Topical or intravenous administration of tranexamic acid accelerates wound healing.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate the morphological and histological effects of tranexamic acid (TA) on wound healing in a rat wound model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 adult male Wistar Albino rats were used in this study. All rats were simple randomly divided into three groups including eight rats in each group. A full-thickness skin defect was created on the back of the rats in all groups. Serum physiological (2 mL) was instilled saline drops after wound formation (control group). Wound was created and topical TA (0.12 to 0.15 mL [30 mg/kg]) was applied (local group). Intravenous TA (0.12 to 0.15 mL [30 mg/kg]) was applied intravenously before the wound was created (intravenous group). The wound diameters of the groups were photographed and measured on Days 0, 3, 7, 10, 14 and, at the end of Day 14, the rats were sacrificed and their histopathological results and wound diameters were compared. RESULTS: Fibroblast count values of the control group were found to be significantly lower than the local group (p=0.002), and no significant difference was observed between the local and intravenous groups (p>0.05). The collagen density (%) values of the control group were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.016 and p=0.044). Wound diameter values of the control group on Day 10 day were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001). In addition, the wound diameter values of the control group on Day 14 were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001 and p=0.0001). The wound diameter changes of the control group on Days 0-10 were found to be significantly lower than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001). In addition, the wound diameter changes of the control group on Days 0-14 were found to be lower than those of the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001 and p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of local or intravenous TA may have positive effects on the fibroblast count and wound contraction in a rat wound model.

Rifaximine spacer application is not superior to local teicoplanin treatment in a rat model of osteomyelitis.

OBJECTIVE: Acute and chronic osteomyelitis generally require long-term antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement. Implant-associated osteomyelitis, particularly from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, is difficult to treat. Rifaximin is an antibiotic derived from rifamycin which may be effective in the treatment of osteomyelitis in terms of its wide spectrum of action and pharmacological properties. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the local efficacy of rifaximin in rat models with MRSA and implant associated osteomyelitis. METHODS: This study was carried out with 40 adult Wistar albino rats. The rats were randomly divided into 4 equal groups with 10 rats in each. An implant related MRSA osteomyelitis was created in the right tibia metaphysis of each rat by Norden's experimental osteomyelitis model. After 4 weeks, the implants of each tibia were removed and debridement was applied. Group 1 was designed as control group and no other treatment was applied other than debridement. Bone cement without any antibiotic was applied to Group 2, bone cement with teicoplanin was applied to Group 3 and bone cement with rifaximin was applied to Group 4. After 4 weeks from the second surgery, euthanasia was performed to the rats and the clinical, histopathological and microbiological results were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in clinical scoring. A statistically significant difference was found between the histopathological scores of Group 1 and Group 2 and the histopathological scores of Groups 3 and 4; the histopathological scores of Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be higher than Group 3 and Group 4. When the pre-and post-treatment colony numbers were compared, although there was a statistically significant difference between Group 3 and Group 2, no statistically significant difference was found between Group 4 and Group 1 results. CONCLUSION: In spite of its wide spectrum, the local efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of osteomyelitis could not be demonstrated. This study shows the ability to shed light on some future comprehensive studies with the inclusion of infection markers.