Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Nurs Pract ; 29(6): e13185, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515349

RESUMO

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of an unsupervised home-based pulmonary rehabilitation with self-management program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: A few recent studies have shown that unsupervised home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can improve the clinical outcome of patients with COPD. More studies are needed to prove its benefits. DESIGN: This study used a quasi-experimental design. METHODS: Seventy-two admitted COPD patients were assigned to experimental group or control group through purposeful sampling. Data were collected from March 2016 to November 2017 in the Thoracic Intensive Care Unit of a Medical Center in Taiwan. The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the COPD Self-Efficacy Scale and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire were measured before education and at the first, second and third months after discharge. RESULTS: The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and COPD Self-Efficacy Scale results in the experimental group were significantly improved compared with the control group in the third month after discharge. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire score continued to improve in both groups in the third month after discharge, and there was no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A short-term unsupervised home-based pulmonary rehabilitation with self- management program had significant benefits for patients with COPD. The long-term effects need to be confirmed.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Autogestão , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Autocuidado/métodos , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Dispneia , Qualidade de Vida
2.
G Ital Dermatol Venereol ; 151(4): 412-31, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26889727

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Biologics are increasingly used in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. However, most of the pivotal studies were performed mainly in western countries. The purpose of this review article was to compare the differences of clinical trial results between Asian and Western subjects of psoriasis regarding baseline demographics, efficacy, dermatology life quality index, safety and antidrug antibodies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In this review article, we searched the PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and posters from main dermatologic meetings. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Only randomized controlled trial results or trial results for registration purposes of etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, tofacitinib, and apremilast are included. CONCLUSIONS: Asian subjects were generally 15-20 Kgs lighter, with fewer psoriatic arthritis, shorter disease duration since diagnosis, and higher baseline severity compared to western subjects. Better efficacy had been found in some studies such as secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, and tofacitinib in Japanese groups. The safety in Asian trials was generally compatible with the pivotal studies, except for the occurrence of active tuberculosis in the infliximab trial in China. Additional indications of pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis are approved in Japan for some of the agents based on phase II/III studies.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/patologia , Povo Asiático , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Peso Corporal , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA