Brain stimulation in obesity.

Obesity is taking up epidemic proportions worldwide with significant impacts on the health of both the affected individual and on society as a whole. Treatment approaches consist of behavioural and pharmacological approaches, however, these are often found to be ineffective. In severe obesity, bariatric surgery is frequently performed. Unfortunately, 40% of patients show substantial weight gain over the long term or display the associated metabolic syndrome, making the development of novel therapies necessary. This review summarizes some of the current conceptual models, in particularly the 'food addiction' model, and then discusses specific therapeutic targets of brain stimulation, both non-invasive (transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)) and invasive (deep brain stimulation and invasive VNS). As we will show, neuromodulatory approaches represent a promising tool for targeting specific brain structures implicated in the pathophysiology of obesity. Non-invasive techniques such as TMS, tDCS and transcutaneous VNS need further investigation before they may become ready for clinical usage. The currently available study data suggest that deep brain stimulation may become an effective and acceptable therapy for otherwise treatment-resistant obese patients. The results of the currently undergoing clinical trials are eagerly awaited.

Diagnostic benefits of presurgical fMRI in patients with brain tumours in the primary sensorimotor cortex.

OBJECTIVES: Reliable imaging of eloquent tumour-adjacent brain areas is necessary for planning function-preserving neurosurgery. This study evaluates the potential diagnostic benefits of presurgical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in comparison to a detailed analysis of morphological MRI data. METHODS: Standardised preoperative functional and structural neuroimaging was performed on 77 patients with rolandic mass lesions at 1.5 Tesla. The central region of both hemispheres was allocated using six morphological and three functional landmarks. RESULTS: fMRI enabled localisation of the motor hand area in 76/77 patients, which was significantly superior to analysis of structural MRI (confident localisation of motor hand area in 66/77 patients; p < 0.002). FMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 96% (tongue representation) and 97% (foot representation) of patients. FMRI-based presurgical risk assessment correlated in 88% with a positive postoperative clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Routine presurgical FMRI allows for superior assessment of the spatial relationship between brain tumour and motor cortex compared with a very detailed analysis of structural 3D MRI, thus significantly facilitating the preoperative risk-benefit assessment and function-preserving surgery. The additional imaging time seems justified. FMRI has the potential to reduce postoperative morbidity and therefore hospitalisation time.

[Artificial intelligence in neurosurgery]. / Künstliche Intelligenz in der Neurochirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) in neurosurgery is becoming increasingly more important as the technology advances. This development can be measured by the increase of publications on AI in neurosurgery over the last years. OBJECTIVE: This article provides insights into the current possibilities of using AI in neurosurgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of the literature was carried out with a focus on exemplary work on the use of AI in neurosurgery. RESULTS: The current neurosurgical publications on the use of AI show the diversity of the topic in this field. The main areas of application are diagnostics, outcome and treatment models. CONCLUSION: The various areas of application of AI in the field of neurosurgery with a refined preoperative diagnostics and outcome predictions will significantly influence the future of neurosurgery. Neurosurgeons will continue to make the decisions on the indications for surgery but an optimized statement on diagnosis, treatment options and on the risk of surgery will be made by neurosurgeons with the help of AI in the future.

[Neuroablative procedures in pain therapy]. / Neurodestruktive Verfahren in der Schmerztherapie.

Although surgical ablative procedures can be effective in the management of chronic pain of malignant and non-malignant origin, they are often disregarded as treatment options due to the fact that in the past these procedures were associated with high complication rates. The complications include the development of new neurological deficits and in cases of long-term follow-up, the occurrence of the old or new pain syndromes by deafferentation. On the other hand there exist many less invasive, e.g. neuromodulatory procedures or non-invasive measures (systemic oral or transdermal opioids) which are able to considerably reduce chronic pain. Nevertheless, there remain certain very restricted indications for the use of neuroablative procedures for the treatment of chronic pain even today.

Biochemical mechanisms of pallidal deep brain stimulation in X-linked dystonia parkinsonism.

OBJECTIVE: Invasive techniques such as in-vivo microdialysis provide the opportunity to directly assess neurotransmitter levels in subcortical brain areas. METHODS: Five male Filipino patients (mean age 42.4, range 34-52 years) with severe X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism underwent bilateral implantation of deep brain leads into the internal part of the globus pallidus (GPi). Intraoperative microdialysis and measurement of gamma aminobutyric acid and glutamate was performed in the GPi in three patients and globus pallidus externus (GPe) in two patients at baseline for 25/30 min and during 25/30 min of high-frequency GPi stimulation. RESULTS: While the gamma-aminobutyric acid concentration increased in the GPi during high frequency stimulation (231 ± 102% in comparison to baseline values), a decrease was observed in the GPe (22 ± 10%). Extracellular glutamate levels largely remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Pallidal microdialysis is a promising intraoperative monitoring tool to better understand pathophysiological implications in movement disorders and therapeutic mechanisms of high frequency stimulation. The increased inhibitory tone of GPi neurons and the subsequent thalamic inhibition could be one of the key mechanisms of GPi deep brain stimulation in dystonia. Such a mechanism may explain how competing (dystonic) movements can be suppressed in GPi/thalamic circuits in favour of desired motor programs.

Thalamic stimulation for essential tremor activates motor and deactivates vestibular cortex.

BACKGROUND: The functional effects of deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius (VIM) of the thalamus on brain circuitry are not well understood. The connectivity of the VIM has so far not been studied functionally. It was hypothesized that VIM stimulation would exert an effect primarily on VIM projection areas, namely motor and parietoinsular vestibular cortex. METHODS: Six patients with essential tremor who had electrodes implanted in the VIM were studied with PET. Regional cerebral blood flow was measured during three experimental conditions: with 130 Hz (effective) and 50 Hz (ineffective) stimulation, and without stimulation. RESULTS: Effective stimulation was associated with regional cerebral blood flow increases in motor cortex ipsilateral to the side of stimulation. Right retroinsular (parietoinsular vestibular) cortex showed regional cerebral blood flow decreases with stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of VIM stimulation in essential tremor are associated with increased synaptic activity in motor cortex, possibly due to nonphysiologic activation of thalamofrontal projections or frequency-dependent neuroinhibition. Retroinsular regional cerebral blood flow decreases suggest an interaction of VIM stimulation on vestibular-thalamic-cortical projections that may explain dysequilibrium, a common and reversible stimulation-associated side effect.

Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR is being used increasingly as an intraoperative imaging technique. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection, thus improving surgical results in patients with high-grade gliomas. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with intracranial high-grade gliomas underwent 41 operations. Using a neuronavigation system, tumors were resected in all patients to the point at which the neurosurgeon would have terminated the operation because he thought that all enhancing tumor had been removed. Intraoperative MR imaging (0.2 T) was performed, and surgery, if necessary and feasible, was continued. All patients underwent early postoperative MR imaging (1.5 T). By comparing the proportions of patients in whom complete resection of all enhancing tumor was shown by intraoperative and early postoperative MR imaging, respectively, the impact of intraoperative MR imaging on surgery was determined. RESULTS: Intraoperative MR imaging showed residual enhancing tumor in 22 cases (53.7%). In 15 patients (36.6%), no residual tumor was seen, whereas the results of the remaining four intraoperative MR examinations (9.7%) were inconclusive. In 17 of the 22 cases in which residual tumor was seen, surgery was continued. Early postoperative MR imaging showed residual tumor in eight patients (19.5%) and no residual tumor in 31 cases (75.6%); findings were uncertain in two patients (4.9%). The difference in the proportion of "complete removals" was statistically highly significant (P = .0004). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MR imaging significantly increases the rate of complete tumor removal. The rate of complete removal of all enhancing tumor parts was only 36.6% when neuronavigation alone was used, which suggests the benefits of intraoperative imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging with implanted neurostimulators: an in vitro and in vivo study.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to assess the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with implanted neurostimulators, in an in vitro and in vivo study. METHODS: Two different implantable pulse generators (IPGs) (ITREL II and 3; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and different leads (separately and connected to an IPG) were tested in three different MRI scanners (0.2, 0.25, and 1.5 T). Measurements of the induced voltages (using an external oscilloscope) and the induced heat (using an infrared camera) were performed in an in vitro study. Finally, 38 patients with implanted neurostimulator systems (leads and IPGs) underwent MRI in 50 examinations, with continuous monitoring by a physician with uninterrupted visual and vocal contact with the patient. Twenty-five patients were studied prospectively, with documented printouts of the parameter settings before and after MRI. RESULTS: An induced voltage of 2.4 to 5.5 V was measured in the experimental configuration with a lead connected to an IPG. The voltage was higher with the leads alone, compared with the leads connected to the IPG, and was dependent on the MRI scanner, the sequences, and the type of lead. No heat induction was observed in any part of the hardware. No change of pulse shape or change of IPG parameters was observed during MRI. No adverse effects occurred in patients with chronically implanted deep brain leads connected to an IPG. CONCLUSION: MRI can be safely performed in patients with implanted neurostimulation systems with the tested deep brain leads connected to an IPG (ITREL II and 3), with running parameters. No heat induction was detected, and the experimentally measured induced voltage did not seem to harm the patients. Only the reed switch of the IPGs was activated; the other parameters remained unchanged. Further investigations must be performed to study the local electrical effects in larger plate electrodes; these effects might cause slight discomfort. There is no danger with any type of electrode during MRI examinations if the electrodes lie outside the region of interest. These observations are restricted to the tested devices. A conscientious estimation of the risks and benefits of MRI for patients with implanted devices is recommended. If the type of device is not known to the examiner, MRI should still be considered to be contraindicated.

Hernia of the spinal cord: case report and review of the literature.

A rare case of a true hernia of the spinal cord through a dural defect without evidence of acute trauma is presented. The cause and the differentiation from other congenital and traumatic spinal cord lesions, especially arachnoid cysts, are discussed.

Treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of long-term outcome after radiofrequency rhizotomy and microvascular decompression.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients after either percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy or microvascular decompression (MVD) for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia at a single institution. METHODS: From 1977 to 1997, 316 radiofrequency lesion procedures and 378 MVDs were performed. Questionnaires were sent to all patients who were alive in 1981, 1982, 1992, and 1998. For all other patients, interviews were conducted with their relatives and general practitioners. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier probability curves as of the latest follow-up date. In addition, 80 patients who underwent MVD were examined postoperatively with quantitative sensory measurements by use of von Frey hairs. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients who underwent MVD and 206 patients who underwent radiofrequency could be analyzed retrospectively in detail. Overall, there was a 50% risk for recurrence of pain 2 years after percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy. Conversely, 64% of patients who underwent MVD remained completely pain free 20 years postoperatively. Patients without sensory impairment after MVD were pain free significantly longer than patients who experienced postoperative hypesthesia or partial rhizotomy. CONCLUSION: Because it is curative and nondestructive, MVD is considered the treatment of choice for trigeminal neuralgia in otherwise healthy people. In our study, it proved to be a more effective and long-lasting procedure for patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia than radiofrequency rhizotomy. Patients without postoperative sensory deficit remained pain free significantly longer, which is a strong argument against the "trauma" hypothesis of this procedure.

Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: The use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurosurgery has increased rapidly, and a variety of concepts have recently been presented. Although the feasibility of the procedure has been demonstrated repeatedly, no conclusive analysis of its effects on the surgical procedures, the extent of tumor removal, and outcomes, or its possible problems, has been performed. METHODS: Of 242 operations performed with intraoperative MRI, 97 procedures for supratentorial glioma treatment were analyzed with respect to intraoperative imaging results and postoperative outcomes. Analysis of the images included assessment of imaging artifacts, image quality, and extent of tumor removal. Patients were monitored to determine radiological progression, survival times, postoperative complications, and morbidity rates. RESULTS: No intraoperative complications related to the imaging procedure were observed. Image quality was good or fair in 85.5% of the cases. Different types of surgically induced imaging changes could be identified. In 56 cases, resection was continued using navigation with intraoperative MRI data sets (rereferencing accuracy, 0.9 mm). For high-grade gliomas, the percentage of cases in which residual tumor was identified by MRI could be significantly reduced from 62% intraoperatively to 33% postoperatively, which was paralleled by a significant increase in survival times for patients without residual tumor. Complication and morbidity rates were within the ranges reported for other studies. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MRI is safe and allows reliable updating of neuronavigational data, with compensation for brain shifting. Surgically induced imaging changes, which have been identified as a possible problem with intraoperative MRI in general, necessitated comparisons with preoperative scans and require future attention. The extent of tumor removal and survival times were increased significantly. Overall, patients seemed to benefit from the method.

Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnostic and therapeutic measures are as follows: 1) intraoperative update of data sets for navigational systems, 2) intraoperative resection control of brain tumors, and 3) frameless and frame-based on-line MR-guided interventions. The concept of an intraoperative MR scanner in the sterile environment of operating theater is presented, and its advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are discussed. METHODS: A 0.2-tesla magnet (Magnetom Open; Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) inside a radiofrequency cabin with a radiofrequency-shielded sliding door was installed adjacent to one of the operating theaters. A specially designed patient transport system carried the patient in a fixed position on an air cushion to the scanner and back to the surgeon. RESULTS: In a series of 27 patients, intraoperative resection control was performed in 13 cases, with intraoperative reregistration in 4 cases. Biopsies, cyst aspirations, and catheter placements (mainly frameless) were performed under direct MR visualization with fast image sequences. The MR-compatible equipment and the patient transport system are safe and reliable. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MR imaging is a safe and successful tool for surgical resection control and is clearly superior to computed tomography. Intraoperative acquisition of data sets eliminates the problem of brain shift in conventional navigational systems. Finally, on-line MR-guided interventional procedures can be performed easily with this setting. As with all MR systems, individual testing with phantoms, application of correction programs, and determination of the optimal amount of contrast media are absolute prerequisites to guarantee patient safety and surgical success.

Pallidal stimulation for generalized dystonia. Report of three cases.

Pallidal stereotactic surgery is a well-accepted treatment alternative for Parkinson's disease. Another indication for this procedure is medically refractory dystonia, especially generalized dystonia with abnormal axial and extremity movements and postures. Improvement of dystonia after pallidotomy has been reported in several recent papers. In this report the authors describe three patients with generalized dystonia (two primary, one secondary) and their improvement after bilateral pallidal stimulation at follow-up times of between 6 and 18 months.

Pallidal stimulation: an alternative to pallidotomy?

A resurgence of interest in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) came with the rediscovery of posteroventral pallidotomy by Laitinen in 1985. Laitinen's procedure improved most symptoms in drug-resistant PD, which engendered wide interest in the neurosurgical community. Another lesioning procedure, ventrolateral thalamotomy, has become a powerful alternative to stimulate the nucleus ventralis intermedius, producing high long-term success rates and low morbidity rates. Pallidal stimulation has not met with the same success. According to the literature pallidotomy improves the "on" symptoms of PD, such as dyskinesias, as well as the "off" symptoms, such as rigidity, bradykinesia, and on-off fluctuations. Pallidal stimulation improves bradykinesia and rigidity to a minor extent; however, its strength seems to be in improving levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Stimulation often produces an improvement in the hyper- or dyskinetic upper limbs, but increases the "freezing" phenomenon in the lower limbs at the same time. Considering the small increase in the patient's independence, the high costs of bilateral implants, and the difficulty most patients experience in handling the devices, the question arises as to whether bilateral pallidal stimulation is a real alternative to pallidotomy.

The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery.

Neuronavigation, today a routine method in neurosurgery, has not yet been systematically assessed in direct comparison with conventional microsurgical techniques. The aim of the present study was the direct comparison of the impact of neuronavigation on glioblastoma surgery regarding time consumption, extent of tumor removal and survival. For each of 52 patients operated for primary glioblastoma with neuronavigation, a patient operated on without navigation was matched. Completeness of tumor resection, including volumetric analysis, was examined by early post-operative MRI. Operating and survival times were obtained for all patients. At a rate of 86.5%, surgeons' opinions about neuronavigation were positive. Operating times were identical in the two groups, while preparation times were 30.4 min longer with navigation. Radiological radicality was achieved in 31% of navigation cases vs. 19% in conventional operations. The absolute and relative residual tumor volumes were significantly lower with neuronavigation. Radical tumor resection was associated with a highly significant prolongation in survival (median 18.3 vs. 10.3 months, p < 0.0001). Survival was longer in patients operated on using neuronavigation (median 13.4 vs. 11.1 months). Neuronavigation increases radicality in glioblastoma resection without prolonging operating time. Regarding the problem of brain shift, neuronavigation should be optimized by intraoperative real-time imaging.

Modified Headholder and operating table for intra-operative MRI in neurosurgery.

In order to facilitate intra-operative use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurosurgery an MRI-compatible headholder was developed and adapted to a modified MR-couch simultaneously serving as tabletop for the operating table. To allow shock-free transport into the scanner the wheels of the operating table were replaced by an air cushion mechanism. In 75 procedures the system proved to be reliable and safe. Image quality was not impaired by the fixation device. With growing routine the transfer became straightforward, requiring approximately 10 min. Intra-operative MRI is thus made possible with minimal changes to the standard surgical environment. Its benefit however, still remains to be critically investigated.

Pallidal stimulation: an alternative to pallidotomy?

A resurgence of interest in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) came with the rediscovery of posteroventral pallidotomy by Laitinen in 1985. Laitinen's procedure improved most symptoms in drug-resistant PD, which engendered wide interest in the neurosurgical community. Another lesioning procedure, ventrolateral thalamotomy, has become a powerful alternative to stimulate the nucleus ventralis intermedius, producing high long-term success rates and low morbidity rates. Pallidal stimulation has not met with the same success. According to the literature pallidotomy improves the "on" symptoms of PD, such as dyskinesias, as well as the "off" symptoms, such as rigidity, bradykinesia, and on-off fluctuations. Pallidal stimulation improves bradykinesia and rigidity to a minor extent; however, its strength seems to be in improving levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Stimulation often produces an improvement in the hyper- or dyskinetic upper limbs, but increases the "freezing" phenomenon in the lower limbs at the same time. Considering the small increase in the patient's independence, the high costs of bilateral implants, and the difficulty most patients experience in handling the devices, the question arises as to whether bilateral pallidal stimulation is a real alternative to pallidotomy.

Comparison of intraoperative MR imaging and 3D-navigated ultrasonography in the detection and resection control of lesions.

OBJECT: The authors undertook a study to compare two intraoperative imaging modalities, low-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and a prototype of a three-dimensional (3D)-navigated ultrasonography in terms of imaging quality in lesion detection and intraoperative resection control. METHODS: Low-field MR imaging was used for intraoperative resection control and update of navigational data in 101 patients with supratentorial gliomas. Thirty-five patients with different lesions underwent surgery in which the prototype of a 3D-navigated ultrasonography system was used. A prospective comparative study of both intraoperative imaging modalities was initiated with the first seven cases presented here. In 35 patients (70%) in whom ultrasonography was performed, accurate tumor delineation was demonstrated prior to tumor resection. In the remaining 30% comparison of preoperative MR imaging data and ultrasonography data allowed sufficient anatomical localization to be achieved. Detection of metastases and high-grade gliomas and intraoperative delineation of tumor remnants were comparable between both imaging modalities. In one case of a low-grade glioma better visibility was achieved with ultrasonography. However, intraoperative findings after resection were still difficult to interpret with ultrasonography alone most likely due to the beginning of a learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary results, intraoperative MR imaging remains superior to intraoperative ultrasonography in terms of resection control in glioma surgery. Nevertheless, the different features (different planes of slices, any-plane slicing, and creation of a 3D volume and matching of images) of this new ultrasonography system make this tool a very attractive alternative. The intended study of both imaging modalities will hopefully allow a comparison regarding sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative tumor remnant detection, as well as cost effectiveness.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to update interactive navigation in neurosurgery: method and preliminary experience.

We report on the first successful intraoperative update of interactive image guidance based on an intraoperatively acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) date set. To date, intraoperative imaging methods such as ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), or MRI have not been successfully used to update interactive navigation. We developed a method of imaging patients intraoperatively with the surgical field exposed in an MRI scanner (Magnetom Open; Siemens Corp., Erlangen, Germany). In 12 patients, intraoperatively acquired 3D data sets were used for successful recalibration of neuronavigation, accounting for any anatomical changes caused by surgical manipulations. The MKM Microscope (Zeiss Corp., Oberkochen, Germany) was used as navigational system. With implantable fiducial markers, an accuracy of 0.84 +/- 0.4 mm for intraoperative reregistration was achieved. Residual tumor detected on MRI was consequently resected using navigation with the intraoperative data. No adverse effects were observed from intraoperative imaging or the use of navigation with intraoperative images, demonstrating the feasibility of recalibrating navigation with intraoperative MRI.