Revascularization and long-term outcomes in high-acuity spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is often treated conservatively due to revascularization risks. Yet, an important number of SCAD patients have high acuity characteristics necessitating revascularization, with uncertain long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Document revascularization utilization and long-term outcomes in high acuity SCAD. METHODS: Prospective/retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to first SCAD event presenting directly to the Minneapolis Heart Institute 2002-2021, median follow-up 3.8 years. RESULTS: Among 139 patients (age 49 ± 12 years, 96% female), revascularization was performed in 60 (43%), utilizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 56, successful in 80%) or coronary artery bypass graft (n = 4). In the entire cohort, 90 (65%) unique patients had one or more high acuity characteristic: ST-elevation (38%), proximal dissection (38%), cardiogenic shock (6.5%), cardiac arrest (9.4%), left main dissection (6.5%), peripartum dissection (7.2%). High acuity patients accounted for 51 of 60 (85%) revascularizations. Revascularization rates were: ST-elevation (60%), proximal dissection (62%), cardiogenic shock (89%), cardiac arrest (62%), left main dissection (100%), peripartum dissection (70%). Survival was 97% (revascularized) vs 100% (nonrevascularized); p = 0.2. Adverse outcomes (revascularized vs. nonrevascularized) included recurrent AMI:16.7% versus 8.9%; p = 0.2, SCAD recurrence: 13.3% versus 6.3%; p = 0.1, stroke: 5% versus 2.5%; p = 0.44, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: 6.7% versus 6.3%; p > 0.9. Reintervention was necessary in 21% of PCI-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-acuity characteristics were present in nearly two-thirds of this SCAD cohort; the vast majority of revascularizations were performed in high-acuity patients. Despite high acuity, long-term survival was favorable in revascularized patients.

Nonatherosclerotic Abdominal Vasculopathies.

BACKGROUND: Nonatherosclerotic abdominal arterial vasculopathies (NAVs), including mesenteric or renal artery dissection, aneurysm, stenosis, and vasculitis, are rare but have great clinical significance. Patients may present emergently with life-threatening complications such as arterial rupture and hemorrhagic shock. Herein, we present our center's experience with NAVs and provide extensive literature review to close the gap in the scarce, related literature. METHODS: From a single-center retrospective data analysis, we identified and characterized subjects (aged 18-60 years) who presented with NAV between January 2000 and December 2015. Of the 1416 charts reviewed, 118 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The average age of patients with NAV was 47.0 ± 9.9 years, mostly affecting women (64%). Primary diagnoses included fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) (25.4%), isolated aneurysms (24.6%), and median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) (15.3%). Less common diagnoses were localized vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract (LVGT) (7.6%), isolated dissection (5.1%), microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (5.1%), trauma (4.2%), segmental arterial mediolysis (4.2%), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (2.5%), Takayasu's arteritis (2.5%), polyarteritis nodosa (1.7%), idiopathic abdominal aortitis (0.8%), and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (0.8%). Females constituted 90% of patients with FMD, 77.8% with MALS, 77.8% with isolated aneurysms, 66.7% with Takayasu arteritis, and 55.6% with LVGT. Prevalent comorbidities included tobacco use (43.6%) and hypertension (52.1%). Coil embolization was used in 14.4%, anticoagulation in 11.9%, angioplasty/stenting in 11.9%, open resection/surgical revascularization in 10.2%, and prednisone in 10.2% of the cases. Conservative management was pursued in 33.1% of the patients. A high degree of symptom relief was shown in 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS: NAV are rare and can be caused by different etiologies that primarily affect females. Hypertension and tobacco use were prevalent. Various imaging strategies revealed aneurysms, stenosis, dissection, and/or thrombosis affecting renal and celiac arteries. Most patients improved with conservative, medical, endovascular, or surgical approach. More research is needed to standardize management approach to patients with NAV.

Extensive Cerebrovascular and Visceral Artery Dissection and Pseudoaneurysm with Underlying Segmental Arterial Mediolysis.

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, nonhereditary vasculopathy that most commonly involves abdominal aortic branches and predominantly affects middle-age and elderly populations. Lysis of the outer arterial media results in separation of the media from the adventitia leading to dissecting aneurysms and/or pseudoaneurysms. We report a unique case of a 47-year-old man who presented with bilateral internal carotid artery dissection followed by dissections and aneurysms involving multiple visceral arteries. This case highlights the dramatic manifestation of SAM and discusses the complexity of decision-making related to this disease including differential diagnoses and management.

Diagnostic Value of Computed Tomography Angiography for Infective Endocarditis After Right Ventricle Outflow Tract Repair.

Congenital heart disease patients with pulmonary valve replacement or right ventricle-pulmonary artery conduit have increased risk of pulmonary valve endocarditis. We present a 6-patient case series illustrating the diagnostic utility of computed tomography angiography to provide definitive visualization of pulmonary valve vegetation to aid in the diagnosis of endocarditis. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Recognition of acute myocardial infarction caused by spontaneous coronary artery dissection of first septal perforator.

AIMS: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) diagnosis is challenging as angiographic findings are often subtle and differ from coronary atherosclerosis. Herein, we describe characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) caused by first septal perforator (S1) SCAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were gathered from SCAD registries at Minneapolis Heart Institute and Vancouver General Hospital. First septal perforator SCAD prevalence was 11 of 1490 (0.7%). Among 11 patients, age range was 38-64 years, 9 (82%) were female. Each presented with acute chest pain, troponin elevation, and non-ST-elevation MI diagnosis. Initial electrocardiogram demonstrated ischaemia in 5 (45%); septal wall motion abnormality was present in 4 (36%). Angiographic type 2 SCAD was present in 7 (64%) patients with S1 TIMI 3 flow in 7 (64%) and TIMI 0 flow in 2 (18%). Initial angiographic interpretation failed to recognize S1-SCAD in 6 (55%) patients (no culprit, n = 5, septal embolism, n = 1). First septal perforator SCAD diagnosis was established by review of initial coronary angiogram consequent to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrating focal septal late gadolinium enhancement with corresponding oedema (n = 3), occurrence of subsequent SCAD event (n = 2), or second angiogram showing healed S1-SCAD (n = 1). Patients were treated conservatively, each with ejection fraction >50%. CONCLUSION: First septal perforator SCAD events may be overlooked at initial angiography and mis-diagnosed as 'no culprit' MI. First septal perforator SCAD prevalence is likely greater than reported herein and dependent on local expertise and availability of CMR imaging. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection events may occur in intra-myocardial coronary arteries, approaching the resolution limits of invasive coronary angiography.

Acute Myocardial Infarction-Like Events in Related Patients With a Desmoplakin-Associated Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.

Patients with familial arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy typically present with ventricular arrhythmias or progressive heart failure. This paper characterizes a rare presentation of an underlying genetic cardiomyopathy with clinical manifestations mimicking an acute myocardial infarction in 2 siblings, each with the same mutation in the desmoplakin (DSP) gene. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).