Clinical features of patients with hepatic portal venous gas.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare clinical condition that is caused by a variety of underlying diseases. However, the factors that would permit accurate identification of bowel ischemia, requiring surgery, in patients with HPVG have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Thirty patients that had been diagnosed with HPVG using computed tomography between 2010 and 2019 were allocated to two groups on the basis of clinical and intraoperative findings: those with (Group 1; n = 12 [40%]) and without (Group 2; n = 18 [60%]) bowel ischemia. Eleven patients underwent emergency surgery, and bowel ischemia was identified in eight of these (73%). Four patients in Group 1 were diagnosed with bowel ischemia, but treated palliatively because of their general condition. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of Groups 1 and 2 and identified possible prognostic factors for bowel ischemia. RESULTS: At admission, patients in Group 1 more commonly showed the peritoneal irritation sign, had lower base excess, higher lactate, and higher C-reactive protein, and more frequently had comorbid intestinal pneumatosis. Of the eight bowel ischemia surgery patients, four (50%) died, mainly because of anastomotic leak following bowel resection and primary anastomosis (3/4, 75%). All except one patient in Group 2, who presented with aspiration pneumonia, responded better to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier identification and grading of bowel ischemia according to the findings at admission should benefit patients with HPVG by reducing the incidence of unnecessary surgery and increasing the use of safer procedures, such as prophylactic stoma placement.

Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a sub-analysis of a large, multicenter, case-control study in Japan.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pneumonia affects the length of stay and mortality after surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to determine the risk factors of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients with CRC, and to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on elderly patients with CRC. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 1473 patients ≥ 80 years of age who underwent surgery for stage 0-III CRC between 2003 and 2007. Using a multivariate analysis, we determined the risk factors for pneumonia occurrence from each baseline characteristic. RESULTS: Among all included patients, 26 (1.8%) experienced postoperative pneumonia, and restrictive respiratory impairment, obstructive respiratory impairment, history of cerebrovascular events, and open surgery were determined as risk factors (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.78 [1.22-6.20], 2.71 [1.22-6.30], 3.60 [1.37-8.55], and 3.57 [1.22-15.2], respectively). Furthermore, postoperative pneumonia was more frequently accompanied by increasing cumulative numbers of these risk factors (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.763). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery may be safely performed in elderly CRC patients, even those with respiratory impairment and a history of cerebrovascular events.

[Surgical Therapy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer].

We examined 40 cases of locally recurrent rectal cancer surgically treated at our hospital. The sites of recurrence were the anastomosis site(16 cases), pelvic lymph nodes(10 cases), pelvis(10 cases), and perineum(5 cases). Intraoperative complications were confirmed in 5% and postoperative complications in 45% of cases. The R0 resection rate was 60.0%, and positive radial margins were confirmed in 35.0% of cases. Second recurrences were confirmed in 60.0% of cases. The 3-year overall survival rate was 68.7%, and the 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 20.3%. Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer was performed relatively safely; however, the R1 resection rate and recurrence rate after surgery were high. R0 resection significantly improved the overall survival rate, and it seems that a treatment strategy to raise R0 resection rate is necessary.

Initial experience of reduced port surgery using a two-surgeon technique for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the decreasing number of surgeons on surgical teams, reduced port surgery (RPS) operations have become popular. We herein present our initial experience with RPS, which was successfully performed using a two-surgeon technique. A retrospective analysis was performed to compare the two-surgeon technique with conventional laparoscopic colectomy and evaluate its efficacy. METHODS: A total of 535 patients were eligible among 749 registered patients. Conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy with three surgeons and RPS using the two-surgeon technique with a surgeon and surgeon's assistant were performed in 429 and 106 cases, respectively. The patient characteristics, short-term outcomes (including intraoperative and postoperative findings) and pathological results were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, BMI, history of abdominal surgery, depth of tumor invasion and TNM classification. Reconstruction via extracorporeal functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed in a significantly higher number of patients in the two-surgeon technique group (74 %) than in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy group (57 %). Furthermore, the mean operative time in the two-surgeon technique group (117.9 min) was significantly shorter than that observed in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy group (170 min), and the median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the two-surgeon technique group (6 days) than in the conventional laparoscopic colectomy group (7 days). There were no major postoperative complications. The final TNM stage was similar in both procedures. CONCLUSION: RPS using the two-surgeon technique compares favorably with conventional laparoscopic colectomy and is considered to be a safe and successful procedure.

Inferior oncological prognosis of surgery without oral chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients not admissible for adjuvant chemotherapy are generally at high risk of considerably inferior prognosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate poorer survival without administration of oral adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon cancer patients in clinical settings. METHODS: Between April 2007 and September 2011, 259 patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent curative surgery were retrospectively assigned to the adjuvant chemotherapy group of 171 patients (66%) and the surgery alone group of 88 patients. Oral fluorouracil (5-FU) derivatives used in adjuvant chemotherapy, such as oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) or capecitabine, were the most commonly used. RESULTS: The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 74.9% for all cases, 58.3% for the surgery alone group, and 83.4% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (P=0.0001). The chemotherapy group was associated with a dramatic improvement in survival for stage IIIB (surgery alone 57.7% versus adjuvant chemotherapy 83.9%; P=0.0001) and stage IIIC (surgery alone 18.2% versus adjuvant chemotherapy 57.3%; P=0.006) patients. There was a significant difference in the overall recurrence rate between groups (surgery alone 35.2% versus adjuvant chemotherapy 18.1%; P=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant therapy as an independent predictive factor of reduced recurrence (hazard ratio (HR): 3.231; P=0.004) and improved RFS (HR: 2.653; P=0.001). CONCLUSION: In clinical settings, adjuvant therapy was the only significant prognostic factor of survival. Since many patients prefer not to receive chemotherapy, it is critical to inform stage III colon cancer patients that chemotherapy raises their chances of survival by three-fold compared with curative surgery alone.

Effects of obesity on the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in obese patients based on the short-term outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 561 patients with colorectal cancer treated from April 2007 to October 2010. The surgical outcomes were compared between non-obese (BMI <25 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)) patients. RESULTS: All of the enrolled patients were classified as non-obese (n = 421) or obese (n = 140). The obese group had a significantly higher proportion of male patients (72.1 vs. 57.0 %; P = 0.002), a higher incidence of left colon cancer (49.3 vs. 36.8 %; P = 0.033), and more systematic comorbidities (P < 0.001) than did the non-obese group. The length of the surgery was significantly longer in obese than in non-obese patients (221 vs. 207 min; P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups; however, surgical wound infections were more common in obese patients (12.1 vs. 5.2 %; P = 0.005). Obesity was not a significant-independent risk factor for total postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.330; P = 0.289). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically feasible and safe for obese patients and provides all the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Late-onset lethal complication of non-surgically managed massive gastric conduit necrosis after esophagectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Gastric conduit necrosis (GCN) after esophagectomy is a serious complication that can prove fatal. Herein, we report a rare case of GCN with a severe course that improved with conservative treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 78-year-old male patient who underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and developed a massive GCN. The patient was critically ill in the initial phase but recovered quickly; he also had a ruptured gallbladder and a bleeding jejunal ulcer. On the 22nd postoperative day, massive GCN was revealed on endoscopy. Considering the recovery course, careful observation with a decompressing nasal gastric tube was the treatment of choice. The GCN was managed successfully, having been completely replaced by fine mucosa within 9 months postoperatively. The patient completed his follow-up visit 5 years after surgery without any evident disease recurrence. Five and a half years after the surgery, the patient presented with progressive weakness and deterioration of renal function. Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a large ulcer at the anastomotic site. Three months later, computed tomography revealed a markedly thin esophageal wall, accompanied by adjacent lung consolidation. An esophagopulmonary fistula was diagnosed; surgery was not considered, owing to the patient's age and markedly deteriorating performance status. He died 2013 days after the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Massive GCN after esophagectomy often requires emergency surgery to remove the necrotic conduit. However, this report suggests that a conservative approach can save lives and preserve the gastric conduit in these cases, thereby augmenting the quality of life.

A comparative study on the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's procedure for high risk patients in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with severe co-morbidities and oncological conditions would not be denied a reconstruction of anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure would be undertaken. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure compared to open Hartmann's procedure for high risk patients in colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: Nine hundred and eighty five primary colorectal cancer resections were performed from April 2007 to December 2010. Thirty six patients (3.6%) who underwent Hartmann's procedure by the same surgical team were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (72%) in the open surgery (OS) and 10 patients (28%) in the laparoscopic surgery (LS) were undertaken Hartmann's procedure. The reason of selected Hartmann's procedure was defined as high risk with severe co-morbidities (OS 8: LS 8, n=16), oncological conditions (OS 14: LS 2, n=16), urgent situations (OS 4, n=4). The mean operation time was not significantly different (p=0.504). The median blood loss count was significantly different between both groups (OS 327.5g vs. LS 16.5g; p=0.0001). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar (OS 38% vs. LS 40%; p=0.763). The median postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different (OS 10.5 vs. LS 12; p=0.216). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure is feasible and safe with a low invasiveness for high risk patients with colorectal cancer.

Efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal resection for risk patients with severe comorbidity.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study assessed the short term results of laparoscopic colorectal resection for high risk patients. METHODOLOGY: Five hundred and fifty seven consecutive patients underwent an elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection by the same surgical team between April 2007 and December 2010. No risk patients in ASA class 1 (Group N, n=222), low risk patients with the systemic disease under the control in ASA class 2 and 3 (Group L, n=320), high risk patients with severe comorbidities in ASA class 4 (Group H, n=15) were respectively compared. RESULTS: The median blood loss count was significantly higher than the other group (N: 26 g, L: 22 g) in group H (59 g; p<0.05). On the other hands, the less lymphadenectomy was performed and a reconstruction with anastomosis was denied in group H. The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different in each group (N: 12%, L: 18%, H: 26%; p>0.05). There was the significant difference of the incidence with systemic complication (respiratory failure, ascites and delirium) in group H. The median postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different in each group (POD7; p>0.05). Hospitalization death occurred in three patients (0.5%) by uncontrollability of the systemic disease, two patients in group L and one patient in group H. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for high risk patients was performed safely without increasing complications and postoperative hospital stay.

Pringle maneuver induces hepatic metastasis by stimulating the tumor vasculature.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Pringle maneuver is traditionally used to avoid hemorrhage during hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis. However, metastasis can occur under ischemic conditions due to some unknown mechanism. METHODOLOGY: An orthotopic model of murine colon cancer was established in syngeneic BALB/c mice. Viable CT-26 cells were implanted into the spleen of these mice. The mice underwent a laparotomy 5 days after the implantation and the hepato-duodenal ligament was clamped for 0 or 10 minutes (Pringle maneuver). The mice were sacrificed 7 days after this maneuver and the number of hepatic metastasis were counted. RESULTS: The mice that underwent the maneuver developed a greater number of hepatic metastasis. An immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the expression of microvessel density, VEGF and KDR/Flk-1 were higher in the hepatic metastasis in the mice treated with the maneuver. In addition, the mice which were treated by the maneuver had a higher level VEGF in the serum. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the Pringle maneuver induces hepatic metastasis by stimulating the overexpression of tumor vasculature.

Surgical outcomes of hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: Initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: Hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) combines better visualization of laparoscopic surgery with the advantages of open surgery. The aim of this study was to describe important technical considerations of HALS and to assess the feasibility of hybrid HALS pelvic exenteration (PE) for primary advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: From May 2012 to August 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who underwent PE for primary advanced rectal cancer (< 10 cm from the anal verge). Patients were divided into the open PE group (n = 5) and the hybrid HALS PE group (n = 6). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the two groups, and all included patients were male. Tumor invasion to adjacent organs was mostly anterior invasion. In addition, four patients (66%) in the hybrid HALS PE group and two (40%) in the open PE group received neoadjuvant therapy (P = .3). CONCLUSION: Compared to open surgery, hybrid HALS has the advantages of less bleeding and less invasion, and can achieve the same results in the short-term. It was a reasonable procedure which was easy and safe dissection of internal iliac vessels and dorsal vein complex. Thus, hybrid HALS may become a useful approach for PE.

Clinical characteristics of patients with pneumatosis intestinalis.

BACKGROUND: Several theories explaining the development of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) have been reported, but a substantial portion of cases have been idiopathic. Additionally, predictors of bowel ischaemia in PI have not been fully investigated, while PI with bowel ischaemia has deteriorated overall outcomes of PI. METHODS: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with PI (2009-2019) were allocated to two groups: with (group 1; n = 15 (23%)) and without (group 2; n = 49 (77%)) bowel ischaemia. Fourteen patients underwent emergency surgery, and bowel ischaemia was identified in nine (64%). Six patients in group 1 were diagnosed with bowel ischaemia, and were treated palliatively. On medical charts, we determined underlying conditions of PI, compared the characteristics and outcomes between the groups, and identified the predictors of bowel ischaemia. RESULTS: Group 1 patients more commonly showed abdominal pain, lower base excess, higher C-reactive protein concentrations, higher white blood cell counts and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, and more frequent comorbid ascites, free air and hepatic portal vein gas. Of nine bowel ischaemia surgery patients, three (33%) died; all because of anastomotic leak. All except three patients in group 2, who presented with aspiration pneumonia, responded to treatment. Only one patient had an unknown cause (1/64, 1.6%), and various underlying conditions in secondary PI were confirmed. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic PI may be identified rarely using current imaging and knowledge, but outcomes in PI patients with bowel ischaemia remain unsatisfactory. Earlier identification of bowel ischaemia by various specialists in accordance with predictors of bowel ischaemia could improve overall outcomes in PI patients.

Is laparoscopic surgery a contraindication in patients with severe senile kyphosis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The japanese population have the longest-life expectancy in the world. Accordingly, older patients with colorectal cancer with senile kyphosis caused by aging or osteoporosis also increase. Laparoscopic surgery is minimally-invasive, and performance on severe kyphotic patients may cause difficulty to approach a narrow abdomen. To determine whether laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in patients with severe senile kyphosis. METHODS: Laparoscopic operations under general anesthesia were undertaken with the patients in lithotomy position. Intraoperative difficulties were compared with normal laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: Working space was divided by right costal arch during right hemicolectomy for right sided colon cancer. For sigmoid colon cancer, dissection of lymph node and anastomosis were completed with much difficulty because the pelvic space was occupied with small intestine. However, the postoperative course was uneventful despite impaired lung function in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Severe senile kyphosis is not a contraindication for minimally invasive technique applied to colorectal cancer patients.

Experience of Altemeier's procedures for a complete rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many patients with a complete rectal prolapse tend to be old. Therefore, surgeons tend to choose a surgical procedure associated with minimal stress. However, the recurrence rate is problematic. Altemeier's procedure causes minimal stress. This procedure is often selected for performing a complete rectal prolapse. Usually, a rectosigmoidectomy, is performed with levatoroplasty and anastomosis of the anal tube and the colon under spinal anesthesia. This procedure was applied for a complete rectal prolapse and the outcomes of this procedure were analyzed. METHODOLOGY: From 2000 August to 2006 January, 13 patients underwent this procedure. The patients ranged from 27 to 89 years of age (median 76 years). The length of the escaped enteric canal ranged from 7.0 to 20.0cm. RESULTS: All patients underwent the procedure under spinal anesthesia. The surgical time was 113 +/- 20 minutes. There were two postoperative complications which were both treated conservatively. One recurrent case was recognized. CONCLUSION: Altemeier's procedure was associated with a minimum of stress and the recurrence rate was low (7.6%). Because a complete rectal prolapse is caused by the fragility of the anal sphincter muscle and levator ani muscle, this procedure is considered to be effective and appropriate.

Splenic artery aneurysm rupture during pregnancy: A case report of maternal and fetal survival.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy has been demonstrated as a significant risk factor of splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) formation and rupture. However, prompt diagnosis of SAA rupture in a pregnant patient showing acute abdomen has been practically challenging in light of its rarity and vague initial presentation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 40-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) at 35 weeks' gestation presented to the emergency department with upper abdominal pain and nausea. Because of fetal dysfunction, emergency caesarian section was performed by a Pfannenstiel incision. Following delivery, 400 g of hemorrhage was removed from the upper abdominal cavity. Computed tomography showed a 37-mm SAA associated with copious adjacent fluid. Although selective angiography did not demonstrate active extravasation, interventional isolation of the SAA was not performed because of multiple surrounding arteries. Relaparotomy with an upper midline incision was then performed. Sudden cardiac arrest occurred upon opening the lesser sac to irrigate clots, and cardiac massage and proximal and distal clamping of the SAA were required. Eventually, splenectomy with excision of the SAA and pancreatic tail was successfully performed, but gauze packing of the open surgical wound was required because of severe coagulopathy. Following removal of the packs and closure of the abdomen 2 days after splenectomy, the patient and infant satisfactorily recovered without sequelae. DISCUSSION: Given continual awareness of abdominal vascular collapse during pregnancy, undelayed diagnosis and safer intervention might be achieved. CONCLUSION: Awareness at initial presentation and multidisciplinary efforts might be essential to achieve maternal and fetal survival in SAA rupture during pregnancy.

Perioperative management of laparoscopic surgery in a patient with protein S deficiency complications: A case report.

Patients with protein S deficiency are prone to developing thrombosis. During laparoscopic surgery in patients with protein S deficiency, there is a risk of deep venous thromboembolism. In the present case, the patient was a 66-year-old man. He was diagnosed with colon cancer, and surgery was planned. Because of the presence of protein S deficiency, he required careful perioperative management for laparoscopic surgery. Surgery was successfully performed. On postoperative assessment, no thrombi were observed. Our approach of perioperative management might help in the treatment of patients with protein S deficiency.

Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection combined with en-bloc prostatectomy using the trans-sacral approach for locally invasive rectal cancer: A case report.

Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection and en-bloc prostatectomy using the trans-sacral approach for locally invasive rectal cancer that invades only the prostate is useful in order to avoid total pelvic exenteration. The patient was a 63-year-old man with cT4b (prostate) N1M0, stage IIIC rectal cancer. Curative resection was performed. Histopathological findings did not indicate definitive invasion into the prostate gland. The patient was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 32 with an anastomotic leak and a ureteral catheter. The patient is able to urinate and has had no cancer recurrence. Laparoscopic bladder-preserving surgery for locally invasive rectal cancer can preserve postoperative quality of life and provides oncological curability.

Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Male Rectal Cancer by Pelvic Measurement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection in male rectal cancer patients with a narrow pelvis cannot be easily resolved. The objective of this study is to assess numerical information of narrow pelvis and to determine whether prediction of morbidity can be possible. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review was performed. From July 2007 to January 2013, 43 consecutive male patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection were divided into the anastomotic leakage-negative group and anastomotic leakage-positive group. Eleven anatomic parameters were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of pelvis and a new index called "pelvic index" was calculated. RESULTS: The pelvic index (difference between the interspinous distance and the diameter of the mesorectum divided by the depth of the cavity of the lesser pelvis) in the leakage-positive group was significantly smaller than that in the negative group (P=0.038). Comparison between those 2 groups at the border of the cut-off value of the pelvic index (13.0) showed a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative assessment by the pelvic index can predict the narrow pelvis and risk of anastomotic leakage.

Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse and descending colon cancer: Short-term and long-term outcomes of a multicenter retrospective study of 1830 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open colectomies, except for cases involving transverse colon and splenic flexure colon cancer. The objective of this study was to confirm the oncological safety and advantages of the short-term results of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer in comparison with open surgery. METHODS: The study data were retrospectively collected from the databases of 45 hospitals. Patients with transverse or descending colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open R0 resection were registered. The primary end-points were the 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates according to pathological stage. The secondary end-points were the short-term results, including blood loss, operative time, diet intake, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 1830 eligible patients, 872 underwent open colectomy and 958 underwent laparoscopic colectomy. The median follow-up period was 38.4 months. The conversion rate to open resection was 4.5%. The 3-year overall survival rate of the laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that of the open group for stage I patients (96.2% vs 99.2%; P = 0.04); it was also higher for stage II (94.0% vs 95.5%) and stage III (87.4% vs 90.2%) patients, but there were no significant differences. The 3-year relapse-free survival rate of the laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that of the open group for stage I patients; there were no differences between the open and laparoscopic groups among the stage II and III patients. In the multivariate analyses, laparoscopic resection was a significant factor in relapse-free survival. Laparoscopic patients had significantly lower blood loss and a significantly longer operative time than the open groups. Also, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter and postoperative morbidity was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Although this retrospective study has limitations, we can conclude that laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer is oncologically safe and yields better short-term results than open surgery.

Oncologic Outcomes of Oral Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage III Colon Cancer: Tegafur-Uracil Plus Leucovorin Versus Capecitabine.

INTRODUCTION: Although several major trials of treatment for stage III colon cancer have been reported, no study has compared oral adjuvant chemotherapy regimens using tegafur-uracil in combination with leucovorin (UFT/LV) and capecitabine (CAPE) alone. This study compared the oncologic outcomes of treatment with these 2 oral regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy from April 2007 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients with stage III colon cancer received oral adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV (n = 157, 61%) and CAPE (n = 101, 39%). The overall rate of completion of scheduled treatment was 78.6%. Significantly fewer patients on UFT/LV completed the regimen compared with those on CAPE (117, 74.5% vs. 86, 85.1%; P < .01). There were no significant differences in oncologic outcome between UFT/LV and CAPE in terms of 3-year overall survival rates (OS; 95.8% vs. 92.4%, P = .45) and 3-year relapse-free survival rates (RFS; 82.7% vs. 79.3%, P = .8). CONCLUSION: The 3-year RFS and OS were similar for both regimens, yielding an excellent outcome. The selection of adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens must be based on the patient's status as well as considering the incidences of adverse events, medical cost, and administration convenience.