The Impact of Thoracentesis On Postprocedure Pulse Oximetry.

BACKGROUND: Although thoracentesis can offer considerable symptomatic relief to the patient, its physiologic impact on oxygen saturation has not been well established in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of thoracentesis on postprocedure pulse oximetry (SpO2) in an inpatient population. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing thoracentesis from January 2012 to November 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria were age above 18 and thoracentesis performed in an inpatient setting. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, procedure reports, and laboratory values. SpO2 and FiO2 values were collected before and 6 and 24 hours postprocedure. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate for changes in SpO2 and SpO2/FiO2. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, serum hemoglobin, effusion etiology, volume removed, nonexpandable lung physiology and procedural complications and FiO2. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 60 (14) years, and 53.4% of the patients were male. The most common cause of pleural effusion was malignant effusion (37%). The median (interquartile range) volume of fluid removed was 1400 (1000 to 2000) mL and nonexpandable lung physiology was noted in 35%. There was no significant within-subject difference in 24 hours postprocedure SpO2 compared with preprocedure SpO2. In multivariable analysis, there was a small increase in 24-hour postprocedure SpO2 [ß=0.31, 95% confidence interval (0.22, 0.41), P<0.01] and a similar small increase in 24-hour postprocedure SpO2/FiO2 [ß=0.84, 95% confidence interval: (0.68, 1.01), P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Among inpatients undergoing thoracentesis, there is no clinically significant change in SpO2 or SpO2/FiO2 at 24-hours post-procedure compared to pre-procedural SpO2 or SpO2/FiO2.

Utility of Flexible Bronchoscopic Cryobiopsy for Diagnosis of Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Initial reports of transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) suggest the diagnostic yield approaches that of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) with an excellent safety profile. Centers performing cryobiopsy differ significantly in procedure technique; an optimal technique minimizing complications but still capable of diagnosing a wide range of DPLDs has not been established. We evaluated our practice of flexible bronchoscopic cryobiopsy in a primarily outpatient setting for patients who required a tissue diagnosis for DPLD of uncertain etiology. METHODS: Consecutive patients with indeterminate DPLD who underwent bronchoscopic cryobiopsy at a large academic medical center from January 2012 to August 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Rates of confident histopathologic diagnosis, confident multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis, management change, and complications were determined. RESULTS: One hundred four cases were identified. Confident histopathologic diagnoses were established in 44% (46/104) and confident multidisciplinary consensus diagnoses in 68% (71/104). Usual interstitial pneumonia (19/104) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (22/104) were the most common histopathologic and consensus diagnoses, respectively. Five subjects proceeded to SLB after cryobiopsy which was diagnostic in 3. Results of cryobiopsies changed management in 70% (73/104). Complications occurred in 8 cases with no death. CONCLUSIONS: Cryobiopsy during outpatient flexible bronchoscopy facilitated confident multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis of DPLD in more than two thirds of cases, and appears sufficient to establish the histopathologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia, with a complication rate that compares favorably to that reported for SLB.