Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1215-1219, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095080

RESUMO

During February 7─September 3, 2022, a total of 39 US states experienced outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus in birds from commercial poultry farms and backyard flocks. Among persons exposed to infected birds, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5) viral RNA was detected in 1 respiratory specimen from 1 person.


Assuntos
Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1 , Vírus da Influenza A , Influenza Aviária , Influenza Humana , Animais , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Influenza Aviária/epidemiologia , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/genética , Aves , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Aves Domésticas , Surtos de Doenças
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(50): 1589-1596, 2022 Dec 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520656

RESUMO

The 2022-23 influenza season shows an early rise in pediatric influenza-associated hospitalizations (1). SARS-CoV-2 viruses also continue to circulate (2). The current influenza season is the first with substantial co-circulation of influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2 (3). Although both seasonal influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2 can contribute to substantial pediatric morbidity (3-5), whether coinfection increases disease severity compared with that associated with infection with one virus alone is unknown. This report describes characteristics and prevalence of laboratory-confirmed influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 coinfections among patients aged <18 years who had been hospitalized or died with influenza as reported to three CDC surveillance platforms during the 2021-22 influenza season. Data from two Respiratory Virus Hospitalizations Surveillance Network (RESP-NET) platforms (October 1, 2021-April 30, 2022),§ and notifiable pediatric deaths associated¶ with influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 coinfection (October 3, 2021-October 1, 2022)** were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 coinfections occurred in 6% (32 of 575) of pediatric influenza-associated hospitalizations and in 16% (seven of 44) of pediatric influenza-associated deaths. Compared with patients without coinfection, a higher proportion of those hospitalized with coinfection received invasive mechanical ventilation (4% versus 13%; p = 0.03) and bilevel positive airway pressure or continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP/CPAP) (6% versus 16%; p = 0.05). Among seven coinfected patients who died, none had completed influenza vaccination, and only one received influenza antivirals.†† To help prevent severe outcomes, clinicians should follow recommended respiratory virus testing algorithms to guide treatment decisions and consider early antiviral treatment initiation for pediatric patients with suspected or confirmed influenza, including those with SARS-CoV-2 coinfection who are hospitalized or at increased risk for severe illness. The public and parents should adopt prevention strategies including considering wearing well-fitted, high-quality masks when respiratory virus circulation is high and staying up-to-date with recommended influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations for persons aged ≥6 months.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Influenza Humana , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Prevalência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Morte
3.
PLoS One ; 14(8): e0221725, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449545

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess awareness of cytomegalovirus (CMV); attitudes towards screening; and frequency of behaviors that could increase the risk of prenatal infection. METHODS: We conducted a survey among 726 women at the 2017 Minnesota State Fair. Minnesota residents aged 18-44 were eligible if they had never been pregnant or had been pregnant within the past 10 years. We compared responses between never-pregnant and recently-pregnant women. RESULTS: Only 20% of study participants had previously heard of CMV. Remarkably, recently-pregnant women were no more likely to be aware of CMV than never-pregnant women after adjusting for potential confounders. After receiving information about CMV, nearly all participants indicated they believed prenatal (96%) or newborn (96%) screening should be offered. CONCLUSIONS: Although baseline awareness of CMV was low (even among recently-pregnant women), after learning more about the risks, women supported screening. Several states have passed or proposed legislation promoting CMV education and/or screening programs. We identified important gaps in knowledge about CMV among women who may benefit from education about how to reduce their risk of exposure and who may need to decide whether they would be willing to screen for CMV in the future.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus/congênito , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Triagem Neonatal , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Vaccine ; 31(13): 1651-5, 2013 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23395733

RESUMO

Mid-season influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated using data from surveillance conducted by the Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based, Influenza Surveillance Program at the United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine. Respiratory specimens from geographically diverse military members and dependents who sought medical care 2 October 2011-3 March 2012 were analyzed by viral culture and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; influenza viruses were typed and sequenced. Controls were influenza test-negative. Overall, vaccine type and subtype-specific VE were estimated using logistic regression. Adjusted VE (95% confidence interval) was: overall 77 (57-87)%; live attenuated vaccine (LAIV) 74 (48-87)%; trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) 75 (48-88)%. H3 component-specific VE was: overall 77 (52-89)%; LAIV 78 (47-91)%; TIV 74 (38-89)%; data were insufficient for separate H1 and B estimates. Both vaccine types showed moderate to high VE, indicating significant protection against circulating influenza strains.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares , Orthomyxoviridae/classificação , Orthomyxoviridae/genética , Orthomyxoviridae/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Sistema Respiratório/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Cultura de Vírus , Adulto Jovem
5.
PLoS One ; 7(7): e41435, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22859985

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Following the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 (pH1N1) pandemic, both seasonal and pH1N1 viruses circulated in the US during the 2010-2011 influenza season; influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) may vary between live attenuated (LAIV) and trivalent inactivated (TIV) vaccines as well as by virus subtype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vaccine type and virus subtype-specific VE were determined for US military active component personnel for the period of September 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011. Laboratory-confirmed influenza-related medical encounters were compared to matched individuals with a non-respiratory illness (healthy controls), and unmatched individuals who experienced a non-influenza respiratory illness (test-negative controls). Odds ratios (OR) and VE estimates were calculated overall, by vaccine type and influenza subtype. RESULTS: A total of 603 influenza cases were identified. Overall VE was relatively low and similar regardless of whether healthy controls (VE = 26%, 95% CI: -1 to 45) or test-negative controls (VE = 29%, 95% CI: -6 to 53) were used as comparison groups. Using test-negative controls, vaccine type-specific VE was found to be higher for TIV (53%, 95% CI: 25 to 71) than for LAIV (VE = -13%, 95% CI: -77 to 27). Influenza subtype-specific analyses revealed moderate protection against A/H3 (VE = 58%, 95% CI: 21 to 78), but not against A/H1 (VE = -38%, 95% CI: -211 to 39) or B (VE = 34%, 95% CI: -122 to 80). CONCLUSION: Overall, a low level of protection against clinically-apparent, laboratory-confirmed, influenza was found for the 2010-11 seasonal influenza vaccines. TIV immunization was associated with higher protection than LAIV, however, no protection against A/H1 was noted, despite inclusion of a pandemic influenza strain as a vaccine component for two consecutive years. Vaccine virus mismatch or lower immunogenicity may have contributed to these findings and deserve further examination in controlled studies. Continued assessment of VE in military personnel is essential in order to better inform vaccination policy decisions.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Militares , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA