Tolerability of atomoxetine for treatment of pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the context of epilepsy.

To examine atomoxetine's tolerability in patients with epilepsy, we reviewed medical records of all patients with epilepsy who were treated with atomoxetine in a tertiary care pediatric psychopharmacology practice. Twenty-seven patients (10.1 ± 4.2 years, 63% male) with an average seizure frequency at baseline of 7 ± 24 per month (median: 0, range: 0-90) were found. Symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in twenty-five patients (92.5%) had previously not responded to stimulants. Atomoxetine, average dose 35.2 ± 24.4 mg, was given for a median of 26 weeks (range: 4-141). Seventeen patients (63%) discontinued atomoxetine due to: inadequate response (n=7, 26%), worsening behavior such as increased irritability/activation (n = 7, 26%), nonadherence (n=1, 4%), emerging psychotic-like symptoms (n=1, 4%), and appetite decrease and tremor (n=1, 4%). There were no discontinuations because of seizure exacerbation. Atomoxetine dose, epilepsy etiology, seizure type, and comorbid psychiatric disorders did not predict discontinuation. No safety problems of sufficient magnitude to preclude prospective studies of atomoxetine in children with epilepsy were found.

Critical thinking about adverse drug effects: lessons from the psychology of risk and medical decision-making for clinical psychopharmacology.

Systematic biases in decision-making have been well characterized in medical and nonmedical fields but mostly ignored in clinical psychopharmacology. The purpose of this paper is to sensitize clinicians who prescribe psychiatric drugs to the issues of the psychology of risk, especially as they pertain to the risk of side effects. Specifically, the present analysis focuses on heuristic organization and framing effects that create cognitive biases in medical practice. Our purpose is to increase the awareness of how pharmaceutical companies may influence physicians by framing the risk of medication side effects to favor their products.

Galantamine-ER for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and correlation with hippocampal neuronal viability: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Many subjects with bipolar disorder experience significant cognitive dysfunction, even when euthymic, but few studies assess biological correlates of or treatment strategies for cognitive dysfunction. METHOD: Nineteen subjects with bipolar disorder in remission, who reported subjective cognitive deficits, were treated with open-label galantamine-ER 8-24 mg/day for 4 months. Ten healthy volunteers matched for age and gender were also assessed. Mood and subjective cognitive questionnaires were administered monthly. At the beginning and the end of the trial all subjects were administered neuropsychological tests, including tests of attention (Conners CPT) and episodic memory (CVLT). Bipolar subjects underwent proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) measurements before and after treatment, healthy volunteers completed baseline 1H-MRS. We acquired 1H-MRS data at 4.0 T from voxels centered on the left and right hippocampus to measure hippocampal N-acetyl aspartate (NAA, a measure of neuronal viability) and choline containing compounds (Cho, a marker of lipid metabolism and membrane turn-over). RESULTS: Compared to healthy volunteers, bipolar subjects had higher baseline subjective cognitive deficits and lower scores on objective tests of attention (Conner's CPT) and verbal episodic memory (CVLT). After treatment, bipolar subjects experienced significant improvement of subjective cognitive scores and on objective tests of attention (Conner's CPT) and verbal episodic memory (CVLT). In the left hippocampus NAA increased and choline (Cho) decreased in bipolar subjects during treatment. CONCLUSION: Bipolar subjects had cognitive dysfunction; treatment with Galantamine-ER was associated with improved cognition and with increases in neuronal viability and normalization of lipid membrane metabolism in the left hippocampus. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00181636).

Comparative clinical responses to risperidone and divalproex in patients with pediatric bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical responses of patients with pediatric bipolar disorder being treated with risperidone versus divalproex. METHODS: Medical records of outpatients younger than 18 years of age were reviewed to gather data on those who received risperidone or divalproex monotherapy for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Effectiveness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales assigned by the treating clinician at visits during the initial 3 months of treatment with risperidone or divalproex. Change in CGI-S score over time was the primary outcome variable. The number of patients with a CGI-I score of < or = 2 at endpoint who did not discontinue the index medication because of adverse events was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients aged 5-14 years who were being treated for bipolar disorder were identified (risperidone n = 16; divalproex n = 12). Regression analysis of change in CGI-S scores revealed greater reductions in bipolar symptoms (p = 0.022) and a faster reduction in CGI-S scores (p = 0.016) in patients receiving risperidone than divalproex. A significantly shorter time to achieving a CGI-I score of < or = 2 was observed with risperidone than divalproex (26.8 +/- 20.7 days vs. 33.8 +/- 11.3 days; p = 0.048). However, the proportion of patients with a CGI-I score < or = 2 at endpoint was not significantly different (risperidone 69% versus divalproex 42%, p = 0.250). Three patients discontinued risperidone and 2 discontinued divalproex. Of these, none of the patients treated with risperidone and only 1 patient treated with divalproex discontinued treatment because of a documented adverse event. Risperidone was associated with significantly more weight gain then divalproex at 3 months (risperidone 2.46 +/- 1.16 kg versus divalproex 0.43 +/- 0.77 kg, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving risperidone experienced a faster decrease in the severity of their bipolar symptoms, as measured by faster decreases in CGI-S scores, than did those who received divalproex. However, risperidone was also associated with significantly greater weight gain.