Rituximab in auto-immune haemolytic anaemia and immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a Belgian retrospective multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: For better characterizing the effect of anti-CD20 therapy, we analysed the use of rituximab in Belgian patients experiencing auto-immune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). DESIGN: We performed a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients with AIHA and ITP treated with rituximab in Belgium. SETTING: Haematological departments were invited to fill in a questionnaire about patient and disease characteristics. SUBJECTS: All patients with AIHA and ITP, both primary and secondary to other diseases, who received one or more courses of rituximab during their disease course were included. Sixty-eight courses of rituximab in 53 patients with AIHA and 43 courses in 40 patients with ITP were analyzed. INTERVENTION: Response rates, duration of response and factors predictive for response were assessed. RESULTS: All patients were given rituximab after failing at least one previous line of treatment, including splenectomy in 19% and 72.5% of AIHA-patients and ITP-patients respectively. Overall response rates were 79.2% in AIHA and 70% in ITP, with a median follow-up since first rituximab administration of 15 months (range 0.5-62) in AIHA and 11 months (range 0-74) in ITP. Progression free survival at 1 and 2 years were 72% and 56% in AIHA and 70% and 44% in ITP. In this retrospective analysis we were not able to identify pretreatment characteristics predictive for response to rituximab. Nine patients with AIHA and three patients with ITP were given one or more additional courses of rituximab. Most of these patients, who had responded to a previous course, experienced a new response comparable to the previous one, both in terms of quality and of duration of response. Finally, the outcome of patients who failed to respond to rituximab therapy was poor both in terms of response to subsequent therapy and in terms of survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that rituximab induces responses in a majority of previously treated patients with AIHA and ITP. Response duration generally exceeds 1 year. Retreatment with rituximab in responding patients is most often successful. The outcome of patients who fail on rituximab is poor. We were not able to identify pretreatment patient characteristics predicting for response.

[Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis and acquired antithrombin, protein C and S deficiency during chemotherapy in a young man: report of a case]. / Thrombose des sinus veineux endocrâniens et déficit acquis en antithrombine, protéines C et S au cours d'une chimiothérapie: observation clinique chez un jeune patient.

L-asparaginase is commonly used in the chemotherapy regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Its use is associated with thrombotic complications in 1 to 14 % of the cases. The pathogenesis of this complication is still unclear. However, the decrease of antithrombin seems to play an important role. We report a case of a 17-year old man with a acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, who developed a cerebral sinovenous thrombosis due to an acquired deficiency of antithrombin and protein C and S following L-asparaginase chemotherapy. We discuss the use of prophylactic supplements of antithrombin and the value of screening of thrombophilia based on the recent medical literature.

Donor lymphocyte infusions in adult haploidentical transplant: a dose finding study.

Haploidentical transplantation has become a clinical option for patients lacking a compatible donor. However, patients are still referred at advanced stages and are usually heavily pretreated. This results in a high risk of toxicity, relapses and infections. We therefore started a donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) dose-finding protocol, to try to improve both relapse rate and immunity reconstitution. In all, 12 consecutive patients were investigated. All had a refractory, some progressive, disease. Conditioning consisted of TBI, melphalan, ATG, fludarabine and CSA pretransplant. In four rapidly progressive patients, Ara-C had to be given 1 week preconditioning. The graft was T- and B-cell depleted with a fixed reinfused CD3 dose of 5 x 10(4)/kg. All patients engrafted before day 20. G-CSF was given from day 5 post-transplant and replaced with GM-CSF in the last three patients. Nonrelapse related mortality was 0/12 at 1 year. DLI were started at day 28 (3 x 10(4) CD3/kg) in the two first patients. This resulted in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in both, but they did not relapse. The next dose was 1 x 10(4)/kg monthly for 3 months. This was well tolerated with only one grade I GVHD. Given the high relapse rate, we escalated doses (1, 3 and 10 x 10(4)/kg). This produced GVHD in all. We next moved, to GM-CSF and 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg monthly. Overall, 6/12 patients relapsed and received therapeutic DLI, starting at 1 x 10(5) CD3/kg with escalation every 2 weeks. We conclude that prophylactic DLI are feasible in adult haploidentical transplantation, without GVHD at a monthly dose of 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg. They result in faster CD4 recovery and a low rate of infections. The impact of GM-CSF remains to be further investigated. This scheme seems ideal for patients transplanted early in the course of their disease. In very bad prognosis patients, it remains insufficient to rapidly induce a GVL effect. Escalated doses are feasible but the price is aGVHD. Therapeutic DLI can be given at higher doses, depending on the time post-transplant. Haploidentical transplantation with low-dose DLI is a safe procedure that should be considered in all patients needing a transplant, but lacking a matched donor, early in the course of the disease.