Prediction of Vancomycin Levels Using Cystatin C in Overweight and Obese Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Hospitalized Patients.

The use of the kidney function biomarker cystatin C (cysC) can improve the accuracy of vancomycin dosing for target trough attainment in nonobese patients. It is unknown whether cysC can also improve vancomycin target trough attainment in overweight and obese patients. We conducted a retrospective observational study of overweight or obese hospitalized adults with stable renal function administered intravenous vancomycin between January 2011 and July 2019. Linear regression models were used to predict initial steady-state vancomycin troughs using several factors, including various cysC- and serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimates of kidney function. We compared the predicted proportion of patients within the target trough range (10 to 20 mg/liter) using the derived models to that observed from usual care. Of the 200 included patients, the mean trough level was 15 ± 6.3 mg/liter. The optimal model to predict the initial trough included both cysC and SCr (R2 = 0.48) rather than either biomarker alone. This model predicted that 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73% to 85%) of troughs could be between 10 and 20 mg/liter compared to the 62% observed in clinical practice (P < 0.001), a 1.3-fold increase. This study is the first to examine the role of cysC in predicting vancomycin levels in an exclusively overweight or obese population. While dosing models based on cysC appear promising in this setting, prospective validation is needed.

Comparable outcomes of outpatient remdesivir and sotrovimab among high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 during the omicron BA.1 surge.

Studies conducted prior to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron demonstrated that sotrovimab and remdesivir reduced hospitalization among high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. However, their effectiveness has not been directly compared. This study examined all high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received either remdesivir or sotrovimab at Mayo Clinic during the Omicron BA.1 surge from January to March 2022. COVID-19-related hospitalization or death within 28 days were compared between the two treatment groups. Among 3257 patients, 2158 received sotrovimab and 1099 received remdesivir. Patients treated with sotrovimab were younger and had lower comorbidity but were more likely to be immunocompromised than remdesivir-treated patients. The majority (89%) had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19-related hospitalization (1.5% and 1.0% in remdesivir and sotrovimab, respectively, p = .15) and mortality within 28 days (0.4% in both groups, p = .82) were similarly low. A propensity score weighted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the outcomes between the two groups. We demonstrated favorable outcomes that were not significantly different between patients treated with remdesivir or sotrovimab.

Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Serum creatinine (SCr) testing has been the mainstay of kidney function assessment for decades despite known limitations. Cystatin C (CysC) is an alternative biomarker that is generally less affected than SCr by pertinent non-renal factors in hospitalized patients, such as muscle mass. Despite its potential advantages, the adoption of CysC for inpatient care is not widespread. At one hospital with CysC testing, we demonstrated a significant rise in non-protocolized use over the last decade. This study uses qualitative methods to provide the first report of how clinicians understand, approach, and apply CysC testing in inpatient care. METHODS: Fifteen clinicians from various disciplines were interviewed about their experience with inpatient CysC testing. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Knowledge and confidence with CysC varied greatly. Clinicians reported first learning about the test from colleagues on consulting services or multidisciplinary teams. The majority believed CysC to provide a more accurate measure of kidney function than SCr. Common scenarios for CysC ordering included medication dosing, evaluation of acute kidney injury, and a thorough evaluation of kidney function in patients with risk factors for an altered SCr. Facilitators for ordering CysC included the availability of rapid results turnaround and the automated calculation of glomerular filtration rate based on the biomarker. Barriers to use included a lack of education about CysC, and the absence of an institutional protocol for use. DISCUSSION: Clinicians at our site decided independent of institutional guidance whether and when CysC added value to patient care. While the majority of study participants indicated advantages to rapid turnaround CysC testing, its use depended not just on the features of the specific case but on clinician familiarity and personal preference. Findings from this research can guide the implementation and expansion of CysC testing.

Cystatin C: A Primer for Pharmacists.

Pharmacists are at the forefront of dosing and monitoring medications eliminated by or toxic to the kidney. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications, accurate measurement of kidney function is paramount. The mainstay of kidney assessment for drug dosing and monitoring is serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimation equations. Yet, SCr has known limitations including its insensitivity to underlying changes in kidney function and the numerous non-kidney factors that are incompletely accounted for in equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a biomarker that can serve as an adjunct or alternative to SCr to evaluate kidney function for drug dosing. Pharmacists must be educated about the strengths and limitations of cysC prior to applying it to medication management. Not all patient populations have been studied and some evaluations demonstrated large variations in the relationship between cysC and GFR. Use of eGFR equations incorporating cysC should be reserved for drug management in scenarios with demonstrated outcomes, including to improve pharmacodynamic target attainment for antibiotics or reduce drug toxicity. This article provides an overview of cysC, discusses evidence around its use in medication dosing and in special populations, and describes practical considerations for application and implementation.

The Many Faces of Itraconazole Cardiac Toxicity.

Itraconazole is well known for carrying a black-box warning for new or worsening congestive heart failure. Single cases of other cardiac- and fluid-related disturbances have been reported periodically since its issuance. We describe a large cohort of patients on itraconazole experiencing a breadth of cardiac- and fluid-related toxicities, ranging from new-onset hypertension to cardiac arrest. A retrospective, single-center, large case series at a large tertiary medical center was conducted. Patients with itraconazole and cardiac toxicity-including hypertension, cardiomyopathy, reduced ejection fraction, and edema-in medical record between January 1, 1999, and May 21, 2019, were identified and assigned a Naranjo score; 31 patients were included with a Naranjo score of 5 or higher. There were slightly more male subjects than female subjects, average age was 66, and all subjects were Caucasian. Median time until presentation of adverse effects was 4 weeks (range: 0.3 to 104 weeks). Most common symptom was edema (74% of patients), followed by heart failure without and with preserved ejection fraction (19.4% and 22.6% of patients, respectively). Worsening or new hypertension was also common (25.8% of patients). Rarer were pulmonary edema, pericardial effusion, and cardiac arrest that occurred in 1 patient. In most cases, clinicians stopped itraconazole (74%) or decreased itraconazole dose (19%), resulting in improvement or resolution of symptoms. In 4 cases, the adverse effect did not resolve. Itraconazole can cause a range of possible serious cardiac and fluid-associated adverse events. Dose decrease or cessation usually resulted in symptomatic improvement or reversal.

Patterns of Cystatin C Uptake and Use Across and Within Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the use of cystatin C (cysC) across and within hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This 2-part study first evaluated access to cysC testing across 129 hospitals in the state of Minnesota, using a telephone-based survey. Second, granular data from a single center (Mayo Clinic) with on-site, rapid-turnaround testing (<1 day) and automated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting was used to describe temporal patterns. The characteristics of hospitals that offered cysC testing and of patients who underwent rapid cysC testing at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2018, were described. Poisson regression analyzed temporal trends in cysC testing. RESULTS: Of the 114 hospitals (88%) that responded to the statewide survey, cysC was available in 91 (80%), but only 3 of 91 (3%) reported a turnaround time of <1 day. At Mayo Clinic, cysC use increased from 0.74 tests per 1000 patient-days in 2011 to 14 tests per 1000 patient-days in 2018 (P=.004). Of the 3774 patients with cysC tests, the mean first available eGFR was 46 mL/min per 1.73 m2 using cysC and 59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 using serum creatinine (P<.001). CysC testing was used across all intensities of care and was ordered by a variety of specialties. Nephrology was consulted in only 42% of cases. CONCLUSION: In the hospital, rapid-turnaround cysC testing is necessary for practical use but was not widely available in Minnesota. When available, a marked increase in cysC testing was observed over the study timeframe. Additional research is needed to determine optimal strategies for implementation of cysC within hospitals.