Characterization of persistent post-traumatic headache and management strategies in adolescents and young adults following mild traumatic brain injury.

Characteristics of persistent post-traumatic headache (PTH) in young individuals are poorly known leading to diagnostic problems and diverse management. We aimed to describe headache phenotypes and self-reported management strategies in young individuals with PTH following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). A comprehensive structured questionnaire was used to evaluate headache phenotypes/characteristics and management strategies to relieve headache in 107, 15-30-year-old individuals with PTH. Around 4 months post-injury, migraine-like headache in combination with tension-type like headache (40%) was the most commonly encountered headache phenotype followed by migraine-like headache (36%). Around 50% reported aura-like symptoms before/during the headache attack. Medication-overuse headache was diagnosed in 10%. Stress, sleep disturbances, and bright lights were the most common trigger factors. More than 80% reported that their headache was worsened by work-related activity and alleviated by rest/lying down. Simple analgesics were commonly used (88%) whereas prophylactic drugs were rarely used (5%). Bedrest and physiotherapy were also commonly used as management strategies by 56% and 34% of the participants, respectively. In conclusion, most young individuals with PTH after mTBI presented with combined migraine-like and tension-type-like headache followed by migraine-like headache, only. Preventive headache medication was rarely used, while simple analgesics and bedrest were commonly used for short-term headache relief.

Self-Rated Executive Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Young Adults With Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess self-reported executive dysfunction in young adult patients with persistent post-concussion symptoms (PCS) 2-6 months post-injury, and the association with self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). METHOD: This cross-sectional study carried out in a hospital setting was a secondary analysis of data from a separate randomized trial testing the effect of a novel intervention, "Get going After concussIoN " (GAIN), for persistent PCS. Patients (18-30 years) were recruited from a clinical cohort of patients with a hospital diagnosis of concussion or referred by primary care physicians. Main measures were The Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version providing two index scores, that is, the Metacognitive Index (MI) and the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI), and the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale. RESULTS: Compared with normative data, patients had elevated scores (i.e., worse functioning) on both the MI and the BRI. In linear regression analysis, the MI score, but not the BRI score, was negatively associated with self-reported HRQoL (MI: slope = -.27, 95% confidence interval, CI [-.53, -.02], p = .03; BRI: slope = -.19, 95% CI [-.49, .13], p = .24), suggesting a positive association of subjective executive dysfunction and lower HRQoL. However, the association was attenuated after adjustment for self-reported psychological distress (MI: slope = -.09, 95% CI [-.34, .17], p = .51). CONCLUSION: Self-reported executive dysfunction is common in young adult patients with persistent PCS, but not strongly associated with decreased HRQoL after adjusting for concurrent psychological distress.

Novel interdisciplinary intervention, GAIN, vs. enhanced usual care to reduce high levels of post-concussion symptoms in adolescents and young adults 2-6 months post-injury: A randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for effective interventions to prevent long-term sequelae after concussion is sparse. This study aimed to test the efficacy of Get going After concussIoN (GAIN), an interdisciplinary, individually-tailored intervention of 8 weeks duration based on gradual return to activities and principles from cognitive behavioural therapy. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, parallel-group randomised trial in a hospital setting in Central Denmark Region. Participants were 15-30-year-old patients with high levels of post-concussion symptoms (PCS) 2-6 months post-concussion (i.e., a score ≥20 on the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)). They were randomly assigned (1:1) to either enhanced usual care (EUC) or GAIN+EUC. Masking of participants and therapists was not possible. The primary outcome was change in RPQ-score from baseline to 3-month FU. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis using linear mixed-effects models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02337101. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2015, and September 1, 2017, we included 112 patients. Patients allocated to GAIN+EUC (n=57) reported a significantly larger reduction of PCS than patients allocated to EUC (n=55) with a mean adjusted difference in improvement of 7·6 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2·0-13·1, p=0·008), Cohen's d=0·5 (95% CI 0·1-0·9). Number needed to treat for prevention of one additional patient with RPQ ≥20 at 3-month FU was 3·6 (95% CI 2·2-11·3). No adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: Compared with EUC, GAIN+EUC was associated with a larger reduction of post-concussion symptoms at 3-month FU. FUNDING: Central Denmark Region and the foundation "Public Health in Central Denmark Region - a collaboration between municipalities and the region".

Design of an early intervention for persistent post-concussion symptoms in adolescents and young adults: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: About 5-15 % of patients with concussion experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PCS) longer than 3 months post-injury. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of a new intervention for young patients with persistent PCS and long-term changes after intervention. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (15-30 years) with persistent PCS 2-4 months post-injury were recruited from a cohort study or referred to a non-randomized feasibility study of an individually tailored, 8-week, multidisciplinary intervention. Assessment was performed at baseline, end of intervention (EOI), and at 3- and 12-month follow-up (FU). Main measures were The Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ), Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and The Quality of Life after Brain Injury - Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS). RESULTS: Twenty-three (72%) patients completed the intervention. The ESQ demonstrated high patient satisfaction. There was a decrease of PCS and an increase in quality of life from baseline to EOI: RPQ score -8.9 points, 95% CI 4.5 to 13.3, p < 0.001; QOLIBRI-OS score +10.5 points, 95% CI 2.5 to 18.5, p = 0.010. Improvement was maintained at 3- and 12-month FU. CONCLUSION: The new early intervention is feasible and may prevent chronification of PCS. An RCT is currently performed to evaluate the effect of the intervention.