Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Procedural data from a German single-center study.

PURPOSE: To assess radiation exposure and diagnostic performance of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for the distinction of pituitary and ectopic adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procedural data of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus procedures were retrospectively evaluated. The analysis included the patients' clinical and demographic data, procedural radiation exposure, and complication rates, sampling results, clinical course of the patients, and calculation of diagnostic performance data. RESULTS: The cases of 46 patients diagnosed with adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome were evaluated. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling was successfully performed in 97.8 % of the cases. The overall median procedure-related fluoroscopy time was 7.8 min. (range 3.2-36.2 min.), and the median procedural dose area product was 11.9 Gy*cm2 (range 2.1-73.7 Gy*cm2). Radiation doses due to digital subtraction angiography series for visualization of the inferior petrosal sinus were 3.6 Gy*cm2 (range 1.0-18.1 Gy*cm2). Radiation doses due to fluoroscopy had a higher impact on the overall radiation exposure and were significantly influenced by the patients' habitus. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 84 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 72 % before stimulation with corticotropin-releasing hormone, and 97 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 93 % after stimulation. Concordance between magnetic resonance imaging studies and bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling results was only found in 35.6 % of the cases. The periprocedural complication rate was 2.2 %, with one patient experiencing vasovagal syncope during catheterization. CONCLUSION: Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling is a safe procedure with high technical success rates und excellent diagnostic performance. The procedure-related radiation exposure shows large variations and depends on the complexity of cannulation as well as the patients' habitus. Fluoroscopy accounted for the largest proportion of radiation exposure. Acquisition of digital subtraction angiography series for the verification of correct catheter placement appears justified. KEY POINTS: · Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling with CRH stimulation provides high diagnostic performance in the distinction of pituitary and ectopic Cushing's syndrome.. · The associated radiation exposure is not negligible and is significantly influenced by the use of fluoroscopy and the patients' habitus.. · Digital subtraction angiography contributes less to the overall radiation dose and appears justified for the verification of correct catheter placement.. CITATION FORMAT: · Augustin A, Detomas M, Hartung V et al. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Procedural data from a German single-center study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 1009 - 1017.

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling with human CRH stimulation in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: results from a retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is regarded as gold standard to differentiate between Cushing´s disease (CD) and ectopic Cushing's syndrome (ECS). However, published data e.g. on the diagnostic value of additional prolactin analysis is controversial. Thus, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of BIPSS with and without prolactin in a multicenter study. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective study in 5 European reference centers. Patients with overt adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome at the time of BIPSS with human corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation were eligible. Cut-offs for the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) to peripheral (P) ACTH ratio and the normalized ACTH:prolactin IPS:P ratio were calculated via receiver operator characteristics analyses (reference: CD). RESULTS: 156 patients with BIPSS were identified. Of these, 120 patients (92 (77%) females; 106 (88%) CD, 14 (12%) ECS) had either histopathologically confirmed tumors or biochemical remission and/or adrenal insufficiency after surgery; only this subgroup was analyzed by ROC analysis. The optimal cut-offs for the ACTH IPS:P ratio were ≥1.9 at baseline (sensitivity 82.1% (95%CI 73.2-88.6), specificity 85.7% (95%CI 56.2-97.5), AUC 0.86) and ≥2.1 at 5 minutes post-CRH (sensitivity 91.3% (95%CI 83.6-95.7), specificity 92.9%(95%CI 64.1-99.6), AUC 0.96). A subgroup underwent additional prolactin analysis. An optimal cut-off of ≥1.4 was calculated for the normalized ACTH:prolactin IPS:P ratio (sensitivity 96.0% (95%CI 77.7-99.9), specificity 100% (95%CI 56.1-100), AUC 0.99). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the high accuracy of BIPSS in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and suggests that the simultaneous measurement of prolactin might further improve the diagnostic performance of this test.

Outcome of CRH stimulation test and overnight 8 mg dexamethasone suppression test in 469 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome.

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test and the overnight 8 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for the differentiation of Cushing's disease (CD) and ectopic Cushing's syndrome (ECS). Methods: Retrospective study in 6 European centers. Inclusion criteria: patients with a) overt adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome at the time of dynamic testing, b) histopathological confirmed tumors and/or c) postoperative biochemical remission and/or adrenal insufficiency. Optimal cut-offs were calculated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using CD as reference. Results: 469 patients were analyzed [78% females; median age 43 years (IQR 19)]. CRH test and overnight 8 mg DST were performed in 420 [CD, n=394 (94%); ECS, n=26 (6%)] and 237 patients [228 CD (96%), 9 ECS (4%)]. Both tests were performed in 205 patients (44%). The post-CRH %-increase at 30 minutes of both ACTH (cut-off ≥31%, sensitivity 83%, specificity 85%, AUC 0.81) and cortisol (cut-off ≥12%, sensitivity 82%, specificity 89%, AUC 0.86) discriminated best between CD and ECS. A test duration of >60 minutes did not improve diagnostic performance of the CRH test. The optimal cortisol cut-off for the %-suppression during the 8 mg DST was ≥55% (sensitivity 80%, specificity 78%, AUC 0.75). Conclusion: The CRH test has equivalent sensitivity but higher specificity than the 8 mg DST and is therefore the test of first choice. The diagnostic outcome of ACTH and cortisol is well comparable, however, sampling beyond 60 minutes post-CRH does not provide diagnostic benefits.