Incidence of acute myocardial infarction in the workforce: Findings from the Occupational Disease Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: Increased risks of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be attributable to the workplace, however, associations are not well-established. Using the Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS), we sought to estimate associations between occupation and industry of employment and AMI risk among workers in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The study population was derived by linking provincial accepted lost-time workers' compensation claims data, to inpatient hospitalization records. Workers aged 15-65 years with an accepted non-AMI compensation claim were followed for an AMI event between 2007 and 2016. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each industry and occupation group, compared to all other workers in the cohort. Sex-stratified analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In all, 24,514 incident cases of AMI were identified among 1,502,072 Ontario workers. Increased incidence rates of AMI were found across forestry (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58) and wood processing (HR 1.50, 1.27-1.77) job-titles. Elevated rates were also detected within industries and occupations both broadly related to mining and quarrying (HR 1.52, 1.17-1.97), trucking (HR 1.32, 1.27-1.38), construction (HR 1.32, 1.14-1.54), and the manufacturing and processing of metal (HR 1.41, 1.19-1.68), textile (HR 1.41, 1.07-1.88), non-metallic mineral (HR 1.30, 0.82-2.07), and rubber and plastic (HR 1.42, 1.27-1.60) products. Female food service workers also had elevated AMI rates (HR 1.36, 1.23-1.51). CONCLUSION: This study found occupational variation in AMI incidence. Future studies should examine work-related hazards possibly contributing to such excess risks, like noise, vibration, occupational physical activity, shift work, and chemical and particulate exposures.

The Use of Metformin in Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Nested Case-control, Population-based Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if metformin use is associated with a lower rate of overactive bladder (OAB) medication use. Metformin facilitates the proliferation and migration of stem cells, which have been shown to improve bladder overactivity in animal models. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective nested case-control cohort study using population-based health-care administrative databases. Our cohort included patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) ≥69years. Cases received a prescription for an OAB medication, matched with up to 4 controls based on age, sex, and DM2 diagnosis date. Exposure was a new prescription for metformin prior to receiving an OAB medication. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Sensitivity analysis was done to assess the relationship between cumulative days' supply of metformin and use of OAB medications. RESULTS: Within our cohort of 2,233,084 patients with DM2, there were 16,549 case subjects who received a prescription for an OAB medication, and 64,171 matched controls. We found a positive association between OAB medication use and metformin use (adjusted odds ratios=1.07, 95% CI=1.03-1.12). Summed days' supply of metformin was also associated with OAB medication use, except when summed metformin days was >2220. CONCLUSION: Older patients with DM2 exposed to metformin had a slightly higher rate of OAB medication use, until 2220+ days' metformin supply, whereafter no association was found. This suggests no protective role for metformin in the prevention of OAB in this patient population.

Sex differences among children, adolescents and young adults for mental health service use within inpatient and outpatient settings, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The pandemic and public health response to contain the virus had impacts on many aspects of young people's lives including disruptions to daily routines, opportunities for social, academic, recreational engagement and early employment. Consequently, children, adolescents and young adults may have experienced mental health challenges that required use of mental health services. This study compared rates of use for inpatient and outpatient mental health services during the pandemic to pre-pandemic rates. DESIGN: Population-based repeated cross-sectional study. SETTING: Publicly delivered mental healthcare in primary and secondary settings within the province of Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All children 6-12 years of age (n=2 043 977), adolescents 13-17 years (n=1 708 754) and young adults 18-24 years (n=2 286 544), living in Ontario and eligible for provincial health insurance between March 2016 and November 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outpatient mental health visits to family physicians and psychiatrists for: mood and anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse disorders, other non-psychotic mental health disorders and social problems. Inpatient mental health visits to emergency departments and hospitalisations for: substance-related and addictive disorders, anxiety disorders, assault-related injuries, deliberate self-harm and eating disorders. All outcomes were analysed by cohort and sex. RESULTS: During the pandemic, observed outpatient visit rates were higher among young adults by 19.01% (95% CI: 15.56% to 22.37%; 209 vs 175 per 1000) and adolescent women 24.17% (95% CI: 18.93% to 29.15%; 131 vs 105 per 1000) for mood and anxiety disorders and remained higher than expected. Female adolescents had higher than expected usage of inpatient care for deliberate self-harm, eating disorders and assault-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Study results raise concerns over prolonged high rates of mental health use during the pandemic, particularly in female adolescents and young women, and highlights the need to better monitor and identify mental health outcomes associated with COVID-19 containment measures and to develop policies to address these concerns.

Utilization of physician mental health services by birthing parents with young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and nonpharmaceutical interventions that reduced the spread of infection had impacts on social interaction, schooling and employment. Concerns have been raised about the impact of these disruptions on the mental health of high-risk groups, including birthing parents of young children. METHODS: This population-based, repeated cross-sectional study used health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to link children to birth parents and to measure subsequent mental health visits of birthing parents of younger (age 0-5 yr) and school-aged (6-12 yr) children. We used a repeated cross-sectional study design to estimate expected rates for visits to physicians for mental health diagnoses, based on prepandemic trends (March 2016-February 2020), and to compare those to observed visit rates during the March 2020-November 2021 period of the pandemic. RESULTS: We identified 2 cohorts: 986 870 birthing parents of younger children and 1 012 997 birthing parents of school-aged children. In both cohorts, observed visit rates were higher than expected in the June 2020-August 2020 quarter (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.16; and IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13, respectively), peaked in December 2020-February 2021 (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.27; and IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16-1.23) and remained higher than expected in September 2021-November 2021 (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.16; and IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.13). The increases were driven mostly by visits for mood and anxiety disorders, and trends in increases were similar across physician type, birthing-parent age and deprivation quintile. INTERPRETATION: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased mental health visits for parents of young children. This raises concerns about mental health impacts and highlights the need to address these concerns.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetes Care for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health prevention measures have led to a disruption of the delivery of routine care and may have had an impact on the quality of diabetes care. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the extent to which structure, process and outcome quality measures in diabetes care changed in the first 6 months of the pandemic compared with previous periods. METHODS: A before-and-after observational study of all community-living Ontario residents >20 years of age and living with diabetes. The patients were divided into 3 cohorts: a pandemic cohort, alive March to September 2020 (n=1,393,404); reference cohort 1, alive March to September 2019 (n=1,415,490); and reference cohort 2, alive September 2019 to February 2020 (n=1,444,000). Outcome measures were in-person/virtual visits to general practitioners and specialists, eye examinations, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) testing, filled prescriptions, and admissions to emergency departments (EDs) and hospitals for acute and chronic diabetes complications. RESULTS: The probability of an in-person visit to a GP decreasing by 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47% to 47%) in the pandemic period compared with both previous periods. The probability of having an eye exam was lower by 43% (95% CI, 44% to 43%), an A1C test by 28% (95% CI, 29% to 28%) and an LDL test by 31% (95% CI, 31% to 31%) in the pandemic period compared with the same 6-month period the year before. There were very small decreases in drug prescriptions and decreases of 18% and 16% in ED and hospital visits for complications. CONCLUSIONS: We observed disruptions to both structure and processes measures of diabetes care in Ontario during the first wave of the pandemic.

Characteristics and methods of incorporating randomized and nonrandomized evidence in network meta-analyses: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to conduct a scoping review of the published literature on methods used to combine randomized and nonrandomized evidence (NRE) in network meta-analyses (NMAs) and their respective characteristics. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a scoping review using a list of NMAs which incorporated NRE that were identified from a previous review. All NMAs that included NRE in the analysis of main outcomes or sensitivity analyses were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and performed data abstraction. Data analysis involved quantitative (frequencies and percentages) and qualitative (narrative synthesis) methods. RESULTS: A total of 23 NMAs met the predefined inclusion criteria, of which 74% (n = 17) used naïve pooling, 0% used NRE as informative priors, 9% (n = 2) used the 3-level Bayesian hierarchical model, 9% (n = 2) used all methods, and 9% (n = 2) used other methods. Most NMAs were supplemented with additional analyses to investigate the effect estimates when only randomized evidence was included. CONCLUSION: Although most studies provided justification for the inclusion of NRE, transparent reporting of the method used to combine randomized evidence and NRE was unclear in most published networks. Most NMAs used naïve pooling for combining randomized evidence and NRE.