Practical guide for safe sedation.

This practical guide has been developed to ensure safe and effective sedation performed in adult patients outside of the operating room, for instance in intensive care units and dental treatment rooms and in the field of palliative care. Sedation levels are classified based on level of consciousness, airway reflex, spontaneous ventilation, and cardiovascular function. Deep sedation induces loss of consciousness and protective reflexes, and can cause respiratory depression and pulmonary aspiration. Invasive medical procedures necessitating deep sedation include cardiac ablation, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and internal radiation therapy. Appropriate analgesia is necessary for procedures that require deep sedation. The sedationist should evaluate the risks of the planned procedure, explain the sedation process to the patient, and obtain the patient's informed consent. Major parameters to be evaluated preoperatively are the patient's airway and general condition. Equipment, instruments, and drugs necessary for emergency situations should be defined and routinely maintained. To prevent aspiration, patients scheduled for moderate or deep sedation should fast preoperatively. In both inpatients and outpatients, biological monitoring should be continued until the discharge criteria are met. Anesthesiologists should be involved in management systems that ensure safe and effective sedation even if they do not personally perform all sedation procedures.

Large volume was associated with increased risk of acute non-hematologic adverse events in the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: preliminary results of prospective phase I/II clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This is the preliminary results of a multi-center prospective clinical trial evaluating the feasibility of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB2, IIA2, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by MRI were eligible. Protocol therapy consisted of 30-30.6 Gy in 15-17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial and pelvic radiotherapy with central shield up to 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase I part was that the rate of grade ≥ 3 acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial would be <10%. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and October 2019, 74 patients underwent primary registration, with 52 patients eventually proceeding to the secondary registration. The median pretreatment tumor width was 5.7 cm, and FIGO Stages were IB2 10, IIA2 2, IIB 20 and IIIB 20, respectively. The median high-risk clinical target volume D90 was 72.0 Gy (54.8-86.6 Gy, EQD2), rectum D2cc was 53.7 Gy (29.3-80.3 Gy) and bladder D2cc was 69.8 Gy (38.9-84.8 Gy). The rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial was 1.9% (1/52), and 17.3% (9/52) of patients experienced non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial of any grade. In multivariate analysis, high-risk clinical target volume ≥ 35 ml was associated with an increased risk of any grade of acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The feasibility and reproducibility of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial were demonstrated from a multi-center prospective clinical trial.

Why not de-intensification for uterine cervical cancer?

OBJECTIVE: The majority of uterine cervical cancer is known to be related to human papillomavirus (HPV), and HPV-related tumors are known to be radio-sensitive. In the management of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, de-intensification of treatment has been attempted; however, no such attempt is performed in the management of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to identify a group of patients who can safely be treated by de-escalated treatment intensity. METHODS: From the Asian international multi-institutional retrospective study involving 13 Japanese, one Thailand, and one Korean institutions based on 469 patients, squamous cell carcinoma (Scc), tumor reduction ratio ≥29%, tumor size before brachytherapy ≤4 cm, and total treatment time (TTT) <9 weeks were identified as factors having an influence on local control. Based on these findings, low-risk patients having these four factors were extracted, and treatment outcomes categorized in 10 Gy increment of CTVHR D90 were compared. RESULTS: Among 469 patients, 162 patients (34.5%) met the criteria of low-risk group, and 63, 41, 43, and 15 patients were categorized in CTVHR D90 50-60 Gy, 60-70 Gy, 70-80 Gy, and >80 Gy, respectively. While 4-y progression-free survival ranged from 66 to 80%, 4-y local control was consistently over 90% in every dose group. Rectum and bladder D2cc and incidence of late adverse events decreased as CTVHR D90 decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The low-risk patients achieved favorable local control with CTVHR D90 <80 Gy. A personalized treatment strategy based on tumor response could also be adopted for cervical cancer.

Patient preference study comparing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient preferences and acute adverse events of hypofractionated (HF) and conventionally fractionated (CF) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery in our institution. METHODS: We conducted a patient preference study comparing CF-WBI (50 Gy/25 fractions) and HF-WBI (41.6 Gy/16 fractions) after breast-conserving surgery. Eligible patients selected either type of fractionation following an explanation from the radiation oncologist. In this report, we analyzed the selection rate and acute toxicities. RESULTS: Between June 2009 and December 2013, 348 patients (349 breasts) were identified as eligible for the study. Among them, 259 patients (260 breasts [74.5%]) selected CF-WBI and 89 patients (89 breasts [25.5%]) selected HF-WBI. Factors significantly associated with the selection of HF-WBI were older age (P = 0.028) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041). Regarding acute adverse events, Grade 2 (G2) or higher radiation dermatitis was less frequently observed in HF-WBI than in CF-WBI (13.8% vs. 29.4%; P = 0.004). In addition, G2 or higher breast pain was only observed in the CF-WBI group (6.9%; P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the presence of fatigue, wound pain or radiation pneumonitis of G2 or higher between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, in which patients themselves selected the irradiation method, more patients tended to select CF-WBI. The frequency of G2 or higher dermatitis and breast pain was significantly lower in the HF-WBI group than in the CF-WBI group. Our results support the evidence for recommending HF-WBI after breast-conserving surgery while presenting aspects of patient preferences.

Feasibility study of chemoradiotherapy followed by amrubicin and cisplatin for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

To evaluate the feasibility of amrubicin plus cisplatin (AP) following chemoradiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer, chemo-naïve patients aged 20-70 years with a performance status of 0 or 1 and normal organ functions were treated with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at 45 Gy/30 fractions (EP-TRT), followed by three cycles of amrubicin 40 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The EP-TRT could be completed in 21 patients (15 male and 6 female patients with a median age of 62 years). Of these, 2, 1 and 18 (86%) patients received one, two and three cycles of AP, respectively. Sixteen (76%) patients required granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in all patients. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in 9 patients, lasting for 1 day in 5 patients. The incidences of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were 43 and 24%, respectively. Grade 3 infection and anorexia occurred in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. The response rate was 95%. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival (PFS) was 41.9 (0-102) months, and the 5-year PFS rate (CI) was 41.9% (20.4-63.4%). The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached yet, and the 5-year OS rate (CI) was 57.8% (35.2-80.4%). In conclusion, EP-TRT followed by AP therapy was well-tolerated, although a large number of patients required G-CSF support.

Survey of advanced radiation technologies used at designated cancer care hospitals in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Our survey assessed the use of advanced radiotherapy technologies at the designated cancer care hospitals in Japan, and we identified several issues to be addressed. METHODS: We collected the data of 397 designated cancer care hospitals, including information on staffing in the department of radiation oncology (e.g. radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation therapists), the number of linear accelerators and the implementation of advanced radiotherapy technologies from the Center for Cancer Control and Information Services of the National Cancer Center, Japan. RESULTS: Only 53% prefectural designated cancer care hospitals and 16% regional designated cancer care hospitals have implemented intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers, and 62% prefectural designated cancer care hospitals and 23% regional designated cancer care hospitals use intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Seventy-four percent prefectural designated cancer care hospitals and 40% regional designated cancer care hospitals employ stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. Our multivariate analysis of prefectural designated cancer care hospitals which satisfy the institute's qualifications for advanced technologies revealed the number of radiation oncologists (P = 0.01) and that of radiation therapists (P = 0.003) were significantly correlated with the implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and the number of radiation oncologists (P = 0.02) was correlated with the implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy. There was a trend to correlate the number of medical physicists with the implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (P = 0.07). Only 175 (51%) regional designated cancer care hospitals satisfy the institute's qualification of stereotactic body radiotherapy and 76 (22%) satisfy that of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Seventeen percent prefectural designated cancer care hospitals and 13% regional designated cancer care hospitals had a quality assurance committee. CONCLUSIONS: The numbers of radiation oncologists and other operating staff might be essential factors in the implementation of advanced radiotherapy technologies. Small proportions of regional designated cancer care hospitals satisfy the institute's qualifications of advanced technologies.

Prognostic Factors of Oligometastasis After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: The Real-World Utility of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Classification.

AIM: The efficacy of local therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the classification system for OMD and explore which groups may benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 45 patients (52 sites) with solid tumors and 1-3 extracranial oligometastases who underwent SBRT for all metastases at our institution between January 2018 and December 2021. OMD states were classified based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification system. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for each group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 14 months (range: 0-48 months). The numbers of patients in the de novo (first diagnosis of OMD), repeat (previous history of OMD), and induced (previous history of polymetastatic disease) OMD groups were 15, 17, and 13, respectively. The LC rates at one year for the entire, de novo, repeat, and induced cohorts were 87.2%, 87.5%, 90.2%, and 83.9%, respectively (p=0.80). The one-year PFS rates for each group were 35.0%, 56.7%, and 29.9%, respectively (p=0.58). The one-year OS rates for each group were 80.0%, 86.2%, and 80.8%, respectively (p=0.50). Grade 2 or 3 AEs occurred in five patients (10.4%). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and highly effective for local control. Patients with repeat OMD demonstrated a trend of longer PFS, suggesting that this subgroup may benefit from local therapy at metastatic sites.

High-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy for under 40-year-old patients with invasive uterine cervical carcinoma: clinical outcomes in 118 Patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study, JASTRO.

BACKGROUND: The current study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of curative intent radiation therapy for young patients with invasive uterine cervical carcinoma in Japan. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients aged ≤40 were registered in the multi-institutional study of the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) from 26 major institutions in Japan. The age range was 24-39 years and the maximum tumor diameter was 2.0-9.2 cm. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics clinical stages were Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb and IVa in 17, 6, 40, 2, 50 and 3, respectively. Curative intent radiation therapy consisted of the combination of external beam radiation therapy and high-dose rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy. The total dose of external beam radiation therapy ranged between 44 and 68 Gy. Both the median and mode of total high-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy dose to point A were 24 Gy in four fractions. Ninety-six patients (58%) received chemotherapy. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate and local control rate of all patients were 61 and 65%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb and IVa were 88, 100, 75, 100, 37 and 0%, respectively. The 5-year local control rates of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb and IVa were 82, 75, 75, 100, 51 and 0%, respectively. Sixteen patients experienced grade 3 or greater late radiation morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year overall survival rate of young patients with Stage IIIb was comparatively low at 37%.

Reduced Risk of Lymphedema With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy Compared With 3-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Who Received Postoperative Pelvic Radiation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term adverse events of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk uterine cervical cancer who underwent postoperative pelvic radiation therapy (PORT). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 177 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery and PORT. IMRT and 3D-CRT were administered to 93 and 84 patients, respectively. Follow-up and toxicity assessments were then carried out. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 63 months (range: 3 to 177). There was a significant difference in the follow-up period between the IMRT and 3D-CRT cohorts (median: 59 vs. 112 mo, P <0.0001). The crude incidences of acute grade 2+ and grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicities were significantly lower with IMRT than with 3D-CRT (22.6% vs. 48.1%, P =0.002, and 3.2% vs. 11.1%, P =0.04, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of late toxicities revealed that IMRT significantly reduced grade 2+ genitourinary (GU) toxicity and lower-extremity lymphedema ([LEL] requiring intervention) compared with 3D-CRT ([6.8% vs. 15.2% at 5-year, P =0.048] and [3.1% vs. 14.6% at 5-year, P =0.0029], respectively). IMRT was the only significant predictor of reducing LEL risk. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of acute gastrointestinal toxicity, late GU toxicity, and LEL from PORT for cervical cancer were reduced by IMRT. Lower inguinal doses may have contributed to a lower risk of developing LEL, which should be validated in future studies.

Durvalumab Plus Concurrent Radiotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The DOLPHIN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Administration of durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, 20% to 30% of patients do not receive durvalumab because of adverse events (AEs) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have a synergistic effect. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab immunotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy followed by maintenance with durvalumab therapy for treatment of locally advanced NSCLC without chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter, single-arm DOLPHIN (Phase II Study of Durvalumab [MEDI4736] Plus Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Advanced Localized NSCLC Patients) nonrandomized controlled trial was performed by 12 institutions in Japan from September 13, 2019, to May 31, 2022. Participants in the primary registration phase included 74 patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC. The current analyses were conducted from June 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. Interventions: Patients received radiotherapy (60 Gy) in combination with concurrent and maintenance durvalumab immunotherapy, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for up to 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of the rate of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent central review, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with 90% CIs calculated using the Greenwood formula. The key secondary end points were PFS, objective response rate, treatment completion rate, and AEs. Results: Data from 35 patients (median [range] age, 72 [44-83] years; 31 [88.6%] men) were included in the full analysis set of the evaluable population. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.1% (90% CI, 59.1%-85.1%), and the median PFS was 25.6 months (95% CI, 13.1 months to not estimable) at a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 4.3-31.8 months). Scheduled radiation therapy was completed in 97.1% of patients. The confirmed objective response rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 75.7%-98.1%), and the treatment completion rate was 57.6% (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%). Among 34 patients evaluated in the safety analysis set, AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18 patients (52.9%), and of grade 5 in 2 patients (5.9%). Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis of any grade occurred in 23 patients (67.6%), and of grades 3 or 4 in 4 patients (11.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial indicate that durvalumab immunotherapy combined with curative radiotherapy for patients with PD-L1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC is a promising treatment with tolerable AEs and is appropriate as a study treatment for phase 3 clinical trials. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCT2080224763.

Phase I/II prospective clinical trial for the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this trial were to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer patients in the phase I/II prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB2-IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for this clinical trial. The protocol therapy included 30-30.6 Gy in 15-17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of HBT and pelvic radiotherapy with a central shield up to 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase II part was 2-year pelvic progression-free survival (PPFS) rate higher than historical control of 64%. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and October 2019, 73 patients were enrolled in the initial registration and 52 patients proceeded to the secondary registration. With the median follow-up period of 37.3 months (range, 13.9-52.9 months), the 2- PPFS was 80.7% (90% confidence interval [CI]=69.7%-88%). Because the lower range of 90% CI of 2-year PPFS was 69.7%, which was higher than the historical control ICBT data of 64%, therefore, the primary endpoint of this study was met. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of HBT were demonstrated by a prospective clinical study. Because the dose goal determined in the protocol was lower than 85 Gy, there is room in improvement for local control. A higher dose might have been needed for tumors with poor responses.

Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guidelines of combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.

It has been postulated that the combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS) is effective and safe for large and irregularly shaped uterine cervical cancer patients. However, due to its invasiveness compared to conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), it has to be said that the implementation speed of IC/IS is slow. Until now, there have been no guidelines for required equipment, human resources, and procedural guide focusing solely on IC/IS. The purpose of this guideline is to provide radiation oncologists and medical physicists who wish to start IC/IS with practical and comprehensive guidance for a safe IC/IS introduction and to help accelerate the spread of the utilization of IC/IS nationwide. This is the English translation of the Japanese IC/IS Guidelines, and it was created in an effort to share the Japanese approach to the management of locally advanced uterine cervical cancer worldwide.

CT-based image-guided brachytherapy in uterine cervical cancer: Effect of tumor dose and volume on local control.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the optimal primary tumor dose for cervical cancer treatment using computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 171 patients with cervical cancer who underwent both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IGBT between May 2015 and December 2019. Majority of EBRT plan included central shielding technique. CT-based IGBT was performed weekly a median of three times. Magnetic resonance imaging preceded the first and third session of IGBT for target delineation. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 30-91 years). The median follow-up time for living patients was 43 months (range: 6-76 months). The 3-year local control rates according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2008) stages were 89%, 100%, 92%, 89%, 78%, and 100% for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA, respectively. The median EBRT dose to the central pelvis and parametrium/pelvic wall was 41.4 Gy and 50.4 Gy, respectively. Patients who received a cumulative 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) (α/ß = 10 Gy) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) D90% ≥ 75 Gy achieved a long-term local control rate of 93%, compared with 80% in those who received <75 Gy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest CT-based IGBT series examining the treatment of cervical cancer based on the tumor dose-volume relationship. An HR CTV D90% ≥75 Gy was significantly associated with favorable local control in this study.

Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.

BACKGROUND: A good cosmetic outcome has been defined as an important endpoint in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Various evaluation methods have been studied, but the optimal method has yet to be identified. The present supplementary analysis of JCOG0906 focused on comparing evaluation methods for breast cosmetic outcomes following hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HFWBI) to examine whether a computer-software (the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results [BCCT. core])-based program evaluation (CE) can be used for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT. METHODS: Of 306 women, 292 underwent institutional evaluation (IE) for breast cosmetic outcomes before (pre) and 3 years after (post) HFWBI using a 4-point scale (excellent/good/fair/poor), and they were evaluated by CE and a central panel evaluation (PE) on the same scale using 292 pairs of pre/post-HFWBI photographs. PE was performed twice by consensus of the same two experts with a 3-year interval. CE was assessed individually by two radiation oncologists, an expert and a non-expert. Intra-observer variability and inter-observer variability were calculated using the kappa (k) and weighted kappa (wk) statistics. RESULTS: The agreement between the first and second PE using pre/post-HFWBI photographs was moderate (k = 0.60, wk = 0.64. k = 0.53, wk = 0.60). The agreement between the expert and non-expert on CE was substantial (k = 0.72, wk = 0.76. k = 0.72, wk = 0.77). The inter-observer variability of CE was smaller than the intra-observer variability of PE. CONCLUSION: CE with BCCT. core was considered a reproducible and an appropriate evaluation method for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT, when breast cosmetic changes were compared between pre/post therapy.

An Asian multi-national multi-institutional retrospective study comparing intracavitary versus the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical carcinoma.

This study is an international multi-institutional retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes between intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy. Locally advanced cervical cancer, the initial size of which is larger than 4 cm and treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy, were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients who received HBT at least once were included in the HBT group, and patients who received only ICBT were included in the ICBT group. Anonymized data from 469 patients from 13 institutions in Japan, one from Korea and one from Thailand, were analyzed. Two hundred eighty and 189 patients were included in the ICBT group and the HBT group, respectively. Patients in the HBT group had more advanced stage, non-Scc histopathology, a higher rate of uterine body involvement, larger tumor at diagnosis, larger tumor before brachytherapy and a lower tumor reduction ratio. With a median follow-up of 51.3 months (2.1-139.9 months), 4-y local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire patient population were 88.2%, 64.2% and 83%, respectively. The HBT group received a higher HR-CTV D90 than that of the ICBT group (68.8 Gy vs 65.6 Gy, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the non-Scc histological subtype, HR-CTV D95 ≤ 60 Gy, reduction ratio ≤ 29% and total treatment time (TTT) ≥ 9 weeks were identified as the independent adverse prognostic factors for LC. Regarding LC, no difference was found between ICBT and HBT (4-y LC 89.3% vs 86.8%, P = 0.314). After adjustment for confounding factors by propensity score matching, no advantage of applying HBT was demonstrated regarding LC, PFS, or OS. Despite the fact that HBT patients had more adverse clinical factors than ICBT patients, HBT delivered a higher dose to HR-CTV and resulted in comparable LC.

An Asian multi-national, multi-institutional, retrospective study on image-guided brachytherapy in cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.

Purpose: There are limited reports on outcomes of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) for cervical adenocarcinoma in Asia. In a multi-institutional retrospective study, we assessed the clinical outcomes of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy for cervical adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma (CA/CAC) in Asian countries. Material and methods: Patients who had undergone definitive radiation therapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy for untreated cervical cancer between 2000 and 2016 were registered. Those who had undergone 3D-IGBT for histologically proven CA/CAC were included. Data on patients' characteristics and treatment were collected, including tumor reduction rate (defined as a percentage of reduction in tumor size before brachytherapy compared with that at diagnosis) and high-risk clinical target volume D90. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Late toxicities were assessed using common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0. Results: Anonymized data of 498 patients were collected. Of the 498 patients, 36 patients met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 39 months. The 3-year OS, LC, and PFS rates were 68.4%, 68.5%, and 44.4%, respectively. After treatment, five patients had tumor re-growth without complete disappearance of the tumor. Two patients developed grade 3 vaginal toxicity or grade 4 rectal toxicity; none developed other severe late toxicities. A tumor reduction rate of > 26.3% was the only significant factor in multivariate analyses, and was associated with significantly better OS (p = 0.018), LC (p = 0.022), and PFS (p = 0.013). There were no significant trends in local control or dose to high-risk clinical target volume D90. Conclusions: LC rate of CA/CAC was insufficient despite 3D-IGBT. Meanwhile, tumor reduction rate was associated with LC, OS, and PFS rates. Therefore, CA/CAC may require a different treatment strategy than that applied in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Radiotherapy quality assurance of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1066): a cooperative phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess radiotherapy protocol compliance in a multi-institutional phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix (JGOG1066). METHODS: For study protocol development, various radiotherapy parameters were examined and consensus was reached by Japanese radiation oncologists with cervical cancer treatment expertise. Quality assurance (QA) was also discussed and included in the protocol. A credentialing process was used to select institutions for participation in the study. Individual case reviews referring to 18 QA items were undertaken for each patient. Radiotherapy data were submitted to the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) data center and reviewed by the members of the radiotherapy committee. The QA evaluation was classed as per protocol, deviation, and violation. RESULTS: Individual case reviews were performed on 69 of 72 patients entered in the study. In 24 patients (35%), there were no deviations for any QA items. There were also no deviations seen for 5 of the 18 items in 69 patients evaluated. Deviations of 64 QA items were seen in 45 cases, and violations were seen in 4 cases (4 items). The most common deviation concerned appropriate application for the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost to involved nodes or parametrium (32 cases). The 4 violations were identified in the QA items regarding high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy protocol compliance was favorable except for the EBRT boost indications. The results of this study validate the quality of radiotherapy in JGOG1066, and indicate that the final analysis will provide meaningful results.

Photon or Proton Therapy for Adolescent and Young Adult Tumors Focused on Long-Term Survivors.

Background This study was conducted to evaluate late toxicities in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who received photon or proton therapy. Methodology A total of 106 AYA patients who received proton and photon therapy and were followed-up for more than two years were retrospectively evaluated. The median age of patients was 22 years (range, 15-29 years). A total of 47 patients were male and 59 were female. A total of 35 and 71 patients received photon and proton therapy, respectively. All but one patient received radiotherapy with curative intent. The target disease was benign and malignant in 28 and 78 patients, respectively. Results The median follow-up period in all patients was 62 months (range: 24-293 months). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 20 patients. There was one case of grade 5 toxicity (myelodysplastic syndrome), which was probably due to chemotherapy. No other secondary cancers were observed. Regarding life events, 15 and 88 patients were married and unmarried at the start of radiotherapy, respectively. Of the 88 unmarried patients, five were married after radiotherapy. Occupation and education were evaluated in 71 patients. Of the 71 patients, 33 were students, 21 were employed, and 16 were unemployed. Of the 33 students, eight were employed and 11 were at a higher educational grade after radiotherapy. Of the 21 employed patients, 17 had the same jobs and four had lost their jobs after radiotherapy. For the 16 unemployed patients, all remained unemployed. Conclusions This study is one of the largest studies to focus on life after radiation therapy among AYAs and suggests that cancer treatment has an influence on life events.

Re-evaluation of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

We attempted to re-evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) with more recent data. A total of 179 patients with LS-SCLC received radical thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy at our institution between 1998 and 2018. One hundred twenty-eight patients who achieved complete response (CR), good partial response (PR), and PR without progression for at least for one year after initial therapy were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into a PCI group (group A, n = 43), and a non-PCI group (group B, n = 85). Survival outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Because several background factors differed significantly between groups A and B, propensity score (PS) matching was performed as 1:1 match of the two groups. Finally, we analyzed 64 patients (group A/B = 32/32). Median follow-up periods were 53 and 31 months in groups A and B, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups' backgrounds. Two-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% in group A and 62% in group B (p = 0.224). Two-year brain metastasis free survival (BMFS) rates were 85% in group A and 57% in group B (p = 0.008). The number of patients who underwent a brain imaging test for confirmation of no brain metastasis (BM) after radical thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy (before PCI) was 84 (group A/B = 32/52). A PS matched analysis for cases of pre-PCI brain imaging group, two-year OS rates for group A/B were 73/59% (p = 0.446). Two-year BMFS rates for group A/B were 91/52% (p = 0.021). Retrospectively, PS matched analysis revealed that adding PCI to LS-SCLC patients who achieved good thoracic control significantly improved BMFS, but OS did not improve.

Clinical value of serum biomarkers, squamous cell carcinoma antigen and apolipoprotein C-II in follow-up of patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

There are currently no reliable, established serum biomarkers to predict the prognosis of radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer. We aimed to identify serum biomarkers for survival after radiotherapy for cervical cancer. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, the usefulness of pre- and posttreatment serum protein levels of potential biomarkers, including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), apolipoprotein C-II (ApoC-II), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)1, and MMP2, were evaluated together with clinical factors in 145 cervical cancer patients in order to determine their suitability to predict survival. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), pelvic PFS (PPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were the secondary endpoints. Blood samples were collected before and 1 month after radiotherapy to measure serum biomarker levels. ApoC-II was measured using a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which was developed for this purpose. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses. In multivariate analysis, larger tumor size was independently associated with shorter PFS, OS, PPFS, and DMFS, while longer overall treatment time was independently associated with shorter PPFS. Higher pretreatment SCC-Ag (P < 0.001) was associated with shorter DMFS. Higher posttreatment SCC-Ag (P = 0.017) was also associated with shorter DMFS. Pretreatment ApoC-II was associated with PPFS in univariate analysis (P = 0.048), but not in multivariate analysis. Patients with pretreatment ApoC-II levels ≤ 25.8 µg/ml had shorter PPFS than those with pretreatment ApoC-II levels > 25.8 µg/ml (P = 0.023, log-rank test). Pre- and posttreatment serum SCC-Ag and pretreatment serum ApoC-II levels may be important biomarkers to predict survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment SCC-Ag and pretreatment ApoC-II might be useful in clinical settings for screening patients to improve treatment strategies in cervical cancer.