Lebrikizumab Combined with Topical Corticosteroids Improves Patient-reported Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Lebrikizumab has previously demonstrated efficacy in Phase 3 trials: ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 (as monotherapy), ADhere, and ADhere-J (in combination with topical corticosteroids). Here, the impact of lebrikizumab combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids on patient-reported outcomes at 16 weeks in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis is evaluated. Eligible patients (n = 286) were randomized 2:2:3 to receive placebo+ topical corticosteroids, 250 mg lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (LEBQ4W+topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline), or 250 mg lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W+ topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline and Week 2) by subcutaneous injection. All PRO endpoints for the study were met; patients in the lebrikizumab in combination with topical corticosteroids groups demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in combination with topical corticosteroids in Skin Pain NRS, DLQI, POEM, WPAI-AD, and SCORAD scales. Lebrikizumab combined with topical corticosteroids compared with placebo+topical corticosteroids improved patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Treatment practices and costs among patients with psoriatic arthritis: A Japanese hospital claims database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess patient characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Japan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PsA from April 2009 through July 2017 were identified from the Medical Data Vision database. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU were evaluated for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 639 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis for patients with a PsA diagnosis. Over 12 months following diagnosis, patients received oral NSAIDs (61.7%), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (55.1%), corticosteroids (35.1%), topical NSAIDs (34.0%), adalimumab (14.7%), infliximab (9.7%), secukinumab (5.0%), ustekinumab (4.5%), ixekizumab (1.6%), and golimumab (1.6%). A total of 227 (35.5%) patients initiated biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) over the median 25.2 months of study follow-up. Compared with the overall group of patients diagnosed with PsA, patients who initiated bDMARDs had higher median total per-patient health care costs ($27,772 vs. $11,316), lower median per-patient hospitalization costs ($31,164 vs. $39,359), and fewer median hospital days per admission (8.0 vs. 12.0 days). CONCLUSION: This study presents knowledge of the current state of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients with PsA in Japan. Considering the relatively recent guideline recommendations, the preliminary treatment patterns suggest physicians may be following treatment guidelines.

Safety and Tolerability of Ixekizumab: Integrated Analysis of Injection-Site Reactions from 11 Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Injection-site reactions (ISRs) are reported with biologic therapies. The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize ISRs among moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A.

METHODS: ISRs are presented from UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3 (12 weeks) and all ixekizumab-exposed patients in 11 controlled and uncontrolled trials (156 weeks).

RESULTS: At week 12, reported ISR frequency with 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W, 16.8%) was comparable with etanercept twice weekly (16.4%); both were significantly higher than placebo (3.3%). With IXE Q2W, ISRs were mild (12.3%), moderate (3.9%), or severe (0.7%), typically reported in the first 2 weeks (median onset, 6.6 days), and most commonly characterized as nonspecified, erythema, and pain. Generally, erythema onset was delayed, whereas pain occurred around drug administration. Discontinuation from ixekizumab due to ISRs (0.4%) occurred in the first 12 weeks. After 2 weeks, ISR frequency decreased and remained stable (≤4.2%) through week 156. No ISR-related serious adverse events were reported in ixekizumab-treated patients. ISR data were solicited if patients reported injection-associated events. Since nonspecified ISR was the most commonly reported term, specific types might be underreported.

CONCLUSIONS: ISRs have been reported with ixekizumab during clinical trials. These reactions are typically tolerable, manageable, and decrease over time.

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01474512 (UNCOVER-1); NCT01597245 (UNCOVER-2); NCT01646177 (UNCOVER-3); NCT01777191 (UNCOVER-A); NCT01624233 (UNCOVER-J); NCT01107457 (I1F-MC-RHAJ); NCT02561806 (I1F-MC-RHBS); NCT02387801 (I1F-US-RHBO);NCT02513550 (I1F-MC-RHBP); NCT02634801 (I1F-EW-RHBZ)

J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(2):200-206.

THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN.

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY.

PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Patient and family burden in pediatric atopic dermatitis and its treatment pattern in Japan.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the level of burden in pediatric and adolescent atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in Japan, the associated burden on caregivers/families, and whether this burden varied with age. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Pediatric AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients conducted in Japan between July and December 2022. Physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease burden, and current/previous therapies. Patients and/or caregivers reported perceived disease severity and impact of AD, including the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and Dermatitis Family Impact questionnaire (DFI). RESULTS: Overall, 55 physicians provided data for 537 AD patients aged ≤17. Mean (SD) overall scores for CDLQI, POEM, and DFI were 9.3 (6.3), 8.3 (6.8), and 11.7 (7.2), respectively. Age was associated with higher patient and/or caregiver-reported CDLQI scores, which increased by 0.543 points per year of age (P = 0.01). Patients with severe disease reported a more significant impact on quality of life factors compared with mild patients (P < 0.001). Age was associated with higher caregiver-reported burden, with DFI scores increasing by 0.325 per year (P = 0.01). Physician-reported impact on caregivers showed that age was significantly associated with increased burden on sleep, daily activities, work, and mood (P < 0.05), with disease severity associated with impact across all factors (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both increasing age and disease severity were associated with the increased impact of AD on patients and their caregivers. Disease control/modification through appropriate therapeutic intervention at a younger age may relieve the burden of pediatric AD on patients and their families.

Treatment persistence of interleukin-17 inhibitor class drugs among patients with psoriasis in Japan: a retrospective database study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Real-world evidence on persistence of interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as a drug class among Japanese patients with psoriasis is lacking. Hence, we aimed to describe persistence rates of IL-17is among patients with psoriasis including psoriasis vulgaris (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) or erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed claims data from the Medical Data Vision database. Patients ≥15 years old with a psoriasis diagnosis and an IL-17i prescription between November 2016 and August 2020 were included and followed through August 2021. Persistence rates of the IL-17i class among patients with psoriasis and its subtypes (PsO, PsA, and GPP or EP), and persistence rates of ixekizumab, secukinumab, or brodalumab among patients with PsO or PsA were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses were conducted in the bio-naïve and bio-experienced subgroups. RESULTS: The IL-17i class had >50% persistence rates up to 36 months among patients with psoriasis and its subtypes (PsO, PsA, and GPP or EP). 36-Month persistence rates for ixekizumab, secukinumab, and brodalumab were 46.2% to 57.7% in patients with PsO and 43.0% to 48.4% in patients with PsA. Across analyses, bio-naïve patients demonstrated similar or greater persistence rates than bio-experienced patients. CONCLUSION: IL-17is' persistence rates over 36 months were >50% among patients with psoriasis and its subtypes (PsO, PsA, and GPP or EP) in Japan.

Ixekizumab 80 mg Every 2 Weeks Treatment Beyond Week 12 for Japanese Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Erythrodermic Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, ixekizumab (80 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] beyond Week 12) received approval in Japan for patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and erythrodermic psoriasis (EP). This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab (80 mg Q2W from Week 12 to Week 20) in Japanese patients with GPP and EP. METHODS: Seven patients with GPP and five patients with EP were enrolled. An initial dose of 160 mg (subcutaneous [SC] injection) was followed by 80 mg Q2W SC until Week 12. Primary endpoint assessed global improvement score (GIS) by comparing psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline and were graded as 1 = resolved, 2= improved, 3 = unchanged, and 4 = worsened. Patients who showed GIS = 1 (resolved) at Week 12 completed the study. Patients with GIS ≥ 2 continued to receive ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W until Week 20. RESULTS: At Week 12, four of seven patients with GPP showed "resolved," two showed "improved," and one showed "worsened." Of five patients with EP, one showed "resolved" and four showed "improved." Two patients with GPP and four patients with EP continued ixekizumab treatment until Week 20. At Week 20, one of the two patients with GPP showed "resolved" and one patient showed "improved." All four patients with EP showed "improved." One non-drug related serious adverse event was reported by one patient with EP at Week 12. From Week 12 to Week 20, no adverse events (AEs) were reported in patients with GPP, but two mild AEs were reported in one of the four patients with EP. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that ixekizumab continuous Q2W dosing is efficacious and safe for patients with GPP and EP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03942042.

Ixekizumab is an anti-interleukin-17 treatment for a skin condition with thick and scaly patches called psoriasis. Ixekizumab (initial dose of 160 mg followed by 80 mg administered every 2 weeks [Q2W] from Week 2 through Week 12 and thereafter 80 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) has been approved in Japan; people who have not achieved 100% clear skin after taking ixekizumab for 12 weeks can continue to receive ixekizumab Q2W rather than monthly. However, this approval partially lacked data from people with rare types of psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and erythrodermic psoriasis (EP). The aim of this study was to look at the effectiveness and safety of continuous Q2W dosing of ixekizumab in Japanese people with GPP and EP beyond Week 12. Researchers aimed to find out whether psoriasis symptoms in this population improved if they continued Q2W treatment for > 12 weeks. Seven people with GPP and 5 with EP participated in the study (12 in total). Participants initially received 160 mg under-the-skin injection of ixekizumab, followed by 80 mg injections Q2W. Two GPP and four EP participants continued to receive ixekizumab after 12 weeks up to Week 20. One GPP participant achieved 100% clear skin, and another GPP participant and all 4 EP participants showed improvement. No participants died, and safety findings were similar to previous ixekizumab studies from both Japanese and non-Japanese people. This study suggests that people with GPP and EP who continue to take ixekizumab Q2W after 12 weeks may show improvements in their psoriasis with a well-tolerated safety profile.

Impact of itch and skin pain on quality of life in adult patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan: results from a real-world, point-in-time, survey of physicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE: Itch is a common symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), however, there is limited evidence of the frequency and association of skin pain alongside itch. This study assessed the incremental dual burden and impact of itch and skin pain on satisfaction, quality of life and work productivity in patients with AD in Japan. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2020 Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists (n = 56) and their patients with history of moderate/severe AD (n = 265). Patients were grouped accordingly: no itch/skin pain (No I/SP, reference group, n = 89), itch/no skin pain (I-only, n = 71), and itch and skin pain (I + SP, n = 26). Descriptive analyses were performed alongside a range of regression models, dependent on outcome variables. RESULTS: I + SP patients had a 4.97-point worse POEM score (p = .005) and 14.5% more overall work impairment (p = .034) versus the reference group. I-only and I + SP patients were 8.92 and 23.5 times more likely, respectively, to experience sleep disruption on a day-to-day basis (both p < .001). I + SP patients were 4.6 times more likely to be bothered by their symptoms (p = .034), had a mean EASI score 6.7 points higher (p = .008) and had 1.39 more areas affected (p = .001). I + SP patients were 7.26 times more likely to express dissatisfaction with lack of improvement in their condition and 8 times more likely to be dissatisfied with convenience of treatment (both p < .05). CONCLUSION: This dissatisfaction, alongside variations in reported symptomatic burdens, suggests that physicians could consider alternative and/or novel therapeutic approaches for the management of both itch and skin pain.

Patients with atopic dermatitis experience a broad range of symptoms, including both itch and skin pain, however it is not clear how these symptoms combine to impact patients in everyday life. This survey of 56 dermatologists and 265 patients with a history of moderate or severe atopic dermatitis investigated the impact of both itch and skin pain on quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Japan. Patients were categorised into three groups depending on the presence of these symptoms; patients with either no itch or skin pain, patients with itch but no skin pain, or patients with both itch and skin pain. These three groups were then compared. Patients with both itch and skin pain reported this combination of symptoms together impacted on their daily lives more than patients with itch but no skin pain, or no itch or skin pain. In particular, patients with both itch and skin pain had more areas of their body affected and reported being more bothered by their symptoms compared to those who did not experience these symptoms, with daily work impairment, sleep disruption and quality of life all worse. Importantly, patients with both itch and skin pain were more likely to be dissatisfied with the lack of improvement in their condition and with the convenience of their treatment. These results suggest that physicians should take into consideration the presence of both itch and skin pain when making treatment decisions in atopic dermatitis, and the need to consider treatments to target both symptoms.

Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved in Japan and the European Union for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). The aim of this study is to report pooled safety data for baricitinib in the Japanese subpopulation of the clinical development program in moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: This analysis included participant-level safety data from five double-blind, randomized clinical studies and one double-blind, randomized, long-term extension study, reported in three datasets for the Japanese subpopulation: (1) placebo-controlled, (2) baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg extended ("2-mg-4-mg extended"), and (3) all baricitinib doses ("All-bari-AD"). The data cutoff was 13 December 2019. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and abnormal laboratory changes. Proportions of participants with events and incidence rates were calculated. RESULTS: Data were collected for 341 participants from Japan who received baricitinib for 371.7 participant-years (median duration 371.0 days). In the placebo-controlled dataset, the frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were low and similar between treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent infections, in particular herpes simplex, was higher in the baricitinib groups compared with the placebo group. No gastrointestinal perforations, tuberculosis, positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were reported with exposure up to 2 years in the All-bari-AD dataset. There were no deaths in the Japanese subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated safety analysis in the subpopulation of Japanese participants is consistent with the established safety profile of baricitinib in the global study population with moderate-to-severe AD. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT02576938, NCT03334396, NCT03334422, NCT03428100, NCT03733301, and NCT03334435.

Comparison of Treatment Goals between Users of Biological and Non-Biological Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Previously, our cross-sectional observational study in Japan revealed high (68%) discordance within treatment goals between psoriasis patients and their physicians. OBJECTIVE: This secondary analysis aimed to determine whether patient and physician users of biologics have higher treatment goals than users of non-biologics. METHODS: A survey for both patients and physicians on background characteristics, disease severity, treatment goals, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life was conducted at 54 sites. Association between treatment goals and biologic/non-biologic users was assessed using ordinal logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total, 449 patient-physician pairs agreed to participate; 425 completed the survey and were analyzed. More biologic users than non-biologic users reported complete clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100) as a treatment goal (patient-reported: 23.6% vs. 16.1%; physician-reported: 26.9% vs. 2.2%). Biologic users were significantly associated with higher treatment goals than non-biologic users (patient-reported: 1.8 (1.15-2.87) (odds ratio (9 5% CI)), p = 0.01; physician-reported: 11.0 (5.72-21.01), p < 0.01). Among biologic users, higher treatment goals were associated with higher treatment satisfaction (patient- and physician-rated); lower treatment goals were associated with back lesions and increasing patient age (patient-rated) and higher disease severity (physician-rated). CONCLUSION: Use of biologics among patients with psoriasis was associated with higher treatment goals. Further use of biologics contributed to treatment satisfaction. Appropriate treatment goals that are shared among patients and their physicians may improve treatment outcomes.

Evaluation of treatment satisfaction misalignment between Japanese psoriasis patients and their physicians - Japanese psoriasis patients and their physicians do not share the same treatment satisfaction levels.

OBJECTIVES: High treatment satisfaction in both patients and physicians is an important factor in improving quality of life in psoriasis patients. This study aimed to evaluate treatment satisfaction alignment between psoriasis patients and physicians and to identify factors associated with satisfaction misalignment, especially "physician-predominant" misalignment. METHODS: This is a nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study. Subjects were paired moderate to severe psoriasis outpatients and their physicians. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 10. Subjects were defined as "misaligned" when the difference in treatment satisfaction was over ±1 between the patient-physician pair. RESULTS: A total of 425 pairs were collected from 54 facilities in Japan. The mean patient age and disease duration were 56.5 years and 18.7 years, respectively. The mean physician age was 50.6 years and 69.6% of physicians specialized in psoriasis. Treatment satisfaction misalignment was found in 49.9% of the patient-physician pairs. Among misaligned pairs, 43.6% were "physician-predominant" pairs. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, "treatment is effective" was the most important reason for treatment satisfaction (odds ratio [OR]: 35.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.43, 231.78). Symptoms in the genital area (OR: 10.2; 95% CI: 2.55, 40.93) and lack of understanding of treatment options by patients (OR: 7.5; 95% CI: 2.19, 25.94) were key factors leading to "physician-predominant" status. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that genital psoriasis plays an important role in treatment satisfaction from the patient perspective, and illustrate the importance of communication between patients and physicians which potentially resolves these factors and improves misalignment.

Dermatologist and Patient Perceptions of Treatment Success in Alopecia Areata and Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: The content validity and treatment success thresholds of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for alopecia areata (AA)-including the Alopecia Areata-Investigator Global Assessment™ (AA-IGA™), Scalp Hair Assessment Patient-Reported Outcome™ (PRO), and clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) and PRO measures for eyebrows, eyelashes, eye irritation, and nails-were established in interviews with dermatologists and patients in North America. This study aimed to confirm the content validity and treatment success thresholds of these measures with clinicians and patients in Japan. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted in Japan with dermatologists with AA expertise and adults with AA who experienced ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Interviews included concept elicitation and cognitive interview questions. Data were analyzed using thematic and framework techniques. RESULTS: Seven dermatologists and 15 patients participated. Scalp hair loss was the most important sign/symptom of AA and the greatest treatment priority. Dermatologists and patients understood the AA-IGA™, Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™, and other COAs, and found these measures to be appropriate, relevant, and clinically meaningful. Dermatologists and patients confirmed that achieving ≤ 20% scalp hair loss (AA-IGA™/Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ categories 0 or 1) indicated treatment success for patients with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Categories 0 or 1 on the other COAs represented treatment success. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the content validity and treatment success thresholds of the AA-IGA™, Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™, and other ClinRO and PRO measures for AA in Japan. These findings were aligned with interview results in North America and support the use of these measures in AA treatment studies.

About 2% of people in the world have alopecia areata, which causes them to lose hair on their scalp, face, and body. We interviewed 15 Japanese adults who had lost at least half of the hair on their scalp and seven dermatologists who treated alopecia areata. The dermatologists felt that scalp hair loss was more important to treat than eyebrow and eyelash hair loss. Patients were most bothered about losing their scalp hair and reported feeling anxious or worried about what other people might think about it. Patients and dermatologists were also shown several questionnaires and thought the questionnaires were appropriate to measure the most important symptoms of alopecia areata. Patients considered that a treatment worked well if it gave them at least 80% of their scalp hair; dermatologists also wanted the treatment to give patients at least 80% scalp hair. These interviews agree with what has previously been found in interviews with patients and dermatologists in North America.

Relationship Between Rapid Skin Clearance and Quality of Life Benefit: Post Hoc Analysis of Japanese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab (UNCOVER-J).

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab has demonstrated rapid onset of action, high levels of skin clearance, and improvements in quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, including plaque, erythrodermic, or generalized pustular psoriasis. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of UNCOVER-J, a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study of ixekizumab for treatment of Japanese patients with psoriasis. The objective was to assess the proportion of patients who achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1) and Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0) at weeks 4 and 12 according to Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) percentage improvement levels. All intent-to-treat patients with plaque, erythrodermic, or generalized pustular psoriasis were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were treated with ixekizumab and included in the analysis. Rapid improvements in PASI at weeks 4 and 12 were associated with improvements in DLQI (0,1) response at week 4 and at week 12. Complete skin clearance (PASI 100) achieved either at week 4 or week 12 was associated with a higher Itch NRS (0) response at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rapid improvement in clinical symptoms of psoriasis had better patient outcomes than those with slower responses. These findings highlight the clinical importance of achieving a fast response in patients with psoriasis, which may lead to better treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01624233.

Molecular characterization of inflammatory genes in sentinel and nonsentinel nodes in melanoma.

PURPOSE: Identification of regional node metastasis is important for accurate staging and optimal treatment of early melanoma. We hypothesize that the nodal profile of immunoregulatory cytokines can confirm the identity of the first tumor-draining regional node, i.e., the sentinel node (SN) and indicate its tumor status. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RNA was extracted from freshly dissected and preserved nodal tissue of 13 tumor-negative SNs, 10 tumor-positive SNs (micrometastases <2 mm), and 11 tumor-negative non-SNs (NSN). RNA was converted into cDNA and then amplified by PCR. Expression of 96 cytokines and chemokines was assessed using cDNA microarray and compared by using hierarchical clustering. RESULTS: Fifty-seven genes were expressed at significantly (P < 0.05) different levels in SNs and NSNs (4 genes had higher expression, and 53 genes had lower expression in SNs). Expression levels of interleukin-13 (IL-13), leptin, lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTbR), and macrophage inflammatory protein 1b (MIP1b) were significantly higher (P < 0.04, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively), and expression level of IL-11Ra was lower (P < 0.03) for tumor-positive as compared with tumor-negative SN. Receiver-operator characteristics curve analyses showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for IL-13, leptin, LTbR, MIP1b, and IL-11Ra was 0.79, 0.83, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.77, respectively. The AUC for the five genes in combination was 0.973, suggesting high concordance of gene-expression profiles with SN staging. CONCLUSIONS: SNs have a different immunoregulatory cytokine profile than NSNs. The cytokine profile of tumor-positive SNs; increased expression of IL-13, leptin, LTbR, and MIP1b and decreased expression of IL-11Ra, may provide clues to the local tumor lymph node interaction seen in the earliest steps of melanoma metastasis.

Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Subgroup analysis of a placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (UNCOVER-1).

The present study describes a subgroup analysis of 33 Japanese patients participating in UNCOVER-1, an international, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients were randomized to a placebo (n = 13) or ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 (IXEQ4W, n = 12) or 2 (IXEQ2W, n = 8) weeks, from week 0-12. At week 12, ixekizumab-treated patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score 0 or 1 (sPGA [0,1]; n = 16) were re-randomized to a placebo (n = 6), ixekizumab 80 mg every 12 (IXEQ12W, n = 5) or 4 (IXEQ4W, n = 5) weeks, from week 12-60. At week 12, more ixekizumab-treated versus placebo-treated patients achieved sPGA (0,1) (≥66.7% vs 0%), ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (≥75% vs 0%), and sPGA (0) or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (both ≥33.3% vs 0%), with improved symptoms and quality of life. At week 60, 100% (IXEQ4W), 40.0% (IXEQ12W) and 16.7% (placebo) had maintained sPGA (0,1). From week 0-12, treatment-emergent adverse events were 76.9% (placebo), 75.0% (IXEQ4W) and 87.5% (IXEQ2W), and from week 12-60 were 66.7% (placebo) and 100% (IXEQ12W, IXEQ4W). Ixekizumab-treated patients had no severe treatment-emergent adverse events, and one serious TEAE (IXEQ4W); infection was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event. In conclusion, ixekizumab for 60 weeks was effective and safe for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, in line with the overall findings from UNCOVER-1.

Surgical management of the groin lymph nodes in melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node dissection.

HYPOTHESIS: Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) has become an increasingly popular surgical technique for staging the regional lymph nodes in early-stage melanoma. The technique of LM/SL has potentially great advantage for the groin, where the morbidity of superficial groin dissection or iliac dissection can be high. The surgical management of these basins is unknown for patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes (SNs). DESIGN: Cohort of successive patients undergoing LM/SL over 18 years. Those patients found to have tumor-positive SNs underwent sentinel complete lymph node dissection. Postoperatively, patients were followed up on a routine basis with serial examinations and chest radiography. The median follow-up was 50 months. SETTING: Tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS: The technique of LM/SL was performed for 431 consecutive patients. Sentinal lymph nodes were identified in each case. Patients with tumor-positive SNs underwent sentinel complete lymph node dissection. INTERVENTION: Cutaneous lymphoscintigraphy and blue dye with or without use of the gamma probe-directed LM/SL. Sentinel lymph nodes were examined by hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry staining with HMB-45 and S100 protein. Only patients with tumor-positive SNs had sentinel complete lymph node dissection. Main Outcome Measure Computer-assisted database with statistical analyses using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of the 431 patients, 264 (61%) were women and the median age was 50 years (age range, 15-89 years). A majority (86%) of the primary tumors were on the lower extremities, 54% were of Clark level IV or V, and there was a mean +/- SD thickness of 1.89 +/- 1.59 mm (range, 0.30-14.00 mm). Ninety-three patients (21%) were found to have tumor-positive SNs. After LM/SL and sentinel complete lymph node dissection, 62 patients (67%) were found to have a single tumor-positive lymph node, 25 (27%) had 2 tumor-positive lymph nodes, and 6 (6%) had 3 or more tumor-positive lymph nodes. Only 12 patients (4%) with tumor-negative SNs have had recurrence in the dissected basin. The 5-year overall survival was significantly better for patients with tumor-negative lymph nodes (mean +/- SD 5-year overall survival, 94% +/- 5%) than for patients with tumor-positive lymph nodes (mean +/- SD 5-year overall survival, 75% +/- 4%) (P < .01). The tumor status of the Cloquet lymph node was predictive of the tumor status of the iliac lymph nodes. Multivariate analyses with a Cox regression model identified tumor-positive SN (P = .001), primary tumor thickness (P = .03), and ulceration (P = .001) as being predictive of survival. Sex, age, Clark level, and primary site were not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the prognostic significance of LM/SL for early-stage melanoma draining to the groin basin. The accuracy of LM/SL measured by the rare recurrences suggests that this surgical procedure should become standard for patients with early-stage melanoma of the lower extremities and trunk. Sampling of the Cloquet node should be used to determine the need for iliac dissection when a tumor-positive SN is identified in the groin.

Prognostic Utility of Immunoprofiling in Colon Cancer: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter Nodal Ultrastaging Trial.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective data indicate that immunoprofiling of T cell markers can be prognostic in colon cancer. Prospective T cell immunoprofiling of colon cancer has not been well defined for patients whose lymph nodes are ultrastaged. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort was selected from patients enrolled in an ongoing phase II multicenter trial of nodal ultrastaging for colon cancer. Primary tumor specimens from 89 patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the T cells CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and FOXP3(+). Lymphocyte populations were quantified with digital image analysis. Results were examined for their association with 5-year disease-free survival along with TNM stage and clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS: Longer disease-free survival was associated with higher CD3(+) counts at the invasive margin (IM) (p = 0.005), higher CD8(+) counts at the tumor center (TC) and IM (p = 0.002), a lower CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.027), and a higher CD8(+)/FOXP3(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.020). After multivariable analysis, CD8(+) at the TC+IM (p = 0.002), the CD8(+)/FOXP3(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.004), and the number of tumor-positive lymph nodes (p = 0.003) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective demonstration of the prognostic utility of immunoprofiling in colon cancer after nodal ultrastaging. Staging based on tumor immunoprofile can augment TNM staging and provide targets for specific immunotherapies.

Second Primary Melanoma: Risk Factors, Histopathologic Features, Survival, and Implications for Follow-Up.

The impact on survival of a second primary melanoma (SPM) is unclear. We used our melanoma center's database to examine clinicopathologic risk factors and outcomes of stage 0 to IV cutaneous melanoma in patients with one versus two primaries. Among 12,325 patients with primary melanoma, 969 (7.86%) developed SPM. SPMs were significantly thinner than autologous primary melanomas (P = 0.01), and 451 SPM patients had better overall and melanoma-specific survival than 451 prognostically matched non-SPM patients (P < 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively) at a median follow-up of 142.37 months. Patients with cutaneous melanoma are at high risk for development of SPM, but the development of SPM does not seem to impair survival.

Factors predictive of tumor-positive nonsentinel lymph nodes after tumor-positive sentinel lymph node dissection for melanoma.

PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of sentinel node (SN) positive melanoma patients have additional non-SN (NSN) metastasis. The rationale for this study was to identify the factors associated with additional nodal disease, as a method to determine which patients may most benefit from completion lymph node dissection (CLND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 1990 to 2002, 1,599 patients have undergone SN biopsy at our institute. 19.5% underwent CLND for tumor-positive SN. One hundred ninety-one of these patients had clinicopathologic information available for review. Univariate analyses used chi2 test, Wilcoxson rank sum test, and chi2 test for trend. Multivariate analyses used logistic regression and Wald test. RESULTS: Forty-six (24%) patients had tumor-positive NSN. Univariate analyses showed that primary thickness (Breslow and Clark), primary site, SN tumor size, and number of tumor-positive SNs were significantly associated with tumor-positive NSN. Multivariate analysis (167 patients), confirmed that Breslow and SN tumor size were independently predictive. Sex, histology, ulceration, mitotic index, and SN basin location were not predictive. Risk stratification by the number of prognostic factors present (Breslow > or = 3 mm and SN tumor size > or = 2 mm) showed that probability of finding tumor-positive NSN was 12.3% in the low-risk group (0 factors), 30.9% in the intermediate-risk group (1 factor), and 41.9% in the high-risk group (2 factors). CONCLUSION: Thicker primary and larger SN tumor size are factors that correlate best with tumor-positive NSN. Although none of these factors are absolutely predictive of residual nodal disease, these factors must be strongly considered if the SN contains metastasis, as they provide enhanced risk assessment for NSN tumor-positivity.

Immunoprofiling for prognostic assessment of colon cancer: a novel complement to ultrastaging.

BACKGROUND: Although AJCC/TNM staging remains the gold standard for prognostic assessment of colon cancer, stage-specific outcomes vary. We therefore prospectively evaluated the prognostic role of immunoprofiling. METHODS: Our cohort included 35 patients from an ongoing prospective trial of ultrastaging for colon cancer. Specimens were analyzed for T cell markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, and FoxP3). The number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was analyzed at the tumor's margin and center and correlated with AJCC/TNM stage, clinicopathologic variables, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: There was a significant inverse association between number of CD3(+) cells in the tumor center and tumor stage (P = 0.05). The tumor center/margin ratio of CD3(+) cells also showed an inverse but non-significant relationship with nodal involvement (P = 0.07). Body mass index was inversely associated with numbers of CD3(+)(P = 0.04) and CD8(+)(P = 0.02) cells. Longer disease-free survival was correlated with higher CD8+ counts (P = 0.07), lower CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratios (P = 0.008), and higher CD8(+)/FoxP3(+) ratios (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective validation of immunoprofiling in patients whose colon cancer is staged with strict surgical and pathology quality measures. The apparent correlation between immunophenotypic response and clinical outcome warrants evaluation in a larger prospective trial.

Redirected lysis of human melanoma cells by a MCSP/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody that engages patient-derived T cells.

Melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (MCSP; also called HMW-MAA, CSPG4, NG2, MSK16, MCSPG, MEL-CSPG, or gp240) is a well characterized melanoma cell-surface antigen. In this study, a new bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE) antibody that binds to MCSP and human CD3 (MCSP-BiTE) was tested for its cytotoxic activity against human melanoma cell lines. When unstimulated peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) derived from healthy donors were cocultured with melanoma cells at effector:target ratios of 1:1, 1:5, or 1:10, and treated with MCSP-BiTE antibody at doses of 10, 100, or 1000 ng/mL, all MCSP-expressing melanoma cell lines (n=23) were lysed in a dose-dependent and effector:target ratio-dependent manner, whereas there was no cytotoxic activity against MCSP-negative melanoma cell lines (n=2). To investigate whether T cells from melanoma patients could act as effector cells, we cocultured unstimulated PBMCs with allogeneic melanoma cells from 13 patients (4 stage I/II, 3 stage III, and 6 stage IV) or with autologous melanoma cells from 2 patients (stage IV). Although cytotoxic activity varied, all 15 PBMC samples mediated significant redirected lysis by the BiTE antibody. When PBMC or CD8 T cells were prestimulated by anti-CD3 antibody OKT-3 and interleukin-2, the MCSP-BiTE concentrations needed for melanoma cell lysis decreased up to 1000-fold. As MCSP is expressed on most human melanomas, immunotherapy with MCSP/CD3-bispecific antibodies merits clinical investigation.