Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized repeated-measures trial. METHODS: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet--solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle)--using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. RESULTS: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.

Sacroiliac arthrograms and post-arthrography computerized tomography.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection and arthrography have been described, yet no study has specifically categorized the morphological characteristics of SIJ arthrograms versus post arthrogram computerized tomography (CT). Forty-three patients with a mean age of 33 years (range 20-48 years) and an equal male to female distribution were studied radiographically for SIJ pathology. A total of 74 SIJ injections were performed using Image-intensifier-control and a posterior-inferior approach. Symptom reproduction indicating a provocation positive outcome, was reported in 63.5% with a mean injected volume of contrast media of 1.08 cc (S.D. 0.29). SIJ findings were then classified and scored in each aspect of the SIJ capsule by plain film arthrography followed by post arthrogram CT (anterior, posterior, superior and inferior aspects of the capsule). There was a significant direct correlation between the plain film and CT arthrography findings in each category (Kendall correlation coefficients 0.63 - 0.99, p<0.01). In addition, there was a significant direct correlation between provocation positive outcomes and volume of contrast injected (Kendall correlation 0.25, p<0.01; ANOVA, p<0.03). Post arthrogram CT revealed significantly more positive anterior capsule findings compared to plain film arthrography (McNemar's test, p<0.04). Conversely, plain film arthrography noted more diverticula compared to post arthrogram CT (McNemer's test, p<0.01). These findings demonstrate that a detailed radiographic analysis of the SIJ capsule is reasonable by either plain film arthrography or post arthrogram CT, with excellent agreement between the two techniques. Further, each test has specific regional benefits that may be appreciated in certain cases.

Improving treadmill performance in patients with lumbar stenosis: evaluation of a custom angle load reduction device.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a custom angle load reduction rolling walker to determine the relationship between flexion and load reduction on walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.The hypothesis was that walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis would be significantly improved using the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus device compared with unaided treadmill walking. DESIGN: Fifteen patients with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis were recruited at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. This study used a cross-sectional design with two random-order treadmill conditions: (1) spinal flexion and unloading and (2) level walking. Primary outcome measures included initiation time of first symptoms, total walking time, spinal flexion angle, and unloading force. Secondary measures included baseline pain, fatigue, and disability severity. RESULTS: The participants' initiation time of symptoms and total walking time were significantly greater with the use of the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus compared with the unaided walking trial. The participants with increased baseline pain, fatigue, and disability severity had decreased walking performance for the unaided condition but not for the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus condition. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that spinal flexion is important for pain reduction in lumbar spinal stenosis. The Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus device used in this study was shown to be effective and immediate in significantly increasing total walking time and prolonging the onset of neurogenic intermittent claudication symptoms while ambulating.

Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet.

We examined the application of outcome measures to determine changes in function caused by standardized functional prosthetic gait training and the use of four different prosthetic feet in people with unilateral transtibial limb loss. Two self-report measures (Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale [PEQ-13] and Locomotor Capabilities Index [LCI]), and three performance-based measures (Amputee Mobility Predictor with a prosthesis [AMPPRO], 6-minute walk test [6MWT] and step activity monitor [SAM]) were used. Ten people with unilateral transtibial limb loss, five with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and five without PVD, completed testing. Subjects were tested at baseline and after receiving training with their existing prosthesis and with the study socket and four prosthetic feet, i.e., SACH (solid ankle cushion heel), SAFE (stationary attachment flexible endoskeletal), Talux, and Proprio feet, over 8 to 10 weeks. Training was administered between testing sessions. No differences were detected by the PEQ-13, LCI, 6MWT, or SAM following training and after fitting with test feet. The AMPPRO demonstrated differences following training with the existing prosthesis in the PVD group and between selected feet from baseline testing ( p