Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the operational efficiency of emergency medical services and its association with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates: A population-based cohort study in Kobe, Japan.

Aim: To identify whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affects the operational efficiency of emergency medical services (EMS) and the survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in prehospital settings. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Kobe, Japan, between March 1, 2020, and September 31, 2022. In study 1, the operational efficiency of EMS, such as the total out-of-service time for ambulances, the daily occupancy rate of EMS, and response time, was compared between the pandemic and nonpandemic periods. In study 2, the impacts of the changes in EMS operational efficiency were investigated among patients with OHCA, with 1-month survival as the primary outcome and return of spontaneous circulation, 24-h survival, 1-week survival, and favorable neurological outcomes as the secondary outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with survival among patients with OHCA. Results: The total out-of-service time, occupancy rate, and response time significantly increased during the pandemic period (p < 0.001). The response time during the pandemic period increased significantly per pandemic wave. Regarding OHCA outcomes, 1-month survival rates during the pandemic period significantly decreased compared with those during the nonpandemic period (pandemic 3.7% vs. nonpandemic 5.7%; p < 0.01). Similarly, 24-h survival (9.9% vs. 12.8%), and favorable neurological outcomes significantly decreased during the pandemic period. In the logistic regression analysis, response time was associated with lower OHCA survival in all outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with reduced operational efficiency of EMS and decreased OHCA survival rates. Further research is required to improve the efficiency of EMS and OHCA survival rates.

[Early phase II dose-finding study of exemestane in postmenopausal patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer].

Exemestane was administered orally to postmenopausal women with advanced/recurrent breast cancer at a dose of 10 mg/day or 25 mg/day once daily for more than 8 weeks in order to evaluate the drug's anti-tumor effects and safety in a dose-finding study. The response rate (CR + PR) in the 10 mg and 25 mg group was 25.0% (8/32) and 31.4% (11/35), respectively, demonstrating no significant differences between the two groups, yet a higher efficacy rate was observed in 25 mg group. The efficacy rate in hormone-treatment-resistant patients within the 10 mg and 25 mg groups was 14.3% (3/21) and 26.1% (6/23), respectively, demonstrating more than a 20% response rate in 25 mg group. Incidences of the adverse events of which relevance to the drug could not be excluded were 30.6% (11/36) in the 10 mg group. 13.9% (5/36) in the 25 mg group and 22.2% (16/72) in the total group. The major adverse events were, hot flashes, numbness of the limbs, nausea, headache etc. Abnormal findings in clinical laboratory tests were as follows: ALP increase; GOT increase; GPT increase; gamma-GTP increase; total cholesterol increase; urinary sediment present. Abnormal findings in endocrine function were as follows: aldosterone decrease; testosterone.cortisol.DHEA-S decrease. But discontinuation due to abnormal laboratory findings was not found. No abnormal findings in physical tests were observed. A significant decrease in plasma estrogen concentration at week 4 was observed in both the 10 mg and 25 mg groups compared with baseline. These low levels were maintained throughout the study period. On the basis of these results, the efficacy of exemestane 25 mg/day was verified to be slightly higher than 10 mg/day. In addition the safety profile had no major adverse events to notice. In these patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer, 25 mg/day was recommended as the most appropriate dose to be used clinically.

Phase II study of 4-weekly capecitabine monotherapy in advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter, phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Japanese intermittent 4-week regimen of capecitabine in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced/metastatic disease were enrolled from 23 centers and received at least two 4-weekly cycles of capecitabine (828 mg/m² orally twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period). RESULTS: The overall response rate assessed by the Independent Review Committee (standard population, n = 46) was 28.3% (95% confidence interval 16.0-43.5%), including complete responses in 6.5%. Stable disease was observed in 20 patients and maintained for more than 6 months in 10 patients. The median duration of response in 13 evaluable responders was 5.3 months. Among evaluable patients (n = 47), median time to disease progression was 5.1 months. Median overall survival was 20.2 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were hand-foot syndrome (66%), nausea (26%), stomatitis (22%) and diarrhea (20%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 23 patients (46%). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphocytopenia (22%), hand-foot syndrome (18%) and hyperbilirubinemia (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the target overall response rate was not reached, the Japanese intermittent 4-week regimen of capecitabine was shown to be an effective and well-tolerated first- or second-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer.