French reconnection: A conservative pancreato-enteric reconnection for disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Disconnectedpancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS), a severe complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), may require surgery, usually by distal splenopancreatectomy, thus increasing the risk of diabetes. We describe a new technique reconnecting the distal pancreas to the digestive tract. METHODS: This technique was proposed after failure of non-surgical treatment and at least 3 months after the onset of ANP in non-diabetic or non-insulin dependent diabetic patients with a distal pancreas of at least 5 cm. The ruptured zone was identified and the distal side was anastomosed to the stomach or the jejunum. RESULTS: From 2013 to June 2019, 36 patients (median age = 49 years) with DPDS underwent a "French reconnection" procedure, indicated for chronic pain/recurrent pancreatitis (n = 35; 97%), persistent pancreatic fistula (n = 33; 91%), or digestive compression/fistulisation (n = 9; 25%). Median preoperative weight loss was 10 kg (4-27), the median number of hospitalisations per patient was 5(1-8) and 24(67%) patients had received endoscopic/percutaneous treatment. Surgery was performed in median 279(90-2000) days after ANP, laparoscopically in 9(25%) patients. The remnant pancreas (median length = 70 mm; range = 50-130) was anastomosed to the stomach (n = 30) or the jejunum (n = 6). There were 13(36%) postoperative grade B/C pancreatic fistulas and 3(10%) bleedings including one death (mortality = 3%). The median hospital stay was 18 (7-121) days. After a median follow-up of 24 (4-53) months, all pancreatic fistulas had healed and the clinical success rate was 91%. Median BMI increased from 22 to 25 kg/m2. In patients with normal pancreatic function, postoperative de novo endocrine and severe exocrine insufficiencies were observed in 4/27 (15%) and 7/22 (32%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The "French reconnection" procedure, as an alternative to distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of DPDS, provides good control of symptoms and decreases the risk of pancreatic insufficiency.

Teaching robotic rectal cancer surgery at your workplace: does the presence of visiting surgeons in the operating room have a detrimental effect on outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Surgery demonstration (SD) is considered to be a mainstay of surgical education, but controversy exists concerning the patient's safety. Indeed, the presence of visiting surgeons is a source of distraction and may have an impact on surgeon's performance. This study's objective was to evaluate possible differences in outcomes between robotic sphincter-saving rectal cancer surgery (RRCS) performed during routine surgical practice versus in the presence of visiting surgeons in the operating room (OR) with direct access to the surgeon. METHODS: Retrospective case-matched studies were conducted from a prospectively collected database. 114 patients (38 with the presence of visiting surgeons) who underwent RRCS between January 2013 and September 2018 were included. Patients were matched in a 1:2 basis after propensity score analysis using five criteria: gender, body mass index, preoperative chemoradiation, type of mesorectum excision, and synchronous liver metastasis. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups with regard to mean operating time, estimated blood loss, conversion, and hospital stay. Also, overall (44% vs. 40%; P = 0.6), major morbidity (26% vs. 19%; P = 0.5), and unplanned reoperation (17% vs. 15%; P = 1.0) rates were not statistically different. No difference was noted with regard to the quality of mesorectum excision, or positive rate of circumferential and distal longitudinal resection margins. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes (17 vs. 14.5; P = 0.04) was lower in the SD group and the number of patients with < 12 harvested lymph nodes (31% vs. 16%; P = 0.09) was greater after SD although it did not reach statistical significance. No differences were observed in disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of visiting surgeons in the OR seems not to interfere in the quality of rectal resection and does not compromise patient's short-term outcome and survival. However, mild differences in the extent of lymphadenectomy were observed and the surgeons performing SD may be aware of this.