Prophylactic endoscopic gallbladder stent placement for cholecystitis after covered metal stent placement for distal biliary obstruction (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute cholecystitis is occasionally observed after biliary drainage using a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) for distal biliary obstruction (DBO). Gallbladder drainage before CSEMS placement may reduce cholecystitis. This study aimed to examine the preventive effect of endoscopic gallbladder stent placement (EGBS) on cholecystitis with CSEMSs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with DBO who underwent CSEMS placement across the orifice of the cystic duct between November 2014 and October 2021 and were negative for cholecystitis on biliary drainage. Prophylactic EGBS was attempted before CSEMS placement. The incidence of cholecystitis was compared between patients with and without EGBS. RESULTS: In total, 286 patients (128 men; median age, 75 years) were included in this study. EGBS was attempted in 32 patients before CSEMS placement, and technical success was achieved in 24 patients (75%). Adverse events were noted in 3 patients (9.4%; penetration of cystic duct in 1 and acute pancreatitis in 2). The cumulative incidence of cholecystitis was significantly lower in patients with EGBS than in those without EGBS (1 [4.2%] vs 56 [21.4%], P = .045). In multivariable analysis, EGBS was a significant protective factor against cholecystitis (hazard ratio, .11; 95% confidence interval, .01-.79; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Although the transpapillary approach to the gallbladder is not easy for patients with DBO, EGBS is effective in preventing cholecystitis associated with CSEMS placement.

Efficacy of pancreatic duct stenting to prevent postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after covered self-expandable metal stent deployment.

OBJECTIVES: Although covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) are associated with the risk of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis due to pancreatic duct (PD) orifice obstruction, they are often used for biliary drainage treatment in malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PD stenting in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis after CSEMS implantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 554 patients with transpapillary CSEMS for MBO. Patients with noninitial deployment, benign disease, CSEMS deployment above the papilla, surgically altered anatomy, uncovered self-expandable metal stents, multiple thin self-expandable metal stents, and unavailable procedure videos were excluded. Logistic regression analysis estimated the association between PD stenting and post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence. We adjusted for age, sex, pancreatitis history, prophylactic rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, naïve papilla, MBO etiology, and prolonged biliary cannulation time. RESULTS: Among 554 patients, 67 (12.1%) experienced post-ERCP pancreatitis. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was recorded in 13.7% of patients in the non-PD stenting and 4.3% in the PD stenting groups. Pancreatic duct stenting was associated with lower risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.099-0.79; P = 0.028). In multivariable analysis, the association between PD stenting and lower post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence was consistent (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.062-0.58; P = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic duct stenting could reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis after CSEMSs.

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Techniques and literature review.

There are various reconstruction techniques that are used after upper gastrointestinal surgery. In recent years, opportunities for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment have been increasing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. With the advent of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (IV-EUS), various procedures have been developed mainly for patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is difficult to carry out. Indications for such procedures are expanding. IV-EUS for surgically altered anatomy (SAA) includes EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration, biliary interventions (e.g. biliary drainage, treatment of bile duct stricture, removal of bile duct stones, and the rendezvous technique), and pancreatic interventions (e.g. rendezvous technique after Whipple surgery). In addition, there have been reports of various EUS-related procedures using a forward-viewing curved linear-array echoendoscope that are carried out for postoperative intestinal tract reconstruction. Although interventional EUS is a useful therapeutic procedure for SAA, there are still no dedicated devices, and standardization of the procedure is warranted.

Methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder in the stomach and duodenum: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (MTX-LPD) can present as a benign lymphoid proliferation or a malignant lymphoma in patients taking MTX. Almost 50% of MTX-LPD cases show spontaneous remission after withdrawal of MTX treatment. Studies have suggested that the hyper-immune state of rheumatoid arthritis, the immunosuppressive state associated with MTX, and the carcinogenicity of the Epstein-Barr virus might contribute to MTX-LPD development. Although most cases of MTX-LPD occur at extranodal sites, few cases of MTX-LPD affecting the stomach and duodenum have been reported. To our knowledge, no other study has reported on the endoscopic observations of dramatic withdrawal and appearance of multiple digestive tract lesions in a short period of time. Herein, we report the clinical course and imaging findings of our case, which may be useful for understanding the pathological condition of MTX-LPD. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 70-year-old woman with MTX-LPD of the stomach and duodenum. Disease regression was temporarily achieved after cessation of MTX treatment; however, it subsequently recurred, and complete response was only achieved after six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The first-choice therapy for patients taking MTX who develop suspected MTX-LPD should be the withdrawal of MTX treatment. Even after remission is achieved, patients should be kept under careful observation, and if the disease recurs, chemotherapy should be commenced promptly.