A framework to measure the wildness of managed large vertebrate populations.

As landscapes continue to fall under human influence through habitat loss and fragmentation, fencing is increasingly being used to mitigate anthropogenic threats and enhance the commercial value of wildlife. Subsequent intensification of management potentially erodes wildness by disembodying populations from landscape-level processes, thereby disconnecting species from natural selection. Tools are needed to measure the degree to which populations of large vertebrate species in formally protected and privately owned wildlife areas are self-sustaining and free to adapt. We devised a framework to measure such wildness based on 6 attributes relating to the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of vertebrates (space, disease and parasite resistance, exposure to predation, exposure to limitations and fluctuations of food and water supply, and reproduction). For each attribute, we set empirical, species-specific thresholds between 5 wildness states based on quantifiable management interventions. We analysed data from 205 private wildlife properties with management objectives spanning ecotourism to consumptive utilization to test the framework on 6 herbivore species representing a range of conservation statuses and commercial values. Wildness scores among species differed significantly, and the proportion of populations identified as wild ranged from 12% to 84%, which indicates the tool detected site-scale differences both among populations of different species and populations of the same species under different management regimes. By quantifying wildness, this framework provides practitioners with standardized measurement units that link biodiversity with the sustainable use of wildlife. Applications include informing species management plans at local scales; standardizing the inclusion of managed populations in red-list assessments; and providing a platform for certification and regulation of wildlife-based economies. Applying this framework may help embed wildness as a normative value in policy and mitigate the shifting baseline of what it means to truly conserve a species.

Un Marco de Trabajo para Medir el Estado Salvaje de Poblaciones de Vertebrados Mayores bajo Manejo Resumen Conforme los paisajes siguen cayendo bajo la influencia del humano por causa de la pérdida del hábitat y la fragmentación, cada vez se usa más el encercado para mitigar las amenazas antropogénicas o incrementar el valor comercial de la fauna. La intensificación subsecuente del manejo tiene el potencial para erosionar el estado salvaje al desincorporar a las poblaciones de los procesos a nivel de paisaje, desconectando así a las especies del proceso de selección natural. Por lo tanto, se necesitan herramientas para medir el grado al cual las poblaciones de especies de vertebrados mayores dentro de áreas de fauna protegidas y privadas son autosostenibles y libres de adaptarse. Diseñamos un marco de trabajo para medir dicho estado salvaje con base en seis atributos relacionados con las dinámicas evolutivas y ecológicas de los vertebrados (espacio, resistencia a las enfermedades y a los parásitos, exposición a la depredación, exposición a las limitaciones y fluctuaciones en las reservas de agua y alimentos, y reproducción). Para cada atributo, establecimos umbrales empíricos y específicos por especie entre cinco estados salvajes basados en las intervenciones de manejo cuantificables. Usamos datos de 205 propiedades privadas de fauna con objetivos de manejo que abarcan desde el ecoturismo hasta el uso para consumo para probar el marco de trabajo en seis especies de herbívoros con una gama de estados de conservación y valores comerciales. Los puntajes de estado salvaje entre las especies difirieron significativamente y la proporción de poblaciones identificadas como salvajes osciló del 12% al 84%, lo que indica que la herramienta detectó diferencias a escala de sitio entre las poblaciones de diferentes especies y las poblaciones de la misma especie bajo diferentes regímenes de manejo. Si cuantificamos el estado salvaje, este marco de trabajo les proporciona a los practicantes las unidades de medida estandarizadas que vinculan a la biodiversidad con el uso sostenible de la fauna. Las aplicaciones de este marco de trabajo incluyen informar a los planes de manejo de las especies a escalas locales; estandarizar la inclusión de las poblaciones manejadas en las evaluaciones de listas rojas; y proporcionar una plataforma para la certificación y regulación de las economías basadas en la fauna. La aplicación de este marco de trabajo puede ayudar a insertar a la fauna como un valor normativo dentro de la política y a mitigar la línea base cambiante de lo que significa conservar verdaderamente a una especie.

Underperformance of African protected area networks and the case for new conservation models: insights from Zambia.

Many African protected areas (PAs) are not functioning effectively. We reviewed the performance of Zambia's PA network and provide insights into how their effectiveness might be improved. Zambia's PAs are under-performing in ecological, economic and social terms. Reasons include: a) rapidly expanding human populations, poverty and open-access systems in Game Management Areas (GMAs) resulting in widespread bushmeat poaching and habitat encroachment; b) underfunding of the Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) resulting in inadequate law enforcement; c) reliance of ZAWA on extracting revenues from GMAs to cover operational costs which has prevented proper devolution of user-rights over wildlife to communities; d) on-going marginalization of communities from legal benefits from wildlife; e) under-development of the photo-tourism industry with the effect that earnings are limited to a fraction of the PA network; f) unfavourable terms and corruption which discourage good practice and adequate investment by hunting operators in GMAs; g) blurred responsibilities regarding anti-poaching in GMAs resulting in under-investment by all stakeholders. The combined effect of these challenges has been a major reduction in wildlife densities in most PAs and the loss of habitat in GMAs. Wildlife fares better in areas with investment from the private and/or NGO sector and where human settlement is absent. There is a need for: elevated government funding for ZAWA; greater international donor investment in protected area management; a shift in the role of ZAWA such that they focus primarily on national parks while facilitating the development of wildlife-based land uses by other stakeholders elsewhere; and new models for the functioning of GMAs based on joint-ventures between communities and the private and/or NGO sector. Such joint-ventures should provide defined communities with ownership of land, user-rights over wildlife and aim to attract long-term private/donor investment. These recommendations are relevant for many of the under-funded PAs occurring in other African countries.

The Zambian wildlife ranching industry: scale, associated benefits, and limitations affecting its development.

The number and area of wildlife ranches in Zambia increased from 30 and 1,420 km(2) in 1997 to 177 and ∼6,000 km(2) by 2012. Wild ungulate populations on wildlife ranches increased from 21,000 individuals in 1997 to ∼91,000 in 2012, while those in state protected areas declined steeply. Wildlife ranching and crocodile farming have a turnover of ∼USD15.7 million per annum, compared to USD16 million from the public game management areas which encompass an area 29 times larger. The wildlife ranching industry employs 1,200 people (excluding jobs created in support industries), with a further ∼1,000 individuals employed through crocodile farming. Wildlife ranches generate significant quantities of meat (295,000 kg/annum), of which 30,000 kg of meat accrues to local communities and 36,000 kg to staff. Projected economic returns from wildlife ranching ventures are high, with an estimated 20-year economic rate of return of 28%, indicating a strong case for government support for the sector. There is enormous scope for wildlife ranching in Zambia due to the availability of land, high diversity of wildlife and low potential for commercial livestock production. However, the Zambian wildlife ranching industry is small and following completion of field work for this study, there was evidence of a significant proportion of ranchers dropping out. The industry is performing poorly, due to inter alia: rampant commercial bushmeat poaching; failure of government to allocate outright ownership of wildlife to landowners; bureaucratic hurdles; perceived historical lack of support from the Zambia Wildlife Authority and government; a lack of a clear policy on wildlife ranching; and a ban on hunting on unfenced lands including game ranches. For the wildlife ranching industry to develop, these limitations need to be addressed decisively. These findings are likely to apply to other savanna countries with large areas of marginal land potentially suited to wildlife ranching.

Intra-pituitary administration revisited: development of a novel in vivo approach to investigate the ovine hypophysis.

The anterior pituitary gland regulates physiological processes via the secretion of hormones, which are under the control of factors produced either in the hypothalamus or the pituitary gland itself. Studies investigating how the pituitary gland functions have employed both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Although in vitro analysis has the advantage that it is pituitary specific, the results may be incomplete because the tissue is isolated from other physiological inputs that could affect function under natural conditions. Without vascular input, such studies are inherently of short duration. Conversely, in vivo experiments that rely upon systemic hormone injections require high doses, are non-target specific and the precise hormone concentrations reaching the pituitary gland are difficult to control. Intracerebroventricular hormone infusions are reliant on assumptions that factors are transported to the pituitary gland from the cerebrospinal fluid and are without cerebral effects. Here we describe an innovative method to investigate anterior pituitary function in conscious sheep by direct infusion of peptides into the pituitary tissue surrounding the hypophyseal portal blood vessels. This approach is an adaptation of the hypophyseal portal cannulation technique whereby an indwelling cannula provides direct access to the rostral aspect of the adenohypophysis. Peptide infusions were achieved by insertion of a needle through the implanted cannula such that it penetrated the pituitary. Using this technique, infusion of TRH (17 ng/1 µl/min for up to 6h) induced a sustained rise in systemic prolactin levels that lasted for the duration of the infusion.