Effects of anti-ulcer drugs on delirium in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) may induce a higher risk of developing delirium than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but current evidence is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether anti-ulcer drugs increase delirium risk. METHOD: Data were obtained from the medical records of patients admitted to a hospital due to trauma. We compared the incidence of delirium in patients who received H2RAs and PPIs with that in patients who received no anti-ulcer drugs. RESULTS: A total of 150, 158, and 238 patients received H2RAs, PPIs, and no anti-ulcer drugs, respectively. Delirium incidence was significantly higher in patients who received H2RAs (34.0%) and PPIs (44.9%) than in those who did not receive anti-ulcer drugs (22.3%). Even after adjustment for possible confounding factors, the association between H2RAs and delirium remained (adjusted OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.04-3.05), but that between PPIs and delirium was attenuated (adjusted OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.71-2.23). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that H2RAs are associated with delirium risk. We replicated findings of a previous data-driven study. Clinicians need to consider the effect of delirium in anti-ulcer drug selection.

Evaluation of Suvorexant and Lemborexant for the Prevention of Delirium in Adult Critically Ill Patients at an Advanced Critical Care Center: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Objective: There is limited evidence for the efficacy of the novel dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant and lemborexant in preventing delirium. We examined the efficacy of DORAs in preventing delirium in critically ill patients at an advanced emergency and critical care center.Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients 18 years of age or older admitted to the emergency center between July 2018 and November 2021 with hospitalization duration of at least 72 h were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and log rank tests were performed to compare between patients with and without DORA treatment. Cox regression analyses adjusting for factors associated with delirium risk were also performed.Results: Of the 633 enrolled patients, 82 were treated with suvorexant and 41 with lemborexant. Cox regression analysis showed that, without adjustment, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) for the development of delirium were 0.56 (0.36-0.86) for patients treated with suvorexant and 0.26 (0.11-0.62) for those treated with lemborexant. After adjustment for delirium risk factors, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) remained low at 0.34 (0.20-0.58) for suvorexant and 0.21 (0.08-0.52) for lemborexant.Conclusions: Both suvorexant and lemborexant may be effective in preventing delirium in critically ill adult patients in an advanced critical care center.

The importance of monitoring renal function and concomitant medication to avoid toxicity in patients taking lithium.

Lithium, which is used for bipolar disorder, can cause toxicity. There are two categories of lithium toxicity, namely, overdose-related and not overdose-related. However, the treatment and prognosis of each type of toxicity are not clearly understood. We, therefore, compared the clinical characteristics of patients with overdose-related and not overdose-related lithium toxicity. Relevant data were obtained from the medical records of 16 patients with lithium toxicity, and renal function and concomitant medications were retrospectively compared between the two groups. We also compared the treatment for, manifestations of, and duration of hospitalization between the two types of lithium toxicity. The not overdose-related group more frequently had a low creatinine clearance (<50 mL/min) than did the overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that creatinine clearance <50 mL/min was a significant predictor of lithium toxicity in the not overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Tremor and dysarthria occurred only in the not overdose-related group, and duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the not overdose-related than overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Clinicians must monitor the renal function of patients taking lithium, even when in compliance with the prescribed dosage, because they are at long-term risk of lithium toxicity.

Deep Vein Thrombosis after Lithium Toxicity: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Lithium administration can reportedly cause toxicity, including lithium-associated thrombosis; however, not all reported cases of this adverse effect have been attributable to lithium overdoses. We report here two cases of deep vein thrombosis that occurred in association with lithium toxicity. Lithium overdose was deemed to be the cause in only one of these cases; a patient in whom deep vein thrombosis occurred 11 days after identification of lithium toxicity. In the other patient, the deep vein thrombosis occurred 15 days after diagnosis of lithium toxicity; this patient was not considered to have been overdosed. Both patients had other risk factors in addition to receiving lithium. We recommend monitoring D-dimer concentrations to facilitate early detection of deep vein thrombosis in patients with lithium toxicity.

Delirium risk of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors: A study based on the adverse drug event reporting database in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Although histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) have been shown to be more likely to cause delirium than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), these results were not adjusted for potential confounding factors. Accordingly, we investigated whether H2RAs and PPIs are risk factors for delirium, even when adjusting for other risk factors by analyzing adverse drug event reports compiled in the post-marketing stages of drugs provided by the Japanese regulatory authorities. METHOD: We analyzed 577,431 reports in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database from April 2004 to July 2020. RESULTS: Of all reports analyzed, 2532 described delirium, and 574,899 described other adverse events. Delirium was associated with H2RAs (crude reporting odds ratio, ROR, 4.17; 95% CI, 3.34-5.22) but not PPIs (crude ROR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.90). Even with adjustment for age, sex, history of dementia or depression, and concomitant drugs reported as risk factors for delirium, the use of H2RAs showed a significantly higher adjusted ROR than that of PPIs (H2RAs: adjusted ROR 3.99; 95% CI 3.18-5.01 and PPIs: adjusted ROR 0.58; 95%CI 0.40-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, from a cognitive perspective, PPIs may be preferable to H2RAs for patients with or at risk for delirium.