Virus susceptibility analyses from a phase IV clinical trial of inhaled zanamivir treatment in children infected with influenza.

A zanamivir postapproval efficacy study was conducted in children (n = 279) in Japan during three influenza seasons. Pharyngeal swab specimens (n = 714) were obtained for detailed resistance analysis. From 371 cultured viruses, 3 viruses (A/H1N1) from two subjects showed reduced susceptibility to zanamivir at day 1 (before treatment), 1 had an N74S amino acid substitution (fold shift, 46), and 2 (day 1 and day 2) had a Q136K amino acid substitution (fold shifts, 292 and 301). Q136K was detected only in cultured virus and not in the swab. From the remaining 118 cultured viruses obtained during or after treatment with zanamivir, no shifts in virus susceptibility were detected. Neuraminidase (NA) population sequencing showed that viruses from 12 subjects had emergent amino acid substitutions, but 3 with susceptibility data were not zanamivir resistant. The remainder may be natural variants. Further analysis is planned. Hemagglutinin (HA) sequencing showed that viruses from 20 subjects had 9 HA amino acid substitutions that were previously implicated in resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors in in vitro assays or that were close to the receptor binding site. Their role in in vivo resistance appears to be less important but is not well understood. NA clonal sequence analysis was undertaken to determine if minority species of resistant viruses were present. A total of 1,682 clones from 90 subjects were analyzed. Single clones from 12 subjects contained amino acid substitutions close to the NA active site. It is unclear whether these single amino acid substitutions could have been amplified after drug pressure or are just chance mutations introduced during PCR.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir in the prevention of influenza in community-dwelling, high-risk adult and adolescent subjects: a 28-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Influenza can cause significant morbidity and mortality in subjects at high risk for complications, including the elderly (age >or=65 years) and those with chronic respiratory, cardiovascular, or metabolic conditions. Effective prophylaxis can significantly reduce the disease burden in this population. Previous studies conducted primarily in non-high-risk subjects have reported the efficacy of inhaled zanamivir in preventing influenza. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of zanamivir in preventing influenza in community-dwelling adult and adolescent subjects at high risk for complications of influenza. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in community-dwelling subjects aged >or=12 years who were at high risk for developing complications of influenza, were able to use the Diskhaler device (Glaxo Group Limited, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), and were able to take the first dose of study medication within 5 days of laboratory-confirmed local influenza activity. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive inhaled zanamivir 10 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. The primary end point was the proportion of randomized subjects who developed symptomatic influenza during prophylaxis, as confirmed by culture and/or serology. All adverse events (AEs) occurring after the first dose of study medication were recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 3363 subjects, of whom 58% were female and 93% were white; the mean age of participants was 60.4 years (range, 12-94 years), and 4% were adolescents. Significantly fewer zanamivir-treated subjects developed symptomatic, laboratory- confirmed influenza during prophylaxis compared with placebo recipients (4/1678 vs 23/1685, respectively), representing a relative risk (RR) of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.44; P < 0.001) and a protective efficacy of 83%. The incidence of complications was reduced in zanamivir-treated subjects compared with placebo recipients (1/1678 and 8/1685), representing an RR of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.02-0.73; P = 0.042) and a protective efficacy of 88%. The numbers of zanamivir recipients (151/1678 [9%]) and placebo recipients (169/1685 [ 10 % ] ) who developed symptomatic influenza-like illness regardless of laboratory confirmation did not differ significantly (RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06), indicating that zanamivir was not effective in preventing influenza-like illness that was not caused by influenza infection. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the numbers of zanamivir and placebo recipients who developed laboratory-confirmed infection regardless of symptoms (39/1678 [2%] and 52/1685 [3%], respectively; RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.50-1.15). Of these, 64 subjects (35 and 29) were asymptomatic; seroconversion occurred in all but 1 subject, indicating that zanamivir prophylaxis did not prevent asymptomatic seroconversion. During prophylaxis, 51% of subjects in both treatment groups reported at least 1 AE. There were no major differences in the frequency or nature of AEs between groups. The most commonly reported AEs (>or=3% of subjects in each treatment group) were consistent with upper respiratory viral infection (headache: 17% zanamivir, 18% placebo; cough: 14% and 15%, respectively; throat and tonsil discomfort/pain: 13% and 14%). There were no differences between groups in the overall incidence of viral respiratory infections (5% in both groups) or ear, nose, and throat infections (2% in both groups). None of the analyzed isolates from confirmed cases of influenza exhibited reduced susceptibility to zanamivir or genotypic evidence of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Zanamivir, administered once daily for 28 days, was efficacious in preventing infection with the predominant circulating strains in the 2000- 2001 influenza season in the Northern Hemisphere (influenza A/New Calendonia/20/99-1ike and influenza B/ Sichuan/379/99-like) in these high-risk community- dwelling subjects aged >or=12 years. Zanamivir was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo. No emergence of resistant virus was detected.

M184V is associated with a low incidence of thymidine analogue mutations and low phenotypic resistance to zidovudine and stavudine.

The resistance of HIV clinical isolates with or without M184V was analysed in relation to plasma HIV-1-RNA level and time on therapy. The number of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) was lower in isolates with M184V, this was independent of plasma HIV-1-RNA level and time on therapy for T215F/Y, D67N and L210W. This suggests a direct effect of M184V on the reduced selection of TAMs. Lamivudine use was significantly associated with lower median fold resistance to zidovudine and stavudine.

Phenotypic impact of HIV reverse transcriptase M184I/V mutations in combination with single thymidine analog mutations on nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of the M184I/V mutation and individual thymidine-associated mutations (TAM) on nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) phenotypic susceptibility and compare these results with those obtained using commercial and public algorithms. DESIGN: An HIV genotypic/phenotypic database with over 27 000 samples was used to obtain the median fold change (5-95th percentile) in NRTI phenotypic susceptibility for viruses from patients containing individual TAM with or without the M184I or V mutation and for wild-type patient viruses. RESULTS: The resulting data indicated that in vitro, individual TAM do not have an equivalent impact on NRTI resistance, with some individual TAM having little or no impact on NRTI resistance (e.g. M41L or K219Q/E/H/R). In the presence of the M184I/V mutation, re-sensitization to some drugs, including zidovudine, stavudine and tenofovir was observed despite the presence of a TAM. For didanosine and abacavir, the presence of the M184V mutation and a single TAM did not result in a fold-change increase associated with decreased drug susceptibility. Analysis of public and commercial algorithms revealed a lack of concordance regarding the impact of these mutations, and with the observed phenotypic data. CONCLUSION: These analyses should assist in the creation of rules for genotypic drug resistance algorithms for a better reflection of the impact of individual TAM and also the impact of M184I/V on resistance. These data provide additional evidence that retaining lamivudine in those treatment regimens in which TAM can be selected may provide some therapeutic benefit by maintaining the M184V mutation.

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease resistance mutations selected during 16-72 weeks of therapy in isolates from antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients receiving abacavir/efavirenz/amprenavir in the CNA2007 study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PRO) mutations selected in isolates from antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced patients receiving an efavirenz/abacavir/amprenavir salvage regimen. METHODS: Open-label, single arm of abacavir, 300 mg twice daily, amprenavir, 1200 mg twice daily and efavirenz, 600 mg once daily, in ART-experienced patients of which 42% were non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive. The virology population examined consisted of all patients who took at least 16 weeks of study drugs (n=74). Plasma population sequencing was carried out at baseline and last time point at which patients were still taking the three study drugs + other ART. The median follow-up was 48 weeks (range week 16-72). RESULTS: Baseline (n=73) and on-therapy (n=49) genotypes were obtained. By 48 weeks, 51% of isolates had > or = 3 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations. NNRTI mutations selected on therapy were K103N (51%), substitutions at position 190 (17/49, 35%): G to A (n=11) / S (n=4) / E (n=1) and T (n=1); L100I (37%) and V1081 (20%) mutations. P225H was not observed in this study. L100I and G190A/S/E/T mutations were rarely detected in the same viral population and baseline Y181C favoured the G190 mutations (OR=8.9, P<0.001), rather than the L100I. The NRTI mutations selected were in accordance with abacavir known resistance profile, no new TAMs were observed, new L74V or I mutations developed in 39 and 16% of isolates, respectively, however, new M184V mutations were only detected in isolates from two patients, one of whom had added lamivudine + didanosine. M184V was common at baseline (55%) and maintained in 22/27 (81%) isolates (five of these 22 added lamivudine or didanosine, or both). The PRO mutations selected were in accordance with the distinct resistance profile of amprenavir compared with other protease inhibitors. Mutations D30N, G48V, N88D/S, L90M and 154V were de-selected, and mutations I50V, I or V to 54M/L, I84V, M46I/L, L33F, I47V as well mutations at position 10 were observed in 20/49 (41%) isolates. CONCLUSION: Prior NNRTI and NRTI therapy influences the pathway of resistance to efavirenz. In this study, the prevalence of mutations selected by efavirenz were different from those described in less ART-experienced patients. Baseline Y181C was associated with the development of mutations at position 190, but not L100I or K103N. In this patient population, abacavir with efavirenz preferentially selected for L74V but not for thymidine analogue mutations. M184V was rarely selected and was maintained in only 77% of patients who did not add lamivudine or didanosine. Finally, amprenavir-specific mutations were selected in the background of other primary protease inhibitor mutations, confirming the distinct resistance profile of amprenavir.

Mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase during therapy with abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine in HIV-1-infected adults with no prior antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) drug resistance in patients receiving abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine therapy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 173 antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults received abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine or lamivudine/zidovudine for up to 48 weeks. After week 16, patients could switch to open-label abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine, and those with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) > 400 copies/ml could add other antiretrovirals. From weeks 11 to 48, samples with vRNA > 400 copies/ml were collected for genotyping and phenotyping. RESULTS: At baseline, 90% of isolates were wild-type (WT). At week 16, vRNA was > 400 copies/ml in seven of 72 (10% patients receiving abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and in 41 of 66 (62%) receiving lamivudine/ zidovudine. At week 16, the genotypes in isolates from the abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone (n = 3 cases), WT (n = 3) and M184V plus thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (n = 1). The genotypes in isolates from the lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone (n = 37), WT ( n= 1) and M184V plus TAMs (n = 3). In the four cases where M184V plus TAMs were detected some mutations were present at baseline. Despite detectable M184V in 74% of patients on lamivudine/zidovudine, addition of abacavir with or without another antiretroviral therapy resulted in a reduction in vRNA, with 42 of 65 (65%) patients having week 48 vRNA < 400 copies/ml (intent-to-treat with missing = failure). At week 48, the most common genotype was M184V alone in the abacavir/ lamivudine/zidovudine group (median vRNA 1-2 log,10 below baseline), and M184V with or without TAMs in patients originally assigned to lamivudine/zidovudine. At week 48, phenotypic results were obtained for 11 isolates for patients from both arms, and all had reduced susceptibility to lamivudine but all remained sensitive to stavudine, all protease inhibitors and all non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Three, three and two isolates had reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine and zidovudine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir retained efficacy against isolates with the M184V genotype alone. TAMs did not develop during 48 weeks of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine therapy and were uncommon when abacavir was added after 16 weeks of lamivudine/zidovudine therapy. Limited mutations upon rebound on this triple nucleoside combination allows for several subsequent treatment options.

Mutations conferring zanamivir resistance in human influenza virus N2 neuraminidases compromise virus fitness and are not stably maintained in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Viruses resistant to zanamivir have been generated in vitro, but no resistant virus has yet been isolated from a zanamivir-treated immunocompetent patient. In contrast most resistant viruses isolated from oseltamivir-treated patients correspond to those selected in vitro. However, despite mutations being in conserved residues in the neuraminidase (NA) they do not confer resistance in all NA subtypes. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We have used reverse genetics and the recombinant baculovirus expression system for investigating reasons for the lack of isolation of zanamivir-resistant H3N2 viruses and for further exploring subtype-specific oseltamivir resistance. RESULTS: H3N2 viruses generated by reverse genetics with H274Y, R292K E119V and E119D mutations were rescued. Those with E119G, E119A or R152K mutations could only be rescued in the presence of exogenous NA and after passage in the absence of exogenous NA only isolates that had reverted to the wild-type NA or, surprisingly, E119G/A to E119V NA were isolated. Mutations conferring zanamivir resistance significantly affected enzyme activity, virus replication or NA thermal stability. E119V viruses were stable and grew to similar titres as wild-type virus, consistent with their isolation from oseltamivir-treated patients. Mutations conferring oseltamivir resistance in N1 (H274Y) and B (R152K) NAs also conferred resistance in recombinant G70C N9 NA expressed in insect cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that zanamivir-resistant H3N2 viruses may not readily arise in vivo due to their poor viability. The G70C N9 NA may also provide a useful model for understanding the structural basis of subtype-specific drug resistance.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutation selection during in vitro exposure to tenofovir alone or combined with abacavir or lamivudine.

Mutations selected or deselected during passage of human immunodeficiency virus strain HXB2 or resistant variants with tenofovir (TFV), abacavir (ABC), and lamivudine (3TC) differed depending on the drug combination and virus genotype. In the wild-type virus, TFV-ABC and TFV-3TC selected K65R (with reduced susceptibility to all three inhibitors) and then Y115F. TFV-containing regimens might increase K65R selection, which confers multiple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance.

Characterization of 2 influenza A(H3N2) clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors due to mutations in the hemagglutinin gene.

Previous studies have shown that amino acid changes in the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of influenza viruses may result in decreased susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in vitro. However, the emergence and characteristics of such HA variants in the clinical setting remain poorly studied. Herein, we report 2 influenza A(H3N2) isolates, from untreated patients, harboring an Arg229-->Ile substitution in the HA1 gene. The Ile229 variants were as sensitive as the Arg229 viruses to zanamivir and oseltamivir in neuroaminidase inhibition assays but were significantly less susceptible (by 60-140-fold) in cell-based assays. Although the Ile229 variants adsorbed less efficiently to Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells in kinetic binding assays, they remained very sensitive to zanamivir in ferrets. Our study shows the importance of the HA1 229 residue in virus binding to MDCK cells and confirms the unreliability of cell-based assays in predicting the in vivo susceptibility of HA variants to NAIs.

Zanamivir: a significant reduction in viral load during treatment in military conscripts with influenza.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial performed at 5 residential units of the Finnish Defence Forces was conducted to assess the antiviral activity, efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir for the treatment of naturally acquired influenza. Conscripts were recruited within 2 d of onset of typical influenza symptoms and received inhaled zanamivir 10 mg via a Diskhaler twice daily for 5 d or matching placebo. Time to alleviation of clinically significant symptoms of influenza was the primary endpoint. Viral load measurements were made using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. 435/588 patients (74%) had laboratory-confirmed influenza infection. The mean area under the curve for viral load during the first 48 h of treatment was 8.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.85 to 14.11] log10 vRNA copies/ml x h lower in the zanamivir group compared with placebo (p = 0.003). Zanamivir reduced the time to alleviation of symptoms versus placebo in the influenza-positive group (medians 2.0 vs 2.33 d; 95% CI-0.17 to 1.0 d, p = 0.08). Zanamivir rapidly reduced viral load following the start of therapy compared with placebo and was well tolerated.

Emergence of resistance to protease inhibitor amprenavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: selection of four alternative viral protease genotypes and influence of viral susceptibility to coadministered reverse transcriptase nucleoside inhibitors.

Previous data have indicated that the development of resistance to amprenavir, an inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease, is associated with the substitution of valine for isoleucine at residue 50 (I50V) in the viral protease. We present further findings from retrospective genotypic and phenotypic analyses of plasma samples from protease inhibitor-naïve and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced patients who experienced virological failure while participating in a clinical trial where they had been randomized to receive either amprenavir or indinavir in combination with NRTIs. Paired baseline and on-therapy isolates from 31 of 48 (65%) amprenavir-treated patients analyzed demonstrated the selection of protease mutations. These mutations fell into four distinct categories, characterized by the presence of either I50V, I54L/I54M, I84V, or V32I+I47V and often included accessory mutations, commonly M46I/L. The I50V and I84V genotypes displayed the greatest reductions in susceptibility to amprenavir, although each of the amprenavir-selected genotypes conferred little or no cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. There was a significant association, for both amprenavir and indinavir, between preexisting baseline resistance to NRTIs subsequently received during the study and development of protease mutations (P = 0.014 and P = 0.031, respectively). Our data provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms by which amprenavir resistance develops during clinical use and present evidence that resistance to concomitant agents in the treatment regimen predisposes to the development of mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance and treatment failure.

Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag at positions L449 and P453 are linked to I50V protease mutants in vivo and cause reduction of sensitivity to amprenavir and improved viral fitness in vitro.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag protease cleavage sites (CS) undergo sequence changes during the development of resistance to several protease inhibitors (PIs). We have analyzed the association of sequence variation at the p7/p1 and p1/p6 CS in conjunction with amprenavir (APV)-specific protease mutations following PI combination therapy with APV. Querying a central resistance data repository resulted in the detection of significant associations (P < 0.001) between the presence of APV protease signature mutations and Gag L449F (p1/p6 LP1'F) and P453L (p1/p6 PP5'L) CS changes. In population-based sequence analyses the I50V mutant was invariably linked to either L449F or P453L. Clonal analysis revealed that both CS mutations were never present in the same genome. Sequential plasma samples from one patient revealed a transition from I50V M46L P453L viruses at early time points to I50V M46I L449F viruses in later samples. Various combinations of the protease and Gag mutations were introduced into the HXB2 laboratory strain of HIV-1. In both single- and multiple-cycle assay systems and in the context of I50V, the L449F and P453L changes consistently increased the 50% inhibitory concentration of APV, while the CS changes alone had no measurable effect on inhibitor sensitivity. The decreased in vitro fitness of the I50V mutant was only partially improved by addition of either CS change (I50V M46I L449F mutant replicative capacity approximately 16% of that of wild-type virus). Western blot analysis of Pr55 Gag precursor cleavage products from infected-cell cultures indicated accumulation of uncleaved Gag p1-p6 in all I50V viruses without coexisting CS changes. Purified I50V protease catalyzed cleavage of decapeptides incorporating the L449F or P453L change 10-fold and 22-fold more efficiently than cleavage of the wild-type substrate, respectively. HIV-1 protease CS changes are selected during PI therapy and can have effects on both viral fitness and phenotypic resistance to PIs.