Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Emerg Med ; 47(2): 188-91, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24928539

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous abscesses are a common clinical condition treated effectively with incision and drainage. OBJECTIVE: Placement of subcutaneous loop drains to facilitate healing of these infections has been described, but has yet to gain widespread adoption in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: This article includes instructions for how to perform this technique using materials available in the emergency setting, as well as a discussion of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this method. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of abscess management is effective and easy to perform. It offers potential benefits, such as decreased pain from packing material, no need for packing changes, and decreased need for follow-up visits.


Assuntos
Abscesso/cirurgia , Drenagem/métodos , Luvas Cirúrgicas , Dermatopatias/cirurgia , Drenagem/instrumentação , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 58(5): 417-25, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803448

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score is widely used to assess patients with head injury but has been criticized for its complexity and poor interrater reliability. A 3-point Simplified Motor Score (SMS) (defined as obeys commands=2, localizes pain=1, and withdraws to pain or worse=0) was created to address these limitations. Our goal is to validate the SMS in the out-of-hospital setting, with the hypothesis that it is equivalent to the GCS score for discriminating brain injury outcomes. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of an urban Level I trauma registry. Four outcomes and their composite were studied: emergency tracheal intubation, clinically meaningful brain injury, need for neurosurgical intervention, and mortality. The out-of-hospital GCS score and SMS were evaluated by comparing areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve with a paired nonparametric approach. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. A clinically significant difference in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve was defined as greater than or equal to 0.05, according to previous literature. RESULTS: We included 19,408 patients, of whom 18% were tracheally intubated, 18% had brain injuries, 8% required neurosurgical intervention, and 6% died. The difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the out-of-hospital GCS score and SMS was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.01 to 0.11) for emergency tracheal intubation, 0.05 (95% CI 0 to 0.09) for brain injury, 0.04 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.09) for neurosurgical intervention, 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.15) for mortality, and 0.05 (95% CI 0 to 0.10) for the composite outcome. CONCLUSION: In this external validation, SMS was similar to the GCS score for predicting outcomes in traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA