RESUMO
Objective: We aimed to investigate the clinical utility of follow-up oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD2) in patients with severe oesophagitis (Los Angeles grades C or D) through evaluating the yield of Barrett's oesophagus (BO), cancer, dysplasia and strictures. Second, we aimed to determine if the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) may be used to identify patients to undergo OGD2s. Design/method: Patients in NHS Lothian with an index OGD (OGD1) diagnosis of severe oesophagitis between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015 were identified. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with grade. Patients were stratified by frailty and a diagnosis of stricture, cancer, dysplasia and BO. Results: In total 964 patients were diagnosed with severe oesophagitis, 61.7% grade C and 38.3% grade D. The diagnostic yield of new pathology at OGD2 was 13.2% (n=51), new strictures (2.3%), dysplasia (0.5%), cancer (0.3%) and BO (10.1%). A total of 140 patients had clinical frailty (CFS score ≥5), 88.6% of which were deceased at review (median of 76 months). In total 16.4% of frail patients underwent OGD2s and five new pathologies were diagnosed, none of which were significantly associated with grade. Among non-frail patients at OGD2, BO was the only pathology more common (p=0.010) in patients with grade D. Rates of cancer, dysplasia and strictures did not vary significantly between grades. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that OGD2s in patients with severe oesophagitis may be tailored according to clinical frailty and only be offered to non-frail patients. In non-frail patients OGD2s have similar pick-up rates of sinister pathology in both grades of severe oesophagitis.
RESUMO
Background: Surgical training emphasizes technical competence. Growing evidence indicates that nontechnical skills are also significant in determining performance. Critically, surgeons should be aware how performance is affected by pressure or distraction. We assessed the impact of novel auditory and visual stressors on performance during a simulated laparoscopic task. We hypothesized that the stressors would worsen performance, and that stress-induced diminution in performance would be inversely related to surgical experience. Methods: Twenty participants (10 surgeons and 10 medical students) completed a peg-threading task using a laparoscopic simulator: three times under control conditions, next with a visual distraction overlay (progressive red saturation of the surgical field, timing personalized to the user's index performance), and then with an auditory distraction overlay (operating theater environment noise). Task completion time and instrument tracking metrics (instrument tip distance traveled and instrument smoothness) were measured. Results: Under control conditions, surgeons completed the task significantly faster, with greater economy of movement, and improved instrument smoothness-compared with students. When exposed to distracting stimuli, the groups behaved differently. Surgeons completed the task more slowly, instrument movements became less smooth (significantly so under audio distraction conditions), but total distance traveled by instruments was unchanged. By contrast, student performance was not impaired and, in some ways, improved. Conclusion: The impact of visual and auditory distraction on surgical performance can be modeled in a laparoscopic simulation environment. The effect of distraction varies according to expertise. This environment may be an effective setting within which to learn to mitigate stress-induced diminution in performance.