Biotic indices of hydrological variability as tools to inform dynamic ecological status assessments in river ecosystems.

River biomonitoring uses biotic indices that assess human-induced degradation, including pollution, by comparison with type-specific static biological reference conditions. However, index scores that indicate pollution may reflect biological responses to natural hydrological variability associated with low flows and drying, leading biomonitoring schemes to misclassify sites as degraded. To address this, dynamic, site-specific adjustments of static biological reference conditions have been proposed, but current biomonitoring tools cannot facilitate implementation of these adjustments. We analyzed 329 samples from mediterranean-climate rivers in Greece, to evaluate the use of six stressor-specific macroinvertebrate-based indices of hydrological variability (CEFI, DEHLI, ELF, LIFE, LIFENZ, MIS-index) as tools to facilitate dynamic adjustments of static biological reference conditions. We examined macroinvertebrate assemblage responses to physicochemical and land use drivers in relation to each sample's hydrological conditions, as assessed by the six indices. We evaluated index performance beyond the region of development by exploring correlations among indices, including correlations with the region-specific Greek ELF index, for which 100% of taxa were represented. We also examined the influence of inorganic nutrient pollution on index performance by comparing index scores from samples with and without nutrient pollution. Season, water temperature, agricultural land use and nutrient pollution were major drivers of macroinvertebrate assemblage composition. Indices were positively correlated but correlation strength varied considerably, driven primarily by taxonomic representation (the proportion of sampled taxa included in each index's calculation), and potentially also by differences in river types, taxonomic resolution and sampling strategies. All indices identified site-specific hydrological conditions both in the presence and absence of nutrient pollution. We recommend the development of region-specific biotic indices of hydrological variability, or regional adaptation of existing indices, to represent 100% of the regional taxa pool and thus to enable acceptable performance beyond their region of development. Such indices could inform dynamic adaptation of static biological reference conditions by assessing site-specific hydrological conditions based on a macroinvertebrate assemblage, without the collection of additional, abiotic field data. Application of our proposed approach could prevent misclassification of ecological status, thus avoiding time-demanding and costly mismanagement of rivers and streams.

River restoration is prone to failure unless pre-optimized within a mechanistic ecological framework | Insights from a model-based case study.

River restoration with the use of in-stream structures has been widely implemented to maintain/improve physical habitats. However, the response of aquatic biota has often been too weak to justify the high costs of restoration projects. The ecological effectiveness of river restoration has thus been much debated over claims that large-scale environmental drivers often overshadow the potential positive ecological effects of locally placed in-stream structures. In this study, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic-habitat model to evaluate the ecological effectiveness of habitat restoration with the use of in-stream structures in various water discharges, ranging from near-dry to environmental flows. The habitat suitability of benthic macroinvertebrates and of three cyprinid fish species was simulated for six restoration schemes and at four discharge scenarios, and was compared with a reference model, without in-stream structures. We found that the ecological response to habitat restoration varied by species and life stages, it strongly depended on the reach-scale flow conditions, it was often negative at near-environmental flows, and when positive, mostly at near-dry flows, it was too low to justify the high costs of river restoration. Flow variation was the major environmental driver that our local habitat restoration schemes attempted -but mostly failed-to fine-tune. We conclude that traditional river restoration, based on trial and error, will likely fail and should be ecologically pre-optimized before field implementation. Widespread use of in-stream structures for ecological restoration is not recommended. However, at near-dry flows, the response of all biotic elements except for macroinvertebrates, was positive. In combination with the small habitat-suitability differences observed among structure types and densities, we suggest that sparse/moderate in-stream structure placement can be used for cost-effective river restoration, but it will only be ecologically effective -thus justifying the high implementation costs-when linked to very specific purposes: (i) to conserve endangered species and (ii) to increase/improve habitat availability/suitability during dry periods, thus proactively preventing/reducing the current and future ecological impacts of climate change.

Stream invertebrate communities are primarily shaped by hydrological factors and ultimately fine-tuned by local habitat conditions.

The environmental factors that determine species richness and community structure in running waters have long been studied, but how these factors hierarchically and/or interactively influence benthic communities remains unclear. To address this research gap, we identified the principal abiotic factors that determine the taxonomic composition and functionality of stream macroinvertebrate communities and explored possible hierarchical and/or interactive patterns. We analyzed a large dataset from Greek rivers, and compared multiple macroinvertebrate metrics and traits between perennial and intermittent watercourses during wet and dry periods. We found that macroinvertebrates were primarily influenced by two ecological gradients: (i) aquatic vegetation-conductivity; and (ii) water temperature-canopy cover. Macroinvertebrates in perennial rivers were mainly influenced by the first gradient, whereas in intermittent rivers both gradients were important. Taxonomic richness and diversity were higher and temporally stable within years in perennial rivers, whereas in intermittent rivers, these metrics peaked during early summer, before the onset of streambed desiccation. The two environmental gradients determined the taxonomic richness and diversity in both spring and summer; however, a clear influence of hydrological factors (wetted width, water depth, flow velocity and discharge) was observed only in the intermittent samples. We conclude that the benthic invertebrate taxonomic richness and diversity in highly variable environments is primarily determined by hydrological variation and ultimately fine-tuned by local habitat factors. As climate change scenarios predict severe modification of hydrological and local habitat factors, this study concludes that in river management, hydrological restoration should be prioritized over other local habitat factors by maintaining natural hydrological variability, to ensure aquatic community richness and diversity.