Approach in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis prevention: results from the Italian multicenter observational EGEO study.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is the most frequent cause of secondary osteoporosis. GIO is linked to glucocorticoids (GC) daily assumption with maximum effect within first months of treatment and decreasing to basal levels as the therapy is discontinued. In Italy, primary prevention of GIO is suggested when GC therapy (prednisone >5 mg/day or equivalent) is taken for longer than 3 months. Lazio GISMO (Italian Group for Study and Diagnosis of Bone Metabolism Diseases) group organized the GC and Osteoporosis Epidemiology study (EGEO) to evaluate physician's approach in preventing GIO. The study involved 19 osteoporosis centers. Patients taking long-term GC therapy were recruited and information collected: medical history and anthropometric data, GC therapy, primary disease, physician's specialty, osteopororosis screening, and pharmacological intervention. The study included 1334 patients. Mean age was 63 ± 13 yr; 243 (18%) patients had a history of falls from standing position in the previous 12 months, 78 (35%) vertebral fractures, 91 (41%) fractures other than vertebral, 27 (12%) femoral fractures, and 27 (12%) multiple sites fractures. The molecules of GC more often prescribed were prednisone and 6-metil prednisolone. One thousand and forty patients (78%) were taking GC for more than 6 months. GC therapy was prescribed more frequently by rheumatologists (62%). Antiosteoporotic drugs for GIO prevention were prescribed in 431 patients (32%). Among the patients, only 27% (360) received calcium and vitamin D supplements, and 39% (319) treated by rheumatologists received anti-resorptive drugs. In conclusion, our data show that in Italy, as already described elsewhere, only a small subpopulation of GC-treated patients was supported by an anti-osteoporotic therapy, indicating the need to further stimulate awareness of both patients and specialists, prescribing GC therapy, to an appropriate and prompt GIO prevention.

[Emergency heart stimulation with a transthoracic electrode. Our experience in 35 cases]. / La stimolazione cardiaca d'urgenza con elettrodo transtoracico. Nostra esperienza in 35 casi.

35 cases of heart stimulation using a transthoracic electrode are presented. It is emphasised that the technique is only applicable in very few cases (total AVB with a critical frequency below 20/min, all types of asystolia). The simple technique, results and complications (in theory many but in practice only 1 occurred) are briefly described.

[Evaluation of 10 patients with stable stress angina using an ergometric test and Holter's dynamic ECG monitoring]. / Valutazione di 10 pazienti con angina stabile da sforzo mediante test ergometrico e monitoraggio con ECG dinamico secondo Holter.

10 male patients with stable angina of effort were studied via bicycle ergometer test and Holter's dynamic ECG. Effort produced asymptomatic ischaemia which were well tolerated and statistically much shorter and less intense than symptomatic attacks in the same patients. The primary qualification for admission to the survey was the presence of stable angina of effort verified by two ergometric tests revealing a stable ischaemic threshold. No predictive figure for asymptomatic ischaemic attacks was found in subjects with a latency period between the appearance of the ischaemia signal and onset of increased angor. It is therefore concluded that Holter ECG test must be added to ergometry for a correct evaluation of subjects with stable angina of effort.

Effect of amiodarone therapy on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias: Argentine Pilot Study of Sudden Death and Amiodarone (EPAMSA).

The efficiency of prophylactic antiarrhythmic treatment with amiodarone in reducing 1-year mortality in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( < 35%) and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (Lown classes 2 and 4) was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Among 127 patients who entered the study, 61 were assigned to no antiarrhythmic therapy (control group [CG] and 66 to amiodarone treatment (amiodarone group [AG]). Amiodarone was administered at a dosage of 800 mg/day for 2 weeks followed by 400 mg/day thereafter. A 12-month follow-up was completed for 106 patients (57 in the AG and 49 in the CG). Amiodarone reduced the overall mortality rate, which was 10.5% in the AG versus 28.6% in the CG (odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10 to 0.84; log-rank test 0.02) and sudden death rate, which was 7.0% in the AG versus 20.4% in the CG (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.08 to 1.00; log-rank test 0.04). Side effects were rare, and in only three patients did amiodarone treatment have to be discontinued.