scenarios, no significant differences were found on the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Care delivered in the presence of senior supervising physicians was more comprehensive than care delivered without access to a bedside supervisor, but was associated with lower resident participation. However, subsequent resident performance during unsupervised scenarios was not adversely affected. Direct supervision of residents leads to improved care process and does not diminish the subsequent ability of residents to function independently.

Improving Ad Hoc Medical Team Performance with an Innovative "I START-END" Communication Tool.

Purpose: To study the effect of a communication tool entitled: "I START-END" (I-Identify; S-Story; T-Task; A-Accomplish/Adjust; R-Resources; T-Timely Updates; E-Exit; N-Next; D-Document and Debrief) in simulated urgent scenarios in non-operating room settings (referred to as "Ad Hoc") with anesthesia residents. The "I START-END" tool was created by incorporating Crisis Resource Management (CRM) principles into a practical and user-friendly format. Methods: This was a mixed methods pre/post observational study with 47 anesthesia resident volunteers participating from July 2014 to June 2016. Each resident served as their own control, and participated in three simulated Ad Hoc scenarios. The first simulation served as a baseline. The second simulation occurred 1-2 weeks after I START-END training. The third simulation occurred 3-6 months later. Simulation performance was videotaped and reviewed by trained experts using technical skill checklists and Anesthesia Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) score. Residents filled out questionnaires, pre-simulation, 1-2 weeks after I START-END training and 3-6 months later. Concurrently, resident performance at actual Code Blue events was scored by trained observers using the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale. Results: 80-90% of residents stated the tool provided an organized approach to Ad Hoc scenarios - specifically, information helpful to care of the patient was obtained more readily and better resource planning occurred as communication with the team improved. Residents stated they would continue to use the tool and apply it to other clinical settings. Resident video performance scores of technical skills showed significant improvement at the "late" session (3-6 months post exposure to the I START-END). ANTS scores were satisfactory and remained unchanged throughout. There was no difference between residents with and without I START-END training as measured by the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale, however, debriefing at Code Blues occurred twice as often when residents had I START-END training. Conclusion: Non-operating room settings are fraught with unfamiliarity that create many challenges. The I START-END tool operationalizes key CRM elements. The tool was well received by residents; it enabled them to speak up more readily, obtain vital information and continually update each other by anticipating, planning, and debriefing in an organized and collaborative way.

Tranexamic acid versus placebo to reduce perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing liver resection: protocol for the haemorrhage during liver resection tranexamic acid (HeLiX) randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Despite use of operative and non-operative interventions to reduce blood loss during liver resection, 20%-40% of patients receive a perioperative blood transfusion. Extensive intraoperative blood loss is a major risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality and receipt of blood transfusion is associated with serious risks including an association with long-term cancer recurrence and overall survival. In addition, blood products are scarce and associated with appreciable expense; decreasing blood transfusion requirements would therefore have health system benefits. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, has been shown to reduce the probability of receiving a blood transfusion by one-third for patients undergoing cardiac or orthopaedic surgery. However, its applicability in liver resection has not been widely researched. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a prospective, blinded, randomised controlled trial being conducted at 10 sites in Canada and 1 in the USA. 1230 eligible and consenting participants will be randomised to one of two parallel groups: experimental (2 g of intravenous TXA) or placebo (saline) administered intraoperatively. The primary endpoint is receipt of blood transfusion within 7 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes include blood loss, postoperative complications, quality of life and 5-year disease-free and overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the research ethics boards at participating centres and Health Canada (parent control number 177992) and is currently enrolling participants. All participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be distributed widely through local and international meetings, presentation, publication and ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02261415.

Self-reported beta-lactam allergy and the risk of surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a self-reported ß-lactam allergy is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) across a broad range of procedures and to determine whether this association is mediated by the receipt of an alternate antibiotic to cefazolin. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Surgical procedures sampled by an institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database over an 18-month period (January 2017 to June 2018) from 7 surgical specialties. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic hospital. RESULTS: Of the 3,589 surgical procedures included in the study, 369 (10.3%) were performed in patients with a reported ß-lactam allergy. Those with a reported ß-lactam allergy were significantly less likely to receive cefazolin (38.8% vs 95.5%) or metronidazole (20.3% vs 26.1%) and were more likely to receive clindamycin (52.0% vs 0.2%), gentamicin (3.5% vs 0%), or vancomycin (2.2% vs 0.1%) than those without allergy. An SSI occurred in 154 of 3,220 procedures (4.8%) in patients without reported allergy and 27 of 369 (7.3%) with reported allergy. In the multivariable regression model, a reported ß-lactam allergy was associated with a statistically significant increase in SSI risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.51; P = .03). This effect was completely mediated by receipt of an alternate antibiotic to cefazolin (indirect effect aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.34; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported ß-lactam allergy was associated with an increased SSI risk mediated through receipt of alternate antibiotic prophylaxis. Safely increasing use of cefazolin prophylaxis in patients with reported ß-lactam allergy can potentially lower the risk of SSIs.

Saddle block analgesia for high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A prospective study.

PURPOSE: To determine effective spinal anesthetic dosing of hyperbaric bupivacaine for patients undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 199 HDR prostate brachytherapy sessions (n=115 patients) under spinal anesthesia with five doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine were prospectively analyzed. Patients received either 11.25mg (n=40 sessions), 15mg (n=63 sessions), 18mg (n=25 sessions), 18.75mg (n=17 sessions), or 20.25mg (n=54 sessions) of 0.75% of bupivacaine with 20microg of fentanyl in 8.25% of dextrose (Hospira, Healthcare Corporation, Montréal, Canada). Sensory block level, intraoperative hypotension, incidence of nausea and vomiting, time to ambulation, and time to discharge were recorded. We assessed for the presence of any transient neurologic symptoms post discharge. RESULTS: The 11.25-mg group had a mean peak sensory block height of L1 at 90min, which was significantly lower than the other groups. Block heights were also decreased at the 5, 60, 120, 150, 180, and 300min time points (p<0.05). The mean time to ambulation was 403+/-92min and to discharge was 427+/-70min; no difference among groups was found. Hypotension was not observed in the 11.25-mg group, whereas the incidence of operative hypotension was 8% in each of the other groups. No transient neurologic symptoms were reported postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The 11.25-mg dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine was sufficient to provide intraoperative anesthesia for catheter placement and sufficient postoperative residual analgesia for the duration that the catheters were left in situ and subsequently removed.

Repeated large-volume epidural blood patches for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

PURPOSE: Refractory headache from spontaneous intracranial hypotension can be debilitating for patients. This report describes the use of repeated high-volume epidural blood patches to treat this condition. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 39-yr-old male presented with a history and diagnostic imaging findings consistent with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. The associated intractable and incapacitating headache was unrelieved by meperidine and a 20 mL lumbar autologous blood patch. Two weeks later, a second epidural blood patch of 45 mL autologous blood administered in the lower thoracic epidural space achieved partial relief. With symptoms persisting despite oral analgesics, a third blood patch was undertaken one month after the initial procedure. On this occasion, administration of 32 mL autologous blood into the mid-thoracic epidural space resulted in complete and lasting resolution of the headache. CONCLUSION: The ideal volume of blood injectate to achieve maximal effectiveness for an epidural blood patch is unknown. While many clinicians use a predetermined maximal volume, a volume titrated to patient symptoms is a suggested alternate approach.

Does the age of acute care physicians impact their (1) crisis management performance and (2) learning after simulation-based education? A protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study in Toronto and Ottawa, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: The proportion of older acute care physicians (ACPs) has been steadily increasing. Ageing is associated with physiological changes and prospective research investigating how such age-related physiological changes affect clinical performance, including crisis resource management (CRM) skills, is lacking. There is a gap in the literature on whether physician's age influences baseline CRM performance and also learning from simulation. We aim to investigate whether ageing is associated with baseline CRM skills of ACPs (emergency, critical care and anaesthesia) using simulated crisis scenarios and to assess whether ageing influences learning from simulation-based education. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective cohort multicentre study recruiting ACPs from the Universities of Toronto and Ottawa, Canada. Each participant will manage an advanced cardiovascular life support crisis-simulated scenario (pretest) and then be debriefed on their CRM skills. They will then manage another simulated crisis scenario (immediate post-test). Three months after, participants will return to manage a third simulated crisis scenario (retention post-test). The relationship between biological age and chronological age will be assessed by measuring the participants CRM skills and their ability to learn from high-fidelity simulation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Research Ethics Board (REB Number 140-2015) and the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (#20150173-01H). The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02683447; Pre-results.