RESUMO
AIMS: Despite rehospitalization being common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), an in-depth analysis on this topic is missing. This study sought to report on the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of rehospitalization within one year following TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients treated with TAVI between 2016 and 2020 in East Denmark were included. Medical records of all patients were reviewed to validate rehospitalizations up to 1 year after discharge from the index admission. The study population consisted of 1,397 patients, of whom 615 (44%) had an unplanned rehospitalization within the first year post-TAVI. The rehospitalization incidence rate was 3-fold higher in the early period (within 30 days) compared with the late period (30 days to 1 year; 2.5 vs. 0.8 per patient-year, respectively; p < 0.001). Predictors of early unplanned rehospitalization were procedure-related complications and prior stroke, whereas late unplanned rehospitalization was associated with pre-existing comorbidities. Predictors of HF rehospitalization included ischemic heart disease, the extent of cardiac damage, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA class at baseline. HF rehospitalization within 30 days and 1-year post-TAVI was associated with a markedly increased 1-year and 5-year mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) of 4.3 and 3.2 for 1-year mortality and HR of 3.2 and 2.9 for 5-year mortality, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rehospitalization after TAVI is frequent in real-world practice. Early rehospitalization is mostly procedure-related whereas late rehospitalization is related to pre-existing comorbidities. HF rehospitalization is associated with poor long-term survival and could be validated as a prognostically relevant endpoint for TAVI trials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Desensitization is a method for inducing temporary tolerance to allergen. The mechanism underlying desensitization is yet to be established. METHODS: Basophil granulocytes in whole blood from grass pollen allergic subjects were desensitized ex vivo by sequential addition of increasing allergen concentrations. At each step basophil activation (CD193 + CD63+ ) was monitored with and without (background activation) allergen challenge at optimal concentration. The sequential desensitization protocol was compared to two single-dose desensitization protocols with threshold and subthreshold allergen concentrations. Incubation intervals and allergen concentrations were varied in order to optimise the protocol. RESULTS: Sequential desensitization effectively reduced basophil response. The single-dose subthreshold protocol and single-dose threshold protocol did not reduce basophil activation with optimal allergen challenge from a mean 57.1 (95% CI: 32.7 - 81.5) to 50.4% (95% CI: 16.3 - 84.4; n = 5; P = 0.43) and 45.0% (95% CI: 23.1 - 66.9; P = 0.14) respectively, while the sequential desensitization protocol reduced activation to a mean 37.2% (95% CI: 16.3 - 58.1; P = 0.018). Reducing incubation time from 10 to 5 minutes increased mean background activation from 22.4 (95% CI: 11.7 - 33.1) to 30.0% (95% CI: 19.7 - 40.3; n = 5; P = 0.026). Increasing time intervals from 10 to 20 minutes reduced background activation from 30.9 (95% CI: 22.8 - 39.0) to 21.9% (95% CI: 16.0 - 27.7; n = 5; P = 0.020). Increasing allergen concentration intervals from 2-fold to 5- and 10-fold did not have significant effect on basophil activation. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential desensitization ex vivo effectively attenuates the basophil response to allergen. Increasing the time spent at each step improves desensitization. This protocol could be valuable for investigation the mechanism of desensitization. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.