RESUMO
PURPOSE: Testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with T deficiency who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer remains controversial. We aimed to assess the impact of TTh on biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates after RP in men with low-intermediate organ-confined disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included men who underwent an RP at our institution for organ-confined prostate cancer and had grade groups 1 to 3 on RP pathology. A Cox model was created for time to BCR with T use included as a time-dependent covariate, adjusted for age, preoperative PSA, grade group at RP, and the presence of comorbidities. A landmark analysis was used: Patients were included in the analysis if their last PSA in the 18 weeks postoperatively was undetectable and they had not had BCR or been lost to follow-up by that point, and follow-up for BCR began at 18 weeks. BCR was defined as a PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL after RP with a second confirmatory rise ≥ 0.1 ng/mL. RESULTS: The study population included 5199 men after RP, with 198 patients receiving T at any point after RP and 5001 not receiving T. The median age was 59 (IQR, 55-65) and 61 (IQR, 56-66) years, respectively. Men in the T group tended to present with more vascular comorbidities. For those receiving T, clomiphene citrate was prescribed in 49% of men, 32% received transdermal T, and 19% intramuscular T. We found a nonsignificantly decreased risk of BCR associated with the use of T after RP (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.48-1.46; P = .5), and overall rates of BCR were low, with probability of BCR at 5 years less than 2% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: TTh can be given to select men after RP. We found no evidence that administration of TTh after RP causes BCR.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intracavernosal injection therapy (ICI) is a well-established therapeutic strategy for men with erectile dysfunction. Complications are often related to patient error when performong ICI. AIM: The objective of this study was to examine patient errors in an established patient training program for performing ICI and identify factors that could predict major errors. METHODS: Patients enrolled in our ICI program are trained on technical aspects, and dose titration is begun. Patients are given explicit instructions during training, both verbally and in written form. Records were reviewed for men using ICI for ≥6 months. Multivariable analysis was used to define predictors of major errors. OUTCOMES: Errors were listed as minor (zero-response injection, penile bruising, expired medication) and major (errors potentially leading to priapism: dose self-titration, double injecting). RESULTS: Overall, 1368 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 66 ± 22 (range 29-91) years. Regarding education, 41% of patients had graduate-level education, 48% had college education, and 11% high school education. Mean follow-up was 3.2 ± 7.6 (range 0.5-12) years. The agents used were trimix (62%), bimix (35%), papaverine (2%), and prostaglandin E1 monotherapy (1%). At least 1 error occurred during self-administration in 42% of patients during their time in the program. Errors included zero response to medication due to technical error (8% of patients), penile bruising (34%), use of an expired bottle (18%), self-titration (5%), and double injecting (4% of patients); 12% of men committed ≥1 error during their time in the program. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of the occurrence of a major error included: young age, graduate-level education, and <12 months of injection use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported study to investigate ICI errors and risk factors. The identification of factors predictive of major errors allows for more tailored and intensive training in this subset of patients. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include a large patient population (1386 men) with a considerable follow-up time. Additionally, the rigorous training, education, and monitoring of the participants, as well as the use of formal definitions, enhances the accuracy and reliability of the results. Despite the strengths of the study, recall bias may be a limitation concern. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients were error free, and the majority of the errors were minor in nature. Major errors occurred in <10% of patients. Younger age, graduate-level education, and less experience with ICI were independent predictors of major errors.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Injeções , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Papaverina/administração & dosagem , Pênis/anatomia & histologia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , PriapismoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Access represents one of the main challenges in performing posterior urethroplasty (1, 2). Several approaches and tactics have been previously described (3). This video demonstrates the Anterior Sagittal Transrectal Approach (ASTRA), which allows better visualization of the deep perineum (4). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our patient was a 65-year-old man with post radical prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis. He failed repeated endoscopic interventions, eventually developing urinary retention and requiring a cystostomy. We offered a vesicourethral anastomotic repair through ASTRA. The patient was placed in the jackknife position and methylene blue instilled through the cystostomy. To optimize access to the bladder neck, an incision of the anterior border of the rectum is performed. Anastomosis is carried out with six 4-0 PDS sutures. These are tied using a parachute technique, after insertion of a 16F Foley. RESULTS: The patient was discharged after 72 hours, and the Foley catheter was removed after 4 weeks. There were no access-related complications. Retrograde urethrogram 3 months after surgery confirmed patency of the anastomosis. Upon review 5 months after surgery the patient had urinary incontinence requiring 5 pads/day and was considered for an artificial urinary sphincter. DISCUSSION: In our series of 92 patients who have undergone reconstructive procedure through ASTRA there have been no cases of fecal incontinence. Two patients with prior history of radiotherapy developed rectourethral fistulas. Urinary incontinence was observed in those patients with stenosis after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: This video presents a step-by-step description of ASTRA, an approach that provides excellent visualization to the posterior urethra, representing an alternative access for repair of complex posterior urethral stenosis.
Assuntos
Estreitamento Uretral , Incontinência Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Uretra/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: 68Ga prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) may be superior to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for localisation of prostate cancer tumour foci, however the concordance and differences between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI when applied to all biopsied patients and potential benefit in patients with negative mpMRI is unclear. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing mpMRI, prostate biopsy and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT over a 3-year period. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI were assessed using biopsy histopathology for the entire cohort and radical prostatectomy specimen in a subset of patients. Lesion concordance and additional detection of each modality were determined, including in a dedicated cohort of patients with mpMRI PIRADS 2 scans. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in the study. Index lesion/foci detection was similar between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI (sensitivity 83.1% vs 90.1%; p = 0.267), however lesions missed by mpMRI were larger (1.66 cm3 vs 0.72 cm3; p = 0.034). Lesion detection rates were similar across the biopsy histopathology and radical prostatectomy specimen subset, with a high concordance for index (80.1%) and a moderate concordance for total (67%) lesions between the 2 imaging modalities. The additional detection yield favoured 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT over mpMRI for index (13.5% vs 4.3%) and total (18.2% vs 5.4%) lesions; both modalities missed 2.1% and 12.3% of index and total lesions, respectively. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT identified 9 of 11 patients with PIRADS 2 mpMRI but subsequently diagnosed with Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high concordance rates, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT incrementally improved tumour localisation compared with mpMRI. These results suggest that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT may have an incremental value to that of mpMRI in the diagnostic process for prostate.
Assuntos
Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Neoplasias da Próstata , Biópsia , Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Isótopos de Gálio , Radioisótopos de Gálio , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Oligopeptídeos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends in the medical and surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) population data from 2000 to 2018. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Annual data was extracted from the MBS, PBS and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare databases for the years 2000-2018. Population-adjusted rates of BPH procedures and medical therapies were calculated and compared in relation to age. Cost analysis was performed to estimate financial burden due to BPH. RESULTS: Overall national hospital admissions due to BPH declined between 2000 and 2018, despite an increased proportion of admissions due to private procedures (42% vs 77%). Longitudinal trends in the medical management of BPH showed an increased prescription rate of dutasteride/tamsulosin combined therapy (111 vs 7649 per 100 000 men) and dutasteride monotherapy (149 vs 336 per 100 000 men) since their introduction to the PBS in 2011. Trends in BPH surgery showed an overall progressive increase in rate of total procedures between 2000 and 2018 (92 vs 133 per 100 000 men). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remained the most commonly performed surgical procedure, despite reduced utilisation since 2009 (118 vs 89 per 100 000 men), offset by a higher uptake of photoselective vaporisation of prostate, holmium:YAG laser enucleation of prostate, and later likely due to minimally invasive surgical therapies including prostatic urethral lift and ablative technologies (including Rezum™). Financial burden due to BPH surgery has remained steady since 2009, whilst the burden due to medical therapy has risen sharply. CONCLUSION: Despite reduced national BPH-related hospitalisations, overall treatment for BPH has increased due to medical therapy and surgical alternatives to TURP. Further exploration into motivators for particular therapies and effect of medical therapy on BPH progression in clinical practice outside of clinical trials is warranted.
Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Austrália , Cistoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dutasterida/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection by facilitating targeted biopsy (cognitive, fusion technology, or in-gantry MRI guidance) and reducing negative biopsies. This study sought to describe the feasibility of introducing an mpMRI-based triage pathway, including diagnostic performance, applicability to training, and cost analysis. METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients attending a large public tertiary referral training hospital who underwent mpMRI for suspicion of prostate cancer was considered. Standard clinical, MRI-related, histopathological, and financial parameters were collected for analysis of biopsy avoidance, diagnostic accuracy of biopsy approach, and operator (consultant and resident/registrar) and logistical (including financial) feasibility. RESULTS: 653 men underwent mpMRI, of which 344 underwent prostate biopsy resulting in a 47% biopsy avoidance rate. Overall, 240 (69.8%) patients were diagnosed with PCa, of which 208 (60.5%) were clinically significant, with higher rates of csPCa observed for higher PIRADS scores. In patients who underwent both systematic and targeted biopsy (stTPB), targeted cores detected csPCa in 12.7% and 16.6% in more men than systematic cores in PIRADS 5 and 4, respectively, whereas systematic cores detected csPCa in 5% and 3.2% of patients, where targeted cores did not. A high standard of performance was maintained across the study period and the approach was shown to be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Introdution of an mpMRI-based triage system into a large public tertiary teaching hospital is feasible, cost effective and leads to high rates of prostate cancer diagnosis while reducing unnecessary biopsies and detection of insignificant PCa.
Assuntos
Hospitais Públicos , Hospitais de Ensino , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Triagem/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize national clinical practice trends in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) in Australia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Population-level data were extracted from existing Medicare Benefits Schedule data for radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (2002-2016), as well as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 2012-2016). Treatment rates were calculated relative to whole and PCa populations among privately treated patients. Overall age-related and geographical trends were analysed. RESULTS: The use of RP and low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy increased between 2002 and 2009, but subsequently decreased to 124 and 6.9 per 100 000 men, respectively, in 2016. More dramatic decreases were observed for men aged <65 years. From 2012, rates of RP (15% drop) and LDR brachytherapy (58% drop) decreased, while the use of EBRT remained steady, falling by 5% to 42 per 100 000 men in 2016. Overall treatment increased in the age group 75-84 years, with the rate of RP increasing by 108%. CONCLUSION: National claims data indicate there has been a reduction in PCa treatment since 2009, which is mostly attributable to a reduction in the treatment of younger patients and reduced use of brachytherapy. RP is most commonly used and its use is rising in men aged >65 years.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous trials have found similar early outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy. We report functional and oncological postoperative outcomes up to 24 months after surgery for these two surgical techniques. METHODS: In this randomised controlled phase 3 study, men who had newly diagnosed clinically localised prostate cancer and who had chosen surgery as their treatment approach, and were aged between 35 years and 70 years were eligible and recruited from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (Brisbane, QLD, Australia). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to have either robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy or open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Randomisation was computer generated and occurred in blocks of ten. This was an open trial; however, study investigators involved in data analysis were masked to each patient's surgical treatment. Primary outcomes were urinary function (urinary domain of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]) and sexual function (sexual domain of EPIC and International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire [IIEF]) at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months and oncological outcome (biochemical recurrence and imaging evidence of progression). The trial was powered to assess health-related and domain-specific quality-of-life outcomes over 24 months. All analyses were done on a per-protocol basis. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12611000661976. FINDINGS: Between Aug 23, 2010, and Nov 25, 2014, 326 men were enrolled, of whom 163 were randomly assigned to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and 163 to open radical retropubic prostatectomy. 18 withdrew (12 assigned to radical retropubic prostatectomy and six assigned to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy); thus, 151 in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 157 in the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group proceeded to surgery. At the 24-month follow-up time point, 150 men remained in the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group and 146 remained in the open radical retropubic prostatectomy group. Urinary function scores did not differ significantly between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy at 6 months post-surgery (88·68 [95% CI 86·79-90·58] vs 88·45 [86·54-90·36]; p1<0·0001, p2<0·0001), 12 months post-surgery (90·76 [88·89-92·62] vs 91·53 [90·07-92·98]; p1<0·0001, p2<0·0001), or 24 months post-surgery (91·33 [89·64-93·03] vs 90·86 [89·01-92·70]; p1<0·0001, p2<0·0001). Sexual function scores were not significantly different between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy at 6 months post-surgery (EPIC: 37·40 [33·60-41·19] vs 38·63 [34·76-42·49], p1=0·0001, p2<0·0001; IIEF: 29·75 [26·66-32·84] vs 29·78 [26·41-33·16], p1<0·0001, p2<0·0001), 12 months post-surgery (EPIC: 42·28 [38·05-46·51] vs 42·51 [38·29-46·72], p1<0·0001, p2<0·0001; IIEF: 33·10 [29·59-36·61] vs 33·50 [29·87-37·13], p1=0·0002, p2<0·0001), or 24 months post-surgery (EPIC: 45·70 [41·17-50·23] vs 46·90 [42·20-51·60], p1=0·0003, p2<0·0001; IIEF: 33·95 [30·11-37·78] vs 33·89 [29·82-37·96], p1=0·0003, p2=0·0004). Equivalence testing on the difference between the proportion of biochemical recurrences between the two groups (13 [9%] in the open radical retropubic prostatectomy group vs four [3%] in the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group) showed that equality between the two techniques could not be established based on a 90% CI with a prespecified margin of 10%. However, a superiority test showed that the two proportions were significantly different (p=0·0199). Equivalence testing on the proportion of patients who had imaging evidence of progression revealed that the two groups were not significantly different (p=0·2956). INTERPRETATION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy yielded similar functional outcomes at 24 months. We advise caution in interpreting the oncological outcomes of our study because of the absence of standardisation in postoperative management between the two trial groups and the use of additional cancer treatments. Clinicians and patients should view the benefits of a robotic approach as being largely related to its minimally invasive nature. FUNDING: Cancer Council Queensland.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of prostatic zone tumor origin on pathological prognostic features and subsequent biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7,051 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between September 1998 and December 2016 in Western Australia were divided into a high grade group, defined as Gleason sum 4 + 3, 8 and 9 or greater and ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) groups 3, 4 and 5, and a low grade group, defined as Gleason sum 6 or less and 3 + 4, and ISUP groups 1 and 2. The t-test and the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences between transition zone and peripheral/central zone cancer. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test was used to determine differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years in patients with high grade disease. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed. Model calibration was determined by the internal validation method. RESULTS: High grade transition zone cancer was associated with significantly increased prostate specific antigen, tumor volume and incidence of positive surgical margins but a lower incidence of intraductal carcinoma, extraprostatic spread, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Patients with low grade prostate cancer had excellent biochemical recurrence-free survival regardless of tumor origin. The high grade multivariable model had a c-index of 0.78 and improved predictive accuracy, particularly for high grade transition zone disease. CONCLUSIONS: Transition zone tumor origin independently and positively impacts biochemical outcomes of high grade prostate cancer. A high grade postoperative prognostic model including transition zone tumor origin as an independent predictor was developed and predictive accuracy was significantly improved in patients with high grade, transition zone disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A male factor contributes to infertility in approximately 50% of couples who fail to conceive, causing significant psychosocial and marital stress. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the general practitioner's (GP's) evaluation of male infertility and indications for referral to a male infertility specialist, and gives an overview of the specialist management of male infertility. DISCUSSION: Male infertility can result from anatomical or genetic abnormalities, systemic or neurological diseases, infections, trauma, iatrogenic injury, gonadotoxins and development of sperm antibodies. When a couple fails to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse, a screening evaluation of both partners is essential. For the male partner this includes history, physical examination, endocrine assessment and semen analysis. Several lifestyle and environmental factors can have a negative impact on male fertility, and the GP has a pivotal role in educating patients about modifiable factors.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Doenças do Sistema Endócrino/complicações , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico/métodos , Análise do Sêmen/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Penile revascularization (PR) is a potentially curative procedure for young men with isolated arteriogenic erectile dysfunction. Standard preoperative evaluation is erectile hemodynamics (HDX) using duplex Doppler penile ultrasound (DUS) and/or cavernosometry (DIC) and assessment of cavernosal arterial anatomy by selective internal pudendal arteriography (SIPA). AIM: The aim of this study was to review our experience with men who sought a second opinion from us regarding their candidacy for PR. METHOD: Study population consisted of men (i) who presented to us for a second opinion regarding PR; (ii) who had DUS/DIC and SIPA; and (iii) had been advised by outside surgeon to undergo PR. Review of the HDX study and SIPA was conducted. Discrepancies between these studies resulted in repeating the DIC in men with normal SIPA or repeating the SIPA in men with normal HDX studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrepancies between HDX and SIPA and the results of repeat HDX or SIPA were the main outcome measures. RESULT: Forty-five patients participated in the study; mean age was 33 years with 4% ≥50 years old. Median vascular risk factor number was 1 (ranged 0-3). A credible trauma history was present in 11%. Thirty-three percent had prior DIC and 49% of patients had a significant discrepancy between HDX study and SIPA, including all patients seen by a community urologist. Thirty-eight percent had a discrepancy between side of abnormality on HDX and SIPA where both studies were abnormal (group A). Seven percent had abnormal HDX and normal SIPA (group B). Four percent had a normal HDX study with an abnormal SIPA (group C). Repeat DIC (n = 20) was conducted in groups A + B and was normal in 70% of cases. Repeat SIPA (n = 2) was conducted in group C and was normal in both patients. CONCLUSION: Almost one half of patients had a significant discrepancy between HDX and SIPA. Of these, 73% had normal repeat studies, making them no longer candidates for penile revascularization.
Assuntos
Impotência Vasculogênica/cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Ereção Peniana , Pênis/irrigação sanguínea , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Multiparametric MRI and the transperineal approach have become standard in the diagnostic pathway for suspected prostate cancer. Targeting of MRI lesions is performed at most centers, but the routine use of systematic cores is controversial. We aim to assess the value of obtaining systematic cores in patients undergoing cognitive fusion targeted double-freehand transperineal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent a cognitive fusion, freehand TPB at a single tertiary urology service (Perth, Australia) between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they were biopsy naive and had a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, based on their mpMRI results. Both targeted and systematic cores were taken at the time of their biopsy. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients suited the selection criteria. Clinically significant cancer was identified in 63% of patients. Of those that had clinically significant cancer, the target lesion identified 91% of the disease, missing 9% of patients whom the target biopsy detected non-clinically significant cancer but was identified in the systematic cores. Higher PI-RADS category patients were also found to be associated with an increasing likelihood of identifying clinically significant cancer within the target. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PI-RADS 3 and higher, the target biopsy can miss up to 9% of clinically significant cancer. Systematic cores can add value as they can also change management by identifying a high-risk disease where only intermediate cancer was identified in the target. A combination of targeted and systematic cores is still required to detect cancer.
Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética MultiparamétricaRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.007.].
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy is affected by surgical technique and patient factors. Age and preoperative erectile function are the 2 patient factors that have been consistently shown to impact postoperative erectile function. The presence of vascular risk factors preoperatively seems to negatively impact erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy independently from age, preoperative erectile function and surgical technique. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether vascular risk factors (VRFs) affect erectile function (EF) recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our prospective database we identified patients with clinically localised prostate cancer who had undergone RP and had preoperative information on EF and VRFs (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease [CAD], and cigarette smoking), surgeon-graded nerve-sparing status, and EF data collected between 24 and 30 months after RP. RESULTS: In all, 984 patients were included in the analyses. The frequency of the VRFs was as follows: hypertension (38%), hypercholesterolaemia (36%), diabetes mellitus (7%), CAD (5%), and cigarette smoking (37%). On univariate analysis, EF between 24 and 30 months was associated with age (r = 0.37, P < 0.001), EF before RP (r = 0.41, P < 0.001), NSS (r = 0.35, P < 0.001), and VRFs (0-2 vs >3 VRFs; r = 0.15, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis all variables remained statistically significant, and accounted for 28% of the total variance in EF between 24 and 30 months after RP. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of VRFs seems to adversely affect EF recovery after RP independently of other factors. This observation might be useful for improving patient counselling before treatment and to support the development of new treatment strategies for erectile dysfunction after RP.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Vasculares/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Austrália , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Ereção Peniana/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Erection hardness has been shown to correlate with increased self-confidence, sexual satisfaction, and improvement in psychosocial factors such as sexual and overall relationship. It is estimated that one-third of men using phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5) cease use of medication after one prescription and one-half cease use by 6 months. AIM: This study was undertaken to explore the link between erection hardness and treatment adherence. METHODS: Men presenting with erectile dysfunction (ED) who were candidates for PDE5 therapy constituted the study population. They were assessed at the baseline regarding their erectile function (EF) and rigidity using autoquestionnaires. Patients then received regular follow-up using the same assessment tools and were also asked about continued use of PDE5. The final patient assessment was conducted at a time point no sooner than 12 months after commencing PDE5. Multivariable analysis was conducted to define predictors of continued PDE5 use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Adherence was defined as continued use of PDE5 at least once per month. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six men were analyzed. The mean age and the duration of ED were 61 ± 22 and 2.2 ± 2.9 years, respectively. Sixty-three percent were married or partnered. The mean partner age was 52 ± 8 years. Of the 186 patients, 32% had one vascular comorbidity, 34% had two vascular comorbidities, 26% had three vascular comorbidities, and 6% had ≥ 4 vascular comorbidities. All patients were treated with sildenafil and were sexually active. The mean time to end-of-treatment (EOT) interview and repeat completion of questionnaires was 17 ± 4 months. At the baseline, 26% were EHS 3 (mild ED), 42% were EHS 2 (moderate ED), and 32% were EHS 1 (severe ED). The mean baseline EF domain score was 14 ± 10, and at the EOT, it was 22 ± 5 (P < 0.01). At the follow-up interview, 4% were EHS 1, 12% were EHS 2, 28% were EHS 3, and 56% were EHS 4. Overall, 67% of the men continued to use PDE5 at follow-up. The distribution of patients continuing to use PDE5 after commencement was 15% of those achieving EHS 1, 30% for EHS 2, 66% for EHS 3, and 82% for EHS 4. Based on logistic regression analysis, the factors predictive of continued PDE5 use were being partnered, partner age, frequency of sexual activity, a shift of ≥ 2 points on the EHS, and reaching level 4 on the EHS scale. CONCLUSION: There is an excellent relationship between erection hardness and adherence to PDE5 treatment. Driving men to greater erectile rigidity appears to translate into lower dropout rates.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Ereção Peniana/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Sulfonas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Disfunção Erétil/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana/psicologia , Satisfação Pessoal , Purinas/uso terapêutico , Autoimagem , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais , Citrato de Sildenafila , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Here we present two cases of post-operative obstructive renal failure following major abdomino-pelvic sarcoma surgery. In both cases, prophylactic ureteric stents were inserted to aid the identification and protection of the ureters during resection of these complex retroperitoneal masses. In case one, obstructive renal failure occurred following ureteric stent removal on day 0 post-operatively. In case two, obstructive renal failure developed on day 1 post-operatively despite having a ureteric stent in situ. Here we propose that a combination of reflex anuria/ureteric edema and papillary sloughing led to the obstructive renal failure in both cases. Re-insertion of bilateral ureteric stents in case one, and replacement of a right ureteric stent in case two saw prompt excretion of urine and sloughy debris with rapid improvement of renal function. This article presents these cases in detail and further reviews the use of prophylactic ureteric stents in major abdomino-pelvic surgery along with the current guidelines for their usage.
RESUMO
In contemporary urological practice periurethral abscesses are rare. We report the case of a 61-year-old presenting with a painless penile mass and urinary retention. He underwent imaging with ultrasonography, targeted antibiotics and successful source control through open incision and drainage. He has been symptom, recurrence and complication free at 24 months post intervention. Risk factors for abscesses include obstruction, trauma, urethral diverticula and urethral carcinoma. Inadequate detection and treatment may lead to urethral fistulae, strictures and rarely, necrotizing fasciitis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a periurethral abscess presenting as a painless penile mass causing urinary retention.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: ⢠To compare the influence of a 4-week course of empirical antimicrobial therapy or observation on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of asymptomatic patients with a raised baseline PSA. ⢠To identify whether a decrease in PSA can predict the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) detection on prostate biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ⢠Patients were referred to our ambulatory centre because of a raised PSA level (>2.5 ng/mL) with a normal digital rectal examination. A 12-core prostate biopsy was indicated in these patients and they were offered antibiotic treatment with levofloxacin 500 mg daily for 30 days. ⢠Patients who did not agree to use antibiotics but who still showed interest in participating underwent simple observation, serving as controls. ⢠Total and free PSA levels at baseline and after 45 days were measured. Variation in PSA level was calculated. ⢠All patients underwent a 12-core prostate biopsy 6 weeks after the initial visit. RESULTS: ⢠In all, 245 men were enrolled, but 43 were lost due to follow-up. A total of 145 patients who used antibiotics and 57 controls were included in the analysis. ⢠The median baseline PSA levels were 7.6 and 7.7 ng/mL in the antibiotic and control groups, respectively, with median follow-up levels of 6.8 and 7.0 ng/mL. The follow-up PSA level was significantly lower than the initial PSA level (P = 0.009). ⢠Mean absolute and percentage variation in PSA level were similar in both groups (P = 0.828 and 0.128, respectively). ⢠The overall PCa detection rate was 15.8%, and did not differ among the groups (P = 0.203). Regarding the percentage variation in PSA level, patients diagnosed with PCa tended to have their PSA level increased (22.4 vs -5.3%; P = 0.001). Indeed, a decrease of 20% in PSA was not predictive of a negative prostate biopsy (P = 0.41). ⢠The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for percentage PSA variation as a predictor of PCa was 0.660. CONCLUSIONS: ⢠PSA levels tend to fall when repeated after 45 days, regardless of antibiotic use. ⢠Despite being associated with the chance of PCa, no percentage PSA variation threshold value exhibits satisfactory discriminatory properties.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite a growing body of evidence supporting erectile function (EF) rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy (RP), there are no guidelines on this subject. AIM: To explore EF rehabilitation practice patterns of American Urological Association (AUA) urologists. METHODS: A 35-question instrument was constructed assessing physician demographics, training, and EF rehabilitation practices after RP, and was e-mailed to AUA members by the AUA Office of Education. Data were acquired by the AUA and analyzed by the investigators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of responders who recommend EF rehabilitation practices following RP, characterization of prevalent rehabilitation practices. RESULTS: Of the 618 urologists who completed the survey, 71% were in private practice, 28% considered themselves as sexual medicine specialists, although only 4% were fellowship-trained, 43% were urologic oncology specialists (14% fellowship-trained), 86% performed RP, and 86% of responders recommended rehabilitation practices. Being a sexual medicine or a urologic oncology specialist was not predictive of rehabilitation employment. Forty-three percent rehabilitate all patients, 57% only selected patients. Selection for rehabilitation was dependent upon preop EF by 66%, nerve-sparing status by 22%, and age by 5%. Eleven percent started rehab immediately after RP, 97% within 4 months. 24%, 45% and 18% ceased rehab at <12, 12-18, and 18-24 months, respectively. Eighty-nine percent of RP surgeons performed rehabilitation vs. only 66% who do not perform RP (P < 0.0001). Eighty-seven percent prefer phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) as their primary strategy followed (in order) by vacuum erection device (VED), intracavernosal injection (ICI), and urethral suppositories. CONCLUSIONS: Among the respondents, penile rehabilitation is a common practice. Urologic oncologists and RP surgeons are more likely to use rehabilitation practices. The most commonly employed strategy is regular PDE5i use for 12-18 months after RP. .
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/reabilitação , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Prática Profissional , UrologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: As a vascular test, dynamic infusion cavernosometry (DIC) has lost popularity, and in the urologic community, penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (DUS) has become the sole test to investigate a vascular etiology of erectile dysfunction. Vasoactive agent redosing has been shown to increase the accuracy of DUS. AIM: To define the erectile hemodynamics in men with previously diagnosed venous leak on DUS. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on patients who (i) had been given a diagnosis of venous leak based on an outside DUS; (ii) elected to undergo a repeat DUS; and (iii) when the repeat DUS suggested venous leak, underwent DIC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: DUS: peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity. DIC: flow to maintain. RESULTS: 292 patients were included. Mean ± standard deviation age was 44 ± 26 years. On repeat DUS, 19% (56/292) had completely normal hemodynamics and 7% (20/292) had arterial insufficiency only without venous leak. DIC revealed normal hemodynamics in 13% (38/292), while in 58% (152/292) of patients, the venous leak diagnosis was confirmed. Overall, 47% (137/292) of patients who had been given a diagnosis of venous leak had completely normal hemodynamics, and in only 43% (126/292), the venous leak diagnosis was confirmed upon repeat vascular testing. On multivariable analysis, younger age (<45 years), failure to obtain an adequate erection during the original DUS, and having <2 vascular risk factors were predictive of a false diagnosis of venous leak. CONCLUSIONS: Penile DUS has a propensity to inaccurately assign a diagnosis of venous leak. Great care should be taken when performing DUS especially in younger men without a significant vascular risk factor history, and the failure to obtain a good erection should make the clinician cautious in assigning a diagnosis of venous leak. Furthermore, there still exists a role for cavernosometry, which appears to have a greater accuracy at diagnosing venous leak.