Use of music therapy in pediatric oncology: an Italian AIEOP multicentric survey study in the era of COVID-19.

Music therapy (MT) is a complementary therapy offered to children, young adults, and their families in pediatric oncology and palliative care. We performed a survey to collect information about MT in pediatric oncology in Italy. The outbreak of COVID-19 unavoidably changed the scenario of MT, suggesting some considerations presented in this survey. 27/32 (84.4%) centers belonging to the Infections and Supportive Therapy Working Group of Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AEIOP) completed in 2 different time points (T1 and T2) an online survey on MT, before and after COVID-19 pandemia. Different kinds of music approach were used taking care of patients in 21/27 centers, while in 14/21 (66%), a specific project of MT conducted by a music therapist was present. In 6/14 centers, MT activities were delivered for < 3 h/week, in 3 centers for > 3 and < 10 h/week, and in the remaining 5 for > 3 h/week. MT sessions were in different areas, day hospital, or ward (patient rooms, operating rooms, waiting rooms), on an individual basis or by groups. Patients were invited to MT by psychologists, caring physician, or nurse, or on equipé decision. MT was evaluated with tools self-made by music therapist in 11/14 centers. After COVID-19, MT has been withdrawn in 3 centers, sessions in the waiting rooms were reduced, individual sessions were preferred, and enrollment by multidisciplinary teams increased. CONCLUSION: This survey represents the starting platform to compare and discuss different experience of MT in AIEOP centers, to implement MT in pediatric oncology for a more qualified assistance to patients, and to improve quality of care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Music therapy in pediatric oncology and palliative care can be used for the management and prevention of various somatic and psychological symptoms of patients and often is provided to children together with their families. • In Italy the application of Music therapy in the AIEOP pediatric oncology centers is constantly increasing, but due to the outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic, Italian pediatric oncology departments were obliged to adopt restrictive measures. WHAT IS NEW: • Although the majority of Centres did not abrogate MT interventions, judgment about limitation should be carefully taken since MT helps children and even more adolescents in their fight against cancer. • The best practice of Music therapy in pediatric oncology requires communication and collaboration among qualified music therapists and multidisciplinary care team, using a model of family-centered care that actively involves parents/ caregivers in assessment, treatment planning, and care delivery.

Comparison of different treatments for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is rapidly evolving. Despite either surgery or radiotherapy (RT), with or without chemotherapy (CT), being acceptable in intermediate and locally advanced diseases, there is uncertainty regarding the best treatment option for these patients. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different treatments for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized clinical trials that enrolled adults with non-metastatic HPV+ oropharynx cancer and provided data about overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) and/or locoregional control and distant metastases (LRC and DM) were included. Fixed- or random-effects models were fit using a Bayesian approach to NMA. Between-group comparisons were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The primary outcome was OS. RESULTS: A total of 844 citations were screened; 11 randomized clinical trials were included (HPV+ stage III-IV cancer, mainly oropharynx carcinomas). Nine treatment arms were compared. Radiotherapy (altered or standard fractionation) + triweekly cisplatin (HR 3.8; 95% CrIs 0.29-65 and 0.3; 95% CrIs 0.03-2.51) was superior to RT in term of OS (P score = 0.42 and 0.16). Radiotherapy with low and high cisplatin doses appeared similar (HR 1.57; 95% CrIs 0.19-12.72). Altered fractionation or standard RT + 3-weekly cisplatin are the 2 highest-ranked options in terms of PFS (P score = 0.35 and 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms the role of cisplatin added to RT as the best option for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. RT+ 3-weekly cisplatin is likely to be the best radical treatment in terms of OS and PFS.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The addition of induction chemotherapy to concomitant neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer could increase pathological downstaging and act on occult micrometastatic disease, leading ultimately to a better outcome. A systematic review was carried out of the existing literature on the treatment outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on locally advanced rectal cancer. TNT was defined as chemotherapy using cycles of induction and/or consolidation in conjunction with standard chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed according to the PRISMA statement up until January 2019. The primary endpoints were complete pathologic response (pCR), disease-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies (3 retrospective and 25 prospective for a total of 3579 patients) were included in the final analysis (n = 2688 treated with TNT and n = 891 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy therapy). The pooled pCR rate was 22.4% (95% CI 19.4%-25.7%) in all patients treated with TNT (n = 27 studies with data available). In n = 10 comparative studies with data available, TNT was found to increase the odds of pCR by 39% (1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of induction or consolidation chemotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy results in a higher pCR rate. Given that the comparative analysis was derived from few randomized publications, large confirmatory trials should be carried out before a strong recommendation is made in favor of TNT.

Resected pN1 non-small cell lung cancer: recurrence patterns and nodal risk factors may suggest selection criteria for post-operative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To describe the pattern of recurrence in resected pN1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify factors predicting an increased risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) or distant metastasis (DM) to define a selected population who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). METHODS: 285 patients with resected pN1 NSCLC were identified. Patients with positive surgical margins, undergoing neoadjuvant treatment or PORT, were excluded. LR was defined as first event of recurrence at the surgical bed, ipsilateral hilum or mediastinum, and other sites were considered as DM. Kaplan-Meier actuarial estimates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from LR (FFLR) and freedom from DM (FFDM) in different subgroups were compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was calculated. RESULTS: 202 patients met the inclusion criteria, 24 % received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 39 months. The total number of recurrences was 118 (64.4 %): 44 (24 %) and 74 (40.4 %) for LR and DM, respectively. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 39.2 and 33.3 %, respectively. Extra capsular extension (ECE) (RR 2.10, p = 0.01) and lymph nodal ratio (LNR) >0:15 (RR 1.68, p = 0.015) were associated with a worse PFS. ECE and LNR >0.15 were significantly related to a worst FFLR (RR 3.04 and 4.42, respectively), and adenocarcinoma to an unfavorable FFDM (RR 1.97, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Nodal factors as high LNR and ECE can predict an increased risk of worse FFLR and PFS. Prospective data on selected patients, treated with modern radiotherapy techniques, need to be collected to re-evaluate the role of radiotherapy.

Duration of androgen deprivation with radiotherapy for high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate various outcomes of different lengths of androgen deprivation therapy in high- and very-high-risk prostate cancer, we conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. The treatment of high-risk PC comprises the use of radical radiotherapy associated with various durations of androgen deprivation therapy, with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogues initiated during or immediately before the beginning of radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study followed the PRISMA extension statement to report network meta-analyses. We systematically searched online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for all randomized trials published up to April 2022. The primary outcomes were overall survival, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and metastasis-free survival. Network meta-analyses were performed under a Bayesian framework using the "gemtc" package (https://gemtc.drugis.org). RESULTS: The network meta-analysis included 12 studies (10 treatments) on overall survival outcomes. None of the arms showed superiority to radiotherapy alone with respect to overall deaths. Nine studies and 10 treatment arms had prostate cancer-specific mortality data. Overall, 36 months of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy resulted in a better outcome than radiotherapy alone, three months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, or 12 or 24 months of adjuvant androgen reprivation therapy, and it was the better treatment (73%) in terms of cancer mortality. Treatment involving luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogues for 6 months before and during radiotherapy ranked the highest in reducing distant metastases (42%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that 36 months of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy after radiotherapy was the optimal duration of endocrine treatment with regard to cancer mortality for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Early antibiotic treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication in patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomised multicentre study comparing two different protocols.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic pulmonary infection is an unfavourable event in cystic fibrosis. Bacterial clearance is possible with an early antibiotic treatment upon pathogen isolation. Currently, no best practice exists for early treatment. The efficacy of two different regimens against initial P. aeruginosa infection was assessed. METHODS: In a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study involving 13 centres, the superiority of inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin compared with inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin (reference treatment) over 28 days was evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were older than 1 year with first or new P. aeruginosa isolation. Treatments were assigned equally by centralised balanced randomisation, stratified by age and forced expiratory volume in 1 s values. The participants and those giving the intervention were not masked to arm assignments. The primary endpoint was P. aeruginosa eradication, defined as three successive negative cultures in 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was registered with EudraCT, number 2008-006502-42. RESULTS: 105 patients were assigned to inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin (arm A) and 118 to inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin (arm B). All patients were analysed. P. aeruginosa was eradicated in 66 (62.8%) patients in arm A and in 77 (65.2%) in arm B (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.55, p=0.81). Following treatment, an increase in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was noted (OR 3.97, 95% CI 2.27 to 6.94, p=0.001) with no differences between the two arms (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.78, p=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: No superiority of treatment under study was demonstrated in comparison to the reference treatment. Early eradication treatment was associated with an increase in S maltophilia.

Different neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

One of the historical standard of care for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) is neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (FP-based CTRT) followed 6-8 weeks later by surgery. The incorporation of further chemotherapy cycles (CT) before or after CTRT (total neoadjuvant therapy) resulted in better outcomes than CTRT alone. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatments for LARC. Fixed-or random-effects models were fit using a Bayesian approach to NMA. Between-group comparisons were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % credible intervals (95 % CrIs). A total of 23 randomized clinical trials were included. In Bayesian comparisons. FOLFIRINOX followed by capecitabine-based CTRT resulted in better OS than other regimens, including the previous standard, and ranked as the best regimen with a probability of 87 %. This NMA confirms that adopting total neoadjuvant therapy improves outcome compared to other preoperative strategies, including FP-based CTRT.

Steroids use and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Steroids are commonly used for managing brain edema in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), treated with surgery and concomitant temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy (CTRT). The adverse effects of glucocorticoids include lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, and risk of infection. We report the results of a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of steroids on outcome when associated with the treatment of GBM. METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception until September 2019 for observational or prospective studies reporting prognosis of adult patients with GBM and treated or not treated with steroids. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and an HR > 1 associated with the worst outcome in steroid users compared to non-users. RESULTS: Twenty-two publications were retrieved from studies selected for a total of 8,752 patients. In the primary analysis (n = 22 studies reporting data), OS was reduced in GBM patients taking steroids during treatment (HR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.37-1.75; p < 0.01). Similarly, PFS was inferior in steroid users in n = 9 studies with data available (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.1-1.49; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GBM and treated with RT and/or CT, association with steroids significantly reduces survival and PFS. Use of the lowest dose of glucocorticoids for the shortest period needed to achieve the treatment goals and prevention of steroid-associated complications are essential aims of treatment of this disease.

Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies.

Background: The modern concept of oligometastatic (OM) state has been initially developed to describe patients with a low burden of disease and with a potential for cure with local ablative treatments. We systematically assessed the risk of death and relapse of oligometastatic (OM) cancers compared to cancers with more diffuse metastatic spread, through a meta-analysis of published data.  Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting prognosis of patients with OM solid tumors. Risk of death and relapse were extracted and pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI).  The primary outcome of the study refers to overall mortality in OM vs. polymetastatic (PM) patients.  Results. Mortality and relapse associated with OM state in patients with cancer were evaluated among 104,234 participants (n=173 studies). Progression-free survival was better in patients with OM disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68; P <.001; n=69 studies). Also, OM cancers were associated with a better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68; P<.01; n=161 studies). In colorectal (CRC), breast, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the reduction in the risk of death for OM patients were 35, 38, 30 and 42%, respectively. Biliary tract and cervical cancer do not significantly better in OM stage likely for paucity of data. Conclusions. Patients with OM cancers have a significantly better prognosis than those with more widespread stage IV tumors. In OM cancer patients a personalized approach should be pursued.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for initially inoperable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review of phase 2-3 studies.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with initially inoperable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) have a poor prognosis, often similar to those with metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) plus concomitant or sequential radiotherapy (RT) may cause tumor shrinkage and allow for radical surgery. We pooled data of studies in which patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or borderline resectable PC were treated with a course of induction (or consolidation) CT followed or preceded by neoadjuvant CTRT regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched articles, including phase 2 or 3 studies, published in English from 2010 up to December 2020 in PubMed, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The primary outcomes were the pooled radical and R0 resection rates, median PFS and OS of included patients (those included in the intent to treat analysis). RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were finally considered eligible for inclusion in quantitative analysis for a total of 2446 patients with locally advanced/borderline resectable PC. Overall the pooled rate of resection was 29.7% (95%CI 26.7-32.8%). In patients who completed the CT + CTRT program, the overall resection rate was 31.8% (95% 28.4-35.4%). After exclusion of studies that included resectable PCs, the overall resection rate was 19.9% (95%CI 17.3-22.7%). In studies were all patients had unresectable PC (n = 20 studies), the resection rate was 12.1% (95%CI 10-14.5%). In two studies that enrolled all borderline resectable PCs the resection rate was 59.2% (95%CI 48.9-68.8%). The pooled R0 resection rate was 68.7% (95%CI 64.7-72.3%). The median pooled OS was 15.7 months (95%CI 14-17.2 months) and the median pooled PFS was 10.7 (95%CI 9.3-12.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is a treatment option in about one third of patients with initially inoperable PC, following total neoadjuvant therapy. In unresectable cases the resection rate was 12%. Median OS and PFS rates were comparable with historical data of advanced PCs. Optimal integration and sequence of chemo- and radiotherapy in unresectable PC must still be defined.

A Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Treatment Recommendations for Cancer Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has inevitably caused those involved in cancer care to change clinical practice in order to minimize the risk of infection while maintaining cancer treatment as a priority. General advice during the pandemic suggests that most patients continue with ongoing therapies or planned surgeries, while follow-up visits may instead be delayed until the resolution of the outbreak. We conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify articles published in English language that reported on care recommendations for cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic from its inception up to 1st June 2020, using the terms "(cancer or tumor) AND (COVID 19)". Articles were selected for relevance and split into five categories: (1) personal recommendations of single or multiple authors, (2) recommendations of single authoritative centers, (3) recommendations of panels of experts or of multiple regional comprehensive centers, (4) recommendations of multicenter cooperative groups, (5) official guidelines or recommendations of health authorities. Of the 97 included studies, 10 were personal recommendations of single or multiple independent authors, 16 were practice recommendations of single authoritative cancer centers, 35 were recommendations provided by panel of experts or of multiple regional comprehensive centers, 19 were cooperative group position papers, and finally, 17 were official guidelines statements. The COVID-19 pandemic is a global emergency, and has rapidly modified our clinical practice. Delaying unnecessary treatment, minimizing toxicity, and identifying care priorities for surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies must be viewed as basic priorities in the COVID-19 era.

Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiotherapy (RT) represents a mainstay in the treatment of brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors. Immunotherapy (IT) has improved survival of metastatic cancer patients across many tumor types. The combination of RT and IT for the treatment of BMs has a strong rationale, but data on efficacy and safety of this combination is still limited. A systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE was conducted. 33 studies were included for a total of 1520 patients, most of them with melanoma (87%). Median pooled OS was 15.9 months (95%CI 13.9-18.1). One- and 2-year OS rates were 55.2% (95% CI 49.3-60.9) and 35.7% (95% CI 30.4-41.3), respectively. Addition of IT to RT was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.44-0.67; P < 0.001). For patients with BMs from solid tumors, addition of concurrent IT to brain RT is able to increase survival and provide long term control.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous malignancy with a high propensity for local recurrence and regional and distant metastases. The main treatment is surgery with narrow excision margins and draining nodes, plus or minus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on the surgical bed and/or lymph nodes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of adjuvant RT in MCC treatment. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before September 2018. Prospective trials and retrospective series comparing adjuvant RT vs. no RT in resected primary MCCs were included. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the outcomes of MCC patients who received adjuvant RT in term of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DFS were aggregated according to a fixed or random effect model. Secondary endpoints were local, locoregional, and distant DFS. A total of 17,179 MCCs across 29 studies were analysed. There was a significant difference in OS between the RT and no RT arms (HR = 0.81, 95%CI 0.75-0.86, P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in DFS in favour of adjuvant RT (HR = 0.45, 95%CI 0.32-0.62, P < 0.001). Adjuvant RT improved locoregional DFS and local DFS but not distant DFS (HR = 0.3, 95%CI 0.22-0.42; HR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.14-0.33, and HR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.49-1.14, respectively). Meta-regression analysis showed that high Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores, stage I-II MCCs, shorter follow-up durations, size >2 cm, and being of a younger age were associated with increased OS. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a survival and DFS benefit for postoperative radiation of MCCs. Intermediate stage MCCs derive the maximum benefit with local and regional relapses reduced by 80% and 70%, respectively. Conversely, distant metastases were not significantly prevented.

Addition of radiotherapy to the primary tumour in oligometastatic NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a discrete number of distant lesions (<5) that can be amenable to radical treatment. The treatment of the primary lung tumour in such stage IV cases is still debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcome of these patients and the added benefit in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when radical treatment of the primary tumour with radiotherapy (RT) was delivered. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published up to July 2018. Prospective trials and retrospective series comparing RT vs no RT to the primary NSCLC in the presence of oligometastases were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS were aggregated according to a fixed or random effect model. Twenty-one studies for a total of 924 synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC were analysed. Median OS and PFS were 20.4 and 12 months. Pooled 1-2-3 and 5-year OS were 70.3%, 43.5%, 29.3% and 20.2% respectively. Overall survival was improved with the addition of thoracic RT (HR = 0.44, 95%CI 0.32-0.6; P < 0.001). Similarly, RT added to the primary tumour increased PFS (HR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.33-0.55; P < 0.001). The only variable associated with the median OS was the year of publication with most recent series associated with a better outcome. In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and disease controlled with ablative therapy of distant metastases, a consolidation with radical RT to the primary tumour is associated with better survival and could be considered as a treatment modality in selected cases.

Whole brain radiotherapy with adjuvant or concomitant boost in brain metastasis: dosimetric comparison between helical and volumetric IMRT technique.

BACKGROUND: To compare and evaluate the possible advantages related to the use of VMAT and helical IMRT and two different modalities of boost delivering, adjuvant stereotactic boost (SRS) or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in the treatment of brain metastasis (BM) in RPA classes I-II patients. METHODS: Ten patients were treated with helical IMRT, 5 of them with SRS after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 5 with SIB. MRI co-registration with planning CT was mandatory and prescribed doses were 30 Gy in 10 fractions (fr) for WBRT and 15Gy/1fr or 45Gy/10fr in SRS or SIB, respectively. For each patient, 4 "treatment plans" (VMAT SRS and SIB, helical IMRT SRS and SIB) were calculated and accepted if PTV boost was included in 95 % isodose and dose constraints of the main organs at risk were respected without major deviations. Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformal Index (CI) and Conformal Number (CN) were considered to compare the different plans. Moreover, time of treatment delivery was calculated and considered in the analysis. RESULTS: Volume of brain metastasis ranged between 1.43 and 51.01 cc (mean 12.89 ± 6.37 ml) and 3 patients had double lesions. V95% resulted over 95 % in the average for each kind of technique, but the "target coverage" was inadequate for VMAT planning with two sites. The HI resulted close to the ideal value of zero in all cases; VMAT-SIB, VMAT-SRS, Helical IMRT-SIB and Helical IMRT-SRS showed mean CI of 2.15, 2.10, 2.44 and 1.66, respectively (optimal range: 1.5-2.0). Helical IMRT-SRS was related to the best and reliable finding of CN (0.66). The mean of treatment time was 210 s, 467 s, 440 s, 1598 s, respectively, for VMAT-SIB, VMAT-SRS, Helical IMRT-SIB and Helical IMRT-SRS. CONCLUSIONS: This dosimetric comparison show that helical IMRT obtain better target coverage and respect of CI and CN; VMAT could be acceptable in solitary metastasis. SIB modality can be considered as a good choice for clinical and logistic compliance; literature's preliminary data are confirming also a radiobiological benefit for SIB. Helical IMRT-SRS seems less effective for the long time of treatment compared to other techniques.

[Radiotherapy in case of locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term follow-up in 223 patients]. / La neoplasia prostatica localmente avanzata sottoposta a radioterapia: follow-up a lungo termine in 223 pazienti

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the long-term follow-up in patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1999 to January 2007, 223 patients with a histologic diagnosis (204 transperineal needle biopsies; 19 trans-urethral prostatic resections) of locally advanced prostate cancer underwent external beam radiotherapy; of these patients, 151 were T3a (extracapsular extension) and 72 were T3b (involvement of seminal vesicles); the extracapsular extension was demonstrated using pelvic RMN or transrectal ultrasound, while the presence of distant and lymph node metastases was excluded using TC total body or bone scan. PSA value at diagnosis was 29.1 ng/mL (0.4-379 ng/mL). Radiotherapy was used on prostate and seminal vesicles in 201 patients (141 T3a; 60 T3b) while in 22 patients (10 T3a; 12 T3b) it was extended to the pelvis. Biochemical recurrence was defined using ASTRO definition (three consecutive PSA rises after PSA nadir); no patients underwent control prostate needle biopsy for problems of interpretation related to postactinic tissue changes. All complications were recorded and analyzed using Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria (RTOG). RESULTS: At a mean 55-month follow-up, of the 223 patients treated, 26 have escaped controls, 168 are alive (141 disease-free; 27 with recurrent disease) and 29 died; of this group, 11 patients died from clinical progression, while in the others the cause was not related to the prostatic problem; only one patient died from iatrogenic problems. Hormone treatment was conducted in different ways (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, concurrent to radiotherapy or in association) considering patients' characteristics. Most common complications involved rectum and bladder.
 CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy is a viable and safe method in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer; however, it is essential the role of hormone therapy.