Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 102(7): 805-12, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25877255

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia (EDA) is a common analgesia regimen in liver resection, and is accompanied by sympathicolysis, peripheral vasodilatation and hypotension in the context of deliberate intraoperative low central venous pressure. This associated fall in mean arterial pressure may compromise renal blood pressure autoregulation and lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). This study investigated whether EDA is a risk factor for postoperative AKI after liver surgery. METHODS: The incidence of AKI was investigated retrospectively in patients who underwent liver resection with or without EDA between 2002 and 2012. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed including recognized preoperative and intraoperative predictors of posthepatectomy renal failure. RESULTS: A series of 1153 patients was investigated. AKI occurred in 8·2 per cent of patients and was associated with increased morbidity (71 versus 47·3 per cent; P = 0·003) and mortality (21 versus 0·3 per cent; P < 0·001) rates. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the EDA group (10·1 versus 3·7 per cent; P = 0·003). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI between patients undergoing minor hepatectomy with or without EDA (5·2 versus 2·7 per cent; P = 0·421), a substantial difference in AKI rates occurred in patients undergoing major hepatectomy (13·8 versus 5·0 per cent; P = 0·025). In multivariable analysis, EDA remained an independent risk factor for AKI after hepatectomy (P = 0·040). CONCLUSION: EDA may be a risk factor for postoperative AKI after major hepatectomy.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Incidência , Testes de Função Renal , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Período Perioperatório , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suíça/epidemiologia
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 17(5): 537-40, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23613218

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perineal stapled prolapse (PSP) resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. However, no long-term results have been reported in the literature. This study analyses the long-term recurrence rate, functional outcome, and morbidity associated with PSP resection. METHODS: Nine consecutive patients undergoing PSP resection between 2007 and 2011 were prospectively followed. Surgery was performed by the same surgeons in a standardised technique. Recurrence rate, functional outcome, and complication grade were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: All 9 patients undergoing PSP resection were investigated. The median age was 72 years (range 25-88 years). No intraoperative complications occurred. Faecal incontinence, preoperatively present in 2 patients, worsened postoperatively in one patient (Vaizey 18-22). One patient developed new-onset faecal incontinence (Vaizey 18). The median obstructive defecation syndrome score decreased postoperatively significantly from 11 (median; range 8-13) to 5 (median; range 4-8) (p < 0.005). At a median follow-up of 40 months (range 14-58 months), the prolapse recurrence rate was 44 % (4/9 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The PSP resection is a fast and safe procedure associated with low morbidity. However, the poor long-term functional outcome and the recurrence rate of 44 % warrant a cautious patient selection.


Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal/prevenção & controle , Proctoscopia/métodos , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Períneo/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Prolapso Retal/complicações , Prolapso Retal/diagnóstico , Recidiva , Reoperação , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Ann Surg Open ; 3(1): e111, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37600094

RESUMO

Objective: To depict and analyze learning curves for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP). Background: Formal training is recommended for safe introduction of pancreatic surgery but definitions of learning curves vary and have not been standardized. Methods: A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases identified studies on learning curves in pancreatic surgery. Primary outcome was the number needed to reach the learning curve as defined by the included studies. Secondary outcomes included endpoints defining learning curves, methods of analysis (statistical/arbitrary), and classification of learning phases. Results: Out of 1115 articles, 66 studies with 14,206 patients were included. Thirty-five studies (53%) based the learning curve analysis on statistical calculations. Most often used parameters to define learning curves were operative time (n = 51), blood loss (n = 17), and complications (n = 10). The number of procedures to surpass a first phase of learning curve was 30 (20-50) for open PD, 39 (11-60) for laparoscopic PD, 25 (8-100) for robotic PD (P = 0.521), 16 (3-17) for laparoscopic DP, and 15 (5-37) for robotic DP (P = 0.914). In a three-phase model, intraoperative parameters improved earlier (first to second phase: operating time -15%, blood loss -29%) whereas postoperative parameters improved later (second to third phase: complications -46%, postoperative pancreatic fistula -48%). Studies with higher sample sizes showed higher numbers of procedures needed to overcome the learning curve (rho = 0.64, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study summarizes learning curves for open-, laparoscopic-, and robotic pancreatic surgery with different definitions, analysis methods, and confounding factors. A standardized reporting of learning curves and definition of phases (competency, proficiency, mastery) is desirable and proposed.

4.
Hernia ; 19(5): 741-5, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25948512

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common procedures in visceral surgery, and an important teaching operation for residents during their first years. A variety of surgical approaches is currently available, including open surgery with or without mesh and laparoscopic surgery. Here we assessed the current clinical practice for inguinal hernia surgery in Switzerland and the impact on training of surgical residents. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was performed among surgical clinics of the Swiss Society of Visceral Surgery (SSVS). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 51 %. Nearly all hernia repairs are performed with prosthetic material, and only 3.2 % of the procedures use no mesh. Overall, open surgery is used for 58.5 % of hernias and 41.5 % are operated laparoscopically. In laparoscopic surgery, TEP is the first choice. Overall, the Lichtenstein repair is the classical teaching operation performed by residents in 77.3 % of cases. In contrast to open surgery, laparoscopic hernia repair is not a training operation and residents perform only 9.7 % of laparoscopic hernia repairs. CONCLUSION: The survey confirms the use of prosthetic material as the standard, and the Lichtenstein repair as the first choice for primary inguinal hernia repair. The popularity of laparoscopic hernia surgery is increasing at the price of less teaching operations available for young residents.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Seleção de Pacientes , Telas Cirúrgicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA