Cognitive and physical rehabilitation of intensive care unit survivors: results of the RETURN randomized controlled pilot investigation.

BACKGROUND: Millions of patients who survive medical and surgical general intensive care unit care every year experience newly acquired long-term cognitive impairment and profound physical and functional disabilities. To overcome the current reality in which patients receive inadequate rehabilitation, we devised a multifaceted, in-home, telerehabilitation program implemented using social workers and psychology technicians with the goal of improving cognitive and functional outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-site, feasibility, pilot, randomized trial of 21 general medical/surgical intensive care unit survivors (8 controls and 13 intervention patients) with either cognitive or functional impairment at hospital discharge. After discharge, study controls received usual care (sporadic rehabilitation), whereas intervention patients received a combination of in-home cognitive, physical, and functional rehabilitation over a 3-month period via a social worker or master's level psychology technician utilizing telemedicine to allow specialized multidisciplinary treatment. Interventions over 12 wks included six in-person visits for cognitive rehabilitation and six televisits for physical/functional rehabilitation. Outcomes were measured at the completion of the rehabilitation program (i.e., at 3 months), with cognitive functioning as the primary outcome. Analyses were conducted using linear regression to examine differences in 3-month outcomes between treatment groups while adjusting for baseline scores. RESULTS: Patients tolerated the program with only one adverse event reported. At baseline both groups were well-matched. At 3-month follow-up, intervention group patients demonstrated significantly improved cognitive executive functioning on the widely used and well-normed Tower test (for planning and strategic thinking) vs. controls (median [interquartile range], 13.0 [11.5-14.0] vs. 7.5 [4.0-8.5]; adjusted p < .01). Intervention group patients also reported better performance (i.e., lower score) on one of the most frequently used measures of functional status (Functional Activities Questionnaire at 3 months vs. controls, 1.0 [0.0 -3.0] vs. 8.0 [6.0-11.8], adjusted p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A multicomponent rehabilitation program for intensive care unit survivors combining cognitive, physical, and functional training appears feasible and possibly effective in improving cognitive performance and functional outcomes in just 3 months. Future investigations with a larger sample size should be conducted to build on this pilot feasibility program and to confirm these results, as well as to elucidate the elements of rehabilitation contributing most to improved outcomes.

Identification of human intestinal carboxylesterase as the primary enzyme for activation of a doxazolidine carbamate prodrug.

Doxazolidine (Doxaz), a formaldehyde-doxorubicin (Dox) conjugate, exhibits markedly increased tumor toxicity with respect to Dox without a concurrent increase in toxicity to cardiomyocytes. Pentyl PABC-Doxaz (PPD) is a Doxaz carbamate prodrug that is hydrolyzed by carboxylesterases. Here, we identify human intestinal carboxylesterase (hiCE) as the agent of activation for PPD. Upon prodrug treatment, cells that express higher levels of hiCE responded with lower IC50 values for growth inhibition. Exposing MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, which respond poorly and express little hiCE, to PPD together with hiCE resulted in a dramatic decrease in the IC50, a decrease that was absent when human carboxylesterase 1 was added to prodrug treatment. Finally, U373MG glioblastoma cells overexpressing hiCE displayed approximately 100-fold reduction in the IC50 for PPD compared to cells lacking the carboxylesterase. Overall, our studies indicate that PPD is selectively hydrolyzed to the active metabolite by hiCE.

Inappropriate medication prescriptions in elderly adults surviving an intensive care unit hospitalization.

OBJECTIVES: To determine types of potentially (PIMs) and actually inappropriate medications (AIMs), which PIMs are most likely to be considered AIMs, and risk factors for PIMs and AIMs at hospital discharge in elderly intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty individuals aged 60 and older who survived an ICU hospitalization. MEASUREMENTS: Potentially inappropriate medications were defined according to published criteria; a multidisciplinary panel adjudicated AIMs. Medications from before admission, ward admission, ICU admission, ICU discharge, and hospital discharge were abstracted. Poisson regression was used to examine independent risk factors for hospital discharge PIMs and AIMs. RESULTS: Of 250 PIMs prescribed at discharge, the most common were opioids (28%), anticholinergics (24%), antidepressants (12%), and drugs causing orthostasis (8%). The three most common AIMs were anticholinergics (37%), nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics (14%), and opioids (12%). Overall, 36% of discharge PIMs were classified as AIMs, but the percentage varied according to drug type. Whereas only 16% of opioids, 23% of antidepressants, and 10% of drugs causing orthostasis were classified as AIMs, 55% of anticholinergics, 71% of atypical antipyschotics, 67% of nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics and benzodiazepines, and 100% of muscle relaxants were deemed AIMs. The majority of PIMs and AIMs were first prescribed in the ICU. Preadmission PIMs, discharge to somewhere other than home, and discharge from a surgical service predicted number of discharge PIMs, but none of the factors predicted AIMs at discharge. CONCLUSION: Certain types of PIMs, which are commonly initiated in the ICU, are more frequently considered inappropriate upon clinical review. Efforts to reduce AIMs in elderly ICU survivors should target these specific classes of medications.

Trends in estradiol during critical illness are associated with mortality independent of admission estradiol.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that elevated serum estradiol (E(2)) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission is associated with death in the critically ill, regardless of sex. However, little is known about how changes in initial E(2) during the course of care might signal increasing patient acuity or risk of death. We hypothesized that changes from baseline serum E(2) during the course of critical illness are more strongly associated with mortality than a single E(2) level at admission. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of 1,408 critically ill or injured nonpregnant adult patients requiring ICU care for ≥48 hours with admission and subsequent E(2) levels was studied. Demographics, illness severity, and E(2) levels were examined, and the probability of mortality was modeled with multivariate logistic regression. Changes in E(2) were examined by both analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 14.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.3% to 16%]. Both admission and subsequent E(2) levels were independently associated with mortality [admission E(2) odds ratio 1.1 (CI 1.0 to 1.2); repeat estradiol odds ratio 1.3 (CI 1.2 to1.4)], with subsequent values being stronger. Changes in E(2) were independently associated with mortality [odds ratio 1.1 (CI 1.0 to 1.16)] and improved regression model performance. The regression model produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (CI 0.77 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Although high admission levels of E(2) are associated with mortality, changes from baseline E(2) in critically ill or injured adults are independently associated with mortality. Future studies of E(2) dynamics may yield new indicators of patient acuity and illuminate underlying mechanisms for targeted therapy.