Body composition is associated with risk of toxicity-induced modifications of treatment in women with stage I-IIIB breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Initial dose of chemotherapy is planned based on body surface area, which does not take body composition into account. We studied the association between fat mass (kg and relative to total body weight) as well as lean mass (kg and relative to total body weight) and toxicity-induced modifications of treatment in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: In an observational study among 172 breast cancer patients (stage I-IIIB) in the Netherlands, we assessed body composition using dual-energy X-ray scans. Information on toxicity-induced modifications of treatment, defined as dose reductions, cycle delays, regimen switches, or premature termination of chemotherapy, was abstracted from medical records. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess associations between body composition and the risk of toxicity-induced modifications of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 95 out of 172 (55%) patients experienced toxicity-induced modifications of treatment. Higher absolute and relative fat mass were associated with higher risk of these modifications (HR 1.14 per 5 kg; 95% CI 1.04-1.25 and HR 1.21 per 5%; 95% CI 1.05-1.38, respectively). A higher relative lean mass was associated with a lower risk of modifications (HR 0.83 per 5%; 95% CI 0.72-0.96). There was no association between absolute lean mass and risk of toxicity-induced modifications of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A higher absolute and a higher relative fat mass was associated with an increased risk of toxicity-induced modifications of treatment. Absolute lean mass was not associated with risk of these treatment modifications, while higher relative lean mass associated with lower risk of modifications. These data suggest that total fat mass importantly determines the risk of toxicities during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Adherence and patients' experiences with the use of oral anticancer agents.

A rapidly growing number of oral anticancer agents has become available in oncology and hematology. Though these introductions have several benefits, medication adherence is an issue of concern. Little is known about the factors influencing adherence to treatment with oral anticancer agents in daily practice. Material and methods. In this observational, multicenter study including 216 patients, carried out between October 2010 and March 2012, the use of oral anticancer drugs was assessed by means of a telephonic pill count, a questionnaire and a review of the patient's medical file and pharmacy medication records. Parameters collected were patients' demographics, treatment characteristics, beliefs and attitude towards disease and medicines, self-reported adherence, side effects, quality of life and satisfaction about information. Patients off treatment filled out a questionnaire about the reasons for discontinuation. Optimal adherence was defined as ≥ 95%-≤ 105%. Results. The mean adherence rate (AR) (n = 177) was 99.1% with 20.3% of patients having a sub-optimal AR (< 95%, > 105%) consisting both of under- and over-adherence. Multivariate analyses showed that being on a cyclic dosing regimen (rather than a continuous regimen), not living alone and being highly educated increased the chances of optimal adherence (ORs = 4.88, 4.59 and 2.53, respectively). In addition, optimal adherence was found to be less common in patients reporting treatment control (OR = 0.77). One third of 79 patients off treatment reported their experienced side effects as one of the reasons for discontinuation. Discussion. Although most patients are fully adherent to oral anticancer agents, there is a substantial number tending to non-adherence. Patients living alone and those on a continuous dosing regimen are most likely to adhere sub-optimally. Interventions to improve adherence should specifically address these patients and be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

Safety and efficacy of sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by weekly paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Improving survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require new strategies or new drugs. Sequential administration of conventional non-cross-resistant cytotoxic drugs offers an opportunity to increase drug diversity while maintaining dose intensity. This Phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of such a regimen in advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV received as first-line treatment four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5) (day 1) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. Thereafter, treatment continued with 12 weekly cycles of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). RESULTS: In total, 46 patients were included. Median age was 59.6 years (range 41.3-74.3 years) and 93.5 % (n = 43) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. All but 6 had stage IV disease, and 13 (28.3 %) had squamous cell carcinomas. Thirty-six (78 %) patients completed 4 cycles of carboplatin-gemcitabine and 35 patients received at least 1 cycle of paclitaxel, of whom 16 (46 % of total) patients completed 12 cycles of paclitaxel. The overall objective response rate was 49 %. Sixteen (37 %) patients had a response to carboplatin-gemcitabine, increasing to 21 (49 %) patients after administration of paclitaxel. Of the 13 assessable patients who showed a partial response (PR) on carboplatin-gemcitabine, 12 (92 %) patients showed also a PR on paclitaxel. Of 19 assessable patients with stable disease (SD) on carboplatin-gemcitabine, 4 (21 %) had a PR and 13 (68 %) SD on paclitaxel. Toxicity was moderate: 24 % stopped because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin-gemcitabine and weekly paclitaxel is active and feasible in advanced NSCLC patients.

The role of (18)F-FDG PET in the differentiation between lung metastases and synchronous second primary lung tumours.

PURPOSE: In lung cancer patients with multiple lesions, the differentiation between metastases and second primary tumours has significant therapeutic and prognostic implications. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential of (18)F-FDG PET to discriminate metastatic disease from second primary lung tumours. METHODS: Of 1,396 patients evaluated by the thoracic oncology group between January 2004 and April 2009 at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, patients with a synchronous second primary lung cancer were selected. Patients with metastatic disease involving the lungs served as the control group. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) measured with (18)F-FDG PET were determined for two tumours in each patient. The relative difference between the SUVs of these tumours (∆SUV) was determined and compared between the second primary group and metastatic disease group. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ∆SUV for an optimal cut-off value. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (21 metastatic disease, 16 second primary cancer) were included for analysis. The ∆SUV was significantly higher in patients with second primary cancer than in those with metastatic disease (58 vs 28%, respectively, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.81 and the odds ratio for the optimal cut-off was 18.4. CONCLUSION: SUVs from (18)F-FDG PET images can be helpful in differentiating metastatic disease from second primary tumours in patients with synchronous pulmonary lesions. Further studies are warranted to confirm the consistency of these results.

Real-World Adverse Effects of Capecitabine Toxicity in an Elderly Population.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the safety and effectiveness of the numerous available chemotherapeutic therapies for geriatric oncology patients. Most safety studies are conducted in large trials, and there is some uncertainty surrounding whether the results would be the same in typical daily use. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aims to assess the adverse effects of real-world capecitabine use in elderly patients. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients treated with capecitabine in an oncology department of a University Clinic in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. We scored adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea, and dosage adjustments and the reasons for them. In total, 132 patients were included, 69 of whom were aged 70 years or below (mean age: 57 years), while 63 were aged older than 70 years (mean age: 74 years). RESULTS: Patients aged over 70 years experienced more serious adverse effects than younger patients. Grade 2 or 3 hand-foot syndrome toxicity was experienced by 20.2% of patients aged younger than 70 years and by 34.9% of patients older than 70 years (p = 0.059). Grade 2, 3, or 4 diarrhea was experienced by 17.4% of the patients aged younger than 70 years but by 31.7% of the patients aged older than 70 years (p = 0.044). Dosage was adjusted for 27/69 patients in the younger group and 52/63 patients in the older group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The difference in observed adverse effects cannot be the sole explanation for the high incidence of observed dose adjustments. A prospective follow-up study of elderly patients using capecitabine outside clinical trials is needed to evaluate the optimum balance between adverse effects and efficacy.

Conventional Pathology Versus Gene Signatures for Assessing Luminal A and B Type Breast Cancers: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

In this study, in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) early stage breast cancer patients who were considered candidates for 70-gene signature (70-GS, "MammaPrint") use, we compared molecular subtyping (MS) based on the previously validated 80-gene signature (80-GS, "BluePrint") versus surrogate pathological subtyping (PS). Between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015, 595 clinical intermediate risk ER+ early stage breast cancer patients were enrolled. Hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 receptor status were determined by conventional pathology using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Ki67 was assessed in a subset of patients. The overall concordance between PS and MS for luminal type cancers (A and B together) was 98%. The concordance between PS and MS for luminal A and luminal B type cancers based on the Bloom Richardson histological grade (BR) (n = 586) or Ki67 (n = 185) was low: 64% (Kappa 0.20 [95% CI 0.11⁻0.28]) and 65% (Kappa 0.22 [95% CI 0.062⁻0.37]), respectively. In this prospective study (NCT02209857) of a selection of ER+ and predominantly HER2- early-stage breast cancer patients, the additional ability of the 80-GS to distinguish between luminal, HER2-type and basal-like cancers was inherently very limited. The distinction of luminal-type tumors into A and B according to Ki67 status or BR grade versus the 70-GS revealed poor concordance.

Chemotherapy response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the value of (18)F-FDG PET for the assessment of chemotherapy response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, part of the objective of this study was to compare 2 methods to quantify changes in glucose metabolism. METHODS: In 51 patients, dynamic (18)F-FDG PET was performed before and at 5-8 wk into treatment. Simplified methods to measure glucose metabolism (standardized uptake value [SUV]) and quantitative measures (metabolic rate of glucose [MR(Glu)]), derived from Patlak analysis, were evaluated. The overall survival and progression-free survival with respect to MR(Glu) and SUV were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Fractional changes in tumor glucose use were stratified by the median value and also the predefined EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) metabolic response criteria, and criteria applying cutoff levels similar to those of RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were evaluated. RESULTS: When stratifying at the median value of DeltaMR(Glu) and DeltaSUV, the difference in overall survival (P = 0.017 for DeltaMR(Glu), P = 0.018 for DeltaSUV) and progression-free survival (P = 0.002 for DeltaMR(Glu), P = 0.0009 for DeltaSUV) was highly significant. When applying the predefined criteria for metabolic response, the cutoff levels as also used for size measurement (RECIST) showed significant differences for DeltaSUV between response categories in progression-free survival (P = 0.0003) as well as overall survival (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The degree of chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism as determined by (18)F-FDG PET is highly predictive for patient outcome, stratifying patients into groups with widely differing overall survival and progression-free survival probabilities. The use of (18)F-FDG PET for therapy monitoring seems clinically feasible, because simplified methods to measure tumor glucose use (SUV) are sufficiently reliable and can replace more complex, quantitative measures (MR(Glu)) in this patient population.

The Predictive Value of Early In-Treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Response to Chemotherapy in Combination with Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

18F-FDG PET/CT is potentially applicable to predict response to chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In 25 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed before treatment and after 2 wk, at the end of the second week of first cycle carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CPB) treatment. Patients received up to a total of 4 cycles of CPB treatment. Maintenance treatment with bevacizumab monotherapy was continued until progressive disease without significant treatment-related toxicities of first-line treatment. In the case of progressive disease, bevacizumab was combined with erlotinib. SUV corrected for lean body mass (SUL and SULpeak) were obtained. PERCIST were used for response evaluation. These semiquantitative parameters were correlated with progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: Metabolic response, defined by a significant reduction in SULpeak of 30% or more after 2 wk of CPB, was predictive of progression-free survival and OS. For partial metabolic responders (n = 19), the median OS was 22.8 mo. One-year and 2-y OS were 79% and 47%, respectively. Nonmetabolic responders (n = 6) (stable metabolic disease or progressive disease) showed a median OS of 4.4 mo (1-y and 2-y OS was 33% and 0%, respectively) (P < 0.001). Conclusion:18F-FDG PET/CT after 1 treatment cycle is predictive of outcome to first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. This enables identification of patients at risk of treatment failure, permitting treatment alternatives such as early switch to a different therapy.

Encouraging results in older patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of treatment guideline adherence in daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was performed to determine whether patients over 60 years old who received chemotherapy were treated according to the existing treatment guidelines and to investigate the reasons for dose reductions or treatment delay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and seven patients aged over 60 years old and diagnosed with colon, breast or lung cancer between 1998 and 2008 who were treated with chemotherapy in the Radboud University Medical Center were included. From the medical records we recorded the number of and the reasons for dose reductions and delays. We calculated the relative dose intensity (RDI) received. RESULTS: RDI did not decrease significantly with age. However patients over 65 years of age had a higher probability of receiving a suboptimal dose intensity, even when treated with curative intent. There was no correlation between toxicity and age, however the comorbidity score increased with age. The average received RDI was higher in patients diagnosed more recently. CONCLUSION: Despite increased comorbidity, older patients receiving chemotherapy were generally treated according to protocol without high incidence of severe toxicity. We saw improvement of RDI over the time period investigated. The participation of geriatricians in multidisciplinary oncology teams could help to optimize therapy decisions for patients with comorbidity.

Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: To understand which factors could affect the assessment of anti-vascular treatment by DCE-MRI, we investigated possible causes that could have hampered the selection of an optimal biological dose in humans of the vascular targeted agent NGR-hTNF by DCE-MRI: (1) insufficient reproducibility of DCE-MRI; (2) less specific targeting of NGR-hTNF; (3) interference of vessel characteristics with NGR-hTNF efficacy; (4) interfering pharmacodynamic effects. EXPERIMENTAL: In a phase I study NGR-hTNF, DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 2 h after NGR-hTNF administration in 31 patients with advanced solid cancer. Reproducibility measurements were performed in 5 other non-treated patients with metastatic disease. Mean kep, Ktrans values and their histogram distribution were determined in metastases and healthy liver tissue. The correlation between tumour size and DCE-MRI parameters was determined. Kinetics of soluble TNF receptors and the development of anti-TNF antibodies were assessed. RESULTS: Reproducibility of the DCE-MRI technique was adequate. Mean DCE-MRI parameters did not significantly change after NGR-hTNF administration, but histogram analyses showed significant changes in metastases and healthy liver tissue in some patients. The anti-vascular effects of NGR-hTNF were larger in smaller tumours, which have less mature neovasculature. Soluble TNF receptors were released. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty to find an optimal biological dose of NGR-TNF by DCE-MRI is likely caused by a combination of factors: (i) different profiles of early anti-vascular effects in tumours and healthy liver tissue, (ii) dependence of the magnitude of the anti-vascular effect of NGR-hTNF on tumour size and (iii) shedding kinetics of soluble TNFα receptors.

Phase I clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study of the vascular agent NGR-hTNF in patients with advanced cancers (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study 16041).

PURPOSE: This phase I trial investigating the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF aimed to determine the (a) dose-limiting toxicities, (b) maximum tolerated dose (MTD), (c) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, (d) vascular response by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and (e) preliminary clinical activity in solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: NGR-hTNF was administered once every 3 weeks by a 20- to 60-minute i.v. infusion to cohorts of three to six patients with solid tumors in escalating doses. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses in blood were done during the first four cycles. DCE-MRI was done in cycle 1 at baseline and 2 hours after the start of the infusion. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients received a total of 201 cycles of NGR-hTNF (0.2-60 microg/m(2)). Rigors and fever were the most frequently observed toxicities. Four dose-limiting toxicities were observed (at doses of 1.3, 8.1, and 60 microg/m(2)), of which three were infusion related. The MTD was 45 microg/m(2). The mean apparent terminal half-life ranged from 0.963 to 2.08 hours. DCE-MRI results of tumors showed a vascular response to NGR-hTNF. No objective responses were observed, but 27 patients showed stable disease with a median duration of 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: NGR-hTNF was well tolerated. The MTD was 45 microg/m(2) administered in 1 hour once every 3 weeks. DCE-MRI results showed the antivascular effect of NGR-hTNF. These findings call for further research for defining the optimal biological dose and clinical activity of NGR-hTNF as a single agent or in combination with cytotoxic drugs.

The first-in-human study of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-sulfate) capsule of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): a phase I open-label multicenter trial in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: In part A, the aim was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-Sulfate) oral capsule formulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886). In part B, the aim was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of the new Hyd-Sulfate capsule with the initial AZD6244 free-base suspension and further characterize the pharmacodynamic profile and efficacy of the new formulation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In part A, 30 patients received escalating doses of AZD6244 Hyd-Sulfate twice daily. In part B, 29 patients were randomized to a single dose of the Hyd-Sulfate capsule or free-base suspension, followed by a washout, then a single dose of the alternative formulation. Patients received the Hyd-Sulfate capsule twice daily at MTD of part A thereafter. RESULTS: The MTD of the Hyd-Sulfate capsule was 75 mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 acneiform rash and pleural effusion. Fatigue (65.7%) and acneiform dermatitis (60.0%) were the most frequent adverse events at the MTD. Based on area under curve(0-24), exposure of the 75 mg Hyd-Sulfate capsule relative to the 100 mg free-base suspension was 197% (90% confidence interval, 161-242%). Pharmacodynamic analysis showed that inhibition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in peripheral blood lymphocytes was related to plasma concentrations of AZD6244, with an estimated IC(50) of 352 ng/mL and maximum inhibition (E(max)) of approximately 91%, showing target inhibition. A patient with metastatic melanoma bearing a V600E BRAF mutation achieved a complete response persisting after 15 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The AZD6244 Hyd-Sulfate capsule formulation has shown a favorable toxicity, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profile, and is being taken forward in ongoing clinical trials.

Evaluation of different normalization procedures for the calculation of the standardized uptake value in therapy response monitoring studies.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the influence of different normalization procedures on relative changes in standardized uptake values (SUV) of F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the assessment of chemotherapy response in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: In 97 patients with CRC (n = 48) and NSCLC (n = 49), FDG-PET was performed before and during the course of chemotherapy. Relative changes in SUV (DeltaSUV) were determined after correction for injected dose and bodyweight, lean body mass, body surface area or a combination of bodyweight and plasma glucose. The predictive value for overall and progression-free survival with respect to the different normalized DeltaSUVs was assessed. RESULTS: In both CRC and NSCLC, no differences were seen in the degree of change between the four SUV-normalizations during chemotherapy. Cox regression analysis for overall survival showed significant hazard ratios of 1.14-1.16 per 10% SUV change in CRC and 1.10-1.13 in NSCLC and for progression-free survival hazard ratios of 1.15 per 10% DeltaSUV change in CRC and 1.10-1.12 in NSCLC. CONCLUSION: Relative changes in SUV is a strong predictor for survival in both CRC and NSCLC. None of the four normalization methods showed statistical advantage over the other. Therefore, simplifying the methods for analysis of FDG-PET data can improve the incorporation of FDG-PET in clinical treatment-response monitoring and may facilitate application in multicentre trials.

Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines (ie, by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) do not recommend secondary infection prophylaxis, whereas, in contrast, caregivers prefer secondary prophylaxis to chemotherapy dose reduction after an episode of febrile neutropenia (FN). Because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is expensive, this study investigates the economic consequences of secondary prophylactic use of different prophylactic strategies (antibiotics, antibiotics plus G-CSF, and a combined sequential approach) in a population at risk of FN, using a Markov model. METHODS: The input for the model is mainly based on the clinical outcome and patient-based cost data set (adopting the health care payer's perspective for the Netherlands) derived from a randomized study on primary prophylaxis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients; establishing mean cost of an episode FN of euro3,290 and prophylaxis of euro79 (antibiotics) +/- euro1,616 (G-CSF) per cycle. The economic analysis was analyzed probabilistically using first- and second-order Monte Carlo simulation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was defined as cost per FN-free cycle. RESULTS: Secondary prophylaxis with antibiotics was the least expensive strategy (mean, euro4,496/patient). The strategy antibiotics plus G-CSF was most expensive (mean, euro 8,998/patient). Comparison of these two strategies resulted in an unacceptably high ICER (euro343,110 per FN-free cycle) in the Dutch context. In scenarios using higher FN-related costs (as found in the United States), the strategies are less distinct in their monetary effects, but still favor antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This model-based economic analysis demonstrates that in the Netherlands and most likely also in the United States, if secondary prophylaxis is preferred, the strategy with antibiotics is recommended.

Review of the value of colony stimulating factors for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenic episodes in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major dose-limiting toxicity of systemic cancer chemotherapy that can lead to fever and infection, requiring prompt analysis and in-patient treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Complicated neutropenia may lead to reduction and/or delay of systemic anti-cancer treatment, which may compromise outcome. Haematopoietic growth factors have the ability to augment haematopoietic cell cycling and are used to facilitate more dose-intense treatments and to decrease treatment-related complications. This review focuses on randomised trials that investigated the use of colony-stimulating factors (CSF) to prevent treatment-related febrile complications in haematological malignancies in (younger) adult patients. In general, these studies demonstrated that CSF reduced the duration of severe neutropenia but not always its febrile complications; therefore inconsistent results regarding clinically relevant reduction of hospitalisation, duration of therapeutic antibiotics, infection-related or disease-related mortality and economic effects were reported. Current developments in treatment of haematological malignancies will pose new challenges as a shift in infectious pathogens can be expected.

Febrile neutropenia: highlighting the role of prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during standard dose chemotherapy for solid tumors.

The prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is important as it reduces hospitalization and is likely to improve quality of life. Several prophylactic strategies are available, although their use in patients with an anticipated short duration of neutropenia is controversial and not recommended. This paper presents the results of a review of the literature on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and also discusses the recommendations in current guidelines in view of recent publications. Both primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and prophylactic antibiotics reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia considerably, and the addition of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to antibiotics is even more effective. As antibiotics, however, give rise to antimicrobial resistance and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is expensive, tailoring of prophylaxis is clearly needed. This will increase the absolute clinical and economical benefits of prophylaxis. Patient-related, treatment-related and disease-related factors enhancing the risk of febrile neutropenia are discussed, including the, underrated, high risk of febrile neutropenia specifically in the first cycles of chemotherapy. Half of the patients developing febrile neutropenia during treatment do so in the first cycle of chemotherapy, which favors primary prophylaxis. The efficacy of secondary prophylaxis is not well documented. Finally, new interesting agents in the treatment and supportive care of solid tumors have become available, and these are discussed in relation to the incidence and prevention of febrile neutropenia.

Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Recently, a Dutch, randomized, phase III trial demonstrated that, in small-cell lung cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) to prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of FN in cycle 1 (24% v 10%; P = .01). We hypothesized that selecting patients at risk of FN might increase the cost-effectiveness of GCSF prophylaxis. METHODS: Economic analysis was conducted alongside the clinical trial and was focused on the health care perspective. Primary outcome was the difference in mean total costs per patient in cycle 1 between both prophylactic strategies. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as costs per percent-FN-prevented. RESULTS: For the first cycle, the mean incremental costs of adding GCSF amounted to 681 euro (95% CI, -36 to 1,397 euro) per patient. For the entire treatment period, the mean incremental costs were substantial (5,123 euro; 95% CI, 3,908 to 6,337 euro), despite a significant reduction in the incidence of FN and related savings in medical care consumption. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 50 euro per percent decrease of the probability of FN (95% CI, -2 to 433 euro) in cycle 1, and the acceptability for this willingness to pay was approximately 50%. CONCLUSION: Despite the selection of patients at risk of FN, the addition of GCSF to primary antibiotic prophylaxis did not result in cost savings. If policy makers are willing to pay 240 euro for each percent gain in effect (ie, 3,360 euro for a 14% reduction in FN), the addition of GCSF can be considered cost effective.