Kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: The Brescia Renal COVID task force experience.

The outcome of kidney transplant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is still unclear. Here we describe the clinical characteristics, disease outcome, and risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death of a cohort of 53 kidney transplant patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Eight of 53 have been handled as outpatients because of mild disease, on average with immunosuppression reduction and the addition of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin; no patients required admission, developed ARDS, or died. Because of severe symptoms, 45/53 required admission: this cohort has been managed with immunosuppression withdrawal, methylprednisolone 16 mg/d, hydroxychloroquine, and antiviral drugs. Dexamethasone and tocilizumab were considered in case of ARDS. About 33% of the patients developed acute kidney injury, 60% ARDS, and 33% died. In this group, thrombocytopenia was associated to ARDS whereas lymphopenia at the baseline, higher D-dimer, and lack of C-reactive protein reduction were associated with risk of death. In the overall population, dyspnea was associated with the risk of ARDS and age older than 60 years and dyspnea were associated with the risk of death with only a trend toward an increased risk of death for patients on tacrolimus. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 infection may have a variable outcome in renal transplant patients, with higher risk of ARDS and death in the ones requiring admission.

[Staphylococcus-associated glomerulonephritis without IgA deposits: a case report].

Staphylococcus-associated glomerulonephritis (SAGN) represents a possible version of parainfectious glomerulonephritis and is a pathological entity that's now constantly increasing in developed countries. It is known how bacterial infections can be a possible trigger for various type of glomerulonephritis with clinical onset and evolution comparable to the ones observed in parainfectious glomerulonephritis. Furthermore, in clinical practice the identification and isolation of the pathogenic microorganism responsible for the development of parainfectious glomerulonephritis is not always possible. Therefore, in those cases in which SAGN is suspected, it is often necessary to recur to kidney biopsy in order to come to as much as possible correct diagnosis. Historically, according to scientific literature, the most distinctive anatomopathological feature of SAGN is represented by predominant or codominant mesangial IgA deposits, sometimes associated with C3 deposits. These findings make the differential diagnosis between SAGN and IgA nephropathy often necessary. However, many reports describe how SAGN can also be characterized by a varying spectrum of immunological deposits. In some cases, for example, IgA deposits can be absent and in some other cases it is described a net dominance of C3 deposits. In this case, it becomes extremely important to exclude a possible occurrence of C3 glomerulopathy (C3GN), considering how different are the therapeutic approach and the prognostic implications associated to it. However, the differential diagnosis between SAGN and C3GN can be very hard. Here's a case report about a patient who has been hospitalized into our Unit after developing a form of Staphylococcus Aureus associated glomerulonephritis which presented atypical anatomopathological features.