Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 13(9): 1111-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26358795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival after rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, availability of this parameter is essential. Although the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial raised awareness about CRM in the late 1990s, quality assurance on pathologic reporting was not available until the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) started in 2009. The present study describes the rates of CRM reporting and involvement since the start of the DSCA and analyzes whether improvement of these parameters can be attributed to the audit. METHODS: Data from the DSCA (2009-2013) were analyzed. Reporting of CRM and CRM involvement was plotted for successive years, and variations of these parameters were analyzed in a funnelplot. Predictors of CRM involvement were determined in univariable analysis and the independent influence of year of registration on CRM involvement was analyzed in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 12,669 patients were included for analysis. The mean percentage of patients with a reported CRM increased from 52.7% to 94.2% (2009-2013) and interhospital variation decreased. The percentage of patients with CRM involvement decreased from 14.2% to 5.6%. In multivariable analysis, the year of DSCA registration remained a significant predictor of CRM involvement. CONCLUSIONS: After the introduction of the DSCA, a dramatic improvement in CRM reporting and a major decrease of CRM involvement after rectal cancer surgery have occurred. This study suggests that a national quality assurance program has been the driving force behind these achievements.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/cirurgia , Documentação/tendências , Auditoria Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinoma/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/normas , Documentação/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Países Baixos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Carga Tumoral
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 109(6): 567-73, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mortality following severe complications (failure-to-rescue, FTR) is targeted in surgical quality improvement projects. Rates may differ between colon- and rectal cancer resections. METHODS: Analysis of patients undergoing elective colon and rectal cancer resections registered in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit in 2011-2012. Severe complication- and FTR rates were compared between the groups in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Colon cancer (CC) patients (n = 10,184) were older and had more comorbidity. Rectal cancer (RC) patients (n = 4,906) less often received an anastomosis and had more diverting stomas. Complication rates were higher in RC patients (24.8% vs. 18.3%, P < 0.001). However, FTR rates were higher in CC patients (18.6% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001). Particularly, FTR associated with anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, and infections was higher in CC patients. Adjusted for casemix, CC patients had a twofold risk of FTR compared to RC patients (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.06-3.37). CONCLUSIONS: Severe complication rates were lower in CC patients than in RC patients; however, the risk of dying following a severe complication was twice as high in CC patients, regardless of differences in characteristics between the groups. Efforts should be made to improve recognition and management of postoperative (non-)surgical complications, especially in colon cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Auditoria Clínica , Colectomia/métodos , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estomas Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1672023 10 11.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37850627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain in the lower abdomen is a common complaint with an extensive differential diagnosis. After childbirth, an ovarian vein thrombosis (OVT) needs to be considered as well. This is a relatively rare condition characterized by abdominal pain with fever. However, due to the non-specific symptoms, the diagnosis is often missed. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 26-year old woman, four days after delivery, presented with acute abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Blood results showed leukocytosis (10.8 x 109 mL) and an elevated CRP (138 mg/L). Ultrasound showed a tubular structure with fat infiltration, most likely due to appendicitis. Laparoscopy was performed, which revealed an appendix sana. Postoperative CT-abdomen showed an OVT, as an explanation of complaints. CONCLUSION: An OVT is an uncommon thrombotic complication in childbirth. Since clinical presentation can mimic that of appendicitis, specific attention for OVT is necessary for adequate diagnosis and prompt treatment of female patients with abdominal pain after delivery.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Trombose , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Apendicite/complicações , Ovário , Período Pós-Parto , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/complicações
4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 59(1): 92-99, 2021 01 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728711

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Quality assessment is an important element in providing surgical cancer care. The main objective of this study was to develop a new composite measure 'textbook outcome', to evaluate and improve quality of surgical care for patients undergoing a resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: All patients undergoing an anatomical resection for NSCLC from 2012 to 2016 registered in the nationwide Dutch Lung Cancer Audit were included in an analysis to assess usefulness of a composite measure as a quality indicator. Based on expert opinion, textbook outcome was defined as having a complete resection (negative resection margins and sufficient lymph node dissection), plus no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, no reintervention in 30 days, no readmission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged hospital stay (<14 days), no hospital readmission after discharge and no major complications. The percentage of patients with a textbook outcome was calculated per hospital. Between-hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed using case-mix adjustment models. RESULTS: In total, 5513 patients were included in this study. Textbook outcome was achieved in 26.4% of patients. Insufficient lymph node dissection had the most substantial effect on not realizing textbook outcome. If 'sufficient lymph node dissection' was not included as a criterion, textbook outcome would be 60.7%. Case-mix adjusted textbook outcome proportions per hospitals varied between 13.2% and 37.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to focusing on a single aspect, the composite measure textbook outcome provides insight into comprehensive performance in NSCLC surgery. It can be used to evaluate both individual hospitals and national performance and provides the opportunity to give benchmarked feedback to thoracic surgeons.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Hospitais , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Risco Ajustado
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA