Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nurse Pract ; 17(4): 371, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33903800
2.
J Nurse Pract ; 17(2): 142, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33654476
3.
J Nurse Pract ; 16(4): A9, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308571
4.
J Nurse Pract ; 16(6): A10, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32547331
5.
6.
J Nurse Pract ; 16(7): A10, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32834793
7.
J Nurse Pract ; 16(10): A20, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33230392
8.
J Nurse Pract ; 16(5): A7, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32412521
9.
Clin Neuroradiol ; 32(3): 705-715, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34605946

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Haemorrhage and calcification can be qualitatively distinguished on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) using phase information, but it is unclear how to make this distinction in a subset of lesions with ambiguous phase, containing a mixture of positive and negative values. This work investigates the validity of qualitative phase assessment at the cranial or caudal margins in classifying such lesions as haemorrhagic or calcific, when quantitative susceptibility mapping is not available to the neuroradiologist. METHODS: In a retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging examinations acquired between July 2015 and November 2019, 87 lesions with ambiguous phase which could be confidently determined to be haemorrhagic or calcific were identified. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently classified these lesions as haemorrhagic or calcific using 3 approaches: qualitative phase assessment at the lesions' cranial or caudal margins, dominant phase, and in-plane margins. Combined sensitivities and specificities of these analyses were calculated using a generalised linear mixed model with random effects for reader. RESULTS: Assessment at the cranial or caudal margins achieved a sensitivity of 100% for haemorrhage and calcification, which was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to dominant phase assessment with sensitivities of 52% for haemorrhage (95% confidence interval, CI 43-61%) and 54% for calcification (95% CI 42-66%), as well as in-plane margin assessment with 28% (95% CI 18-38%) and 46% (95% CI 36-56%). CONCLUSION: Haemorrhage and calcification can be reliably distinguished in lesions with ambiguous phase on SWI by qualitative review of the phase signal at the cranial or caudal margins.


Assuntos
Calcinose , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Hemorragia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
10.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 30(3): 117-119, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757879

RESUMO

Storm preparedness and recovery has shown much improvement since Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana in 2005, during which more than 1,000 people died. The floodwaters did not recede for weeks. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with information on the lived experience of a nurse practitioner during Hurricane Katrina. Health care providers are not immune from the life-changing effects of a disaster. Readers are provided resources to access disaster preparedness information.


Assuntos
Tempestades Ciclônicas , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Profissionais de Enfermagem/psicologia , Humanos , Nova Orleans
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA