Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in adult patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

PURPOSE: Spinopelvic sagittal alignment is crucial for assessing balance and determining treatment efficacy in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Only a limited number of reports have addressed spinopelvic parameters and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). Our primary objective was to study spinopelvic sagittal parameter changes in patients with LSTV. A secondary objective was to investigate clinical symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with LSTV. METHODS: In this study, we investigated 371 participants who had undergone medical check-ups for the spine. LSTV was evaluated using Castellvi's classification, and patients were divided into LSTV+ (type II-IV, L5 vertebra articulated or fused with the sacrum) and LSTV- groups. After propensity score matching for demographic data, we analyzed spinopelvic parameters, sacroiliac joint degeneration, clinical symptoms, and QOL for these two participant groups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) indices were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Forty-four patients each were analyzed in the LSTV + and LSTV- groups. The LSTV + group had significantly greater pelvic incidence (52.1 ± 11.2 vs. 47.8 ± 10.0 degrees, P = 0.031) and shorter pelvic thickness (10.2 ± 0.9 vs. 10.7 ± 0.8 cm, P = 0.018) compared to the LSTV- group. The "Sitting" domain of ODI (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.011) and "Pain/Discomfort" domain of EQ-5D (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.005) were larger in the LSTV + group. CONCLUSION: There was a robust association between LSTV and pelvic sagittal parameters. Clinical symptoms also differed between the two groups in some domains. Surgeons should be aware of the relationship between LSTV assessment, radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms.

Does global spinal alignment affect the use of walking aids after multi-segment spinal fixation for patients with ASD? A multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the relation between global spinal alignment and the necessity of walking aid use in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to investigate the impact of spinal fixation on mobility status after surgery. METHODS: In total, 456 older patients with ASD who had multi-segment spinal fixation surgery and were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patients under 60 years of age and those unable to walk preoperatively were excluded. Patients were classified by their mobility status into the independent, cane, and walker groups. Comparison analysis was conducted using radiographic spinopelvic parameters and the previously reported global spine balance (GSB) classification. In addition, preoperative and 2 years postoperative mobility statuses were investigated. RESULTS: Of 261 patients analyzed, 66 used walking aids (canes, 46; walkers, 20). Analysis of preoperative radiographical parameters showed increased pelvic incidence and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in the walker group and increased sagittal vertebral axis in the cane and walker groups versus the independent group. Analysis of GSB classification showed a higher percentage of walker use in those with severe imbalance (grade 3) in the sagittal classification but not in the coronal classification. While postoperative radiographical improvements were noted, there was no significant difference in the use of walking aids before and 2 years after surgery (P = 0.085). CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was found between "sagittal" spinal imbalance and increased reliance on walking aids, particularly walkers. However, the limitation of improvement in postoperative mobility status suggested that multiple factors influence the mobility ability of elderly patients with ASD.

Longitudinal impact of multi-segment spinal fixation surgery on mobility status and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in postoperative mobility status in patients with ASD, and the determining factors that influence these changes and their impact on clinical outcomes, including the rate of home discharge and long-term mobility. METHODS: A total of 299 patients with ASD who underwent multi-segment posterior spinal fusion were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patient mobility status was assessed using walking aids and classified into five levels (1: independent, 2: cane, 3: walker, 4: assisted, and 5: wheelchair) preoperatively, at discharge, and after 2 years. We determined improvements or declines in the patient's mobility based on changes in the classification levels. The analysis focused on the factors contributing to the deterioration of postoperative mobility. RESULTS: Two years postoperatively, 87% of patients maintained or improved mobility. However, 27% showed decreased mobility status at discharge, associated with a lower rate of home discharge (49% vs. 80% in the maintained mobility group) and limited improvement in mobility status (35% vs. 5%) after 2 years. Notably, postoperative increases in thoracic kyphosis (7.0 ± 12.1 vs. 2.0 ± 12.4°, p = 0.002) and lower lumbar lordosis (4.2 ± 13.1 vs. 1.8 ± 12.6°, p = 0.050) were substantial factors in mobility decline. CONCLUSION: Postoperative mobility often temporarily decreases but generally improves after 2 years. However, an overcorrection in sagittal alignment, evidenced by increased TK, could detrimentally affect patients' mobility status. Transient mobility decline associated with overcorrection may require further rehabilitation or hospitalization. Further studies are required to determine the biomechanical effects of surgical correction on mobility.

A nationwide multicenter study of the cost effectiveness of five leading drugs for pharmacological management of cervicobrachial symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Cervicobrachial pain frequently affects the quality of life (QOL) of the general public and has a significant economic impact on the health care systems of various countries. There are a number of treatment options for this disease, including widely-used drug therapy, but the effectiveness of each option is indeterminate, and there have been no published cost-effectiveness analysis studies so far. This prospective observational study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment for cervicobrachial symptoms. METHODS: A 6-month medication regimen for each of five frequently-prescribed drugs for cervicobrachial symptoms was administered to 322 patients at 24 centers in Japan. Outcome measures, including of the EuroQol Group 5D, Short Form-8, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were investigated at baseline and every month thereafter. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the drug cost to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. A stratified analysis of patient characteristics was also performed to identify baseline factors potentially affecting cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER of entire drug treatment for cervicobrachial symptoms was 7,491,640 yen. Compared with the reference willingness-to-pay, the ICER was assumed to not be cost-effective. A certain number of QALYs were gained during the first 3 months after the treatment intervention, but almost no QALYs were gained during the following 3 months. Stratified analysis showed that cost-effectiveness was extremely low for patients with high baseline VAS and high QOL. CONCLUSIONS: The available medications for cervicobrachial symptoms did not have excellent cost-effectiveness. Although a certain number of QALYs were gained during the first 3 months after medication, no QALYs were gained in the latter half of the study period, suggesting that it is not advisable to continue the medication needlessly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.