Lower limb alignment in healthy Japanese adults.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding the normal alignment of the lower limb is important when considering alignment for total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have explored the lower limb alignment of healthy Japanese subjects. METHODS: Between July and October 2020, we performed whole leg standing radiography of 120 legs of 60 healthy adult Japanese volunteers aged <50 years in the closed-leg stance. The measurement parameters were hip knee ankle angle (positive for varus), percentage of constitutional varus (hip knee ankle angle ≥ 3°), mechanical axis deviation ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle (positive for lateral opening), and tibial joint line angle (positive for medial inclination). RESULTS: The mean measured values for all volunteers, men and women, were as follows: hip knee ankle angle (°), 2.3, 2.6, and 2.0; mechanical axis deviation ratio, 35.8, 35.6, and 36.9; mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (°), 86.7, 87.0, and 86.7; medial proximal tibial angle (°), 85.6, 85.0, and 86.2; joint line convergence angle (°), 0.6, 0.3, and 0.8; and tibial joint line angle (°), -1.0, -0.7, -1.4, respectively. The percentage of constitutional varus was 35.8% overall, 35.8% in men and 35.3% in women. Only the medial proximal tibial angle was smaller in men than that in women (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical lateral distal femoral and medial proximal tibial angles were smaller, hip knee ankle angle was larger, and percentage of constitutional varus was higher in Japanese subjects than those reported for subjects in other countries. Our findings improve the understanding of Japanese-specific alignments when considering alignment for lower limb surgery, especially, total knee arthroplasty.

Evaluation of hindfoot and knee alignment by the hip-to-calcaneus view in patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: Hip-to-calcaneus (HC) view is a whole-leg standing view that can visualize the hindfoot in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of tibiocalcaneal angle in HC view (H-TCA) by comparing it with that in long axial view (L-TCA). We also verified whether periarticular knee alignment parameters, measured conventionally in whole-leg standing radiography, could be measured in HC view. METHOD: Sixty healthy volunteers and 61 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were included. H-TCA was measured by two examiners in the healthy group, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were evaluated. H-TCA and L-TCA were then measured in the healthy and osteoarthritis groups and correlated. Finally, we measured hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical axis deviation ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint-line convergence angle in HC view and conventional whole-leg standing radiography to evaluate statistical differences and correlations. RESULTS: The intra-observer and inter-observer ICCs were 0.86 and 0.76, respectively. Correlation coefficients (r) between H-TCA and L-TCA were r = 0.87 in healthy group and r = 0.81 in osteoarthritis group, indicating a strong positive correlation in both groups. There was no significant difference in periarticular knee alignment parameters between HC view and conventional whole-leg radiography. CONCLUSIONS: Hindfoot evaluation in HC view showed high intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities and strong positive correlation with TCA in long axial view. By using HC view before knee surgery, such as total knee arthroplasty, other necessary alignments can be evaluated simultaneously.