Deep learning reconstruction algorithm and high-concentration contrast medium: feasibility of a double-low protocol in coronary computed tomography angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiation dose and image quality of a double-low CCTA protocol reconstructed utilizing high-strength deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR-H) compared to standard adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) protocol in non-obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June to October 2022, consecutive patients, undergoing clinically indicated CCTA, with BMI < 30 kg/m2 were prospectively included and randomly assigned into three groups: group A (100 kVp, ASiR-V 50%, iodine delivery rate [IDR] = 1.8 g/s), group B (80 kVp, DLIR-H, IDR = 1.4 g/s), and group C (80 kVp, DLIR-H, IDR = 1.2 g/s). High-concentration contrast medium was administered. Image quality analysis was evaluated by two radiologists. Radiation and contrast dose, and objective and subjective image quality were compared across the three groups. RESULTS: The final population consisted of 255 patients (64 ± 10 years, 161 men), 85 per group. Group B yielded 42% radiation dose reduction (2.36 ± 0.9 mSv) compared to group A (4.07 ± 1.2 mSv; p < 0.001) and achieved a higher signal-to-noise ratio (30.5 ± 11.5), contrast-to-noise-ratio (27.8 ± 11), and subjective image quality (Likert scale score: 4, interquartile range: 3-4) compared to group A and group C (all p ≤ 0.001). Contrast medium dose in group C (44.8 ± 4.4 mL) was lower than group A (57.7 ± 6.2 mL) and B (50.4 ± 4.3 mL), all the comparisons were statistically different (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLIR-H combined with 80-kVp CCTA with an IDR 1.4 significantly reduces radiation and contrast medium exposure while improving image quality compared to conventional 100-kVp with 1.8 IDR protocol in non-obese patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Low radiation and low contrast medium dose coronary CT angiography protocol is feasible with high-strength deep learning reconstruction and high-concentration contrast medium without compromising image quality. KEY POINTS: Minimizing the radiation and contrast medium dose while maintaining CT image quality is highly desirable. High-strength deep learning iterative reconstruction protocol yielded 42% radiation dose reduction compared to conventional protocol. "Double-low" coronary CTA is feasible with high-strength deep learning reconstruction without compromising image quality in non-obese patients.

Radiomics applications in cardiac imaging: a comprehensive review.

Radiomics is a new emerging field that includes extraction of metrics and quantification of so-called radiomic features from medical images. The growing importance of radiomics applied to oncology in improving diagnosis, cancer staging and grading, and improved personalized treatment, has been well established; yet, this new analysis technique has still few applications in cardiovascular imaging. Several studies have shown promising results describing how radiomics principles could improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis, risk stratification, and follow-up of patients with coronary heart disease (CAD), ischemic heart disease (IHD), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), hypertensive heart disease (HHD), and many other cardiovascular diseases. Such quantitative approach could be useful to overcome the main limitations of CCTA and MRI in the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases, such as readers' subjectiveness and lack of repeatability. Moreover, this new discipline could potentially overcome some technical problems, namely the need of contrast administration or invasive examinations. Despite such advantages, radiomics is still not applied in clinical routine, due to lack of standardized parameters acquisition, inconsistent radiomic methods, lack of external validation, and different knowledge and experience among the readers. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a recent update on the status of radiomics clinical applications in cardiovascular imaging.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography.

PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (29 males) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA from April to December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Fourteen datasets were reconstructed for each patient: three DLIR strength levels (DLIR_L, DLIR_M, and DLIR_H), ASiR-V from 10% to 100% in 10%-increment, and filtered back-projection (FBP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) determined objective image quality. Subjective image quality was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. Concordance between reconstruction algorithms was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: DLIR algorithm did not impact vascular attenuation (P ≥ 0.374). DLIR_H showed the lowest noise, comparable with ASiR-V 100% (P = 1) and significantly lower than other reconstructions (P ≤ 0.021). DLIR_H achieved the highest objective quality, with SNR and CNR comparable to ASiR-V 100% (P = 0.139 and 0.075, respectively). DLIR_M obtained comparable objective image quality with ASiR-V 80% and 90% (P ≥ 0.281), while achieved the highest subjective image quality (4, IQR: 4-4; P ≤ 0.001). DLIR and ASiR-V datasets returned a very strong correlation in the assessment of CAD (r = 0.874, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLIR_M significantly improves CCTA image quality and has very strong correlation with routinely applied ASiR-V 50% dataset in the diagnosis of CAD.

Diagnostic performance of CT lung severity score and quantitative chest CT for stratification of COVID-19 patients.

PURPOSE: Lung severity score (LSS) and quantitative chest CT (QCCT) analysis could have a relevant impact to stratify patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia at the hospital admission. The study aims to assess LSS and QCCT performances in severity stratification of COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 19, 2020, until May 3, 2020, patients with chest CT suggestive for interstitial pneumonia and tested positive for COVID-19 were retrospectively enrolled and stratified for hospital admission as Group 1, 2 and 3 (home isolation, low intensive care and intensive care, respectively). For LSS, lungs were divided in 20 regions and visually assessed by two radiologists who scored for each region from non-lung involvement as 0, < 50% assigned as 1 and > 50% as 2. QCCT was performed with a dedicated software that extracts pulmonary involvement expressed in liters and percentage. LSS and QCCT were analyzed with ROC curve analysis to predict the performance of both methods. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Final population enrolled included 136 patients (87 males, mean age 66 ± 16), 19 patients in Group 1, 86 in Group 2 and 31 in Group 3. Significant differences for LSS were observed in almost all comparisons, especially in Group 1 vs 3 (AUC 0.850, P < 0,0001) and Group 1 + 2 vs 3 (AUC 0.783, P < 0,0001). QCCT showed significant results in almost all comparisons, especially between Group 1 vs 3 (AUC 0.869, P < 0,0001). LSS and QCCT comparison between Group 1 and Group 2 did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: LSS and QCCT could represent promising tools to stratify COVID-19 patient severity at the admission.

Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Based Contrast Media Adaptation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Personalized Triphasic Injection Protocols: A Matched Case-Control Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first-line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure are of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130 kV with a 10 kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120 kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0-52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1-73.0] mL, p < 0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p = 0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3-5] vs. 4 [3-5], p = 0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality.

Intraindividual reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT angiography.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics is not yet used in clinical practice due to concerns regarding its susceptibility to technical factors. We aimed to assess the stability and interscan and interreader reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) and photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on both systems. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT CCTA within 30 days. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at various keV levels and polychromatic images (T3D) were generated for PCD-CT, with image reconstruction parameters standardized between scans. Two readers performed myocardial segmentation and 110 radiomic features were compared intraindividually between EID-CT and PDC-CT series. The agreement of parameters was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and paired t-test for the stability of the parameters. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (15 males) aged 67.6 ± 9.7 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included. Besides polychromatic PCD-CT reconstructions, 60- and 70-keV VMIs showed the highest feature stability compared to EID-CT (96%, 90%, and 92%, respectively). The interscan reproducibility of features was moderate even in the most favorable comparisons (median ICC 0.50 [interquartile range 0.20-0.60] for T3D; 0.56 [0.33-0.74] for 60 keV; 0.50 [0.36-0.62] for 70 keV). Interreader reproducibility was excellent for the PCD-CT series and good for EID-CT segmentations. CONCLUSION: Most myocardial radiomic features remain stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT. While features demonstrated moderate reproducibility between scanners, technological advances associated with PCD-CT may lead to greater reproducibility, potentially expediting future standardization efforts. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: While the use of PCD-CT may facilitate reduced interreader variability in radiomics analysis, the observed interscanner variations in comparison to EID-CT should be taken into account in future research, with efforts being made to minimize their impact in future radiomics studies. KEY POINTS: Most myocardial radiomic features resulted in being stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT on certain VMIs. The reproducibility of parameters between detector technologies was limited. PCD-CT improved interreader reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features.

Ultra-high resolution coronary CT angiography on photon-counting detector CT: bi-centre study on the impact of quantum iterative reconstruction on image quality and accuracy of stenosis measurements.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of different quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) levels on objective and subjective image quality of ultra-high resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images and to determine the effect of strength levels on stenosis quantification using photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. METHOD: A dynamic vessel phantom containing two calcified lesions (25 % and 50 % stenosis) was scanned at heart rates of 60, 80 and 100 beats per minute with a PCD-CT system. In vivo CCTA examinations were performed in 102 patients. All scans were acquired in UHR mode (slice thickness0.2 mm) and reconstructed with four different QIR levels (1-4) using a sharp vascular kernel (Bv64). Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sharpness, and percent diameter stenosis (PDS) were quantified in the phantom, while noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), sharpness, and subjective quality metrics (noise, sharpness, overall image quality) were assessed in patient scans. RESULTS: Increasing QIR levels resulted in significantly lower objective image noise (in vitro and in vivo: both p < 0.001), higher SNR (both p < 0.001) and CNR (both p < 0.001). Sharpness and PDS values did not differ significantly among QIRs (all pairwise p > 0.008). Subjective noise of in vivo images significantly decreased with increasing QIR levels, resulting in significantly higher image quality scores at increasing QIR levels (all pairwise p < 0.001). Qualitative sharpness, on the other hand, did not differ across different levels of QIR (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The QIR algorithm may enhance the image quality of CCTA datasets without compromising image sharpness or accurate stenosis measurements, with the most prominent benefits at the highest strength level.

Intra-individual comparison of epicardial adipose tissue characteristics on coronary CT angiography between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems.

PURPOSE: To explore the potential differences in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and attenuation measurements between photon-counting detector (PCD) and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT systems. METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age 69 ± 8 years, 41 male [82 %]) were prospectively enrolled for a research coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on a PCD-CT within 30 days after clinical EID-based CCTA. EID-CT acquisitions were reconstructed using a Bv40 kernel at 0.6 mm slice thickness. The PCD-CT acquisition was reconstructed at a down-sampled resolution (0.6 mm, Bv40; [PCD-DS]) and at ultra-high resolutions (PCD-UHR) with a 0.2 mm slice thickness and Bv40, Bv48, and Bv64 kernels. EAT segmentation was performed semi-automatically at about 1 cm intervals and interpolated to cover the whole epicardium within a threshold of -190 to -30 HU. A subgroup analysis was performed based on quartile groups created from EID-CT data and PCD-UHRBv48 data. Differences were measured using repeated-measures ANOVA and the Friedman test. Correlations were tested using Pearson's and Spearman's rho, and agreement using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: EAT volumes significantly differed between some reconstructions (e.g. EID-CT: 138 ml [IQR 100, 188]; PCD-DS: 147 ml [110, 206]; P<0.001). Overall, correlations between PCD-UHR and EID-CT EAT volumes were excellent, e.g. PCD-UHRBv48: r: 0.976 (95 % CI: 0.958, 0.987); P<0.001; with good agreement (mean bias: -9.5 ml; limits of agreement [LoA]: -40.6, 21.6). On the other hand, correlations regarding EAT attenuation was moderate, e.g. PCD-UHRBV48: r: 0.655 (95 % CI: 0.461, 0.790); P<0.001; mean bias: 6.5 HU; LoA: -2.0, 15.0. CONCLUSION: EAT attenuation and volume measurements demonstrated different absolute values between PCD-UHR, PCD-DS as well as EID-CT reconstructions, but showed similar tendencies on an intra-individual level. New protocols and threshold ranges need to be developed to allow comparison between PCD-CT and EID-CT data.

Post-infarction ventricular septal rupture with a contained right ventricular pseudoaneurysm formation.

Mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction, such as left ventricular free-wall or septal rupture, pseudo-aneurysm or true aneurysm, are uncommon but potentially fatal conditions, that require an early diagnosis and management. We describe a case of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture with pseudoaneurysm formation included in the right ventricle.

Automated Identification of Coronary Arteries in Assisting Inexperienced Readers: Comparison between Two Commercial Vendors.

Background: to assess the performance and speed of two commercially available advanced cardiac software packages in the automated identification of coronary vessels as an aiding tool for inexperienced readers. Methods: Hundred and sixty patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were prospectively enrolled from February until September 2021 and randomized in two groups, each one composed by 80 patients. Patients in group 1 were scanned on Revolution EVO CT Scanner (GE Healthcare), while patients in group 2 had the CCTA performed on Brilliance iCT (Philips Healthcare); each examination was evaluated on the respective vendor proprietary advanced cardiac software (software 1 and 2, respectively). Two inexperienced readers in cardiac imaging verified the software performance in the automated identification of the three major coronary vessels: (RCA, LCx, and LAD) and in the number of identified coronary segments. Time of analysis was also recorded. Results: software 1 correctly and automatically nominated 202/240 (84.2%) of the three main coronary vessels, while software 2 correctly identified 191/240 (79.6%) (p = 0.191). Software 1 achieved greater performances in recognizing the LCx (81.2% versus 67.5%; p = 0.048), while no differences have been reported in detecting the RCA (p = 0.679), and the LAD (p = 0.618). On a per-segment analysis, software 1 outperformed software 2, automatically detecting 942/1062 (88.7%) coronary segments, while software 2 detected 797/1078 (73.9%) (p < 0.001). Average reconstruction and detection time was of 13.8 s for software 1 and 21.9 s for software 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: automated cardiac software packages are a reliable and time-saving tool for inexperienced reader. Software 1 outperforms software 2 and might therefore better assist inexperienced CCTA readers in automated identification of the three main vessels and coronaries segments, with a consistent time saving of the reading session.