RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: 'Hub-and-spoke' networks may be one solution to reduce the geographical inequality in access to liver transplantation (LT) and the growing demands on, and saturation of, LT centres. It is not clear if such networks improve equity of access, deliver comparable patient outcomes or effect patient satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of outcomes and patient satisfaction within the Royal Free liver transplant 'hub-and-spoke' network. METHODS: Patient outcomes in those assessed for LT between September 2011 and 2014 at spoke centres (n = 4) were compared retrospectively with those assessed at the LT hub centre. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed and changes in LT referral patterns were explored with data obtained directly from NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). RESULTS: A total of 655 patients (180 spoke; 475 hub) were assessed for LT. Patients referred from spoke centres were more likely to have viral hepatitis as an underlying aetiology (72/180 vs 110/475; P < 0.001), or hepatocellular carcinoma (48/180 vs 60/475; P < 0.001) as an indication for LT and were more likely to be listed for LT when compared with hub patients (139/180 vs 312/475, P = 0.005). Mortality on the waiting list (9/123 vs 25/269, P = 0.57), waiting time to LT (64-days vs 78-days, P = 0.91) and Model for End-Stage liver disease (MELD)/United Kingdom End-Stage Liver Disease (UKELD) score (P = 0.24/0.26) in listed patients were equivalent as were 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival rates. Patient satisfaction rates were high at both types of centre, with significantly more patients preferring 'locally delivered care' at spoke vs hub (11/50 vs 70/73, P≤0.0001). Since the development of formal hub-and-spoke networks data from NHSBT based on postcode confirmed a significant increase in patients undergoing LT (153%) from spoke centres, whereas numbers assessed and transplanted from the hub centre have remained static. CONCLUSION: Hub-and-spoke LT networks are effective in offering equivalent clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction and alleviate clinical pressure on the hub centre. They have to potential to help eliminate the geographical disparity in mortality rates from chronic liver disease.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Organizacionais , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Hepatopatias/mortalidade , Hepatopatias/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Listas de Espera/mortalidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Measuring wedged hepatic venous pressure and hepatic venous pressure gradient as indices of portal pressure is being increasingly used in assessing the prognosis and response to pharmacological treatment for portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. AIM: To re-evaluate the agreement and correlation between wedged hepatic pressures and directly measured portal pressures. METHODS: Medline search for studies comparing direct portal with wedged hepatic pressure measurement and assessment of correlation and agreement of the pooled data. RESULTS: Eleven suitable studies included 320 patients. Coefficient of determination (r2) was 0.87 in all patients, 0.87 in 102 patients with alcoholic liver disease, 0.83 in 88 patients with non-alcoholic liver disease and 0.75 in 53 patients with hepatitis C-related liver disease. Coefficient of determination was 0.85 in the 194 patients in whom a wedge catheter and 0.90 in the 113 patients in whom a balloon catheter was used. Agreement according to the method of Bland and Altman was also found to be good, with only 4-8% of the measurements outside 2 standard deviations. CONCLUSIONS: Wedged hepatic pressure measurement correlates well with direct portal pressure measurement and the agreement is sufficiently good to use this as a surrogate measurement.
Assuntos
Veias Hepáticas/fisiopatologia , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Pressão na Veia Porta/fisiologia , Pressão Venosa/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/fisiopatologiaAssuntos
Coristoma/patologia , Doenças do Esôfago/patologia , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Glândulas Sebáceas , Adulto , Biópsia por Agulha , Doenças do Esôfago/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Doenças Raras , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
Liver cirrhosis is characterized by impairment of primary and secondary hemostasis but it is not clear how this impairment is related to the bleeding problems seen in cirrhosis. This delicate hemostatic balance can be perturbed by numerous conditions, such as variceal bleeding, renal failure, or infection/sepsis, which may lead to worsening of coagulation status to date. The role of endogenous heparinoids (glycosaminoglycans) in the coagulopathy of patients who have cirrhosis has been demonstrated by thromboelastography with the addition of heparinase I in patients who have recent variceal bleeding and infection. The heparin-like effect has also been demonstrated to be part of the coagulopathy seen after reperfusion in patients who have cirrhosis and are undergoing liver transplant. Therapeutic implications of these findings are not clear at the moment and the use of drugs able to cleave heparinoids should be explored.
Assuntos
Hemorragia/metabolismo , Heparinoides/metabolismo , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Transplante de Fígado , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/metabolismo , Coagulação Sanguínea , Doenças Transmissíveis/complicações , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemostasia , Antagonistas de Heparina/uso terapêutico , Heparina Liase , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/metabolismo , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Protaminas/uso terapêutico , Tromboelastografia , Varizes/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reducing immunosuppression not only reduces complications but also may lessen recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation. PATIENTS/METHODS: HCV-infected cirrhotic patients randomised to tacrolimus monotherapy (MT) or triple therapy (TT) using tacrolimus 0.1 mg/kg/day, azathioprine 1 mg/kg/day, and prednisolone 20 mg/day, tapering over 3 months. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (MT) and 29 (TT)--median follow up 661 days (range, 1-1603). Rejection episodes (protocol/further biopsies) within first 3 months and use of empirical treatment were evaluated. New rejection was diagnosed if repeat biopsy (5-day interval) did not show improvement. Treated rejection episodes: 20 MT (15 biopsy-proven) vs. 24 TT (21 biopsy-proven), with 19 (MT) vs. 24 (TT) methylprednisolone boluses. Overall: 35 episodes (MT) and 46 (TT). Fewer MT patients had histological rejection (70%) than TT patients (86%), with fewer episodes of rejection (18.5% vs. 10%), and more moderate rejection (22% vs. 41%). The MT group had higher early tacrolimus levels. Rates of renal dysfunction, retransplantation, and death were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus monotherapy is a viable immunosuppressive strategy in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients.
Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/terapia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Transplante de Fígado , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepatite C/complicações , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Transplante de Fígado/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Recurrent variceal bleeding is very frequent after variceal haemorrhage and pharmacological therapy is the first choice treatment. Recently, baseline and repeat measurements of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) have been considered necessary to optimally manage patients receiving pharmacological therapy so as to reduce the frequency of rebleeding. However, the clinical validity and applicability of monitoring for target HVPG reductions is not sufficiently proven and needs to be specifically evaluated in a prospective trial.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão Portal/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/fisiopatologia , Pressão na Veia Porta/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Treatment of portal hypertension is evolving based on randomised controlled trials. In acute variceal bleeding, prophylactic antibiotics are mandatory, reducing mortality as well as preventing infections. Terlipressin or somatostatin combined with endoscopic ligation or sclerotherapy is the best strategy for control of bleeding but there is no added effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality. Non-selective beta-blockers are the first choice therapy for both secondary and primary prevention; if contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers are present then band ligation should be used. Novel therapies target the increased intrahepatic resistance caused by microcirculatory intrahepatic deficiency of nitric oxide and contraction of activated intrahepatic stellate cells.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Portal/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Carbazóis/uso terapêutico , Carvedilol , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Propanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections have been proposed as a trigger for portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Endogenous low molecular weight heparinoids have been previously detected in vitro by heparinase-modified thromboelastography, but it is not known what type of heparinoids they are. The aim of this study was to assay anti-Xa concentrations to detect heparin activity in infected cirrhotics in vivo. METHODS: We evaluated 30 cirrhotic patients (15 with bacterial infection, 15 not infected) and 9 non-cirrhotic patients with bacterial infection. The anti-Xa assay was performed at the start of infection in all patients and after resolution of infection in 8 cirrhotics (5 to 10 days after starting antibiotics); thromboelastography (native and heparinase I-modified TEG) was performed in a subgroup of 11 cirrhotic patients with infection, 8 cirrhotics without infection and 8 non-cirrhotics with infection. RESULTS: Anti-Xa activity was detected in 9 of the 15 infected cirrhotics (60%) and only in 1 of 15 non-infected cirrhotics (6.7%) (P < 0.01). In the infected cirrhotic patients, a heparinase effect was shown in the heparinase I-modified TEG: k time (P < 0.01), alpha-angle (P < 0.01) and r time (P = 0.05), with no effect in the non-infected cirrhotics. Four of 9 (44%) infected non-cirrhotics were positive with the anti-Xa assay. CONCLUSION: In cirrhotic patients, bacterial infections modify haemostasis by producing endogenous heparin-like substances which can inhibit the activated clotting factor X (factor Xa). In infected non-cirrhotics, anti-Xa activity can also be found.