Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Proc Biol Sci ; 281(1780): 20133172, 2014 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24523276

RESUMO

Mathematical models that couple disease dynamics and vaccinating behaviour often assume that the incentive to vaccinate disappears if disease prevalence is zero. Hence, they predict that vaccine refusal should be the rule, and elimination should be difficult or impossible. In reality, countries with non-mandatory vaccination policies have usually been able to maintain elimination or very low incidence of paediatric infectious diseases for long periods of time. Here, we show that including injunctive social norms can reconcile such behaviour-incidence models to observations. Adding social norms to a coupled behaviour-incidence model enables the model to better explain pertussis vaccine uptake and disease dynamics in the UK from 1967 to 2010, in both the vaccine-scare years and the years of high vaccine coverage. The model also illustrates how a vaccine scare can perpetuate suboptimal vaccine coverage long after perceived risk has returned to baseline, pre-vaccine-scare levels. However, at other model parameter values, social norms can perpetuate depressed vaccine coverage during a vaccine scare well beyond the time when the population's baseline vaccine risk perception returns to pre-scare levels. Social norms can strongly suppress vaccine uptake despite frequent outbreaks, as observed in some small communities. Significant portions of the parameter space also exhibit bistability, meaning long-term outcomes depend on the initial conditions. Depending on the context, social norms can either support or hinder immunization goals.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Vacinação em Massa/psicologia , Modelos Teóricos , Conformidade Social , Vacinação/psicologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Vacinação em Massa/tendências , Pediatria/tendências , Prevalência , Vacinação/tendências
3.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 2597, 2018 02 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416056

RESUMO

The Caribbean coral reef ecosystem has experienced a long history of deterioration due to various stressors. For instance, over-fishing of parrotfish - an important grazer of macroalgae that can prevent destructive overgrowth of macroalgae - has threatened reef ecosystems in recent decades and stimulated conservation efforts such as the formation of marine protected areas. Here we develop a mathematical model of coupled socio-ecological interactions between reef dynamics and conservation opinion dynamics to better understand how natural and human factors interact individually and in combination to determine coral reef cover. We find that the coupling opinion and reef systems generates complex dynamics that are difficult to anticipate without use of a model. For instance, instead of converging to a stable state of constant coral cover and conservationist opinion, the system can oscillate between low and high live coral cover as human opinion oscillates in a boom-bust cycle between complacency and concern. Out of various possible parameter manipulations, we also find that raising awareness of coral reef endangerment best avoids counter-productive nonlinear feedbacks and always increases and stabilizes live coral reef cover. In conclusion, an improved understanding of coupled opinion-reef dynamics under anthrogenic stressors is possible using coupled socio-ecological models, and such models should be further researched.


Assuntos
Antozoários , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Recifes de Corais , Animais , Região do Caribe , Pesqueiros , Peixes , Humanos , Biologia Marinha , Modelos Teóricos , Dinâmica Populacional , Alga Marinha
4.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 16758, 2018 Nov 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30409979

RESUMO

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA