Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 226(6): 1052-1056, 2022 09 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Published data regarding long-lasting immunological rabies memory after pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are scarce. We tested the hypothesis that rabies booster immunization elicits rapid anamnestic responses. METHODS: For this observational study, we included participants who had received PrEP 10-24 years before inclusion. We measured rabies antibody titers before, and on days 3, 7, and 14 after a single intramuscular booster. RESULTS: All 28 participants responded adequately regardless of route of administration or 2-dose vs 3-dose PrEP regimen. CONCLUSION: Rabies immunological memory is reactivated within 7 days after a single intramuscular booster immunization, even when administered 10-24 years after PrEP.


Assuntos
Vacina Antirrábica , Vírus da Raiva , Raiva , Anticorpos Antivirais , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Injeções Intradérmicas , Injeções Intramusculares , Memória de Longo Prazo , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(5): 797-804, 2019 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566636

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective and safe single-visit rabies vaccination for pre- and postexposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) could substantially simplify rabies prevention and therefore increase compliance. METHODS: In a comparative trial, 303 healthy adults received a primary vaccination that consisted of 2 intradermal (ID) doses of 0.1 mL of the purified chicken embryo cell vaccine (PCEV) during a single visit. One year later, participants were randomly assigned to receive either 4 or 2 ID PEP booster doses of 0.1 mL PCEV during a single visit. The primary endpoint for immunogenicity was the percentage of participants with an adequate antibody level (>0.5 IU/mL) 7 days after the booster doses. The safety endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed adverse events (AEs) following primary and/or booster vaccination. RESULTS: All participants, except 1 (99.3%) in each study group, had a rabies antibody titer >0.5 IU/mL on day 7 following the booster schedules. Participants exposed to the 4-dose PEP schedule had a geometric mean titer of 20 IU/mL vs 14 IU/mL for the 2-dose PEP schedule (P = .0228). Local reactions at the injection site following PrEP and PEP were mild and transient and only seen in 14.9% and 49.6%-53% of the participants, respectively. No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adults, a 2-dose (2 × 0.1 mL) single-visit ID PEP schedule was as immunologically adequate and safe as a 4-dose (4 × 0.1 mL) single-visit PEP schedule 7 to 28 months following a 2-dose (2 × 0.1 mL) single-visit ID PREP. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2014-00183612.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Injeções Intradérmicas , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Wildl Dis ; 2024 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754866

RESUMO

Canine distemper has been observed infrequently in Belgian wildlife, mainly stone martens (Martes foina) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). This report describes an outbreak in the Brussels urban red fox population, characterized by its high density. The identified virus matched those within a cluster of viruses found previously in red foxes in Germany. Different canine distemper virus (CDV) strains, found in Belgian wild carnivores, share relationships with viruses found farther east. This and other reports indicate an endemic distribution of CDV in wild carnivores in Europe whereby the complex interplay of population density, group immunity, and infection of metapopulations determines the pattern of spatiotemporally alternating outbreaks.

4.
J Travel Med ; 30(2)2023 04 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36477981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For immunocompromised patients (ICPs), administration of rabies immunoglobulins (RIG) after exposure is still recommended regardless of prior vaccination, due to a lack of data. We aimed to assess the 1-year boostability of a three-dose rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) schedule in individuals using immunosuppressive monotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective study, individuals on immunosuppressive monotherapy with a conventional immunomodulator (cIM) or a TNF-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) for a chronic inflammatory disease received a three-dose intramuscular PrEP schedule (days 0,7,21-28) with 1 mL Rabipur®, followed by a two-dose simulated post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) schedule (days 0,3) after 12 months. Rabies neutralizing antibodies were assessed at baseline, on day 21-28 (before the third PrEP dose), day 60, month 12 and month 12 + 7 days. The primary outcome was 1-year boostability, defined as the proportion of patients with a neutralizing antibody titre of ≥ 0.5 IU/mL at month 12 + 7 days. Secondary outcomes were geometric mean titres (GMTs) and factors associated with the primary endpoint. RESULTS: We included 56 individuals, of whom 52 completed the study. The 1-year boostability was 90% (47/52) with a GMT of 6.16 (95% CI 3.83-9.91). All participants seroconverted at some point in the study. Early response to PrEP (at day 21-28) was significantly associated with 100% boostability (Odds Ratio 51; 95% confidence interval [5.0-6956], P < 0.01). The vaccination schedule was safe and well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In patients using immunosuppressive monotherapy, a three-dose rabies PrEP schedule followed by a two-dose PEP schedule is immunogenic, with all patients seroconverting at some point in the study. Although boostability 7 days after PEP was not 100%, nobody would wrongly be denied RIG when only administered to those who responded early to PrEP while reducing the administration of RIG by 73%.


Assuntos
Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica , Raiva , Humanos , Adulto , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Anticorpos Antivirais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Imunossupressores , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Esquemas de Imunização
5.
Parasit Vectors ; 15(1): 27, 2022 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35057826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A number of tick-borne pathogens circulate in the Belgian tick population in addition to the causative agent of Lyme borreliosis. However, so far, only a few patients with tick-borne diseases other than Lyme borreliosis have been reported in Belgium. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of other human tick-borne infections in Belgium and their possible clinical manifestation. METHODS: Patients with fever (> 37.5 °C) after a tick bite or those with erythema migrans (EM) were included in the study. EDTA-blood samples were screened for the presence of DNA from Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Neoehrlichia mikurensis, spotted fever group rickettsiae (genus Rickettsia), Babesia spp., Bartonella spp., Spiroplasma ixodetis and tick-borne encephalitis virus, using multiplex PCR methods. A questionnaire on, among others, demographics and clinical symptoms, was also filled in. RESULTS: Over a period of 3 years, 119 patients with EM and 14 patients with fever after a recent tick bite were enrolled in the study. Three samples initially tested positive for N. mikurensis by quantitative PCR (qPCR), but the results could not be confirmed by other PCR methods, and repetition of the DNA extraction procedure and qPCR test was not successful. The qPCR test results for the other tick-borne pathogens were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In general, only a few patients with fever after a tick bite could be identified. Although no tick-borne pathogens were detected, their occurrence cannot be excluded based on the limited number of patients and the limitations inherent to current methodologies. This study underscores the possibility of false-positive PCR results and the necessity for the development of multiple independent tools for the sensitive and specific detection of emerging tick-borne pathogens.


Assuntos
Eritema/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos/sangue , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos/epidemiologia , Carrapatos/microbiologia , Carrapatos/parasitologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Babesia/genética , Babesia/patogenicidade , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Borrelia/genética , Borrelia/patogenicidade , Eritema/classificação , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rickettsia/genética , Rickettsia/patogenicidade , Picadas de Carrapatos/epidemiologia , Carrapatos/patogenicidade , Adulto Jovem
6.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 22: 36-39, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631038

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rabies is a lethal, but vaccine preventable disease. Vaccination uptake is however hampered by the time-consuming three-dose, 21/28-day schedule. The aim of this study was to examine whether adequate rabies antibody titers are reached after two intradermal (ID) doses of rabies vaccine, with a seven-day window. METHOD: We conducted an observational cohort study with military personnel. A titer was assessed by RFFIT, on the day of the third vaccination, to ensure an adequate rabies antibody response after ID immunization. RESULTS: After this abbreviated two-dose, seven-day ID schedule, seroconversion was reached in 99.3% (427/430) with a geometric mean titer of 7.59 IU/mL (95% CI 7.04-8.17). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this two-dose schedule will protect more people against Rabies. Travelers and military personnel under time constraints, who otherwise would remain unvaccinated, can be considered adequately protected after this two-dose schedule. For populations in endemic areas, local application of a two-dose schedule could provide an opportunity to vaccinate more people with less vaccine. Given the paucity of published data, this study adds relevant evidence in support of the new policy (2017) of WHO, concerning a two-dose, seven-day schedule is approved for all healthy individuals.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Injeções Intradérmicas , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/normas , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
7.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 10(8): e0004902, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27483431

RESUMO

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against rabies infection consists of a combination of passive immunisation with plasma-derived human or equine immune globulins and active immunisation with vaccine delivered shortly after exposure. Since anti-rabies immune globulins are expensive and scarce, there is a need for cheaper alternatives that can be produced more consistently. Previously, we generated potent virus-neutralising VHH, also called Nanobodies, against the rabies glycoprotein that are effectively preventing lethal disease in an in vivo mouse model. The VHH domain is the smallest antigen-binding functional fragment of camelid heavy chain-only antibodies that can be manufactured in microbial expression systems. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy of half-life extended anti-rabies VHH in combination with vaccine for PEP in an intranasal rabies infection model in mice. The PEP combination therapy of systemic anti-rabies VHH and intramuscular vaccine significantly delayed the onset of disease compared to treatment with anti-rabies VHH alone, prolonged median survival time (35 versus 14 days) and decreased mortality (60% versus 19% survival rate), when treated 24 hours after rabies virus challenge. Vaccine alone was unable to rescue mice from lethal disease. As reported also for immune globulins, some interference of anti-rabies VHH with the antigenicity of the vaccine was observed, but this did not impede the synergistic effect. Post exposure treatment with vaccine and human anti-rabies immune globulins was unable to protect mice from lethal challenge. Anti-rabies VHH and vaccine act synergistically to protect mice after rabies virus exposure, which further validates the possible use of anti-rabies VHH for rabies PEP.


Assuntos
Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Raiva/mortalidade , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos de Domínio Único/administração & dosagem , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Linhagem Celular , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Camundongos , Testes de Neutralização , Vírus da Raiva , Vacinação , Carga Viral
9.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e109367, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25347556

RESUMO

Rabies virus causes lethal brain infection in about 61000 people per year. Each year, tens of thousands of people receive anti-rabies prophylaxis with plasma-derived immunoglobulins and vaccine soon after exposure. Anti-rabies immunoglobulins are however expensive and have limited availability. VHH are the smallest antigen-binding functional fragments of camelid heavy chain antibodies, also called Nanobodies. The therapeutic potential of anti-rabies VHH was examined in a mouse model using intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of rabies virus. Anti-rabies VHH were administered directly into the brain or systemically, by intraperitoneal injection, 24 hours after virus challenge. Anti-rabies VHH were able to significantly prolong survival or even completely rescue mice from disease. The therapeutic effect depended on the dose, affinity and brain and plasma half-life of the VHH construct. Increasing the affinity by combining two VHH with a glycine-serine linker into bivalent or biparatopic constructs, increased the neutralizing potency to the picomolar range. Upon direct intracerebral administration, a dose as low as 33 µg of the biparatopic Rab-E8/H7 was still able to establish an anti-rabies effect. The effect of systemic treatment was significantly improved by increasing the half-life of Rab-E8/H7 through linkage with a third VHH targeted against albumin. Intraperitoneal treatment with 1.5 mg (2505 IU, 1 ml) of anti-albumin Rab-E8/H7 prolonged the median survival time from 9 to 15 days and completely rescued 43% of mice. For comparison, intraperitoneal treatment with the highest available dose of human anti-rabies immunoglobulins (65 mg, 111 IU, 1 ml) only prolonged survival by 2 days, without rescue. Overall, the therapeutic benefit seemed well correlated with the time of brain exposure and the plasma half-life of the used VHH construct. These results, together with the ease-of-production and superior thermal stability, render anti-rabies VHH into valuable candidates for development of alternative post exposure treatment drugs against rabies.


Assuntos
Vírus da Raiva/imunologia , Raiva/imunologia , Anticorpos de Domínio Único/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Linhagem Celular , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Meia-Vida , Cadeias Pesadas de Imunoglobulinas/genética , Camundongos , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Raiva/virologia , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Vírus da Raiva/genética , Anticorpos de Domínio Único/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos de Domínio Único/genética , Distribuição Tecidual , Carga Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA