Novel oxysterols have pro-osteogenic and anti-adipogenic effects in vitro and induce spinal fusion in vivo.

Stimulation of bone formation by osteoinductive materials is of great clinical importance in spinal fusion surgery, repair of bone fractures, and in the treatment of osteoporosis. We previously reported that specific naturally occurring oxysterols including 20(S)-hydroxycholesterol (20S) induce the osteogenic differentiation of pluripotent mesenchymal cells, while inhibiting their adipogenic differentiation. Here we report the characterization of two structural analogues of 20S, Oxy34 and Oxy49, which induce the osteogenic and inhibit the adipogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (MSC) through activation of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. Treatment of M2-10B4 MSC with Oxy34 or Oxy49 induced the expression of osteogenic differentiation markers Runx2, Osterix (Osx), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and osteocalcin (OCN), as well as ALP enzymatic activity and robust mineralization. Treatment with oxysterols together with PPARγ activator, troglitazone (Tro), inhibited mRNA expression for adipogenic genes PPARγ, LPL, and aP2, and inhibited the formation of adipocytes. Efficacy of Oxy34 and Oxy49 in stimulating bone formation in vivo was assessed using the posterolateral intertransverse process rat spinal fusion model. Rats receiving collagen implants with Oxy 34 or Oxy49 showed comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP2/collagen implants as measured by radiography, MicroCT, and manual inspection. Histological analysis showed trabecular and cortical bone formation by oxysterols and rhBMP2 within the fusion mass, with robust adipogenesis in BMP2-induced bone and significantly less adipocytes in oxysterol-induced bone. These data suggest that Oxy34 and Oxy49 are effective novel osteoinductive molecules and may be suitable candidates for further development and use in orthopedic indications requiring local bone formation.

Transcriptome profiling of human and murine ESCs identifies divergent paths required to maintain the stem cell state.

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are an important source of stem cells in regenerative medicine, and much remains unknown about their molecular characteristics. To develop a detailed genomic profile of ESC lines in two different species, we compared transcriptomes of one murine and two different hESC lines by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Over 2 million signature tags from each line and their differentiating embryoid bodies were sequenced. Major differences and conserved similarities between species identified by MPSS were validated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and microarray. The two hESC lines were similar overall, with differences that are attributable to alleles and propagation. Human-mouse comparisons, however, identified only a small (core) set of conserved genes that included genes known to be important in ESC biology, as well as additional novel genes. Identified were major differences in leukemia inhibitory factor, transforming growth factor-beta, and Wnt and fibroblast growth factor signaling pathways, as well as the expression of genes encoding metabolic, cytoskeletal, and matrix proteins, many of which were verified by RT-PCR or by comparing them with published databases. The study reported here underscores the importance of cross-species comparisons and the versatility and sensitivity of MPSS as a powerful complement to current array technology.

Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells.

We compared gene expression profiles of mouse and human ES cells by immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR, and membrane-based focused cDNA array analysis. Several markers that in concert could distinguish undifferentiated ES cells from their differentiated progeny were identified. These included known markers such as SSEA antigens, OCT3/4, SOX-2, REX-1 and TERT, as well as additional markers such as UTF-1, TRF1, TRF2, connexin43, and connexin45, FGFR-4, ABCG-2, and Glut-1. A set of negative markers that confirm the absence of differentiation was also developed. These include genes characteristic of trophoectoderm, markers of germ layers, and of more specialized progenitor cells. While the expression of many of the markers was similar in mouse and human cells, significant differences were found in the expression of vimentin, beta-III tubulin, alpha-fetoprotein, eomesodermin, HEB, ARNT, and FoxD3 as well as in the expression of the LIF receptor complex LIFR/IL6ST (gp130). Profound differences in cell cycle regulation, control of apoptosis, and cytokine expression were uncovered using focused microarrays. The profile of gene expression observed in H1 cells was similar to that of two other human ES cell lines tested (line I-6 and clonal line-H9.2) and to feeder-free subclones of H1, H7, and H9, indicating that the observed differences between human and mouse ES cells were species-specific rather than arising from differences in culture conditions.